Kanye does have a point...

This tired old faggot book.

Attached: 1522843636987.jpg (298x200, 17K)

this
the entire slave trade was niggers selling other niggers to white people.

The Africans sold each other to Jews and Arabs who then sold them to the West, MUH WHITE MAN TOOK US FROM OUR LAND is a fairy tale.

Just like you white people want white genocide.

Retard

is there any scientific proof to that?

Bet it doesn't say shit about megalithic cultures.

>your whole race
Do blacks in america think they are the only black people in the world? It feels like that sometimes. Blacks enslaved eachother then sold eachother to the highest bidder which in this case was americans. How in the world is that even white peoples fault to begin with? What white people did was buy them as the latest of people in the world, and then get buyers remorse and set them free and give them citizenship. And since then blacks have refused to leave america, and constantly creating ethnic tension. They should not be looked at as victims. Do you see any 153 year old blacks running around. Nope. These are people who are mentally living in a past which they never experienced.

that would be the point of the book

actually they did resist you idiot, you cant really do much when you have a spear and a shield. Whites had an army of infantry rifle man and they pretty much won without losing many soldiers.

Check the Italian Ethiopian war. Haitian revolution. Harriet Tubman, Fredrick Douglas, MLK, etc

You total chumps lose the Napoleonic war to a Rothschild pigeon .. since then you koks do what you asked

Attached: 35A650C200000578-3659653-image-a-70_1466861650009.jpg (962x640, 211K)

Africans are complicit in slavery.

HATE FACT!!

That book is so terrible, i don´t know why people keep referring to it. And has factual errors in it aswell with regards to domesticateable animals. It´s basically trying to say that the reason western societies are more successfull than some random place in africa, is because they invaded everywhere. This isn´t even the case with regards to making colonies and such. And europeans were excellent and cultivating their own lands and inventing and finding out all sorts of things. Jared in the book is essentially trying to take that away from europeans.

Inferior, crocodile alligator. I drive a Chevrolet movie theatre

youtu.be/kZwhNFOn4ik

Because they were too busy gathering slaves to sell?

Niggers were enslaved by niggers for the most part. Do some research instead of allowing the tv do your thinking

This is 100% what he meant and is 100% true. We are free today because our ancestors refused to be held in slavery and we willing to die for liberty

4D chess strikes again. Africa is more enslaved by China now than it ever was by colonialism.

>what you niggers think of this theory of Kanye West playing a trick ?
>twitter.com/Snowcone965/status/991695769714479104
Hmmm really makes you think..
This theory is elaborate but the goal is different
> represents Kaufman
I think it represents white fighting each others, like what we're doing right now over Kanye on Jow Forums

What do you think, Jow Forums

Attached: snowcone.jpg (611x815, 91K)

I think he did have a point but it's such a charged topic you can't have an honest discussion about it ESPECIALLY with blacks.

I think the fact that they refuse to have an honest discussion says enough on it's own.

>This is 100% what he meant and is 100% true. We are free today because our ancestors refused to be held in slavery and we willing to die for liberty
Really? No you are free because the white americans abolished slavery and gave you citizenship of the US, rather than sail you back to africa. There wasn´t some kind of thing with blacks refusing to be slaves. Who do you think created african slavery. Africans themselves. Blacks enslaved happily other blacks in africa as late as just a few years ago. And it´s still going on. What was it the british even had to argue with some west african slavers because they refused to stop selling blacks, since it was too profitable, it was a nice way for them to make money. No what the problem black americans have is a mentality of seeing everything through race, which wasn´t even the reason for black slavery to begin with. And they have a mentality of pretending that everything is oppression, when it really isn´t. You´re in a country you are not supposed to be in, that´s why you had segregation, so that resistance for desegregation was understandable. You weren´t exactly immigrants.

Attached: modern_slavery_globally.jpg (623x547, 49K)

African slaves were literally captured by other Africans and then sold to kikes before being shipped over seas.

pretty sure he's referring to when they were in captivity already. basically rephrasing the Ben part in this scene

youtube.com/watch?v=H6GxitywJfw

Slaves tried some revolts in the US as I recall, and they revolted in Haiti right?

I don't think they could really offer effective resistance to other races by themselves due to their traits.

They enslaved each other and then sold it as a product to the Arabs and Euro's. How do people not know this? I suspect ((social studies)) text books still contain the tired, drawn, picture of white euros throwing nets.

>African slaves were literally captured by other Africans and then sold to kikes before being shipped over seas.
This should be taught to all blacks in the US in the classroom. But instead they are taught something probably about how white people were bad for giving them citizenship but maintaining things like segregation. So they don´t even have a CLUE that they were enslaved by and sold by other africans. Basically hunted down by other blacks, and put in chains to be sold as free labour to make other africans money. It would go a long way to calm the blacks down. So not only are they living in a past they never experienced themselves, and refusing to go to africa themselves at any point. Not only did they recieve full citizenship in a white ethnostate inspite of not even being immigrants, which is bizarre in and of itself. But the real history of their own enslavement they don´t even know. They also have zero respect for that many europeans were also slaves and lived and worked in much harsher conditions in many cases, than the blacks in the contton plantations. But they don´t have respect for that either. Every single white person they hate is completely innocent about it. And they hate them for something they have not even experienced themselves aswell. They are living in the past mentally whilst blaming others for things they are not even doing.

What a waste of a good id. Geographic deteminalisim was rejected by scientists over 50 years ago. Jared Diamond isn't even familiar with the field he's writing books about.

>us whities

Attached: britain.jpg (619x664, 134K)

>why didn't the whole of Africa attempt some kind of resistance
Ever notice how they never mention that Africans sold their OWN race into slavery, a known fact completely ignored

AFRICANS HAD A CHOICE AND CHOSE SLAVERY

Attached: thinking.png (600x600, 149K)

>They enslaved each other and then sold it as a product to the Arabs and Euro's. How do people not know this? I suspect ((social studies)) text books still contain the tired, drawn, picture of white euros throwing nets.
I´ve seen examples of this being peddled in movies. Some american blacks think that they were just standing there buttnaked in africa having a good time (total illusion about the primitive state they lived in). And then somehow white people came hunted them down put them in chains and forced them on a boat to go to america and pick cotton. This is pure nonsense ofcourse, and there was no racial motivation behind the slaves being black either. It was just free labour. Africans were selling, american jews were buying. It was a luxury item for a few rich american plantation owners etc. Because it is obviously enticing to have people that just need food and housing, and otherwise work for free, if you buy them at a one time fee. Many european immigrants worked harder than the ancestors of black americans ever did, under programs such as indentured servitude. And the irish in america were treated sometimes worse than the blacks from what i understand. Indentured servitude is basically the same as a slave. Only difference is that they weren´t property, since you hadn´t bought them. but for practical purposes it´s the same thing. Basically they were worked extremely rough like.
>you want to be american? Then get the fuck back to work.
>Until the late 18th century, indentured servitude was very common in British North America. It was often a way for poor Europeans to immigrate to the American colonies: they signed an indenture in return for a costly passage. After their indenture expired, the immigrants were free to work for themselves or another employer. The consensus view among economic historians and economists is that indentured servitude occurred largely as "an institutional response to a capital market imperfection"

Attached: jews_black_slavetrade.jpg (602x427, 105K)

>Ever notice how they never mention that Africans sold their OWN race into slavery, a known fact completely ignored
Maybe that´s why they are freaking out, because they don´t want blacks in america to realize that? Idk. I mean what identity do black americans have other than this bullshit story about how evil white people were keeping their ancestors down, which isn´t even true. It´s almost as if they would just become regular decent americans without that victimhood propaganda.

bcuz a pan-african identity didn't exist so how tf are Africans writ large gonna unite against a common foe? They warred among each other constantly, and ppl forget that the scramble for Africa only happened in the latter half of the 19th century. The transatlantic slave trade existed long before that. You had independent African kingdoms and states that would sell slaves and made themselves a tidy profit, they had no incentive to stop. Slave uprisings took place in the new world, the most successful being Haiti, but obviously its hard for slaves to win as it has been throughout society. That's like asking why Europeans let themselves be enslaved by the Romans and didn't overthrow the empire. The answer is obviously because Rome was better at war and had more resources then a loose alliance of slaves who probably don't even speak a common tongue. Anyone who rose up was killed in battle or executed after. Most people just want to keep living so they didn't rise up themselves.

>bullshit story about how evil white people were keeping their ancestors down, which isn´t even true
>which isn´t even true
Sorry Denmark but I can't deny the fact that there have been laws made in the past (they no longer exist) by prominently by whites that were made to completely dehumanize and completely disadvantage blacks

I know this is often a hateful place but please understand that whites aren't COMPLETELY responsible for the enslavement of Africans

Post Zebras

LITERALLY 14 words, one word for each year.

According to Muslims who explored the region before europeans ever showed up, the negros just accepted being slaves.
Which makes sense since most Niggers think a half-breed comedian whose mother was a coal burning slut has a real window into what white people are like and they think his raving lunatic fantasy Get Out was a documentary.
They just sort of accept whatever they're told.

Attached: arabsonniggers.jpg (1385x1822, 292K)

It was enough for a full standard deviation in IQ. And with another two hundred years of interbreeding they might get to where white people are now.

>blacks think all of the slaves came to the US
>blacks think only whites bought slaves

I REALLY wish these two falsities would stop being perpetuated in the minds of the stupid.

It's crazy how just a couple of months ago blacks were so much in love with Killmonger for saying the same thing Kanye is saying here.

>Slaves tried some revolts in the US as I recall, and they revolted in Haiti right?
They're revolting everywhere.

>Sorry Denmark but I can't deny the fact that there have been laws made in the past (they no longer exist) by prominently by whites that were made to completely dehumanize and completely disadvantage blacks
What do you mean? Segregation? Blacks were given citizenship in a country they had no business being in, and that was majority european on purpose. Instead of being sent back to africa. Segregation was perfectly understandeable from that perspective. And since owning black slaves was prohibited in the US, every black person had 153 years to leave united states with nobody stopping them. Now today they have everything they could ever ask for, inspite of not belonging there, wasn´t even immigrants they literally were not supposed to have been there whatsoever. Others were deliberately kept out from immigrating aswell. And so what is there to complain about? Other than doing so creating ethnic tension.
>I know this is often a hateful place but please understand that whites aren't COMPLETELY responsible for the enslavement of Africans
No they are responsible a very few of them of buying them from other africans as labour to work in case of the US in cotton plantations. It was the way things were back then. The africans had enslaved eachother and were therefore considered just free labour. Africans were like an entire people who had slapped chains on themselves and were looking for buyers, so they became dehumanized because they had dehumanized themselves as a slave race. So americans went ok fine, let´s buy some from the africans, why the heck not. It´s just blind luck for the black americans that their ancestors weren´t going to another place like say middle east. Why do i say that? Because they would castrate the males and kill the babies. This is why black people aren´t running around in the middle east today. But besides this it makes no sense to live in the past because nobody is alive today who were involved in it.

Attached: africans_pre_transatlantic_slavetrade.jpg (1319x1174, 175K)

Are you sure those aren't those plastic people from Doctor Who?

Because "Racialists" who advocate and champion some kind of a racial nationalist solidarity have always been played the fool by bitter realpolitik realities.

-The Japs tried to pull "Rise up, Yellow race, and we will overthrow the white man!" "Oh and naturally we Japanese will be the supreme power and ruler of you all, but kindly like a brother rather than like a slavemaster". Few listened to them and most aligned against the Japs and colonialists or temporarily with the colonialists (the minority aligning with the Japs on behalf of some yellow crusade).

-The Germans tried, and especially their apologists try, and present it as if the Nazis were some grand white crusade. Naturally, it is the Germans who would be the kings and masters and anyone they didn't like will be deemed nonwhite ("I decide who is a jew"), while those who they like will be white. Hence honorary Aryan slavs and undermench slavs naturally corresponding to Nazi strategic goals. And for a supposedly pro-white cause they sure loved subjugating and rapaciously looting from fellow whites.

-Any niggers who've tried to do the same thing with "RISE UP MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS WE WILL OVERTHROW YAKUB'S DEVILS" always naturally appoint themselves the supreme masters of their race. African Americans, if still in their woke 1960s black nationalism would naturally see themselves as the proper leaders of a united nations of niggeria across Africa, the Caribbean and the USA south.

-Arabs, usually in the religious-ethnic dimension of Islam, pull the exact same behavior. "All Umma are equal but some Umma are better than others"

Because certain Africans made a shit ton of money by selling out their own kind

Attached: Screenshot_2018-04-12-12-09-53.png (720x1280, 260K)

>why didn't an entire continent of tens of thousands of different warring tribes who had not even formed countries yet with only bronze age technology fight the biggest empire in human history?

damn my senpai I dont know

Some of the slave-kingdoms in West Africa were belligerent to the British and French about the prospects of them shutting down the slave trade. In the Western Sahel the French elected to allow slavery to continue rather than upset the locals and that pissed off folks back home.

Whites are not the first people to enslave anyone, but hey are the first people to abolish slavery, outside of maybe a brief interlude of some compassionate ruler like an Asokha.

It is also what is not often talked about is the subsaharan slavetrade of blacks, again sold by other blacks but purchased by the arabs. It lasted about 1400 years compared to the trans atlantic slave trade which was much shorter and then abolished. They didn´t abolish black slaves btw. It doesn´t make no sense to go through the past and try to beat someone over the head with it today, if you want to live in the same society. If you don´t want to live in the same society then it´s stupid to keep pretending as if you should. And that kind of villification of white americans for example is doing nothing but creating ethnic tension on purpose. And they are also now spreading it to other countries via social media and african immigrants who have no business being in europe are saying similar nonsense. This is why it is very important to start to have this conversation, if they don´t want to put the past to rest, they damn sure should not be allowed to lie about it. And there were far different moral and ethical standards back then with regards to black slaves for instance. To them it was completely normal, and nothing wrong with it. You can´t try to project that onto people today who think differently. It doesn´t make any sense. There seems to be a desire for some to pit various ethnicities against eachother by constantly bringing up something about the past in order to attempt to enrage certain people. You can´t have a future if you won´t put the past to rest.

t. sub 110 “”master race””

actually the niggers sold the other niggers to jews, then the jews sold the niggers to the whites
you really think the international merchants weren't getting a slice of that?

>-The Germans tried, and especially their apologists try, and present it as if the Nazis were some grand white crusade. Naturally, it is the Germans who would be the kings and masters
This is absolutely wrong. The Germans just wanted the territory that was stripped from them after WWI.
They were in a position to get it through negotiation when Britain told Poland that they would back them no matter what, so Poland stopped negotiating.

omg there was just like, nooooo way that indians could've domesticated animals!!!
lmao at this fucking farce of a book

Attached: BISONBURGERS1602-2.jpg (600x600, 163K)

How many times does this book have to be fucking debunked before faggots like you stop lauding it around like it's worth shit

the niggers in the coastal parts were going inland and capturing other tribes of niggers then selling/trading them to slave merchants
White people weren't running around Africa throwing nets over niggers

Ze Germans just wanted German territory back because the ethnic Germans who lived in that territory were being brutalized and murdered.
Poland dropped out of negotiations because they had british support, so Germany invaded to take it. Then France and Britain declared war on Germany.
Germany beat them back to Dunkirk and then let them escape, then offered peace terms to the British, but the Brit-Jew media and the Jew Controlled PM wouldn't let that get out to the populace and started bombing German Civilians.

I didn't realize they lost territory in Northern France and Belgium and Denmark and Netherlands and Norway.
Or territory that belonged to the Austro-Hungarians.
Or the fucking entirety of Poland and the Western plains of Russia.

Nigger. They were a German nationalist force, not white nationalist.

Nigger, they didn't invade East until Britain and France declared war on them.

I meant West.

He also by using only examples from 50 years ago, that every nation on the planet was basically ethnonationalist before that time period. they protected their supermajority or was not worried about it because they had next to no immigration, or extremely limited. And they preferred people who were very close to being the same as they themselves were aswell, for society to operate decently. All this idea of having radically different groups of people, and many groups, in the same country is a very new idea. And the blacks where you might argue it was initiated in the US and only because they did not repatriate them as some of them wanted to. And then had to go through all that stuff with segregation etc. Were likewise not done on purpose. US was no exception it had extremely limited immigration. If the blacks had never been in the US they would be like 98% european, just like other european countries, since they were a british colony. So in other words people had no problem standing for their own people because that nation was that people basically.
Also his larp about someone wanting to supreme rule over everyone is also historical nonsense.

(((Jared Diamond)))

A fucking kike almost every time.

bisons are also native to europe dumbass and have not been domesticated over here either while bos taurus, a relative was domesticated to the point of bringing forth multiple species of domesticated cattle

I’d like to know how they think whites are weaker yet we conquered them completely

WOKE

Attached: Woke.png (506x714, 68K)

So because whites didn't domesticate them, that means they're impossible to domesticate? You are fucking dumb as hell.

Because Africa was a bunch of primitive tribal niggers that has been used for slavery since ancient times. Even if they somehow managed to rally a few tribes in the area, it would still be niggers running around with spears and bows against gunpowder.

Thats not what he said you dingus bong. He said blacks are in a state of mental slavery right now cause slavery ended hundreds of years ago and no one born today ever experienced slavery or anything similar; its all a victim complex. It came out funny cause "Yeee finna be freee" and "my girl candace gon hit yo with the facts, she got the facts ya feel me?".

Attached: 4B681E6000000578-5642499-image-m-13_1524347046224.jpg (470x689, 43K)

>((Diamond))