GET FUCKED STREET SHITTER

The bill has to be passed in the house. It won't pass, and they know this.

It's just more positioning for midterm campaigning.

Attached: tumblr_inline_p89vfiRyDC1vfcvcn_540.jpg (500x700, 135K)

So wait, because the whole situation is confusing to me. Did the guy succeed in doing what he wanted to do or did he fail?

Attached: 1525192688690.png (595x584, 352K)

WE DID IT REDDIT

Yep NN wasn't the real goal but unchecked vigilance.

Net Neutrality is like one of the biggest useless slides ever it seems. It distracts people on a different autism level to not admit who the real enemy is.

>le land of the freeeee

Google, Facebook, Netflix etc. are going to have to pay up to the ISPs instead of pretending that they're just like every other internet user
so it's going to cost these huge progressive organizations a shit ton of money while the average person isn't going to care

Someone forgot that the House of Representatives exists kek.

Why hasn't nobody killed this bastard yet? A well placed sniper shot would take him out.

This is why we have the 2nd Amendment. If we got corrupt people, take them out.

Attached: Vss_vintorez_01.jpg (2558x876, 190K)

Ah yes, the evil guy who wants to take power away from the government.

Attached: Smug Aoba.jpg (262x274, 19K)

Fuck off Hogg

and give it to the three letters.

Go ahead man, why don't you try?

there are a lot of lies and disinformation around this issue but most of it as usual comes from the right wing corporatist kikesucking Republican faggot shitlords

No, I'll wait for an article that someone sniped him.

>It won't pass, and they know this.

>193 Democrats

>132 Republicans didn't sign letter supporting Pai
gizmodo.com/132-house-republicans-did-not-sign-this-letter-supporti-1821272965

sounds like the only real threat now is a presidential veto

Attached: 1524944680503.jpg (640x640, 63K)

>implying there are no 3 letters in the government.
They're both bad, the difference is, coprs are at least driven by $$$ and will prioritise profit. Ff some bad decisions will hurt their bottom line they will change or be taken out of business by competitors who will probably be just waiting for one of the distributors to shoot themself in the foot with some retarded package. Meanwhile, you never know what the fuck will the government do, apart from trying to get even more power than they already have.

Nah the US intelligence agencies have a bad case of to much freedom.

What a fucking shill you are... Like the average person wasn't affected at all by ISPs dicking on companies like Netflix, oh wait, they were the ones actually afftected by the ISPs dicking with speeds. You are either a shill or a moron. What a time to be alive when I actually hope you are a shill lol.

>regulating utility monopolies is communism

Attached: 56by6y56y.jpg (800x800, 66K)

Both, the Democrats and Republicans hate Pai with a extreme passion and they probably want his head on a platter. I bet even CIA, FBI, and DOJ hate him too.

What does that even mean, senpai.
These monopolies exist because of regulation in early 20th century so companies would lay down phone lines faster. Also where have I said anything about communism?

>Also where have I said anything about communism?

just your aversion to regulating utilities because "government" is involved.

There's a reason we made market regulations, so the public don't get raped on prices and businesses don't put white paint in milk.

I think the agencies we never trusted are being untrustworthy.

>lol

you have to go back, you worthless fucktard

no one cares if ISPs throttle Netflix because they have 10,000% more data than everyone else combined and now you have to watch Dear White People in 480p. go fuck yourself

>businesses don't put white paint in milk.

>"without the benevolent state protecting us all, evil capitalists would put poison in all the food and kill everyone"

SMAAAAAAAASH CAPITALISM!!!

all kinds of immigrants are fucking with USA lel

>charges for both bandwidth and priority
>throttles competition
>can even censor opposition

So good lol.

>monopolies are free markets

brainlet detected

So. Much. This. Why do right wing retards want to pay 500x more for internet access and have all their favorite sites BANNED?

Truly republicans are everything wrong with the world...

Do you really want the internet to go back to how it was before 2013 when Net Neutrality was enacted by our lord and savior Barack Hussein Obama? Do you remember how bad the internet was back theN???????????????????????????????????

I'm against any government regulations though. Apologies if I was unclear in my post. I was convinced that Net Neutrality = Government regulation, repeal = more power in companies hands.

>There's a reason we made market regulations, so the public don't get raped on prices and businesses don't put white paint in milk.
if a company does then it quickly goes out of business. Not to mention, without government holding power over internet providers, internet providers will not lobby in elections and such because they will gain nothing, meaning people won't be shafted by politicians in that regard.

Everyone in high places in the US is untrustworthy, the only thing that is is money and without government regulations you have more power as a consumer, you can argue that it doesn't matter because comcast and the rest have monopolies, but didn't NN also made it so small network companies can't start out because they can't provide required bandwidth?

>"without the benevolent state protecting us all, one big rich guy would get a monopoly on all the milk production in the entire country and then he would put white paint in it and kill everyone"

SMAAAAASH CAPITALISM!!!!

Something tells me you're baiting, but with NN don't people pay more because they have to pick up the tab for companies like Google using much a fuckton of bandwidth and paying less than they should have because NN?

>founding fathers put eminent domain in constitution because they are communist

absolute brain death

Why the fuck are you just bringing up random shit unrelated to what I'm posting? Go die of AIDS

>all kinds of poo are fucking with the loo

>I'm against any government regulations though.
theres your problem.

maybe we shouldn't have police or fire codes

>nternet providers will not lobby in elections and such because they will gain nothing

what they gain is anti-competitve advantage by government NOT regulating.

> but didn't NN also made it so small network companies can't start out because they can't provide required bandwidth?

actually it didn't

> Go die of AIDS
>t. literal fag

ISPs can also block Jow Forums and other bad goy sites too w/ NN you stupid kike.

>theres your problem.
>maybe we shouldn't have police or fire codes
Please provide arguments why do you disagree with me there, because you provided none.
>actually it didn't
I must have been misinformed on the matter, sorry

also required by Jow Forums policy
>reddit spacing

לעזאזל עם זה

Attached: 1447297063014.jpg (297x365, 36K)

Dont try to argue for NN here. Brainwashed burgers will fight you till the last...

Attached: 1513816405668.jpg (885x516, 359K)

That would imply they would drop prices but they wont. Instead they could charge you not only by bandwidth but also by priority.
For example, if all rich kikes in your neighborhood had the premium package and they decided to fap while you had a less expensive package, your speed would be shit since their traffic would have priority over you. Said premium package most certainly would be expensive (this is on the individual consumer side).
On the content creators side given that they would pay more it would eventually cause a mass spam of ads and possible speed reductions. Also if said creators had a beef with the ISP's they would be fucked. It also opens way to literal extortion.
It really sucks.

Don't argue against government regulation here. Brainwashed euros will always fight you till the last shilling for more government.

AT&T literally fucked with Jow Forums in the past.

>*fap to porn being streamed

Sometimes its actually a good thing. But hey, be a hardcore principle dude if you want to. I for one wants my internet the way it is.

Attached: 1513817571741.jpg (1000x563, 339K)

I don't understand why people make the argument of
>''your internet will be slower unless you pay more''.
Why don't you make argument that maybe, your internet will be the same BUT if you pay more, it will be faster, so if you only need to do banking and email you can pay less, but if you stream a lot of stuff you'll pay more. What is wrong with more customer choice? I absolutely can see that maybe companies will be able to shaft you, but that might be against their interest to get as much profit as possible. Not to mention the government can also fuck you over.
Like it or not, with NN in place, consumer has no power, under NN you can at least boycott

I can respect that, we can agree to disagree

he succeded but some fags are trying to undo it, but it has to pass through the house, whoch it wont, in short, OP sucks cocks

>A shit skin in literally any field from food service to politics.
>They're human trash.
Wow, how surprising I'm so surprised.

>Please provide arguments why do you disagree with me there, because you provided none.

why don't you start with reading the history of the Gilded Age, where monopolies controlled every aspect of production at the expense of quality of life for most americans.

If monopolies want """freedom"""" to crush competition and price gouge, then they can enjoy freedom from police and fire protection, courts enforcing their contracts, access to public roads and airways.

how would they enjoy that ""free market"" alternative?

This poo and 4 of his unaccountable buddies having unlimited censorship\regulatory control over all broadband internet in the US behind closed doors is not "net neutrality", you fucking retard.

>the consumer has no power
You pay for bandwidth and your traffic has equal priority to anyone else. Whats not to like?
I guarantee you that the cheaper/average packages would be absolute shit.

>its not private companies doing the censoring

brainlet detected

What? The kike's were mad that the Trump administration overturned their 2015 take over of all broadband internet in the USA, which faggots like you call net neutrality.

Admit that you have no idea what's going on.

>Everyone in high places in the US is untrustworthy

So the solution is become untrustworthy cause if everyone is untrustworthy no one is?

>nn stops monopolies

brainlet niggerfaggot detected

>but it has to pass through the house, whoch it wont

you sure about that?

in an election year?

gizmodo.com/132-house-republicans-did-not-sign-this-letter-supporti-1821272965

Attached: 5432533.png (939x674, 288K)

>le series tubes meme

see yourself out

>the government imposes ISP's that all traffic is treated equally and that they cannot discriminate on an individual basis based on data priority
>"..buh buh da guberment censors... like it decides to forbid stuff"
Dumb fucks lol.

LOOK HE IS MOCKING THE HACKER KNOWN AS 4CHINS.
>REEEEEEEE

Attached: reee.jpg (512x288, 19K)

The fuck are you talking about? The internet was doing just fine until the Obama administration decided to take it over in 2015. I know you're too retarded to realize this, but 5 bureaucrats having unlimited power to censor anything on the internet behind closed doors is not a good thing. It was clearly intended for Hillary's administration to censor anything she deemed "muh rusha". This has nothing to do with "Net neutrality", which existed as a legal precedent since the 80s, but a power grab by the Obama administration that the Trump administration corrected.

Poo loo btfo

All these paid shills for CuckCast

Attached: post-29676-Comcast-because-fuck-you-meme-dakt.jpg (335x175, 9K)

That's not what happened, you fucking retard. Pay attention.

Obama didn't invent net neutrality it existed before 2013. This is another key talking point of lying, brain dead Republican shitbag kikesuckers. What Republicans want and what ATT, Verizon, Comcast, want is complete control over the internet and everything on it so they can gouge profits through rent seeking. Now go KYS faggot.

>5 bureaucrats having unlimited power to censor anything on the internet behind closed doors
Which part of the bill allowed that?

It shouldn't be legal to spy on me under no circumstance.

132 out of 239 didn't sign it. 107 of 139 did.

Every Democrat didn't sign it either so it ain't passing through the house

>muh comcast
Sorry, this board is for adults only. Some of us remember a time before the kike takeover of the internet in 2015, which handed 5 beurocrats effective ownership of all broadband internet in the USA. Non-children can assure you that the internet only got better, faster, cheaper and more open over time.. Up until 2015 of course.

>In 2007, Comcast, the largest cable company in the US, was found to be blocking or severely delaying BitTorrent uploads on their network using a technique which involved creating 'reset' packets (TCP RST) that appeared to come from the other party
>(2009) AT&T has apparently declared war on the extremely popular imageboard Jow Forums.org, blocking some of the site’s most popular message boards, including Jow Forums and the infamous /b/

lol, go eat a bag of dicks

>but 5 bureaucrats having unlimited power to censor anything on the internet behind closed doors is not a good thing

literal bullshit

its about stopping paid whores from letting internet turn into cable television

hows it feel to be a useful idiot for utility company lobbying?

132+193= number of people NOT supporting the Poo rules at FCC

Cool. Then you should be against 5 bureaucrats arbitrarily controlling what content you see. You should be offended that the kikes on the TV lied to you and told you that it's what "Net Neutrality" is, despite the fact that it has existed as a legal precedent since the 80s. You should be happy that Trump's FCC came in and correctly realized that they should not have that insane power. You should not be crying that they voluntarily threw the ring into the fire, bringing us back to where were were in 2015. Instead you fucking faggots are crying in the street over unaccountable bureaucrats giving up draconian powers they should never have been given in the first place. It's fucking pathetic.

>supports letting 5 companies control what you see
>not a part of the kike takeover

nice try shill , i dont get a paycheck from ISP's like you faggot

>Then you should be against 5 bureaucrats arbitrarily controlling what content you see

you mean 5 companies. none of this shit u bring up is any part of net neutrality rules.

literally a lie

Who is this?

a poo trying to outlaw the internet

>Up until 2015 of course.
But the 2015 reclassification only gave FCC back its enforcement power which it lost in 2014 in a lawsuit against Verizon.

They can do that with net neutrality too. Net neutrality hasn't stopped them from taking down other shit.

The fuck are you rambling about, Mr. Reddit spacing? You claimed the government simply added "Net Neutrailty rules" (which already existed since the 80s), when the reality is a tiny handful of unaccountable bureaucrats completely took over all broadband internet in the USA in 2015, giving them the power to micromanage every single aspect of broadband internet behind closed doors, including the content and the infrastructure. Those of us who aren't retarded correctly realize that was not necessary to enforce "Net Neutrality" rules, which already existed. Again, admit that you have no idea what's going on and you're just winging it at this point because someone on Reddit told you it makes you virtuous

You don't know that, you might be right but you also might be wrong. I see your point, but some people absolutely don't need as much bandwidth as you and I and maybe they'd rather pay less. Mind you, I'm not American so I don't know the prices or the bandwidth of an average American user, but in a perfect scenario, when Google and others would have to pay extra for extra bandwidth, the price for the bandwidth for an average user should go down. NN is like internet socialism imo

Yeah thats 375 people all together.

375 people didn't sign it.
107 people did sign it.

Roughly 77.22% didn't sign it.

inb4 some fag says they like this guy just to be contrarian:
His wife is european, is that enough for you guys to hate him?

>NN ever actually coming back
I hate to tell you this, liberal faggot, but Net Neutrality isn't coming back, just because some leftist queers and 3 RINOs want it doesn't mean you'll get it. Kill yourself, commie.

Attached: 1525823065974.jpg (608x758, 115K)

Ajit Varadaraj Pai is a telecommunications director who serves as the Chairman of the United States Federal Communications Commission.
He basically wanted to take away a thing Obama and his cronies put in place. Don't listen to the autists telling you stuff like ''outlawing the internet'' or ''censoring it'', it's basically about which jew do you prefer to be fucked over, the government jew or the corporate jew

No, I mean the 5 bureaucrats who you want to own the internet despite the fact that they clearly don't want that power. Thank you for confirming that you have no idea what's going on. It's so fitting that every one of you clueless faggots use Reddit spacing.

>Roughly 77.22% didn't sign it

which is why its gonna pass the House.

The letter is AGAINST net neutrality.
The people who signed are AGAINST net neutrality.
The 107 is AGAINST net neutrality.

get it now?