Ask an anarcho-nazist anything

Ask an anarcho-nazist anything

Attached: 1524295278358.png (2000x1333, 70K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vAlMdSa8leg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

are you white?

>anarcho-nazist
bump for the final redpill, also nice pic

there is no final redpill. Just struggle and overcoming.

Judge it yourself, statist

Attached: IMG_20180512_222533.jpg (1280x720, 442K)

how does it feel to be a retard?

>anarcho-nazist
>not anarcho-national socialist
SAGED you kike shill

>he isint a fasharco-hedonist

stupid faggot your troll ideology is nowhere near as gay as mine

AMA about my dick

That’s like Nick Fuentes white. Nice try el goblino

>El goblino
Show your hand, la creatures americanos

How long until you grow up and learn your life is better under capitalism than it will ever be under socialism, and no amount of state sanctioned genocide can fill that emptiness in your soul?

Yeah, we're on Jow Forums we pretty much know anything about it, my dude

Attached: Icke Pill.jpg (680x505, 53K)

since we're brothers, we can have political disagreements. care on

>not psychedelic tribal fascism

Can you fuck off back to leftypol please with your 50 hues of marxist shitposting?

So, you don't believe in a state as an anarchist,

but you think that the white race (any race/identity) has a right to their own ethnostate that you don't even subscribe to?

Where is the meaning/logic in this?

And who tf makes it a meme-flag when i have never even heard of it before.

Attached: futurememe.jpg (423x267, 17K)

I believe that race should have right to defend itself from invaders like muslims, but Muslim have right to invade it. And we have right to invade them and they have right to defend themselves
I can't understand this meme, but pic related

Attached: IMG_20180512_224155_421.jpg (2160x3840, 1.23M)

the redpill is to embrace struggle, rather than shirk away from it

the way the right and the left are interacting now is very similar to how there were interacting in europe pre-ww2. Its always been nationalism vs internationalism. Leftists seek the open society, a place without struggle, and constant happiness (so an unachievable utopia that is propped up by brave new world drugging and 1984 enforcement on wrongthink). The german nihilists hated this, they were a reaction to it. They hated the open society, they hated the empty platitudes that came along with it. They knew that life is maintenance, life is struggle. When you cease to maintain, decay sets in.

Capitalism and communism are two sides of the same coin. They are both effective control structures for the elites. Communism is only slightly more effective because the grip is a bit tighter and nobody can really have any class mobility.

It seems a mistake to go all the way down either rabbit hole, both are materially driven ideologies that cause humans to stray from their nature, or even require that nature to be reprogrammed for the power structure to exist to begin with. IMO economic centrism seems to be the most logical path, the problem is the concepts of the open society and multiculturalism make this sort of human organization ineffective. We're still animals, there is a desire in us to take care of our tribe before the others. Homogeneity is the key to making pretty much any ideology achievable. The only other thing is nation size, large nations will always be spread too thin and any centralization with result in pointless bureaucracy.

I agree.. I've always been NatSoc and understand Natural order.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vAlMdSa8leg

Thanks

>I'm an anarcho-non-anarchist

Gee, what an inspired thread.

The way that swastika does not run perpendicular to the colours of the flags makes the Fuhrer sad and if the Fuhrer is sad, I'm sad.

It's anarchism, no führer, we just NatSoc here

It's gonna be economically anarchism, socialism in the sense of brotherhood between Aryans and Nationalism in the sense of pride

you know hierarchies are a pretty inherent part to national socialism and the natural order, right?

Furthermore nationalism implies a state.

>Anarcho-nazist
Jesus fucking Christ, anarcho-nationalism exists... "AnNaz," I fucking hate identity politics.

Attached: Anarcho-Fascism.png (600x600, 28K)

I don't know what your nationalism is but I mean
"racial" nationalism
>I believe that race should have right to defend itself from invaders like muslims, but Muslim have right to invade it. And we have right to invade them and they have right to defend themselves
citting from older posts
race is what is important,read

...

Well you claim to be anarchist, which is generally against the state. nat soc includes authoritarian nationalism. Just because its an ethnostate doesn't mean its not still a state.

The only way I can really see your position being defensible is if you subscribe to a hans hermann hoppe type approach to anarchism (creating and defending your own communities)

You don't have to compare our national socialism to Hitler's
My point is simple, people are not forced to be part of NatSoc, but we have the right to put them down without any law, they have right to fight back. Laws don't apply, everything works how it seem to work, if there is a problem, we are going to use physical force

I like your thinking.

Yeah you should check out hans hermann hoppe if you haven't. Your approach is very similar to his, he's not interesting in natsoc as much, but certainly in right wing bone structure in city state type organizations. Social taboo and community rules to ward away the social degeneration that traditional anarchism/ancap/libertarianism has no provisions to combat because freedoms

Anyway I think we have a similar approach, Its just your flag choice kind of throws me off, since most people who use the anarcho-commie flag are complete retards with no understanding that anarchism is simply a transient state between power holders. Power will always consolidate somewhere.

where I am is hereI think the optimal social order for humans comes from a synthesis of psychedelic tribalism, fascism, and gnostic thinking.

Good
It is listed as Anarchist as a flag here, i thought it was just Anarchism flag, but it could be anarcho-communist, I will use this flag then

why are you retarded?

Attached: jojo_the_dino.jpg (1280x873, 107K)

I don't know about you but I prefer Anarcho-Fascism

Fascism is more civil-nationalism, but I can understand that you are not European, so you don't need racialism or ethnic nationalism

Your ideas are more important than your flag, its just something I use as context on people.

Attached: national-socialism-jes-not-fascism-the-main-difference-between23053946.jpg (530x600, 109K)

>I'm a demi-neo-anarcho-monarchist
Jow Forums has political ideologies, Tumblr has genders

>eu flag
>calling other statist

Attached: Gtblack+guy+goes+into+washing+machine+gtasian+_1c469e4e0ae024462ff2d264f73b80bb.png (900x900, 603K)

Do you specialize in empty plates like Hitler and Marx too?

>Anarchy
>Welfare state