Is the 1965 immigration act the worst thing that's ever happened in American history?

Is the 1965 immigration act the worst thing that's ever happened in American history?

Attached: 1524888846629.png (4200x6184, 1.19M)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/DavidDukeShockingJewishRoleInSlavery
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_views_on_slavery#Jewish_slave_ownership_in_the_southern_United_States
dw.com/en/new-figures-show-immigration-to-germany-is-highest-in-20-years/a-17653135
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_Germany#Mainland_Turkish_migration
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Yes

Demographic genocide is real but who really cares it's not like anyone educated wants to leave a "legacy" on this failed planet.

Attached: 1524204436754.jpg (605x864, 60K)

No really

1965 would not be a thing if not for 1913

>(((the 1965 immigration act)))

No, Lincoln's election was

also this

But I would go further and say that whites bringing blacks to the american continent was where the mistake started

Yes.

And ending segregated.

Basically the 60s killed America

Yes

Attached: 19658642.jpg (1276x997, 232K)

they could have castrated them. maybe it was a plot to destroy america right from the beginning.

Attached: 1526097923260.jpg (667x515, 90K)

yes

Jews brought slaves to the States.

>whites bringing blacks to the american continent was where the mistake started
Whites? jews boast about their domination of the transatlantic slave trade in their own history books, the slave posts were even shut on jewish holidays

Not even close.
1. Worst thing ever was bringing African slaves.
2.Not deporting slaves to Liberia after the war of northern aggression.
3. Electing Abe Lincoln
4.Giving Monterey and Mexico City back to the Mexicans after rightfully seizing them in warfare.
It's been a downward spiral ever since.

Was the sugar and tobacco wealth worth it in the end?

the end of segregation started with Eisenhower tho

american presidents since 1912 have been a mistake, the only one that was not a zionist shill was Nixon and they took him down

Would you please point me to a jewish history book that contains this? I'd like to see it.

no

>war of northern aggression

Attached: 1499712137292.png (481x489, 219K)

How about the 1776 masonic takeover that lead to it

Jews didn't force anyone to buy their slaves

Through history, whites have an extremely hard time saying "NO" to jews, for reasons that escape me

First with Christianity which robbed the romans of their warrior ethos, then with Charlemagne giving them a banking monopoly, then with the Puritans and the beginnings of "Zionism", the list has no end

Anybody got the pic for tax liability where whites owe 200k over their life and nogs receive 700k and spics receive something in between

archive.org/details/DavidDukeShockingJewishRoleInSlavery

only 2% of Americans owned slaves, whilst 40% of jews in america did

Probably was, yes.

You know what is funny? Sherman destroyed it all, Sherman burned all the palaces and all the wealth the dixies has managed to create

At the end, slavery was for nothing

what about giving voting rights to women?

1961 USA forced Germany to accept Turkish immigration. You're just getting what's coming to you Mutts.

Nah, allying with Stalin and Bolshevism was

Jews were a very small minority until 1910 tho

Yes.

That's the real tragedy of the colonial slave trade, they should have been used then deported once slavery was no longer worth it.

and they therefore did not dominate the transatlantic slave trade? and boast about it?

This is accurate btw. Although I have to conceed it also might have been the (((USA)))

Attached: Amerijew.png (650x925, 627K)

they only sold the slaves
no one was forced whites to buy their product
the majority of slave owners was NOT jewish

> Jews accounted for only 1.25% of all Southern slave owners.[13]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_views_on_slavery#Jewish_slave_ownership_in_the_southern_United_States

* no one was forcing

Immigration and migration errors of the United States:

>1. Importing black slaves
>2. In 1807, when outlawing new importation of black slaves, not sending them all back to Africa
>3. At emancipation, after the Civil War, not sending the blacks back to Africa
>4. The 1965 immigration act
>5. Not having solid border walls and barriers with armed guards 24/7/365, manned entry/exit points, deadly no-man's lands, drone-based monitoring, etc.
>6. Convincing much of the population that immigration is good any longer just because it was good centuries ago. We have enough.
>7. H-1B visa abuse, mostly by the IT industry

A good immigration platform:

>Stop all legal immigration immediately. No new visas issued except tourist and business visas. Stop issuing green cards immediately.
>Build the southern wall
>Increase enforcement and penalties for illegal immigration. Deport with prejudice.
>Stop issuance of all H-1B visas and H-2 visas immediately. Move up expiry dates for all current H-1B and H-2 visas to 60 days and tell holders they must leave the country. Tell businesses they must now hire American citizens.

Immigration helped fill the country back in the 1700s. Waves of immigration have made America that melting pot everyone mentions. But we're big enough now. We don't need that any longer. Get rid of the romantic notion that immigration is good and contributes to our society. We have enough people to contribute. We do amazing things. We don't need more people.

STOP ALL IMMIGRATION! REMOVE ALL NON-CITIZEN IMMIGRANTS IMMEDIATELY! LOCK DOWN THE BORDERS!

please do notice that endless chains of family reunification laws is what allowed turks to increase their numbers to 4 % of the population, and the extra-european immigration to Germany has been 300 000 each year since 1995, BEFORE the refugee crisis

The vast majority of non-whites in Germany were brought by the unified german government

>they only sold the slaves
I see, totally innocent then, well done chaim

Attached: j melting.jpg (1510x1067, 481K)

You know the thing is, there always was political capital for those laws, but for some bizarre reasons, whites didn't vote for Pat Buchanan in 1994, when whites were still 80 %

Now the political capital is completely gone, you would need ALL the whites to agree on this, but that's impossible with so many jews and good-goy christians counting as whites

I never claimed that they were innocent.

But to assume that whites didn't know what where they getting into is just... silly

If it wasn't the jews, it would have been the portuguese, if not then, the arabs would have sold those slaves

>If it wasn't the jews, it would have been the portuguese, if not then, the arabs would have sold those slaves
just like all those thousands of little girls raped by muslims in bongland? they would have got raped anyway if the muslims weren't there?

Attached: 1471619281414.jpg (500x377, 30K)

literally a completely different topic

the only way to blame jews for whites buying slaves is to claim that jews have "magical mind control powers"

No they were not. And the number you cited consists of inter European immigrants. The Turks are BY FAR the largest Muslim group in Germany, then follow the Arabs which were 200k in the 70s and grew to 1,2 million through brithrates alone. The refugee crisis is another glow in the dark operation in cooperation with a treacherous government working against its own people of which many are deep state puppets. I am SICK AND TIRED having to explain this over and over again.

Attached: tiresome.png (1022x731, 643K)

More like human history, seeing as America is the ghost of European future.

Nah. Not enough spics in range and we don't get Slaves

Attached: The Way.jpg (600x450, 51K)

> And the number you cited consists of inter European immigrants.

No

this is right from before the refugee crisis, 2013

dw.com/en/new-figures-show-immigration-to-germany-is-highest-in-20-years/a-17653135

> Of the new arrivals in Germany, 1,108,000 were non-German nationals, 15% more than in 2012, according to Destatis.
> Most of the non-German immigrants came from European Union countries (727,000), with Poland as the top country of origin (189,000).

That puts immigration numbers from outside the EU at 381 000

That number has been the main driver of the increase of non-whites in Germany

also, as I mentioned, the main driver of the growth in numbers in turks have been reunification laws

> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_Germany#Mainland_Turkish_migration


This was partly due to the family reunification rights that were introduced in 1974 which allowed Turkish workers to bring their families to Germany.[37]

> Moreover, once the recruitment of foreigner workers was reintroduced after the recession of 1967, the BfA (Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte) granted most work visas to women. This was in part because labour shortages continued in low paying, low-status service jobs such as electronics, textiles, and garment work; and in part to further the goal of family reunification.[39]

> Initially, some Bulgarian Turks arrived in Germany during the introduction of the family reunification laws of 1974. The Bulgarian Turks were able to take advantage of this law despite the very small number of Bulgarian citizens in Germany. This is because some Turkish workers in Germany who arrived from Turkey were actually part of the Bulgarian-Turkish minority who had left Bulgaria during the communist regime during the 1980s and still held Bulgarian citizenship, alongside their Turkish citizenship.[43]

> Due to the numerous wars in Lebanon since the 1970s onwards, many Lebanese Turks have sought refuge in Turkey and Europe, particularly in Germany.

> Indeed, many Lebanese Turks were aware of the large German-Turkish population and saw this as an opportunity to find work once settling in Europe. In particular, the largest wave of Lebanese-Turkish migration occurred once the Israel-Lebanon war of 2006 began.

> During this period more than 20,000 Turks fled Lebanon, particularly from Beirut, and settled in Germany.[55]

Family Reunification Laws are the european equivalent of the 1965 Immigration Act

every new non-white in Europe can keep sponsoring an endless chains of relatives that can then sponsor even more relatives, and it can't be stopped because "YOU ARE DIVIDING THEIR FAMILIES YOU DEMON"

JFK

I think he would have legislated a lot like Johnson