White Genocide And Eurabia Debunked

You're pretty retarded.

Attached: 222.png (399x614, 429K)

You can't bump your own threads. Also you already posted this thread yesterday. Come up with new material.

Wait, are you a bot? Or is English not your first language?

>The basic idea behind the flawed notion of “white genocide” is the notion that population demographic changes over decades (caused by e. g. different populations moving and interbreeding) constitutes an actual genocide. However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide
Why is the demographic changing in the first place? Why is wrong to not want demographics to change?

The fact is if a people have no choice in the matter, if the aren’t allowed to halt or revere the change, what difference is it to a genocide or at the very least an invasion? How is forcing a population to support another group of people instead of being able to put those resources toward their continual growth and survival not genocide?

Im trying to get a high paying job and save money but wages are low because of increased labor from immigration and taxes are high to support others. Both of those are forced on me and my kin by the government.

did you buy a pass or are you in hong kong? I know the captcha doesnt work in china.

Fuck, every thread. I need to get a proxy.

Mainland + Jow Forums gold

Just use a meme flag mate

Literal copypasta thread from earlier, OP got btfo in that one lol

dalits is not a race, neither are burakumin.
therefore racism does not apply to them.
classism (or casteism) does.

It is a Gene-O-Cide genocide, meaning the death of certain genes.

This doesn't have to be accomplished with killing or anything that strikes you as dramatic.

It can be done with propaganda (to racemix), economics, toxic (chemically) environments, distribution of pornography and other materials to develop sexually distracting habits, proliferation of abortion of babies in the target population (feminism) etc.

All of these together and you see clearly that Whites are on the decline. Not to mention that in terms of them being openly murdered, they ARE targeted by groups who have been taught to "join in" on the hatred of them, a.k.a. Blacks, who many of which, despite not being direct descendants of the American slave trade, have developed a victim complex regarding Whites, and openly kill them.

In places like South Africa. It IS open killing of Whites.

How'd you bypass the "great firewall"?

OP didn't get BTFO. All you retarded white supremacists copy and paste same recycled shit on this site and post it back as its some kind of "evidence".

China doesn't ban Jow Forums. Not enough people use it to bother.

China banned Battlefield 4 LOL. And countless other games.

china doesn't ban Jow Forums, but they do ban google, which kills the captcha, effectively stopping people from posting.

thats a lot of bullshit word salad fag babble you could have just said "i'm a sperm drinking fart sniffer who enjoys rimming fat mexicans" and saved a fuckton of effort

>Demographic change is not the same as genocide

Call it then "ethnic displacement", then. When cities become majority-minority from lily-white in a little over a generation, it's just semantics to play around with the words.

Also, you could argue that it fits "(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;", as these migrants use more social services and welfare.

>Black on White crime in the USA is genocide

Literally no one argues this. Blacks are violent and will deteriorate the quality of any neighbourhood they go into. THAT'S what's being argued.

>Europe will only be 8% Muslim by 2030

Okay, having 1/10 "Europeans" be Muslim in a decade is being downplayed a lot by saying that, that's a BIG change.

But this doesn't even take into account Blacks, Asians, South Americans, Arab converts etc. in Europe. You count all those together, and you'd get what, 15%? 20%? And just by 10 years time?

France is already only ~85% White, fuck me, this data is also misleading as it generalises all of these countries into "Europe" when the problem is much more concentrated in W.Europe and Scandinavia than Eastern Europe or Southern Europe.

Never have I met someone who actually debates these kinds of topics agains the right with honesty.

>The pitiful attempt at 'debunking' twin studies

She literally used the 'plants in different soils' argument. We know by many other means that most of the differences in intelligence between races is due to the genetic differences between races. And even if it was due to environment, who's creating the environment, dummy? If a White father tells his White child to read, and a Black father isn't even present to raise the Black child, whose genes do you think is causing the Black child's environment to not improve his IQ as much as it could?

youtube.com/watch?v=w3y2SDpIEhE

Attached: Oh Lord.jpg (382x400, 24K)

*Call it 'ethnic displacement and and poltiical and cultural dispossession of Whites by non-Whites", then, I always thought that the term 'genocide' was too emotional anyway.

It's obviously genocide under the UN's own definition.

No amount of intellectual dishonesty and sophistry will change that fact.

I like how left gets to redefine racism to mean "what conservative white people do" to claim exclusive use of the term for rhetoric, but won't permit a simple temporal extension of genocide.
>Demographic change over time due to population migration is not the same as the intentional physical extermination of entire groups of people.
Over time to INTENTIONALLY use population migration to make us minorities in our own countries, and with this mythology of us being the devil who knows what then.

Attached: lol0.png (1050x604, 1.3M)

being a clueless faggot suits you.

Also you dumb cunt and this leftist drivel is wrong on genocide the literal definition actually fits to what is happening in europe. Thats why you never hear the actual definition of the word form leftsits you dumbfuck.

You can bump your own threads, but only after other people have posted in them iirc.

Jesus, that's the ugliest neo-nazi you could find? If you're going to produce non-arguments, you could at least put some effort into them. I won't be so arrogant as to assert that I'm attractive, but just know that I have had nonWhite females approach me, for whatever that's worth in your mind.

youtube.com/watch?v=qx_dCM2Ukig

This a favourite of mine from the Great Faulk. It can be summarised as arguing that because dysgenic rates of Blacks and Whites have differed since they've arrived in the Americas, it must be accepted that they were either unequal then, or unequal now.

youtube.com/watch?v=tSoJMppGAAk

Attached: Oh Lord (15).png (676x907, 255K)

just imagine if we were planning to do the same thing to jews. of course they'd call it genocide.

under united nations definitions, deliberate replacement migration counts explicitly as genocide.

Doesn't matter what you call it, the fact is whites are being displaced in many majority white countries. Some countries have fewer than 25 years before they majority non-white. White people have a lot of distinct mental and physical traits that I don't want to see die out. Also I feel like I'm living in a dystopian future the way the US currently is. I hope we get enough support to have a white ethnostate before I die.

Attached: 1525148804784.png (730x192, 35K)

No memeflag this time?
Surprising.

You're aware almost every white American before 1965 would've been considered "Alt-Right" by today's standards?

Attached: 1512860749289.png (1240x1870, 2.9M)

>Look at me, everyone; I'm being retarded on the internet!
What did she mean by this?

>However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide.
This is a lie, the article is junk and the author doesn't know what he is talking about.

The UN defines genocide as:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.html

So, long term population changes are in fact genocide, according to the UN definition.
Please delete your post, it is false.

Delete your post already, it is a lie.

My cat said all people are equal.

>I've never been BTFO
The thing you posted included a blatant lie .

Attached: 1684276977542.jpg (599x655, 45K)

In addition to the Rome Statue, which certainly includes "Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;", we also find many other definitions that have been included in Wikipedia

Yehuda Bauer writes:
>[Genocide is] the planned destruction, since the mid-nineteenth century, of a racial, national, or ethnic group as such, by the following means: (a) selective mass murder of elites or parts of the population; (b) elimination of national (racial, ethnic) culture and religious life with the intent of "denationalization"; (c) enslavement, with the same intent; (d) destruction of national (racial, ethnic) economic life, with the same intent; (e) biological decimation through the kidnapping of children, or the prevention of normal family life, with the same intent…. [Holocaust is] the planned physical annihilation, for ideological or pseudo-religious reasons, of all the members of a national, ethnic, or racial group
What we are complaining about is "biological decimiation through... the prevention of normal family life"

Henry Huttenbach writes:
>Genocide is any act that puts the very existence of a group in jeopardy
Speaks for itself

Helen Fein writes:
>Genocide is a series of purposeful actions by a perpetrator(s) to destroy a collectivity through mass or selective murders of group members and suppressing the biological and social reproduction of the collectivity.
Again, we see that the media is attempting to supress the "biological and social reproduction" of white people

John Cox writes:
>[It] is a concerted effort to eliminate its individual members and to destroy the group’s ability to maintain its social and cultural cohesion and, thus, its existence as a group.
Indeed, do we not find our "ability to maintain its social and cultural cohesion" under attack?

As a follow-up, what OP is doing is genocide denial. Let's see what our good friends at Wikipedia have to say about that:

>Those who were involved in the perpetration can get away with the crime of genocide. (e.g. Ottoman Courts-Martial of 1918-1920)

>Studies by genocide scholars have shown that denial of a past genocide is one of the indicators of future ones. The deniers within the country are three times more likely to help commit the crimes.

>In many countries where the government denies genocide (e.g. Turkey), education on this event is non-existent, or the children are told it is a myth. Writings on the truth of the event result in the persecution of the author and publisher.

Attached: 1526382191304.png (672x451, 22K)

Jow Forumstards are generally pretty degenerate when it comes to this, and seeing some argue that the best way to preserve the White race is to breed with Orientals numbs the mind as ice does to skin.

That being said, what the unattractive man says is true. In a very real sense, groups need to reproduce, or they will cease to exist.

Attached: 080.jpg (1280x853, 133K)

Wait.... hol up. You be telling me.... White Nationalists are degenerates?

Shiiiieeeetttt nigga, you must be a shill

Attached: 1525976921495.png (5117x1945, 1.34M)

What a dumb image.

t.butthurt

Attached: 1518968400674.png (444x638, 245K)

Jow Forumstards, retard, not "White Nationalists".

You may as well lump in everyone who regularly watches Fox news with Republican voters.

Attached: 133.jpg (1429x1600, 542K)

>Most of the observed over-representation of African-Americans in crime statistics can be explained by various socio-economic factors and related factors.
Dey was good bois dey dindu nuffin

huge demographics over as little as 10 years is genocide you cunt.

Attached: D2AC926B-0014-48AD-96C4-F5BCE7B92CC5.jpg (285x322, 59K)

>Demographic change over time due to population migration is not the same as the intentional physical extermination of entire groups of people.
1. it is according to the UN
2. the effect is the same, so it's weird that you're hung up on this point
3. I'm glad you fucking jews are at least willing to admit what you're doing now

So they basically play a gay word game about whether or not it constitutes genocide? What kind of retard is this? It's morally abhorrent whether it's genocide or not.

No, it fails to address that a decline in birthrate has causes, which go beyond personal choice.
If people do not feel financially capable of having children or are forced to focus more on careers, you will see a decline in birthrates, without a decline in people wanting children.

Also the picture you just posted literally lacks ALL understanding of WW1 and the tensions in the geopolitical situation during that time.

Yeah, blabber about Nazi Germany and Krauts all you want, all White peoples were what you would now slur as 'neo-nazis' at the time.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-05-16 at 9.35.45 pm.png (1152x230, 65K)

Yes let's start arguing I'm what constitutes a genocide while in the meantime your country is sold out to middle East Arabs. In early 19th century there was no such thing as the world genocide, does that make the genocides that happened any less wrong?

It's being orchestrated by a powerful elite and the net effect is identical to genocide, but we don't define it as genocide so it's totally ok :^)

Attached: 1380593479221.jpg (768x716, 105K)

...

>we could be pursuing authentic traditionalism but for the insistence of a clutch of retards on making it indistinguishable from Nazi nonsense
god dammit.

Attached: dsafgfd.jpg (400x309, 30K)

R A T H E R

L O S E

T H E

W A R

I'm more thinking about what kind of retard wrote the post and didn't actually think it through in the way I did. He purely focuses on the word genocide which to be honest, is ultimately irrelevant. The word you use doesn't change the nature of the thing. Of course he's one of those skeptic retards.
You're not allowed to wonder why your grandfather's generation were all married with stable jobs at 25 whilst that's impossible for your generation. Enjoy your niggertech and cheap services though.

T H A N

G I V E

F U L L

E Q U A L I T Y

T O

T H E

A M E R I C A N

N E G R O E S

L O O S E
O O S E L
O S E L O
S E L O O
E L O O S

T H E
H E T
E T H

I literally just want to incentivise and make it significantly easier for people to start families at a young age. Everything else would follow from that, you don't have to try to recreate Munich circa 1937.

W A R
A R W
R W A

op btfo

>The basic idea behind the flawed notion of “white genocide” is the notion that population demographic changes over decades (caused by e. g. different populations moving and interbreeding) constitutes an actual genocide. However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide.

so we are literally right, genocide just isn't an accurate word describe what's happening lmao ? so it's basically genocide. we are right. why the fuck are you cunts so retarded.

exactly, which starts by understanding how the family unit, and only the family unit, and its reinforcing virtues are the best institutions for promoting that, because they guarantee stability
anything else that just focuses on the simple reproduction part but not the supporting functions that take place after the birth is doomed to failure, which included a lot of stuff Hitler pondered when he tried to start injecting Eugenics/survival of the fittest ideology into traditional marriage

It's called white suicide
And it's fucking beautiful

Attached: Screenshot_20180516-081323.jpg (1054x1385, 441K)

Is this a thread against the article?
Because it's dumb, real dumb.
Even if the population of immigrants is 2, if they have a higher fertility rate than the hosts, they will overtake them numerically in time.

I concur, the association does not even have any justification, the beliefs of the right today don't descend from the strange tangent to Western civilisation that was Nazi Germany.

Attached: America .jpg (788x1000, 134K)

Back to redddddit, scumbag

Attached: wat.jpg (574x420, 142K)

You forgot how we have hundreds of videos of them admitting white genocide.

White Genocide Is Real - In Their Own Words
liveleak.com/view?i=aec_1508296335

White Genocide Is Real - In Their Own Words
bitchute.com/video/cTykEjkGNRzB/

Attached: 1950 Brazil rio white.jpg (1280x1268, 175K)

This is too obvious a samefag to not be a troll.

>Most of the observed over-representation of African-Americans in crime statistics can be explained by various socio-economic factors and related factors.
"Muh socioeconomic factors."
Poor white communities don't have astronomical murder rates.

Attached: PaleBois.jpg (960x956, 96K)

> White genocide isn't real because semantics semantics semantics.
> Also, blacks don't commit more crime, well actually they do but it's because they have a greater tendency to low-education, poverty and every other traits correlating with criminality so it's not really their fault.
Really activate my so᠌y.

Fuck off, you just tried shilling this bullshit yesterday

This. Whoever use it is retarded. They must think people will automatically join their side because wow, genocide is super bad.

Great threats requires sarcastic euphemisms, not retarded hyperbole. Speaking "non-optional cultural enrichment" convinces much more people imo.

Thanks Davido-kun, I hope that you enjoy the rest of your holidays, assuming that your stay in Taiwan is not business related or that you are a native (if you are, you have a strange curiosity in Western politics!).

Attached: Ilium.gif (500x254, 1017K)

>>The basic idea behind the flawed notion of “white genocide” is the notion that population demographic changes over decades (caused by e. g. different populations moving and interbreeding) constitutes an actual genocide. However, this does not actually fall under the definition of genocide.
this is correct. the suffix "cide" in genocide means "to kill". same as homicide or suicide.
a better, more accurate term for what might happen to indigenous europeans in the future is - ethnic cleansing.

Attached: 1494030020317.jpg (960x685, 76K)

semantics matter. semantics will be used against you on important matters throughout life. it is important to use the right words when arguing your case because if you dont people will disregard your argument entirely or think you are uneducated.

>The Eurabia conspiracy theory is based on the flawed notion that Arabic countries are plotting to transforming Europe into an Islamic republic by sending a deluge of Muslim immigrants with enormously high fertility rates compared with Europeans.
right, "Arabic countries". (((Kalergi))) in his own words:
>The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. [...]
>Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.

OP is a faggot
Death to all commies
Squeeze the juice

>semantics semantics semantics

Ethnically displacing an entire population is not killing but will result in the end of that population.
And there are a lot of people who want to abolish "whiteness" and hate whites with a passion to the poin they want whites gone.

Attached: abolish.jpg (464x508, 40K)

I like how OP has no counter arguments and just goes straight for the ad hominems when he got BTFO by other anons.

Just pure faggotry

Attached: 62BA77AD-EC0B-4300-9FC5-8CBE734C6553.gif (500x500, 779K)

nigger we see it happening, how can they even deny it at this point.
I hope Soros cooks up a large batch of fresh niggers in order to accelerate things more

But under UN’s definition it is genocide.

What’s the difference between ethnic cleansing and genocide anyways?

Then go cry to the U.N. about.

china #4

So you conceded then?

Attached: 81ED9C87-79B1-4F6E-9C5B-16661FFE7F71.png (420x420, 288K)

Reminder that OP wants this extinct

Attached: DKkwfJcUEAEiyzh.jpg (596x447, 55K)