They're going all out now

they're going all out now

Attached: 2018-05-17 01_49_43-A world of free movement would be $78 trillion richer - If borders were open.png (773x655, 381K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

wtf I'm a communist now

>“Labour is the world’s most valuable commodity—yet thanks to strict immigration regulation, most of it goes to waste,” argue Bryan Caplan and Vipul Naik in “A radical case for open borders”.

Wat

"the world"
Somebody would be richer but I'm not sure if it would be "the world"

>The quickest way to eliminate absolute poverty would be to allow people to leave the places where it persists. Their poverty would thus become more visible to citizens of the rich world—who would see many more Liberians and Bangladeshis waiting tables and stacking shelves—but much less severe.

Attached: 1479865240008.png (1421x682, 880K)

COMMIE COMMIE COMMIE

HOW DARE YOU SUGGEST CAPITALISM IS DESTROYING LITERALLY EVERYTHING AND SELLING OUT OUR HERITAGE FOR SHORT TERM PROFITS.

YOU JUST DON’T WANNA WORK

*sips malt liqour

GET A JOB YOU LAZY BUM. JOB JOB JOB WE NEED JOBS BOOTSTRAPS.

ITS NOT THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM IS YOU!!!!

HELIGOBTER RIDDDDDDEEEEE

Attached: 144429E4-D745-41BD-8495-8D930EA38828.png (650x750, 19K)

But almost all of that $78 trillion would go to the top 1%, so the left should be against it, right?

Really makes me say fuck borders n shiet

whos world?

Attached: 1494995021736.jpg (640x629, 47K)

perfect moment for an holocaust joke

Or an open borders for israel campaign

Capital isn’t the most important possession in the world, family is

and the quality of life for the average "world citizen" would be?

>If we flood the world with poor people, everyone will have more money. It makes so much sense! And that's a good thing.

>If lots of people migrated from war-torn Syria, gangster-plagued Guatemala or chaotic Congo, would they bring mayhem with them? It is an understandable fear (and one that anti-immigrant politicians play on), but there is little besides conjecture and anecdotal evidence to support it. Granted, some immigrants commit crimes, or even headline-grabbing acts of terrorism. But in America the foreign-born are only a fifth as likely to be incarcerated as the native-born.

>Life improves for the top 1% and a bunch of third world retards
>Life drastically worse for everyone else
Nah, I'll pass.

>A study of migration flows among 145 countries between 1970 and 2000 by researchers at the University of Warwick found that migration was more likely to reduce terrorism than increase it, largely because migration fosters economic growth.

Why dafuq would any high IQ nation want to import massive amounts of low IQ workers? Makes no fucking sense.
>pic related, although the faggot who wrote it actually supports it

Attached: download (4).jpg (178x283, 10K)

>
Would mass immigration change the culture and politics of rich countries? Undoubtedly. Look at the way America has changed, mostly for the better, as its population soared from 5m mainly white folks in 1800 to 320m many-hued ones today.

>The selectively-vetted h1b1 monkeys and Mexicans commit less crime than blacks born in the US
>Therefore we need more blacks

GET A JOB HURRRR

LAZY LAZY HAHA CAPITALISM IS PERFECT. I PLUMB TOILETS AND HAVE DONE SO FOR DECADES AND COME HOME EVERY NIGHT AND PUT ON SOME LED ZEPPELIN AND DRINK SOME ICE COLD BEER.

FEELS REALLY GOOD KNOWING I HELP PEOPLE AND I HAVE A GREAT ROLE IN SOCIETY. OPEN THE BOARDERS MAYBE WE’LL GET SOME BETTER ATHLETES FOR MUH SPORTS TEAM! MY FAMILY IS FINE KIDDO THE BROBLEM IS YOU YOU YOU

Attached: EE760AA6-20D7-487B-AB09-0D7E65E8ACA4.jpg (300x300, 15K)

>be a vicious serial killer, lib tards convice world that no passport or anything needed to travel anywhere freely. start killing on one side of the world and just freely make you way around to the other killing as many people as you feel like

80/20 applied to a global economy = a few uber rich financiers.

Who would be 78 trillion richer?

lol

This.

Free movement centralises wealth and is only more productive on a global level.

Jews

Is that a Porky in the upper right corner?

Attached: porky.jpg (576x566, 66K)

How much that vast some of money does the average person see? I have a feeling its around naught. So in essence we give up our sovereignty culture and borders and in return, Jeff Bezos gets another airbus hangar full of money.

Sign me the fuck up, that sounds awesome!

>a world with free movement would be $78T richer
LATER THAT EVENING
>Why does $78T dollars belong to the richest 1%?

Attached: 1258348900588.png (509x380, 204K)

They/we import low IQ workers because it drives the macro economy.

And are you supposed to think you are part of this "world"?

>But in America the foreign-born are only a fifth as likely to be incarcerated as the native-born.
If the government actually investigated welfare/SS fraud you could jail probably upwards of 90%. Just for clarity I'm talking about legals. I could have the border closed tomorrow if people knew about how much their schemes cost the taxpayers.

You mean the Jewish elite would be $78 trillion richer while everybody else would be poorer.

And we wouldnt see a dime of that

>a few giant companies are plundering the wealth of everyone
>open the world as a market for the few companies to plunder more
so progressive! yes!

Attached: 1509484500090.png (1194x1036, 88K)

78 trillion isn't even much like at all... white countries would plummet in wealth

And all concentrated in the hands of the top 0.1%. What do I get out of this?

Later that evening on Jow Forums
>Why do the Jews control $78T
>1% richest is 50% jewish
>Kikes own you
>real Holocaust when?

Attached: 76E9E7DE-6069-43FF-9775-DD3720691132.jpg (750x936, 73K)

You see proves my point

The left can't meme.

78t. Not even giving a 10percentile.
Mfw this pocket change.

Attached: 1524090408893.jpg (556x426, 102K)

Do these retarded faggots actually believe that violence is somehow tied to the land? Violence and crime are PEOPLE. The Congo isn't a mess of cannibalism and rape because it's built on an ancient alien burial ground ffs

Jesus fucking christ, WHO would be made richer? The (((1%))) or 99%?

Yeah I'm sure the neets are just dying to move to places that still have jobs fit for low IQ retards and surrender their western gibs.

>everyone moves where there isn't poverty
>Agenda 21 fulfilled without firing a shot

The rich globalists would be richer. Middle class and lower would be murdered or brought to poverty by niggers.

I think this would work if foreigners were not apart of minimum wage. If I could hire labor cheaper than minimum wage I would. Fuck

Forgot to add:
>No goy you cant move to that empty country, its a natural reserve now. What's that? Nah, i have a permit for that villa here.

>What do I get out of this?
an additional bunch of people competing for the same jobs as you.
you're welcome goy

(((CAPLAN)))

translation:
"every time we open the flood gates a little wider,
we plan to un-fuck that country's economy a bit so
that the (((academics))) can do studies proving it's a good thing

(((They))) get 78 trillion richer and the middle class disappears

cool, If I give half my wages to a homeless guy then he'll be richer, wow I'm sold on this idea !!!11!

The only reason that number is so low is because of asian immigrants who barely commit any crime.

That's a right wing meme you stupid faggot.

That's right, goyim.

Money is all that matters. Even when inflation makes it worthless.

Wait, where are the ancient alien burial grounds? Pls reply

>much GDP
But what will "free movement" do for crime rates, welfare rates, social cohesion and trust? Wouldn't the generous social welfare systems, public education, and public healthcare systems of the West collapse due to the massive influx of low skilled, low IQ and poor third worlders into the west?

Just because you're not smart enough to get into the 1% in your country doesn't mean rich people shouldn't take advantage of the poor. Besides the average American is already the top 1% of income levels worldwide.

Attached: milanovic-custom1.jpg (484x355, 42K)

>people have legitimate objections but just bribe them lmao
Is the left even trying anymore?

>Nazis BTFO

Attached: Screenshot_2018-01-12-03-31-20.png (720x1280, 339K)

that is the stupidest statement ever
They make that statement because you can say prove it, and they can simply rebuttal "disprove it"

and the reason why is because it's made up bullshit.
Lets use common sense shall we. If we allowed people to freely migrate where ever they fuck they wanted
They would obviously go to locations that are prosperous.
Then these places would no longer be prosperous, because those countries after paying for the massive unemployment with their social saftey nets. Increasing taxes to assist paying for these money drains. And then the increased cost of housing, the rampant unemployment and lowering of wages. Basically if this migrant activity was allowed unchecked. Would cause massive locust like plagues upon any country that was doing well. Reducing them to shit holes.
Then the locusts would move on to another country. rinse repeat.
While the countries that they devastate would take literally decades to recover if they can recover at all.

it's a fucking retarded idea.

>but there is little besides conjecture and anecdotal evidence
This is the worst part of it

Attached: 1486178041568.gif (500x375, 221K)

Well you see, according to studies, the media and every normie with Facebook:
Natural born male citizens in predominately white countries commit more crimes and acts of terrorism.
Whites in western countries also use the most welfare!
And immigration improves social cohesion through the means of tasty food from other cultures. The only trust you need is trust in your government. Your vote matters, so make the right choice.

Commodity? When can I start trading humans on the stock exchange?

And a movement free America would be much poorer. I like niggers to remain poor. All non whites should be shipped to Africa and walled off from humans.

The same way immigrating magically makes people smarter, healthier, all that jazz... okay, OKAY MAYBE their kids. Their parents will surely raise them to love and appreciate their savior culture, right...?!

(There's a homeless nigger I keep seeing on the way to work, I can't stop thinking about how east and satisfying it would be to hear him shriek in pain)

>free movement is good for the bigwig corporations that I actually hate and wish to abolish through socialism

>easy
*easy

checked,
but better translation is:
"Opening the flood gates makes us, the rightful rulers of this world, richer, goy. Now get out of our way and fight each other for our scraps."

These people are fucking retarded. They seriously believe you can just make wealth appear out of nowhere and make everyone equal instantly. Delusional at best.

>use the example of legal immigrants into the United States as proof that a world without immigration laws would be just fine
This is shitty propaganda that will only convince utter retards.

>The quickest way to eliminate absolute poverty would be to allow people to leave the places where it persists.
Not possible.

>Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs - NumbersUSA.com

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

You can safely guarantee that every single western social welfare system would be destroyed within a year. Starting with healthcare.

Look, they say this while also saying that labor will be obsolete because of AI. We don't need millions of 75 IQ dirt world colonists. They're obviously lying, everyone knows it, including them.

There’s literally nothing wrong in that pic. I guess it’s true what they say, the left can’t meme

So I can go to Africa and buy it all up?And its not colonialism?

Ohhh (((theyre))) just talking about white countries again.

I'm a Guatemalan immigrant living in the US. I started an investment company and I'm still in my early 20s. Would I have started this if I had stayed in Guatemala? I highly doubt it. Would every Guatemalan immigrant create capital like me? Extremely unlikely. Most just end up bogging down the price of labor, worsening the living conditions for those at the bottom.Open borders have a cost that I'm certain whoever made this article is ignoring. Productive people like me leaving my country just makes my home country worse off, further encouraging poverty there (Capital flight yadiyada etc)

(((Naik)))

Attached: 1513045229078.png (300x301, 144K)

nah. the jews don't need more money - they control the
whole money system. it's more about power and control.

unchecked immigration basically makes the
preservation (or formation) of local cultures
impossible, which makes a country easier to control.

This would flood the unskilled labour pool to such an extent that hiring staff would be cheaper than AI. Which I would imagine is one of the goals.

OPEN ALL BORDERS NOW

PRESIDENT DRUMPF......TEAR DOWN THE WALL!!!!!

^ this
It's not worldwide open borders if I can't go open up a mcdonalds in zimbabwe

(((((((((((((((((((()))))))))))))))))))))

They need to enter oblivion toes-first through a wood chipper. I can't see any hope that's actually worth a damn anymore. Denying my killers satisfaction as unexpectedly and horribly as possible is the only thought that brings me sleep anymore.

I forgot to mention healthcare as well.

It's an idiotic statement by globalists. they think that if they allow unchecked migration globally that's magically going to even out every country eventually.

And that is not the case, you can see this happening in all these countries accepting immigrants en masse. their systems are slowly collapsing.
1. due to bodies vs jobs available
2. The one HUGE thing these globalists overlook. LANGUAGE.

Unless english or some other common language is the default of the world. An immigrant isn't going to just "jump into the work force". And if they do, they will be low end, shitty workers. You going to trust a doctor who cannot speak your language and you go in for tonsil removal and you wake up with no balls!!??
oops...sorry.

no, the idea of globalism is a utopian wish list.
It works in star trek because they can create food out of thin air using energy. So money is now irrelevant.
Unfortunately, we aren't there yet

This so much

Or you could be responsible, work hard and climb the ladder of success. I am a poorfag but even though it is harder to move up in our generation, I know what to do to rectify the mistakes of the past and get out of the mess I am in.

A global socialist republic does not sound good to me, in fact it sounds downright evil. I do not want to see all the cancerous corrupt centers of power unified more and more. In fact that shit needs decentralization

>((($78 trillion richer)))

Attached: EchoesAct3.jpg (780x800, 91K)

It's almost like jews always play 2 sides to everything.....

>2. The one HUGE thing these globalists overlook. LANGUAGE.

This can be a plus if you're hiring staff to perform menial tasks in a warehouse. They're unlikely to be able to find a job elsewhere, and they won't know how to take legal action when you violate working conditions.

>the world would be richer
More money (in theory) would be in circulation, but how would it be distributed?
>$78 trillion
Pretty precise measurements that sound really high for pure theory
>potential gains
Either a high risk at the cost of destroying all national idenites and heritages/a way to weasel out when/if this fucks over more people than it helps
>objectors could be bribed
Practically admitting that they are willing to do shady shit to accomplish goals, while also ignoring the key principles of democracy by using money or other desierables to encourage decision makers to possibly go against their own supporters interest

Why am I not even supprised

Attached: 4E159473-A5DC-4D5E-BB17-6AA31D817367.jpg (750x500, 82K)

Just knowing my work might just possibly benefit a nigger is enough to make me consider welfare... Let them bitch about whitey sucking their teat dry, so long as it finally, blessedly, dries.

aand all of the money goes to the 1% and the jews

>but how would it be distributed?

We know exactly how it would be distributed.

They're pretending that the third-world works now to make people believe that.
It's an old lie, they tried selling it to us about 15 years ago.
Then the statistics came out and it became unviable so now it's the "humanitarian" spiel they use.

Attached: 1525904186590.jpg (684x1024, 110K)

The wealthy arguing to impoverish all and everyone else in pursuit a cemented legacy only of their own.

>refusing to work niggers get $100 dollars
>mudshits who spends all day demanding a Islamic government get $100
>public office holders (officially) get $100 unless they are part of a bad goy party then they only get $100
>factory worker get $100 and pays $50 in taxes

if thats true why does germany harp on about poland or hungary needed refugees? wouldnt they greedily horde them and threaten war if others dont send them to germany. wouldnt the refugees pay for themselves?