This thread is dedicated to the revolutionary proposition that free speech laws must be extended to online platforms. Given Reddit’s heavy and unrelenting moderation, liberal bias, it’s realized propaganda delivery platform, it’s nature as a hub for Millenials, admins’ willingness to play God of the ecosystem by editing posts, and very high trafficking it is an ideal target for advancing our program. How do we accomplish this? We go after the Reddit brand. Many Redditors believe that the fabric of the Reddit ecosystem is so unique and noteworthy that they populate a subreddit dedicated to the examination of Reddit itself. The following screenshots put on display a number of failings of the platform as expressed in the words of its seasoned users. These failings, if appropriately presented, provide pressure points to agitate the site’s user base to demand expanded freedoms, more transparency, or if unsuccessful in those endeavors, trigger a mass exodus from the platform.
This thread is dedicated to the revolutionary proposition that free speech laws must be extended to online platforms...
No more ADL/SPLC algorithms. No more censorship. No more Israeli botnets. No more shills.
>He thinks he has rights on a privately owned website.
Take over Digg.
You do realise private domains should have the right to regulate what goes on in and on their sites. Private properties have the right to refuse or deny service. Reddit is not government funded public land.
Locked threads are on the rise
all you have to look at is the eventual fate of these censored cyclops's, the more censoring the faster their demise.
Quality discussion is drying up.
Abuse your power once and you will forever be suspect. It has been over a year since /u/spez surreptitiously edited a users comment using admin-only backdoor DB access.
Despite moderation, discourse is becoming meaner.