What does Jow Forums think of the French Revolution?
What does Jow Forums think of the French Revolution?
Other urls found in this thread:
myjewishlearning.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
archive.org
twitter.com
Angry poor cunts.
It's also credited by some as being the 'birth of Nationalism' so I wondered what Jow Forums would think of that.
It was also one of the biggest libertarian socialist uprisings, so...
unfinished
unmitigated disaster, France never recovered
Monarchy is stupid.
The beginning of the end
It had it's positives and it's negatives.
The French nobility and monarchy was becoming insanely bad by that point desu, corruption, abuse of powers and positions, frankly not giving a shit about the peasantry, or the king not even giving a shit about lower nobles, people like Marquis de Sade basically getting away with a ton of degenerate shit because of their birthright status, massive inequality, feudal serfdom still being massively widespread, The Catholic Church probably getting away with a lot or basically exerting total control among large facets of peoples' lives, all among a lot of other things.
The Revolution did bring about some good and was likely the catalyst for future nationalism that brought about nationalistically unified and coherent nation-states like Germany. It also laid the seed for future socialist/left-wing movements like the Revolutions of 1848 which if not entirely successful eventually did bring about some good by at least making life better for industrial workers, peasants, farmers, etc. in most Northern, Central, and Western European countries.
Out with the old tyrants, in with the new tyrants. Progress!
the origins of fascism
it was the birth of leftism, anti traditionlism, anti catholicism,and anti christianity in general. un others words, the beginning of the end
Funded by freemasons (jews)
It's hard to tell just yet.
Napoleon was the only good thing to come out of it.
One of the five things that made this timeline bad.
proto-communism, anti-tradition. sick.
I dont think about it a lot as there is no France anynore
jewish psyop
First proto Jew lead communist revolution. The French monarchs weren't great, but the alternative was worse. Also lead to the increase in power of the Rothschilds banking house's financial control over Europe.
a well-intentioned mistake
but a mistake nonetheless
also this
What's the Jew connection? I don't believe in Jew omnipotence, but I'm willing to take evidence they contributed.
One of the great catastrophes, it was an early socialist revolution. Lots of stupid ideas were acted out and the barbarism that took place is beyond words.
This. They brag about it.
This. Well, maybe the """Reformation""" was but it was definitely when we crossed the Rubicon.
The Highway to Hell is paved with good intentions, is it not?
Conflicted. The nobles in France were incompetent and would have been susceptible to Jewish infiltration. Now we're here and it seems like it just delayed the inevitable. With Jews you lose?
Ben Franklin was one of the chief architects.
it was more the freemasons
>What does Jow Forums think of the French Revolution?
American 'education' never fails to impress me.
There was more than one revolution dipshit; pre Napoleon and post Napoleon.
The beginning of the end.
>well-intentioned mistake
don't you hate it when you mistakenly commit mass murder? Happened to me just last week
>What does Jow Forums think of the French Revolution?
MUCH needed, we need another
Financial support, along with organisation and fanning discontent amongst the masses of people. Now lets look upon the ruin it has brought upon the French, Is Paris even French anymore?
myjewishlearning.com
Bolshevik Kike inspired horror.
(((It's always them)))
>It's also credited by some as being the 'birth of Nationalism'
By ahistorical plebs certainly. The Peace of Westphalia is the real birth of nationalism as a state ideology. (Nacio-tribalism was already present with the ancient greeks)
>unfinished
pro eu anarchists shilled for the eu establishment every fucking time they had the chance.
a revolution would not go too well for champaign anarachists
One of the first domino's to drop after the Protestant Reformation and the American war of independence
I'd be interested to hear about what the Masonic connection was.
French revolution a.k.a (((jacobins))) a.k.a everything wrong with the world today. You don't trust me ? Do your own research a.k.a lurk more
inb4 autists sperg out about using 'nation' to describe ancient greek city states
This
French rev was the beginning of the our descent into degeneracy.
It’s on their fucking motto.
Faggotry, Communism and talmudism...
I mean, liberty, equality and fraternity
I'm aware of that and just used the general phrase
The first masonic and burgeois"revolution" sold out as "beffining of freedom".
Everyone seems to forget that France had emperors after "La Revolusion".
Marxists have created a romantic vission of it for some reason.
>jew connection
>freemasons
it's the Jacobins a.k.a. jewish freemasons
Hence why I said Nacio and not Natio.
1250-1300; Middle English < Latin nātiōn- (stem of nātiō) birth, tribe, equivalent to nāt(us) (past participle of nāscī to be born) + -iōn- -ion
this unironically. french revolution might be considered a big classical proto color revolution.
It's Jewish. It should've never happened.
>”The first masonic and burgeois”
Call them by their rightful name
Much more glorious than the American one militarily speaking, but worse on every other aspect
In a nutshell
fuck the Jacobins. Straight line from them to SJWs & Bolsheviks.
The American revolution doesn't even qualify as the same sort of event, it was more a secession than anything.
The beginning of the end
Only Napoleon try to save us
What are the other 4?
This.
Curious that most of the countries who supported the first revolution didnt supported, or eventually fought against the second.
All of the Jacobin leaders were Jacobins. Even their constitution has a Masonic pyramid
I mean they were all Freemasons. I was just being autistic.
but he was promoted and back stabbed by them, just like they did with hitler later.
All for naught.
A complete disaster. We're experiencing the results of a world where filthy businessmen with no morals are at the top.
Always this, sadly.
Got off to a slow start, but got aHead when someone yelled chop chop.
the birth of socialism marxism communism
The way the world is going and the middle-class disappearing, we might get a new one on a global scale once the number of angry poor people reaches critical mass.
That brave woman who killed the tub-leper deserves a monument
terror and virtue!
Libido Dominandi covers it well
>The French nobility...corruption
the commoners were led by a particularly degenerate group of well funded (british) revolutionaries
>Marquis de Sade basically getting away with a ton of degenerate shit
after the king had lost his head he had political sway
before then he was in the bastille but his books were out in the public domain
oh yeah
and the number of priests that were killed is insane
It’s a lie like all of “history” it was just the rich massacring the poor
christianity destroyed europe and plunged it into the dark ages you fucking cuck.
Jow Forums supports the vendeans and the thermidorianreaction
Jewish falsflag to overthrow the monarchyand establish their dominance in France.
One of the roots of the modern cancer in the west. It was only a matter of time that liberty egality and fraternity would spread and apply to non euros.
Your monarch overthrew himself by being a retard.
"In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, " brought to our
ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm.
And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of
the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the
foundations of the GOY States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it
gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card - the
destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of
the GOYIM, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us.
On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the GOYIM we have set up the
aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications
for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in
knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force."
"The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that
their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the
country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove."
It lead directly to the reign of this man, therefore it is one of the greatest events of world history. And what I wouldn't give to see a balls-to-the-wall HBO series set during the Revolution and the Napoleonic era.
Why do some military men think that that ridiculous horseshoe flattop looks cool? This seems to be their thought process:
>high and tight looks badass
>flattop looks badass
>let's combine them
>looks like a fucking retard
you need a low iq to even consider joining the army
>Supposedly against exploitation of the worker.
>As soon as they get into power, they change the length of a week from 7 to 10 days, with only one rest day.
That text is such falseflag bullshit. The aristocracy never defended the people against the Jews. The European aristocracy allowed the Jews to gain power by letting them become bankers and even borrowing money from them.
Big mistake.
Enlightment should have been limited to the promotion of science not promotion of moral foundations of politics with the fake social contract.
Fucking bullshit.
"The people, under our guidance, have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their one
and only defense and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage which is
inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people. Nowadays, with the destruction
of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grinding
scoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers."
The aristocracy was the only defense states had against the Jews, once the gentile rulers noticed they were being tricked they expelled the kikes over and over again. It also should be noticed that not all aristocracies of Europe consciously and deliberately allowed the Jews to amass fortunes. The Protocols are as real as the soil we stand on, it has proven itself true over and over again since it's publication.
archive.org
To anyone who wishes to read.
Beginning of the end.
Don't fall for the Enlightenment jew
The original pussyhats.
If you ever wore combat headgear you would understand.
Yeah, but the death of Christianity after it had been introduced and rooted into the life of Europe meant that Anti-Christianity meant complete and total rejection of the spirit itself. In the past, philosophers could say "No, I don't quite believe in these deities as you would present them" but they still had two feet in the river of spirituality. The only difference was that the water was up to their neck instead of completely submerging the individual.
As Atheism post-Christianity stands it is literally God - 1. One God, from which all spirit stems from, from which everything non-material finds itself rooted in, -1. Meaning nothing exists outside of the immediate and material. You take away 1 God from a European Pantheon and what do you have? Mythical beasts, forms, 12 other Gods, traditions, holidays, etc.
The birth of Anti-Christianity in the context given here birthed the only logical conclusion one has when they reject God as presented in Christian scripture. Complete Spiritual rejection and a militant approach to enforcing the worldview of spirit < material.
Christianity did not destroy Europe, it merely granted the means for its destruction. Truly, Europe WOULD have been better off had it stayed loyal to the creed. But, that being said, had it never been introduced Europe would have been all the better for it.
Implying the aristocrats had a choice when the jewish monopoly of usury was enforced by the Vatican. The first state to openly fight against that would be the target of a coalition.
>The first state to openly fight against that would be the target of a coalition.
Do you seriously believe that? There were actual states that were entirely non-christian in Europe that were never targets of coalitions, and you want people to believe that coalitions would happen just because someone banned banking?
Fuckin based. Can't wait for Robespierre 2.0 to bring it to bourgies
me on the left
This