>Social Darwinism is bacause nazi fascism racism bigots
why do people hate social Darwinism so much for no reason?
Social Darwinism
Because it's only championed by mentally deranged ideologues who believe they're at the top of the food chain. Protip: you aren't.
>Tu quoque
here's we go, no actual criticism of it.
inherently anti-social philosophy that breeds apathy and competition in every society which sows it; a tool to weaken a collective.
Probably because it omits the other type of natural competition when attempting to apply natural tendencies to society.
It's true that individuals will compete with one another for limited resources, but they'll also help each other if faced with an outside threat. Competition against natural forces or outside threats.
Two cavemen would breat the shit out of each other for the last of the food, but they'd also help each other in the event of a forest fire or a tornado because both of them surviving raises both of their future chances of survival.
I guess what I'm getting at is that people dislike Social Darwinism because it insinuates that competitiveness between individuals is the only natural tendency that exists while totally ignoring mutual aid and cooperation that are just as observable in nature and arguably more useful for a society
Tl;dr: two cavemen beat lion. Or at least have better odds.
I'm not sure social Darwinism necessarily means 0 collectivism, Herbert Spencer seem to have been some kind of white collectivist for example.
doesn't matter, social darwinists are more likely to accept a rigid hierarchy/caste system and antagonize the rest of the populace.
>Why do people hate a system which reminds people of their inferiority?
Come on, you know the answer to this.
Darwinism is "on" at all times, there is no "off" setting. This way of life exists because it happened to outlast other ways of life - it is the arrogance of self-enlightened intelectuals that pushes them into top-down-revamping of all society with no in-depth consideration as to why the institutions that make it up arose and survived in the first place. Social Darwinists are like Marxists, in this approach, "Competition" and "equality" are abstracted to the extreme and elevated above any level an actual practical, sensible person would put them on.
>why do people hate social Darwinism so much for no reason?
I hate it because it's very obviously an excuse for immorality.
It's also poorly thought out bullshit. Societies that are pro-social and communal regularly out compete other animals and societies that are more individualistic. See Rome vs. Germanic tribes, Lions vs. Tigers, Humans vs. every other animal. Also the entire institution of human brain development is based on a highly nurturing biological strategy. High investment, high reward. If human infants were as "fit" and competitive as, say, deer we would be that much the lesser for it.
There are no valid arguments against it.
Read Arthur Keith: a new theory of human evolution.
Solved the question of morality/human ethics forever and established the logic behind human tendency to either consider themselves a collective or not.
Tip; out-group and in-group duality
The truth is that if you replaced American blacks with Europeans the crime rates would drop by half.
Most poor neighbourhoods would suddenly become livable again. And if you replaced illegal Mexican workers with Poles you would have harder less criminally minded folk.
The ones against it are the ones who think they would be targeted by it, because they suffer from a massive inferiority complex.
It's not a complex. They are absolutely right about their inferiority.
If society progressed in that way one day i might be targeted too. But i would accept the fact that i am either not allowed to have children or not be a part of society.
If unintelligent blacks can't accept these terms they are free to form their own government or move back to their ancestral homelands
Some people perceive themselves as inferior even though they are not.
We are all inferior to someone. The gap between a man like tesla and even the above average educated man is enormous.
But there is also a large gap between the average man and below average person. Or average white person and the average black person.
80% of blacks could easily be considered too inferior to procreate in advancing society along with the bottom 20% of whites
Even if it's natural, to base government policy on it would just be following the naturalistic fallacy.
You know what I mean. There's high IQ white professionals who suffer from various inferiority complexes, as well as nigger retards who believe they're the top of the food chain. Self-perception =/= reality
[citation needed]
Just imagine, some 80% of the chosen people would be Jews. Probably looking at something like 80% Jew, 15% Asian, 3% white, 2% other.
Honestly you could just replace the northern mexicans with southern mexicans and achieve the same goal.
You can start with comparing the murder rate of Mexico and the murder rate of Poland, and go from there.
ucr.fbi.gov
13% black minority committing 52.5% of all murders. Replacing blacks with whites would lower murder rates by 45%
Only a jew would make such a blantant lie. Jewish IQ is anywhere between 95 and 102 the difference between Israeli Jews in general and Ashkenazi Jews.
Asians are on average less intelligent than whites unless if you are comparing Japanese Koreans and Chinese which are just slightly more intelligent on average
wow it's almost like there's an american war on drugs that fuels the incredibly violent competition between drug cartels to produce and supply america with it's drugs, leading to massive amounts of government corruption and crime! Wow!
Get the fuck off my board and go BACK to your fucking containment board you shits. Stop swinging around your tiny beaver dicks regurgitating your propaganda and performing mental gymnastics for all to see. Take your circle jerk back to pol.
Wow it's like all brown countries are shitholes because of whitey.
You can't blame all Mexico's problems on USA. The only countries who get to do that are countries which were destroyed by USA in war like the poor Vietnamese people.
Drug cartels on the other hand are mainly the blame of Mexicans and Mexican government which is run by Mexicans
Not him but the cartels would have no market to expand their power if we didn't have the drug policy we did.
Plus we keep giving them guns.
>all mestizo countries that currently exist are ultra-violent shitholes
>this is clearly the fault of the Americans
laughing my ass off right now
en.wikipedia.org
1. El Salvador
2. Honduras
3. Venezuela
10. Guatemala
14. Brazil
15. Colombia
21. Dominican Republic
23. Mexico
25. Dominican republic
All spic shitholes full of mongrels with Indian and African blood.
> Herbert Spencer
Spencer wasn't a Darwinist. He wrote his ideas about heritability before Darwin even published Origins. Spencer was inspired by Lamarck. Even DARWIN became progressively Lamarckian as he got older ironically enough.
lol, asshurt shitskin spic. Mexico is a shithole filled with trash unworthy of the title ''human''. The world would unironically be better if you were genocided and replaced with whites (actual humans). Stay in your shithole and don't come to my country.
>ignores argentina
inb4 some retard claims argentina is 80% white. ive been there, white people are definitely a minority. i went north to south, west to east. its a brown country.
Argentina is indeed mostly white. It's actually whiter than the US currently.
>ive been there
>muh anecdotal evidence
Nobody cares spic, get lost.
>But i would accept the fact that i am either not allowed to have children or not be a part of society.
literal cuckold who wants to sacrifice himself for some spook
>Asians
Only if by Asian you mean specifically East Asians. India, Pakistan and the various Turkic countries are all dumber than shit.
/thread
>Wow it's like all brown countries are shitholes
China (actually most of it is shit), South Korea and Japan aren't shitholes though. They are brown/yellow/tanned. Jow Forumstards still believe that skin tone correlates with intelligence. It doesn't. Other wise albino blacks would be 150 IQ geniuses and red headed people would be highly intelligent too. In my experience gingers are annoying retards who should be wiped out.
Yellow fever/weeb detected.
China is a complete shit hole full of morons.
Also on the subject of Indians...it seems Indians are superior to White Americans...?
t. Pajeet
Huh...that's kinda queer...seems that a lot of "west asians" are doing better than white Americans too!
America lets only educated Indians in, so literally their elite. India has an average IQ of India 82.2, it's a nation of imbeciles.
I knew that was coming but for the record I'm not an Indian and even if I was it doesn't change the facts that middle easterners, south and east asians do far better than whiteoids.
>the cause of all of indias problems are genetic
citation needed.
actually what this all really implies is that when you take indians out of a shitty environment they exceed whites in terms of success. if you put whites in the indian environment the average IQ score would probably drop.
If you put whites in the Indian environment they would build toilets with proper sanitation you instead of shitting in the streets like dogs.
Excluding the Northern parts of the Indus valley other wise known as Pakistan which houses the Indo Aryans. No, India is the way it is because of its population.
An assertion void of any reference.
>Social Darwinism
>any kind of Darwinism
>believing in evolution
Euphoria.
What does indivualism have to do with social darwinism? Humans evolved to be collectivist and prosocial because it is a superior evolutionary strategy.
>No actual argument
>Insinuates only Atheists believe in Evolution
>born into monopoly oil baron family
>see the less fortunate outside my mansion
>"im sorry my less fortunate friends"
>"Im just more fit than u"
>why do they hate me so