What are some arguments against eugenics?

what are some arguments against eugenics?

Attached: 1287623098430.jpg (1177x2501, 373K)

Gattaca, the movie

>muh racism
That's really the only one.

You mean the movie where the miracle of eugenics makes life infinitely better for everyone and then one naturally born asshole steals someone's identity and puts a mission to fucking Saturn in danger by going to space without having the necessary physical fortitude?

Nothing.
Purely political correctness.

Nature and by extension capitalism is already the best eugenics system

That was pro-eugenics movie you simpleton.

>You mean the movie where the miracle of eugenics makes life infinitely better for everyone and then one naturally born asshole steals someone's identity and puts a mission to fucking Saturn in danger by going to space without having the necessary physical fortitude?
kek

"NAZI!!!!"

why is eugenics considered racist? if an african country wants to make the perfect african they are free to

Attached: 1297398732423498g.webm (634x720, 1.47M)

Who dictates what are good and what are bad genes? Who is in charge of deciding who gets to breed?
It will probably be a Jew deciding both and they will actively work against whites.

The Nazis gave eugenics a bad name by bringing race into it. Just make healthy smart people with various shades of skin.

humans are bad at selection.
nature will do it by trial and error forever.

Easy. Since the Jews take control over everything they get their hands on, the inevitable effect of eugenics will be that the Jews will use it to breed whites out of existence even quicker and create a global race of docile mutts within a generation.

Potentially to created utterly deformed people.
You know for like 8 supermans 2 disgusting mentally reatrded gnomes. So now you'll gotta gas them buddy.

she is very attractive

How did it end like this then?

Attached: 1446081771606.gif (480x228, 263K)

it eventually leads to wasted screen time that would be better spent on klingons or romulans

not an argument. iceland already does that

Attached: 1525172886820.jpg (2001x3000, 438K)

Multiculturalism.

With recent advancements in genetical engineering, eugenics is bound to happen.

Just with a different name

It's degenerate and anti Christian.
Crusades are fine though

>You mean the movie where the miracle of eugenics makes life infinitely better for everyone and then one naturally born asshole steals someone's identity and puts a mission to fucking Saturn in danger by going to space without having the necessary physical fortitude?

Attached: 1514696145194.png (750x711, 87K)

The argument against eugenics is that you'd ultimately be granting the government the authority to play god with people's lives. Your idea of what's "desirable" may in fact be viewed as "undesirable" in the eyes of the government. The act of "improving" the human race could be very subjective depending on who is in charge.

Legit.

Attached: 9828f71093d02dc44006ff3e488125ae.jpg (426x679, 53K)

I've been saying this for year now.
Africans could actually have an advanced society if they actually accepted the reality of race and iq and applied a strong eugenics program so that their average iq will rise.
But their pride won't allow them to do that, so it is easier to blame the white man and keep failed policies like affirmative action and diversity hire.

MUH FEELFEELS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (whatever that is).

Also, who decides who which traits are undesirable?

Because Eugenics = Genocide to many people

White boy, white boy whatch'a gonna do?
Whatch'a gonna do when they come for you?

Yeah that's what we want.
Smart Africans who can build nukes.

I like them the way they are thank you very much.
Dumb, starving and a total non-threat.

you give people like Merkel Trump Clinton or Macron the legal power to kill human beings.

that alone should scare you away from eugenics

Then white boys will never have white women ever again since the most fertile and superior men are black and arab and will take all of them for themselves.

The genetic clinic client.

You can't let (((governments))) decide that. If they had the power, everyone would be born a statist cuck unable to question them.

Everyone wants smart, beautiful children, so everyone would order them.

You filter for IQ and you make society white again (and asian).

Yet white women couldnt give two fucks about iq but muscles and masculine traits, something white boys dont have any left.

It depends on the form. Aside from the moral and ethical dilemma of it, negative eugenics tends to have the unintended consequence of breeding the best of the worst. So when you go to round up the undesirables you get the unprotected, dumbest, weakest of the bunch. The exception in negative eugenics might be for example Gladiatorial competitions where the best fighters continue on and reproduce. Positive eugenics is still widely practiced but it's not called by that name. There are tons of small things societies implement that tend to favor certain attributes in the population. Organized religions are a good example. Those who participate, follow and obey are recognized and helped more by the group thus giving them a potential boost in passing on their traits.

it takes away competition and incentive to work hard to breed

Some humans adopted stupid ideas
They burn the coal, they pay the toll
Darwin catches up to everyone who falls off the treadmill, whether it's their genetics or their behavior that trips them up

Humanity has a long history of rewarding sheep-behavior.

I'm not surprised that the majority of the population doesn't think for themselves anymore. Maybe in caveman days it was different.