Black activist jailed for his Facebook posts speaks out about secret FBI surveillance

>but I can't recall anyone ever having been arrested for that, so I don't know what kind of a line they would have to cross.
Yvette Falarca in Berkeley, case is ongoing now. She's on of the leaders of By Any Means Necessary, a radical Marxist group that routinely engages in black bloc marches and other shit.

As to the actual topic of the thread, I'd say the guy might have warranted surveillance but not arrest.

well if you weren't such a lover of advertisements and all things jewish, you would understand that it is best not to throw away an expensive firearm when you commit a crime, but to use a cheap one instead.

>"let's kill these niggers" illegal

That's a lot of the world you're talking about. Also the possibility that a few are black themselves.

Attached: 800px-NJC089.jpg (530x298, 86K)

>As to the actual topic of the thread, I'd say the guy might have warranted surveillance but not arrest.
That's what I'm thinking as well. It's clear he's a radical, militant revolutionary. Keeping tabs on him makes sense. However, everyone is acting like it's no big deal because he's a dindu. Do they not realize these same methods will be used against us? And no one will give a shit about you when you get thrown into jail for being a "suspected racist".

Niggers are fucking retarded.

This is the real police state. They have a FUCKHUGE budget with no terrorists to catch, so they're gonna go after people with radical views INCLUDING US on here. Back in the day you used to actually have to be part of a terror network or group to be a terrorist

as much as they are pandered to, lol nah.

None of us post pictures of ourselves holding guns threatening to kill a bunch of random nogs.

This. If we condone this guy going prison without due process, our fate will be the same very soon

MUH FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Yeah, I feel pretty much the same. It wouldn't have surprised me if the guy was on that path already, and there's a fair chance that his arrest might have actually "sped up" that process of radicalization.

>Back in the day you used to actually have to be part of a terror network or group to be a terrorist
lolno

Back in the day there was even more loose criteria. One of which was "UnAmerican utterances" that was never defined.

>Calling for open violence on people
Cite where he did that, faggot. Way to buy into the MSM propaganda.

Yeah the article actually says they have no direct evidence of him doing that, but that others at the really were. Does this not just sound like Charlotteville to you guys?

Yes, I can see it.
This is all fucked.

Attached: 2415543-tumblr_m53xticpvs1qckc8bo4_1280.jpg (1280x1024, 177K)

Now consider that almost all right-wing websites and figureheads have been recently hit by lawsuits, where they will probably be required to give up information of all of their users to the feds.

my thoughts are I don't really care if the government "oppresses" niggers because they're not really people anyway so rights shouldn't be extended to them

>Calling for open violence on people while brandishing firearms is neither free speech nor gun rights
Brandenburg v. Ohio
>I forget the actual term for it at the exact moment, but for now let's just call it "not being a fucking asshole."
Retarded millennial ZOG-drone understanding of law. "umm like if you make someone uncomfortable that's not OK, repeal the bill of rights"
>It's perfectly reasonable for laws to be in place to stop people from being fucking assholes.
Good goy

Brandenburg v. Ohio

Or i do not have the mindset to commit a crime and need a throwaway gun?