Looks like a majority of us have been duped on a lot of things.
>The basic idea behind the flawed notion of “white genocide” is the notion that population demographic changes over decades (caused by e. g. different populations moving and interbreeding) constitutes an actual genocide. However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide.
>Another component to the myth of white genocide is the notion that there is an epidemic of black-on-white homicide in the United States. This is usually advanced by raw data comparisons on statistics from the U.S Department of Justice or the Federal Bureau of Investigation. However, a naive raw data comparison is a notorious example of statistical illiteracy. A simplified example may help to bring this point home: imagine that a raw data comparison between right-handed and left-handed people showed that there were more right-handed murderers than left-handed ones. What conclusions could you draw about the connection between being right-handed and being a murderer? Absolutely nothing, as you have to perform the correct data normalizations. In this case, you have to control for the size of the two groups of right-handed and left-handed people. Are there more murders by right-handed people because right-handed people are more prone to murders or because there are just so many more right-handed people than left-handed people? In other words, the correct comparisons are between frequencies, not absolute figures.
>okay, okay, okay... it's happening but it's NOT a genocide because left and right handed people exist in different proportions This is a fallacy, races are separate for reasons entirely different to the reasons that explain what hand you write with... let alone the fact that immigration and population do not select for handedness. Can someone other than a complete brainlet try to argue against the white genocide claim for once?
>let me define genocide for you >see, what you call genocide isn't genocide by my definition >qed
Benjamin Walker
answer my question
Jonathan Martinez
Don't waste your time arguing with jews, even if you destroy it's argument it will be back tomorrow as if the argument never took place and post the same sentiments, having learned nothing.
We need that smuggie going >prove that X is true - but within my ruleset >can't do it? heh, thought so >I win
Samuel Stewart
>Replacing X population with one other is not genocide
Fuck off , it is
Noah Cruz
considering we have leaked documents of uk cuntservatives that now have to switch gears to brownnosing islam because "british people are now to few to win elections" tells a decididly different story. A story in which british people got robbed of their political decision making powers in their one and only home by traitors paid by open border globalists and only interested in votes. So no you are wrong and so is this smoke bomb you utter retard. Also belgium has now a islamist political group yes not a muslim or islam no a islamist sharia supporting one. So again .. fuck off moron.
Noah Morgan
Wow, really good statistics shlomo, they are 13% of the population but kill double the whites and somehow whites are the ones overrepresented.
Lol at that "right-handed murderers" nonsense, when you control for population size, black murder rate is way way higher. It is precisely the frequency and not the "raw data" that we are citing.
How can they not see that by applying their own method described here it shows that blacks have a ridiculously high violent crime rate after controlling for everything from population size to poverty, etc
I almost agree with the part about white genocide, never liked that term because it's not the same as the Holodomor and the Khmer Rouge, etc.
What they are missing though is that it's not just natural population variance, there are active policies and ideologies promoting increased immigration and decreased white fertility, so there is definitely something worth fighting against here
Bentley Long
Refer to this, they are literally retarded and don't understand statistics. Committing DOUBLE the murders is somehow committing less.
Eli Nelson
How is debunking white genocide being politcally incorrect towards the left?
>I almost agree with the part about white genocide, never liked that term because it's not the same as the Holodomor and the Khmer Rouge, etc.
You've been indoctrinated.
Zachary Young
You must be really thick in the head.
Nolan Hughes
>does not actually fall under the definition of genocide If it is systemic and planned by (((certain elements))) to this end it very well falls under exactly that.
Juan Lee
>However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide. Whatever the definition of genocide is doesn't matter. The fact is that there are repugnant niggers and filthy Kanacken all over the street in Germany. I'm a foreigner in my own nation and eventually (maybe 200 years down the line) the populations will be so much interbred that only disgusting Mischlinge are left and the German people are eradicated. That's good enough for me to call it a genocide.
Bentley Wood
>Karlsson A Swede that must have been fed Barbara Spectre propaganda since he was little. Sad
Adjusting the interracial homicide stats for the black percentage of the population makes them look worse than just raw numbers though.
John White
That's because Germany decided EU should open the borders. I disagree with their choice. Germany shouldn't be running the EU any how.
Henry Davis
>>Another component to the myth of white genocide is the notion that there is an epidemic of black-on-white homicide in the United States. This is usually advanced by raw data comparisons on statistics from the U.S Department of Justice or the Federal Bureau of Investigation. However, a naive raw data comparison is a notorious example of statistical illiteracy. A simplified example may help to bring this point home: imagine that a raw data comparison between right-handed and left-handed people showed that there were more right-handed murderers than left-handed ones. What conclusions could you draw about the connection between being right-handed and being a murderer? Absolutely nothing, as you have to perform the correct data normalizations. In this case, you have to control for the size of the two groups of right-handed and left-handed people. Are there more murders by right-handed people because right-handed people are more prone to murders or because there are just so many more right-handed people than left-handed people? In other words, the correct comparisons are between frequencies, not absolute figures. That literally doesn't make sense.
Brandon Martinez
>A simplified example may help to bring this point home: imagine that a raw data comparison between right-handed and left-handed people showed that there were more right-handed murderers than left-handed ones. What conclusions could you draw about the connection between being right-handed and being a murderer? Absolutely nothing, as you have to perform the correct data normalizations. In this case, you have to control for the size of the two groups of right-handed and left-handed people. Are there more murders by right-handed people because right-handed people are more prone to murders or because there are just so many more right-handed people than left-handed people? In other words, the correct comparisons are between frequencies, not absolute figures. This is a terrible example. There are way less blacks than whites, and even if you took into account that most of these take place in cities and still would even if the cities were white, blacks are still over-represented.
Parker Hall
This is Jow Forums not some safe space for retards, he was called out for a reason.
Owen Mitchell
wow, that's not even bad statistics, that's just straight up retarded
Zachary Powell
>Germany decided EU should open the borders Germany as in the people? Because they absolutely didn't. The ones that pushed for it were a ragtag group of traitors from special interest groups, business and politics.
You are clearly trying to subvert people's minds away from issues that matter to them. You kikes think too little of the people you speak to and you make too many assumptions. It hurts your entire argument.
Daniel Gonzalez
This is what they're talking about. Sure, blacks may kill twice as many whites as whites do blacks, but the average black is killed more likely by a white. They basically ignore the rate and use a method which goes against the murder rate to prop up minorities. This is literally the most jewish misrepresentation of statistics I have ever seen.
Which part? If you are patient enough to learn a little stats I can help you.
Thats only one of the two effects he says need to be mitigated.
Josiah Smith
Are you familiar with the right-left paradigm, stranger?
Zachary Sullivan
I'm not Jewish, and if you read what I posted you'd know that you're just a fool like I was and many others that fall prey to their shit.
Ethan Perry
>”Right Handed people commit more murders than Left Handed because there’s more of them >the black population is 1/3 of the whites and commits twice the murders of the entire white population by their logic blacks commit 6x the murders if the population was even
Ryder Russell
All my previous criticisms still stand.
Anthony Johnson
>>The basic idea behind the flawed notion of “white genocide” is the notion that population demographic changes over decades (caused by e. g. different populations moving and interbreeding) constitutes an actual genocide. However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide. Remember a decade ago when they said flooding tibet with ethnic chinese was genocide?
Easton Bailey
This article is so grotesque it's infuriating to see people in the comments praising it. Claming to be a debunker while you spin numbers and make your own brand of logic to fit your ideology is some top level bullshit.
Benjamin Morales
>White genocide is a myth! It's all lies! >To even suggest such a thing is preposterous! >Shut up shut up shut up! You're deluded if you even think this!
Whites get genocided and there's none left, either violently or just everything turns brown
>Oh whoops lol couldn't have seen that one coming! Oh well, I guess they were right but can't do anything about it now!
Joshua Thomas
Note their very specific wording on the part I cited earlier,Instead of the chance that you will be murdered by any black, they use the chance you will be killed by a black. Literally judging criminality by percent of the population you make up instead of per-capita. This method was created purely to benefit the minority, and for no other purpose.
Jaxson Harris
>That's because Germany decided EU should open the borders. No it didn't. Greece and Italy didn't do their job of protecting the EU exterior border. When Merkel decided to let the sandniggers in they were already in Hungary.
Christopher Murphy
Team A has 1,000,000 people. Team B has 1,000 people
Team A kills 10 of Team B. That's 1% Team B kills 100,000 of Team A. That's also 1%.
Therefore Team A and Team B are the same.
Is that ACTUALLY the argument that Tim Weiss is making?
In other words, a person from Team A on average kills 10/1,000,000 = 0.00001 people from Team B. And someone from Team B on average kills 100,000/1,000 = 100 people from Team A.
Obviously these numbers are simplified but the principle is the same.
No, there are three kinds of people in this world - commie bastards, fashy bastards, and the enemies of both.
Ryan Butler
>the notion that population demographic changes over decades (caused by e. g. different populations moving and interbreeding) constitutes an actual genocide. However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide. Genocide: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group If the 'population demographic changes over decades' are PLANNED/ORCHESTRATED, it's a genocide.
Yup, I didn't believe it at first and had to look into the article to find the "statistics" they were using. It's so manipulative and false that it's a wonder anyone believes what they say at all. That is literally what they are saying. They are using a method which is made to specifically help minorities no matter who they are. Cite the paragraph and actually make your case instead of relying on the article to do it for you, you can even take screenshots if you want. I warn you, whatever you do will make you look more Jewish and retarded.
Isaiah Morgan
Fuck off you glow in the light ultrafaggot Niggers are being shipped en masse by mail to north europe every second of the day. All because jews are on a guilt trip of being half bred palestinian arabs. Get out of life.
Jonathan Adams
I don't like the term "white genocide" .. replacement has better optics .. however the kike that sued for abortion in Canada (that "survived" a Polish death camp) brought about the destruction of millions of white babies. A genocide of sorts.
>Are there more murders by right-handed people because right-handed people are more prone to murders or because there are just so many more right-handed people than left-handed people? Are there more murders by black people because black people are more prone to murders or because there are just so many more black people than white people?
Brandon Smith
Wrong link. She was the kike that gave us affirmative action.
Why are you playing some gay word game? Whether it's "genocide" or not is completely irrelevant. It is what it is no matter what name you put on it. White people and subgroups of whites are being dispossessed in their own countries.
Adrian Evans
Shut up you fucking Krautnigger, it's your mistake of a country's fault that we can't properly defend our borders to begin with.
We used to have border patrols with guns to shoot the shitskins coming in until the EU said it was "cruel".
I hope central Europe dies soon so the countries that are still sane can leave this sinking boat.
Samuel Gutierrez
That's not on the site.
Cooper Richardson
Is this bait or did you not actually check the links on the article you posted?
Nicholas Ramirez
Anwser his question faggot.
Thomas Roberts
1st argument: >ok it's happening, but it doesn't meet the definition of Genocide 2nd argument: >black on white crime isn't really happening as much as the data says, because something something left and right handed people.
Even as someone who has often argued against using the term "Genocide" for what is happening, those are retarded arguments. The absolute state of faggot-flags.
This is actually genocide. Just like when the australians took a shitload of abbo women and forced them to marry white men
Joshua Clark
This is the very definition of a slide thread.
Angel Thomas
>We used to have border patrols with guns to shoot the shitskins coming in And you still have border patrols with guns. You're just not using them.
>until the EU said it was "cruel". Why do you care what some EU faggot says? Noone cares about EU faggots.
Carter Cook
>From some Swedish cucks blog Sure
John Collins
I've also argued against using the term "genocide", because of optics, even though it does technically fit the definition (see )
Kevin Wood
Give us a link to the real thread then so we can go to it.
Owen Jones
>Fuck off you glow in the light ultrafaggot >Niggers are being shipped en masse by mail to north europe every second of the day. All because jews are on a guilt trip of being half bred palestinian arabs. Get out of life.
He's clearly paranoid "Niggers are being shipped en masse by mail to north europe every second of the day. " and a schizoid.
>Hur dur this is a slide thread Then what is it sliding, faggot?
Jack Foster
>However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide.
so their argument is not that it isn't happening, but its not technically a "genocide"
they dont deny that the demographics are changing over DECADES, not centuries, DECADES and we're wiped the fuck out.
Noah Hall
It has nothing to do with "optics", it's just dumb and a really difficult threshold to prove. We have truth on our side, why would we intentionally make life difficult for ourselves by burdening ourselves with something that's so hard to prove?
Aiden Ward
Technically it's not on the site.
Justin Johnson
Fucking retarded
>HEHE THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT PER CAPITA IS EVEN THOUGH 95% OF CITED STATISTICS POSTED ACCOUNTS FOR THAT Sage
>difficult threshold to prove Merkel's "wir schaffen das", combined with statements from Juncker proves it though.. It proves that it's an intentional replacement of "nazis" in their/our countries, because they like shitskins more (they're more dependent).
David Watson
the complete inability of the opposition to present any type of factual argument is why even stupid people are figuring out that theyre either lying or covering shit up. the truth does not fear investigation.
Here's your proof nigger the chart used in the article that was supposed to prove it wrong. muslim countries have and are projected to maintain a much higher birthrate than their non-muslim counterparts. If you combine this with bringing in refugees it inevitably causes the muslim ones to replace the non-muslim by birth rate alone.
>And you still have border patrols with guns. You're just not using them. No we don't. The EU also banned rubber bullets so our border patrols are literally unarmed. See: youtu.be/gVjgqYMKFQo
>Why do you care what some EU faggot says Because if we don't care then your country drown us with fines
