If we should cleanse the world of niggers, because they disproportionately commit more crime...

It's Ok, they don't reproduce.

Literally wrong. Black slaves built all the palaces in the southern US.

Including the White House
"The D.C. commissioners, charged by Congress with building the new city under the direction of the president, initially planned to import workers from Europe to meet their labor needs. However, response to recruitment was dismal and soon they turned to African Americans—both enslaved and free—to provide the bulk of labor that built the White House, the United States Capitol, and other early government buildings."

They probably would tear it down again if they were allowed though

So would everyone else in the world. Canada/UK burnt it down but that's another story.

Great one Henk.

Why would you choose to exterminate any race just for committing crimes? If I were to exterminate niggers, it'd be because they are stupid, ugly and, most importantly, an existential threat to my people.

>pidgeon completely unaffected by blowdart in it's head

looks like your typical lefty

women commit just as much crime as men do, they just dont get prosecuted for it because judges are beta whiteknights. it's called the "pussy pass"

That's utterly stupid. Women don't commit more crimes, because they in general do less. Men evolved to do, women evolved to be.

>If we should cleanse the world of niggers, because they disproportionately commit more crime

Attached: strawman.png (500x667, 707K)

All crimes are committed by the living. Make life illegal, that's the only answer.

The crime is life, the sentence is death!

Actually that is true only in America. In other countries the crime rate is more even.
Blacks in America get special court treatment where they get light sentences, sadly they makes it easy to commit another crime adding up to felonies and more incarceration.
On top, Black culture in America is based on Hip Hop and gangsta culture, where hard work is not rewarding and often they call those blacks "coons".

>In other countries the crime rate is more even.
What the fuck are you talking about? Even Finnish jails are full of dindus. I bet it's even worse outside of USA.

>calls me stupid
>says some stupid pseudo-science platitude shit
stfu roastie

if we killed all men humanity would go extinct, user

Stupid was far too kind a word, honestly. You might honestly be retarded.

I'm just trying to make the comparative argument. Why is violence and degeneracy reason enough to denounce an entire group, be it race or gender. When data shows that one group is way more likely to commit crime for example, why is the right response to exterminate that group? Let me broaden the question to avoid strawman accusations: what should we do with niggers and why?

Very little people legitimately call for complete ethnic cleansing apart from memes.

Deportation sounds like a much more practicable solution.

>women evolved to be
top zozzle! i KNOW you are female to say some corny shit like that. what tumblr meme did you get that nonsense from?

you know the rules btw. tits. show them

Because they have very low IQs an their morphology is alien to that of Europeans. Think of it as humans of lesser quality who are only here to breed you out of existence and erase centuries of European culture..

Jesus Christ. It'd take me two minutes to illuminate you, but you are not worth even that little.

This is the first time I've ever encountered anyone this off-putting to even start talking about evolution or differences between sexes. Very few such cases. Sad. Good bye.

Attached: truly stupid.jpg (390x390, 114K)

expose your hoots or vacate the premises, thot

Under the instruction of white men. Niggers can only build mud huts in their own.

Because race has been shown to be the biggest indicator of crime in an area, and because you still have to have two sexes to reproduce. Also, men do the killing, not you wenches, as violent-minded as you are. You're too stupid.

"Built" lolololol

Yep. You are definitely a woman. I can hear the condescension dripping from your words. You're a fat hoss, aren't you?

Okay, but why? It's been proven there are decent human beings who are also black, so why not try to elevate the rest of them to that level. Not through leftist affirmative action and welfare, but through a drastic change in culture and an emphasis on fatherhood.

>so why not try to elevate the rest of them to that level.
What's wrong with whites? Why do we need to elevate anyone else, when we already have perfectly good people of our own?

But we've seen IQ raise over time through education and diet. So couldn't niggers get better over time in theory?

i have one of those blowguns theyre pretty fun. but my brother in law borrowed it without telling me that he wanted to shoot the stray cats with it :( i fucking hate cats too but that pissed me off

>So couldn't niggers get better over time in theory?
Are you honestly trying to say that niggers in America or Europe are living in hunger? Also, education doesn't increase IQ.

Attached: Faggots.gif (480x292, 1.99M)

As opposed to deporting them all. Which seems excessive and not politically viable.

she's even giving us the silent treatment

Attached: 1521033193225.jpg (530x298, 16K)

>Which seems excessive
Why? They got here somehow. They can leave somehow.
>not politically viable.
If there was enough will to get them here, there can be enough will to get them out of here.

White Men greatly benefit society more than harm it. Hell, they build societies .

No, but I'm asking if you think they could catch up after living in mudhuts for centuries.

Because someone needs to keep the lights on.

The niggers at Harvard only have about 10 more IQ points than the niggers in the ghetto..

Don't you think that's an extreme position? They're not all pawns being brought in by a giant boat with "freedom" on it, after living in mudhuts in the desert. Do you honestly mean all black people, or everyone with a criminal record?

They can't, they won't, and I wouldn't care even if they could or did. Why should I care about the blights of other species'? I can promise I won't deliberately cause extra suffering for you, but that's all you can ask of a moral man. There are millions of species suffering globally. Why should I care about this one any more than any of those others?

>Don't you think that's an extreme position?
It's extreme only if you happen to look at it from the other extreme.
>o you honestly mean all black people,
Yes.
>or everyone with a criminal record?
No. If you have a criminal record, I'd execute you, if I had the power. Those without one, I'd be willing to only deport.

So you think they're just slighty more intelligent monkeys who don't belong in civilized society? Does that mean there can't be any black scientists? Or do they have to have been mixed somewhere along the family tree?

John Deere grows all the corn in the midwest too

So what about the families living here since slavery? Where do you send them to exactly? Do you just drop them off along the coast of Africa? What about a designated nigger concentration camps somewhere in the U.S? How would you gp about that? What do you do with nigger sympathizers? I really want to understand your position on this

>So you think they're just slighty more intelligent monkeys who don't belong in civilized society?
I don't. I don't care how smart they are. I don't want Asians here either. Neither do I want Jews or space aliens.
>Does that mean there can't be any black scientists?
No. I work with a pitch black African. He's a nice guy, and we get along fine, but I would still deport him.
>Or do they have to have been mixed somewhere along the family tree?
Probably. The average IQ of blacks is ~85, and the standard deviation is between 10 and 15. For a black guy to be any kind of scientist, he'd have to have an IQ of ~120+, and that already is enough to rule out 99 % of blacks. Therefore, 99 % of blacks are completely useless for Europeans. And, honestly, you'd need to have an IQ of 140+ to have a chance of being a great scientist, which rules out almost every single black.

Who said cleansed? Just contain them in Africa.

>here since slavery?
>netherlands
Makes sense.
>Where do you send them to exactly?
Beyond the borders of my country. They're free to choose after that.
>What do you do with nigger sympathizers?
Despise them deeply, and punish them progressively more severely until my country is pure within reason again.

False cognate. Black people commit crime. Now ask yourself. What do black people do other than commit crimes? Do they bring forth societal development? Now apply that logic to whites. Do white people bring forth societal development ? Unless you are a nigger, you probably know the answer. Are you from Shariablue? I could give you some tips towards making better bait threads.

>Does that mean there can't be any black scientists?
They're simply outliers. You are analyzing it from an individual standpoint (which is inherent to the western world) You need to understand the concept of mass, which determines the quality of said group, race, specie, culture...

Note that I use the word "cognate" not in a linguistic sense but in a pure etymological sense.

I don't think we should kill niggers, I think they should be sent back. I justify it in the same way that I don't think everyone homeless should be killed and why I'm not going to start inviting all of them into my house, mainly because I don't want to have to babysit countless people, who have no discernible talent, and who would probably stab me to death the second my back was turned for my last £1, regardless how much I've helped them.

>why shouldn't the same apply to men in general?

Shouldn't you be attending your retards anonymous meeting?

>Muh justice
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This is about survival of our group. Who is right or wrong is completely irrelevant. Niggers should all die even if they were fucking saints, which they are not BTW

Attached: 22p2ng.jpg (648x500, 145K)

>I don't think we should kill niggers, I think they should be sent back.
I'm along the same lines, but I wouldn't go beyond unreasonable pains to make sure it wouldn't be deathless. It's like removing pests. It'd be nice, if you could just shoo all mice in your house outside, but you just can't. Usually you can just pick up a fly and toss it outside, but sometimes you'll have to swat it.

My coworkers looked at me strangely when I kek'd.

Nathaniel Rothschild and Naomi Campbell

Attached: 07pig442[1].jpg (500x750, 191K)

They tell us where "Wakanda" is and that's where we will take them, as long as it's outside the US.

Attached: 07pig541[1].jpg (1000x665, 217K)

>criminalize male 'immorality'
>legalize and applaud female 'imorality'

Men dont commit more crime, male acts are criminalized more.

what is her role?

Attached: 07pig425[1].jpg (1000x667, 220K)

concubine

that skank has an island with that stupid egyptian illuminati eye on it.

Attached: 07pig543[1].jpg (1000x665, 233K)

>Men dont commit more crime, male acts are criminalized more.
Where is this retarded meme coming from? Men do all things more than women. Men are braver, stronger, more reckless, more assertive, more everything. The only things women do more than men are giving birth and rearing children. If you honestly can believe that women do as much crime as men, you must be incredibly low testosterone yourself. Do you also believe women hit as hard as men or do as great soldiers as men?

coincidence?

Attached: timthumb[1].jpg (599x315, 72K)

wonder how many goys have been sacrified there

I'll admit I made an exaggerated remark to open a broader conversation about race. I know whites contribute more to society, but I want to understand why people here think the answer to the nigger problem is deportation. If there are outliers, decent people, then it can't be inherent to their race, can it? The other reason I can think of would be that you would want to keep the white race pure. But are there definite downsides to racemixing? I'm honestly curious.
But what if our group is our country, and those who share it's ideals. What makes race the special group parameter?
So you would let hard working decent niggers stay? Or is there something inherent in their blood that justifies their deportation?
Not true, testosterone is a definite link to criminal activity. Men commit more crime than women, how much more is disputable, but the fact itself stands.
I understand that, but I have a hard time sending thousands of people away, knowing there are dozens of decent men in there. Besides, some whites are more degenerate than blacks. Besides ease of identification, what warrants a race based deportation initiative above a merit based one? And why have a merit based one at all? If people are incompetent, let them die in the streets.

Because economically, men are a net benefit to society, while women are a net loss.

Attached: 1526269895013.jpg (638x558, 63K)

>niggers
Spelled Middle East wrong

Nature vs nurture
You can still overcome nature to some degree. The problem though is that the facts concerning blacks aren't spoken about because das racis'.

> Woman drowns her kid
> She had post-partum depression your honor! Look at these puppy dog eyes!
> Gets out scot free

Because they're, like women and unlike men, net loss for society but women at least have redeeming ability to shit out human kids. What use niggers have?

>then it can't be inherent to their race, can it?
If one blade is blunt, is sharpness not an inherent quality of a knife? That's retarded, and you know it.
>What makes race the special group parameter?
Race gave rise to the culture. Race is the only thing that lives after we die. Our cultures will be unrecognizable 1000 years from now. Our races might still exist, if we play our cards right. On one hand you have eternal life, on one hand you have a life of ~100 years at most.
>Or is there something inherent in their blood that justifies their deportation?
Yes. Every milliliter of it justifies it a million times over.
>some whites are more degenerate than blacks.
This argument can be made of anything ever to justify anything. Yes, some of us are pretty bad. But we can't send them away, since nobody wants them. That in no way justifies anything another species does to us.
>If people are incompetent, let them die in the streets.
Remind me, which one of us is the bad guy here?

Don't get me wrong, that's just best case scenario. If such a thing came into practice and some of them refused to go along with it, well, that's when you would have to stop being all rainbows and sunshine.

>Or is there something inherent in their blood that justifies their deportation?

Yes, the hardworking decent ones are the exception, not the rule. Rather than sifting through millions of niggers to find the dozen that are a benefit isn't worth it. Aside from that, to make sure niggers aren't desperate to come back, the hardworking decent ones would have to go in order to build the nigger country up.
I've had this kind of discussion with people before. They'll tell me how great it is that (((refugees))) are coming here because they're all doctors, nurses, and space technicians, and they believe it's a good thing because they're pro-(((equality))). However, if you question the (((equality))) of taking doctors, nurses, and space technicians from developing countries, who clearly need them a lot more than we do, for our own benefit, they go suspiciously quiet.

>I've had this kind of discussion with people before. They'll tell me how great it is that (((refugees))) are coming here because they're all doctors, nurses, and space technicians, and they believe it's a good thing because they're pro-(((equality))). However, if you question the (((equality))) of taking doctors, nurses, and space technicians from developing countries, who clearly need them a lot more than we do, for our own benefit, they go suspiciously quiet.
I don't get the point in either way. If they don't take my job, they're leeches who I have to support. If they do take my job, I'm out of job. I'll be pissed whatever these immigrants do, and I'd expect everyone to feel the same. There is only one single situation, where an immigrant is a positive thing, and that is when he can do a job that none of us can. How likely is that to happen? We have record unemployment, so I'm pretty sure we could do everything we wanted to with what we already have.

Simple labour?
>which one of us is the bad guy here?
Never said you were the bad guy, I'm genuinely trying to have a discussion with you. I may agree with you more than you think, but arguing against your own beliefs is the best way to reinforce them.
>If one blade is blunt, is sharpness not an inherent quality of a knife? That's retarded, and you know it
I understand the analogy, but what nurture? Do you think 'black behavior' and fatherly absence f.e. are correlated? Can niggers in your opinion be as socialized as whites, and, assuming they could, would you still want to deport them?
>Race gave rise to the culture.
Source? I think ideology and religion were more influential than race.
>Race is the only thing that lives after we die.
So it's a preservation and continuation of heritage? I can see that. But why not just make race mixing illegal?
>Yes. Every milliliter of it justifies it a million times over.
Why?
>But we can't send them away, since nobody wants them.
>That in no way justifies anything another species does to us.
So it's really a mindset of war. One group against the other. We don't kill our own soldiers, we kill the enemies'. Do you think individualism only works in racially homogenous societies and why?

Genesis 18:26
"And the LORD said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes."

No, you clearly don't understand the concept of mass because you once again, referred to anecdotal evidence.
>some whites are more degenerate than blacks
>there are dozens of decent men in there

You appear to be emotionally driven... Clouded by anecdotes and European compassion.

The thing that warrants their deportation, is their inequation to european society our culture, race...

I have spoken to the 'hard working niggers' like you referre them as, and half of them agree that the majority of IMMIGRANTS are a problem and should be deported ASAP.

>Can niggers in your opinion be as socialized as whites, and, assuming they could, would you still want to deport them?
Like I already said, I don't care. If a space elf superior to me in every conceivable way came here, why would I want it here? It would only take my job and end up ruling over me. Why would I want that? Think of it from the perspective of my genetics. What would be the best way to guarantee the survival of those? Certainly not bringing absolutely foreign competition against them.
>Source? I think ideology and religion were more influential than race.
Ideology and religion are results of race. Proof: wolves and sheep don't have cultures.
>But why not just make race mixing illegal?
We can also do that. But what would be the point of having this sub-group in our society, then? Macchiavelli already noted a thousand years ago about how dangerous it is to have subgroups inside your principality. Rousseau made the very same observation far more recently. The more homogeneous your society is, the more stable it is. And people really like stability and security.
>Why?
Because the average human has trillions of cells, and everyone of those has about 6 billion encoding bases. That's a lot of reasons in a really small packet.
>One group against the other.
Yes. That's the way of life.
>Do you think individualism only works in racially homogenous societies and why?
It works in homogeneous societies only, because we are social creatures. We are never truly alone. There is a machine of million people behind everything you do and everything you see. Think of it all as a family: If you go pick up a child from daycare, do you pick your own? You probably do. Are you an individual, then? You have a preference for that single child. Can that preference manifest in other areas, like employment or simply friendship? Yes. Therefore, you will end up having cliques and sub-groups inside your society based on genetic connections. And.. sub-groups are dangerous.

Good point. I've actually spoken with people who believe that "more people = more jobs", but they forget that reality doesn't work that way and people aren't just all interchangeable who you can just assign X, Y, and Z jobs based purely on the fact they're people and people do jobs. It's literally a (((Commie))) way of thinking that relies on anti-logic.

Niggers aren't people though, the Bible explicitly states that.

>Exodus 23:29
>Leviticus 26:22
>Jonah 3:7-8

Traditionally war was used to wipe out undesirable men. Those who were still single and not on a career path were scooped up and sent to the front lines. That’s the real reason why there was so much prosperity in the post war society, and also why we’ve been on a steady moral, economic, and social decline since we haven’t drafted in 50 years.

The only positive version is where you have immigration specifically for those jobs that you can't fill with the local population. Say your unemployment is sub 2% and you need the equivalent of 0.5% of the population to become physicians and programmers.
In that case I think immigration from say Yugoslavia and India would work out fine, and if they work for over 10 years and don't commit crimes then maybe citizenship could be acceptable.
It is another thing to import nurses en massé to put downward pressure on welfare wages.

>and India would work out fine,
Please no. That's exactly how Britain started out on its path towards hell. And just look out even our own universities right now. I'm just about the only white guy in my department. A good half are Indians, Pakistanis or Iranians.
>maybe citizenship could be acceptable.
I don't see the point. Why should it ever be possible? To motivate you to stay until you're old? Why would I want that? To motivate more of you to come? Why would I want that? If we absolutely must have foreign rocket engineers and doctors, why can't their and their families citizenships expire the moment their contracts end?

Fair enough, so name me as specifically as you can what you mean by
>inequation to european society our culture, race...

>why shouldn't the same apply to men in general?
Great question. The thing with blacks is that the crime is just one part of it. During the European revolution (see Ryan Faulks video) the violent men were killed off at something that would be called a genocidal pace today. I would not oppose bringing this back.

The second part is that men pay over 65% of all taxes in "equal countries" like Sweden and over 80% of the taxes in countries like the US. They also do about 99% of all scientific discoveries and start roughly 100% of all successful companies. Men arrest nearly all criminals and so on.

Blacks have passed the magic ratio where there aren't enough black men to take care of the bad ones. For whites you need to offset less than 1 per 500 to have functioning law enforcement, for blacks you need a minimum of 1 in 40. That is a massive law enforcement. And for blacks, that is also the top tier of their demographic that will be lost in the police force.

What you are left with, when blacks police themselves is an average IQ of 70 of the available workforce.

If we remove white men from any nation, you'll see how shit tier it becomes. Beaners are better to have then white women for instance. And that should tell you a lot.

Agree to some degree, though most of the best German stock was killed off during both world wars. The more Whites kill each other the more we weaken ourselves in the long run.

That's a bad reason to genocide people. However if they threaten your existence that's a better reason.
It would be nice to actually fight our enemies for the first time in over 100 years.