>Muslims would stay in their lands if we never destabilized their countri-

Attached: crusadebattlearea.jpg (1584x1584, 133K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades#Reconquista
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>comparing apples to oranges
>crusades against europeans not mentioned
keep on keeping on christcuck

Your error was giving any credence whatsoever to the serpentine lies emanating from The Establishment

>crusades against europeans not mentioned
What the fuck does that have to do with the claims that muslims dindu nuffin against Christians and the Crusades against muslims were unprovoked?

That's not an accurate map of the crusades

Muslim expansionism was for more brutal than the crusades.
If the byzantines had lost against them back in the 8th century, the entire continent could be muslim by now

They are both fruit so they are comparable.

Why because they didn't show the Crusades into Eastern Europe. The map is to compare Christian vs. Muslim battles. If you guys want us to include Crusades against pagans then we should also include Muslim expansion into the Iranian plateau and southern Asia.

Attached: 13432E28-2B02-4E5E-B095-DDD47C0CA475.jpg (2496x2350, 603K)

You should kill yourself to see where you end up

>its another atheistcuckolds defending mudslimes episode

Attached: 1526114527111.png (625x773, 143K)

I think the idea of this video/info was to show that Muslims are inherently more violent against people that don't share their faith.

When it comes to the Crusades, yes, the fourth crusade was left out of the pic, but sectarianism of East Orthodoxy vs. Roman Catholicism with chief difference of Fililoque (plus Constantinople was wealthy and ripe for sacking, pretty well all that was done there -- par for the course on the average European conquest) is a little bit different than "believe in Allah or suffer the sword".

If anything, I'd argue that leaving out the fourth crusade just makes the point even stronger about the fact that inter-religious violence of Christianity on predominantly Islam is a hell of a lot smaller than the reverse.

so why doesn't this map show the reconquista of iberia?

That's a dumb picture, you're comparing all of Islam to one particular group of Christians.
The fact that you don't recognize how flawed the comparison is shows that you're a fucking idiot, you probably embarrass yourself constantly. Stop just feeling a feel and then going along with whatever caters to your emotions. You're not a helper.

Notice how the crusaders had zero interest in helping their European brothers in Iberia and Italy. And this not mentioning how many eastern europeans they killed, even though they like to say the crusades were to quench muslims

Because its a Reconquista not a crusade.
There is a difference between Castillian Reclaiming their lands and A religious crusade

also he's right the map is inaccurate and doesn't show some battles that took place in anatolia and northern syria

but the crusades were a reclamation of land. I don't understand why muslim invasions on this map aren't arbitrary but european invasions on muslims are arbitrary, especially considering there is not really any significant difference between the recapturing of jerusalem and the recapturing of spain.

this map is biased.

Which one of the crusades is it listed under?

There were crusades in the Iberian peninsula, they were just smaller and are more ignored by historians. But more succesful than the ones in the middle east.

anyone who have above 40 iq can tell this map is a lie
but you post it as proof
what does that say about you

They were fighting an occupying power, where most of the people were still Christian being controlled by muslims. It's different than traveling somewhere to conquer another people, occupy their lands, and attempt impose your religion upon them.

why are all muslim conquests on europeans included but not all european conquests on muslims? I don't get it, why is this map only limited to the crusade on jerusalem?

>anyone who have above 40 iq can tell this map is a lie

your countries literally have subhuman IQ, you retarded sandnigger

Why were most efforts directed towards the middle east when muslims were already within European soil? Does a desert shithole matter more than Europe? You're aware a lot of castles in France, for instance, were built to defend from muslims since most men had been drafted to the middle east?

If he hates jews and stays in his own country he is more of a friend of ours than the average american.

What are you talking about? The crusaders on that map literally were getting help from armenians that were all over southern anatolia and there were christians living in jerusalem when they besieged it. are you just talking out of your ass?

Conquering the holy land (Jerusalem) was the main goal.
But I agree, I'd be smarter to focus on the Iberian Peninsula.

its a clip from a video

youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

this. I am actually anti-islam expansion and that's why it annoys me when people post bullshit maps like this and make people in my movement look retarded.

But they probably wouldn't have te motivation to do so.

>literal jungle monkey speaking to me
uma

youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y
dont be retarded, he posted a screencap during a video, its not an accurate depiction of the source material

Because the Holy land was significant to the Christian religion.Why did the muslims keep attacking Rome, even before the Crusades?

is it above 40?
than stfu

that's what I'm complaining about. the OP image is retarded and inaccurate and very arbitrary and it annoys me that it's posted.

and yes
the islamic wars of conquest was a response to foreign destabilization and imperialism too

based turks cleared that tumor once and for all , mashalah

not gonna back you up on that one mustafaar. not only is there not really any historical evidence backing that up but islam was pretty aggressive. not a lot of zoroastrianists and isis worshippers left, I wonder what happened...

I like the armenians. jerk

>mustafaar
tariq*
>not only is there not really any historical evidence backing that up but
litrally grab any history book about the subject
mesopotamia was colonized by iranics
levant by romans
eternally warring and turning the middle east into a desolate war zone

>Because its a Reconquista not a crusade.
Anons from Anglo countries should get a grip and read.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades#Reconquista

their entire history was allying with invaders to shit up the middle east from mongols to crusaders

Attached: AINTLOYAL.png (500x500, 90K)

All these Muslim hate threads, I feel this is the work of the jews and their propaganda in light of the massacre they did in recent hours.

Attached: 1523875435907.png (399x322, 42K)

>all these muslim dick suck threads

literally never seen mudshits defended this hard on Jow Forums in all my years, its amazing how many of you shills came out of the woodwork this week

Why is Christianity so cucked?

>Mx5dppFc
>never seens the jews get hated on Jow Forums
>jews and their lies
browse longer newfag or rather get lost your not welcome.
i see the the jidf as always hard at work with their lies

So christian dogma is more important than Europeans? Fuck blood and soil, basically?

just IGB THEM the LNAD ALREADY!