Electoral College BTFO

>dream a little dream
>its totally reality now!

It doesn't actually go in all fields. Do any of you nupol tards ever read the faq.

Might want to start learning Spanish, sweetie. You know, so can understand your grandkids.

I live in New Jersey, and I voted for Trump, but I did so basically ironically. Because I didn't think he would win and I knew my state would go to Hillary anyway so what difference did it make, right?

Without the EC though I would have voted for him unironically.

It won't happen. It's not even close. All they got are the deepest of blue states.

When they get an actual red state, or a purple state like Florida, wake up me. Until then it's just lefty state legislature butthurt.

this will help republicans since it seems like safe blue states are all up in arms about it and doing these changes

Only some blue states have voted to this and red states would have to agree to it to get the required 240 or whatever required for it to pass. It's an empty gesture and waste of tax payer money by the left on a useless topic that will never happen.

Good... both parties need to die and the GOP is the weaker of the two.

>having indications in Spanish
>in the fucking American polls
Fucking hell America, get your shit together.

>Democrat controlled states using democratic votes while Republican controlled states continue to use indirect representation

Just like how you were surprised when hillary lost, righy? You and your ilk are so out of touch with reality, it's disgusting.

Who needs an electoral college when you can have the same three cities decide the president every election.

Hahahahha he is serious

>imblying they have three quarters of the Several states to change the constitution

>centros electorales
Disgusting enablers

Sorry Shill, Hillary Loses in every scenario. The best case scenario for her she ends up with 265 votes to Trump's 267, 6 for Johnson, House decides president.
>they aren't going for an amendment, they want a bunch of states to agree to distributing their electoral votes by percentage rather than winner take all.

270towin.com/alternative-electoral-college-allocation-methods/

It's not a constitutional change. Basically, the idea is to get enough states to join a coalition to do the following: if 270 electoral votes worth of states are in the coalition, everyone in the coalition will allocate their electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote regardless of how the states themselves voted.

The winner of which popular vote? The national one or the state one?

OHNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
>Tfw your tax-ridden states is now beyond saving

Stupid Democuck still doesn't understand why the Two Party System is maintained. There are a handful of ultra wealthy families in the world. Some people claim there are about 400 such families that own nearly half the wealth on earth. Rothschild, Windsor, Rockefeller are the top three.

If the USA becomes a one party state, you have to deal with not just your Darkie Slaves by angry white males too. If you kill off your Darkies, you get expensive labor. If you kill off your angry white males you have no barrier between the ultra rich and the Darkie Slaves. They can overthrow you fast. Wait until the angry white males start coming to your Democuck political meetings and informing the working class Democrats that they are being screwed by Elitists and they start showing such men where those Elitists live.

You don't know about such people because you don't work with any. I grew up in a super duper progressive Democuck environment so I know how to talk shop, so to speak. I know how to prove a claim and slip sensitive information to angry men. There is no need at this time to do such bold measures. When I don't have rights anymore as a non Elite blue eyed white male, I will have no incentive to keep the Elite people safe.

The Bosses used to know that taking care of your workers was important. There are not too many Bosses like that left in this world. The times are going to get very interesting in the next 10 to 20 years.

TLDR: You want a working class revolt? Because that's how you get a working class revolt.

>not the world's most democratic democracy

>democracy

npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/05/07/609060190/connecticut-oks-bill-pledging-electoral-votes-to-national-popular-vote-winner

National apparently, so even funnier. Let's say Trump had gotten an extra 3mil votes in texas alone, but lost wisconsin, pennsylvania, michigan, florida, ohio, north carolina, etc. by 1k votes. He would then win the entire country (assuming all the dem states go along with this retarded idea) and take the electoral votes from all the aforementioned states as well as from california, new york, illinois, oregon, massachusetts, connecticut, etc.

top kek

If Democrats want to ever win again, it's pretty simple: drop gun control, drop abortion, drop race baiting, drop gay rights/tranny rights/etc. 1% special interests and give everyday Americans some good policies that will actually improve their lives.

Attached: K1VXZ[1].png (1050x670, 116K)

Of course they haven't, these redditfags have only been here for a few months. They heard the sage goes in all fields maymay and don't understand it was a joke

Dream on pedo. Try telling your voters they were wrong. Of the states that have joined the " compact" not one would have changed from the voters results in the 2016 election. More fallacious drivel from the homosexual lobby.

conetti-what?

dream. on.

Attached: 1518236787091.jpg (690x6602, 551K)

Or import a billion spics

god, that guy is such a fucking blatantly obvious partisan shill. he correctly predicts obama will win in 2012 (which was pretty obvious considering the country will never elect a non-christian like mormon romney) and for some retarded reason the media thinks he can see into the future. Pathetic.

Probably California.

Louisiana used to have English/French. I don't know if it still does.

that works too

Ironically this system would have made Obama's second presidential election a draw.

Keep in mind that it's a draw unless one candidate wins a majority of electoral votes.

Read this this morning, pissed me off beyond belief.

Connecticut fags need to wake the fuck up.

Your legislature pretty has Stolen your vote

Imagine... Your state produces an independent candidate of sterling reputation. 100% of your state could vote for said candidate but because they aren't Dem or Rep your vote gets STOLEN for the more popular one. WHAT. THE. FUCK.

Thats worse than "my vote not mattering".

The popular vote is not the fucking golden standard of our democratic-republic. Fuck your governor for signing that piece of shit. Fuck your legislature for putting this bill forward. and Fuck yourselves for selling out to populism.

Then they get a Spic revolt. Which is the main reason it hasn't been tried already.

Three ways to handle immigration.
1. Import a fuck ton of new laborers. (High risk of revolt but loads of cheap laborers.)
2. Import a substantial but managable number of new laborers. (Low risk of revolt but not as many cheap laborers as number 1.)
3. Import few to zero new laborers. (High risk of Stock and Housing market collapse.)

Variations of number 2 are what you see when Regan gave amnesty to illegals in the 1980's. I expect several million migrant workers to be allowed in and out without the government granting them citizenship. Citizenship gives a person rights to complain about long hours, bad conditions and low pay. If they don't have citizenship, they can be deported and thus are more obedient to their bosses.

Attached: 1488169388553.jpg (419x630, 45K)

Not really. 100% of the blue states could adopt this and i wouldn't change much.

Getting real sick of your faggotry though. If you're gonna fuck the rules every time you lose, you should expect others to do the same.

Would ridding of an electoral college make the position more or less vulnerable to subversion? It seems like while both systems are vulnerable the one we have now has higher potential to ward off corruption by having higher risk of creating whistleblowers that have actual platform.

you need to add in the one about how she lost $6 billion in state department funds

Remember the purple revolution. Remember the vote seeking to tap into the upset 'fencesitter' that may lean a direction but for the most part is unhappy albeit has low involvement in politics beyond the radio and morning news. Remember Clinton's daughter won a nobel prize for existing without having shady shit tied to her so far, or maybe it was just for existing? Be vigilant.

>Keep in mind that it's a draw unless one candidate wins a majority of electoral votes.
pretty much irrelevant. Under one scenario on that 270 link, neither candidate gets 270, so goes to the house, then whichever party controls the house decides president. And in that scenario, it's only because 6 electoral votes went to 3rd party.
>Ironically this system would have made Obama's second presidential election a draw.
Then house would have likely voted Romney in for President, since republicans had control.

>dumping spics into human civilization hasn't been tried
um, sweaty...

It’s treason then.

Attached: 45B05A87-D48E-42AF-9D77-F41E39988C5F.jpg (800x516, 78K)

Sounds good to me.
Red states are all deep red, while most blue states are half republican. It's only the major cities. Trump would have taken half of NY and Cali and Nevada if this is how we did it. This will only help republican candidates.

You dumb fucking idiots. It would require 75% of states to ratify it. It will never happen.

On the off chance it did, this nation would fail within one new election cycle, because the disaffected would overthrow the unduly elected government.

>Really hairy arms
>pale skin
>feminine bracelet
>sausage fingers

Basedboy detected. She can still win!!

Attached: 1509401466939.png (601x600, 191K)

> stupid confused faces when you think you've won the election next time. You're all going to be like, "Huh, wtf happened."
You sound like somebody, who has experience on this subject, can you tell us, how it feels? :^)

>It would require 75% of states to ratify it. It will never happen.

It's not an amendment.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

but I think in a system like that 3rd parties would seem more viable and would gain more traction

CT is always blue, completely pointless

Death to Connecticut