Stanford Professor Here, Let's Talk Psychology Warfare
How do you recognise propaganda online?
Which emotions does it propaganda appeal to?
Why does it do this?
What is the purpose of propaganda?
How can YOU effectively counteract propaganda?
I thought you guys might find this clip interesting
Don't Talk to the Police
youtube.com
Buzzwords, slogans, fallacious language. We're very well trained here.
I utilize top secret classified CIA brainwashing techniques desu
What about more insidious forms of propaganda or psychological warfare?
Can you think of any demoralisation tactics which would be used?
You sound like Hamlin from better call saul
Great, then you can tell us all about it.
Are these techniques still classified or just hard to find the declassified files, as Bill Clinton did apologise for the MKUltra program.
You mean like the Chad/Virgin meme that was pushed? Or the 56% Amerimutt meme?
Yeah, the better of us recognise that too. We call it "forced meme."
Timestamp or GTFO. LARP
Don't have a camera of any sort in this office as I don't bring my phone to work but if a student pops by, I can ask.
Yes exactly! Name some more of these types of things please and if you could expound upon the ones you have mentioned, how they are supposed to effect the individual emotionally etc, that would be really helpful. Thanks in advance.
Looking him up, he seems to be a friend to Chuck? Seems decent, thanks.
lol I get it now.
You want me to explain why being reminded of my romantic ineptitude is painful?
Oh I see, so you yourself have found the memes to be hurtful on a psychological level?
Did it affect you?
>Don't have a camera of any sort in this office...
It's 4:30 am LARPing faggot.
...you're not a very good psychologist, you know.
Make your own lecture slides, "prof". If you're really from "the farm", tell us what part of the quad your office is in
My Illuminati benefactors wouldnt appreciate me revealing such classified sensitive materials
We did this a few hours ago , just you were from Harvard .
Go away mossad, sad.
Early bird catches the worm. I come here at 4am. I worked as a postman for three years in my twenties, getting up early is part of my make-up now. I have inspired a set of graduates to do the same while listening to Debussy between four and six am.
I'm not going to risk tenure to do that but rest assured some of my colleagues know I am speaking with you. The university has some very good remote viewing programs being run by a group of chemists. I am sure some of the chans would love it here and would sail in.
Then help me be better.
How should I have framed that question?
No that was Annie.
It's Phil here.
Tell us where you go to lunch in the quad then
I bring a packed lunch of two avocados, bagel with cream cheese and a San Pellegrino sparkling water, in the glass bottle. I try and avoid over exposure to plastics.
I usually have earl grey tea in my flask as well but only the Twinnings brand or the teapig kind as I find the others to be overly perfumed.
OK you're a LARP, good bye
Where do you go for lunch in the quad? :)
professor really? I got to stanford too... you usually at coho? or other cafe near coho starbucks? wtf you doing here?
>How can YOU effectively counteract propaganda?
Ruthless mockery. Political Incorrectness. Skepticism to the point of paranoia.
Jow Forums works because we understand it's better to accuse (and abuse) 10 people of being shills, even if only 5 of them actually are.
On that note, I want to see a timestamped pic of Stanford stationary up your pooper, or GTFO.
Starbucks coffee tastes like candyfloss in a cup, I don't go near it. I do use it.
Coupa Cafe has a nice seating area outside and the cafe is pretty decent.
coffee*
Sorry I'm just back from Paris. The place is a mess.
All modern media is highly weaponized against females. Camera cuts to female smiles, certain tones and colors. The kikes have enslaved women and steer the world with their pigtails.
There was a Thai cafe in Jordan Hall in the past. No idea if it's still there, if I had to stop by campus today I'd probably checkout whatever's new in tresidder like a tourist. But you're a LARP so why do you care?
Who decides what goes on the front page of the site? Is it an algorithm or selected?
Would love some ramen with an egg in it.
I'm not a larper but I am being slightly intellectually lazy today. I thought this would be more profitable.
I have been dying to drink those blooming flower teas, I wonder if the Thai place would do them. It's purely aesthetic of course, I don't imagine there is a taste of great magnitude but I could be wrong.
Also:
Social validation has been quantized. You must get x likes and however many comments. You must have a certain level of "engagement" with this system of mental slavery that sells you back your social interactions at a cost of time and dignity. You will be chastised for not meeting your quotas and becone estranged for not walking in line.
Social media is open warfare on women and they are too fucking retarded to pull it together and see whats been done to them. Men can, and have, cut these cords at a comparably higher rate than women. But without women acknowledging these issues, nothing will be done. It is gleeful slavery.
>How do you recognise propaganda online?
Everything is propaganda, people can't help but shill narratives they support.
>Which emotions does it propaganda appeal to?
Depends on the propaganda, obviously, but usually fear.
>Why does it do this?
People don't like being afraid so they're quicker to accept your "solution" with less thought.
>What is the purpose of propaganda?
To push an agenda or shill a narrative.
>How can YOU effectively counteract propaganda?
Call it out when you see it.
Step 1: don’t repeat the title in your post
/thread sage
The menu was fairly limited from what I remember, so probably not. It was just decent food and was right there in the quad. Go to the old/new/old-again coho for something that will provide an experience.
The media coordinates messaging behind the scene "for the greater good". This can be seen clear as day with the turn in messaging this week from the NYT and Vice who have begun trying to distance themselves from "leftist hysteria" without calling it that. It's just continual branding. The mediasphere is literally, unironically, indistinguishable from professional wrestling if you understand what goes i to the production and promotion.
Yes you have encapsulated the scenario brilliantly. It is a rewiring of the dopamine reward system into a state of social slavery and servitude. I do spend vast amounts of time online but do not use facebook or the like at all. It's entirely unnatural to be exposed to those levels of people for analysis of your being and this breeds the behaviour of framing falsehoods to represent yourself, in the "wonderful" life you are having, to compete with others and inevitably rob yourself of self-esteem by failing to live up to the created false self, false image.
Who runs the centralized propaganda coming out of hollywood?
The themes are too coherent not to have a main office exercising top down control.
By the way, your views of propaganda are very very simplistic I doubt youre a stanford professor
Limited menus are great if they do each item brilliantly. Too much choice isn't good for me. I sit far too long navel gazing, undecided.
Out niggerkike
Propaganda is not online, its on TV, radio, billboard, and printed advertising.
Well I am a Stanford Professor and your presumptuousness is unbecoming in an academic environment which consists of but a few paragraphs. Always assume someone has something to tell you.
You will notice I am interested in your knowledge of the art of propaganda, so if you care to enlighten me, I would be very glad.
Game theory.
Do you have anything a professor would actually have, like some sort of theory underpinning any of this? You can't just say dopamine and expect us to be stunned.
The Panopticon is the Illuminati.
>Propaganda is not online, its on TV, radio, billboard, and printed advertising.
Woefully low IQ detected. Just keave the thread, please.
stfu you dick, no Stanford professor would write like that, this isn't Yale, chill the fuck out and give us something real or choke on a dick because again you're a LARP
No, I’m smarter than you.
18 years old? 17?
From your perspective, you operate inside "The Cathedral" which was constructed by the old world elite. You are not able to perceive the "Illuminati" (lol) as your entire sector was codified and curtailed ages ago. If you take your sector "seriously", you have already lost the battle against the builders of "The Cathedral". That said, there are clearly learning institutions of merit and value and Stanford is still among them. It is a shame the entire system has rotted and AI identities will one day replace you all.
Well it's part of a campaign of total spectrum dominance, complete surveillance 24 hours a day 7 days a week, at any location because people voluntarily offer their personal space to be occupied by radiating smart phone devices.
They willing check there location at restaurants, bars, parties, friends, families...
Making an infallible control grid which coupled with AI... Well, there isn't any escape from it.
So that's the overarching theory of the New World Order and it's foundations and willingly used.
People give complete profiles of their moods and behaviours which can be individually manipulated by their timelines (give less exposure to others thus acquire less likes - decline in mood.. etc), (negative news stories - decline in mood... etc).
Or people can be manipulated on mass. I mean it's mind boggling to think of it.
Every aspect of life, influenced and managed subconsciously.
One day?
AI have always run things, you should know that if you have any clout in academia.
Willingly*
their*
Sorry I am slightly dyslexic.
Soon, AI will be dispatched to boost a man's morale, or distract him. What do I mean? You ever see those pop up windows on porn sites that pretend to be chat windows? Thatis going happen for real and people will fall for it.
Better?
We are about to enter (less than 5 years) and information singularity where all positions will be considered true. Real time fabricated evidence will be continual (tech has been gushingly showed off hundreds of times now, see also: diminished reality) and rather than back down, people will recede even further into their sedation bubbles.
This LARP fucking sucks
I think this is already happening on mass. There are countless high functioning AI simulations running across social media and even Jow Forums.
If we wish to take it further, we should consult with Schrodinger on his ideas revolving around the puppet theatre of reality with numerous non actors which we indeed control!
Your attitude sucks.
Now I am entangled.
The majority of posts on this websote for the last year and a half have been robotic posts of some kind or another. The change in discourse was very real, Summer 2016 it began to become difficult to read. A newcomer would find this board totally indecipherable now, misinformation and nonsense everywhere that nobody even responds to.
Too late though, we are a virus spreading awareness. I have converted tens of people even in my "post national state".
I will not be returning to the flock and I will continue to expose propaganda. I have several large creative projects that will get international attention in a little over 2 years.
Hope to see you then, "Stan".
Yes however if we observe earlier happenings, we can see they were most likely manipulated directly via Tavistock. Such as the scientology backlash, interesting the BBC would run propaganda pieces against scientology.
I am not a scientologist and take the claims of abuse within the church very seriously, however I am curious as to Tavistock's role within it.
I'm thinking how to contribute as well.
Most bleeding obvious to me is the tactic used by late night shows.
Political statement -> Humorous non sequitur -> derisive laughter by audience.
Rinse and repeat 40 times per show. It's conditioning.
Well the media chose multiple "safe targets" in the mid 2000s. It was edgy when South Park had a gun toting Jesus. Steven Colbert used to insult NAMBLA every day (he would be off the air if he did this now) and attacking any religion with "no victims" (Scientologists are all "others" by virtue of being "connected" or famous, therefore derision is virtuous)
There's nothing to suggest it was Tavistock guiding Jow Forums, and you must always remember there are at least a dozen parallel groups representing other initiatives also engaging in these types of events.
That being said, Hollywood agenda is very easy to track and discern since they literally lionize and continue to re-sell their messaging. You can track the progress of their messasing.
it’s catholic canon that in the garden of gethsemane jesus christ saw every sin committed by human beings which means that he watched a guy blasting rope to waluigi hentai and still decided to sacrifice himself for humanity. absolute legend
What was the Donald Trump NAMBLA rumour all about? Who started it and why?
I have seen that infographic before. It's Project Mockingbird yes?
>Jesus saw every sharpie in every pooper
Do you believe in the immortal soul?
Doesn't sound much to me like you do by the general demeanour of your spirit.
infographic?
No idea if it's a known phenom. But after I stopped finding the 'jokes' on such shows as funny, and noticed the studio audience more, I slowly figured what was what. Realised that on so so many political issues I had an opinion but was completely and utterly ignorant about the issue itself. I'd simply been conditioned through laughter.
Never heard the rumor. I know that the DNC shopped around a case (multiple judges turned it down) trying to tie Donald to Epstein's rape island. But I never heard the NAMBLA angle. They never come up any more because muh gender identity (don't even get me started) and muh beleaugered homosexuals.
Care to give some insight on this NAMBLA angle?
How dark.
>'On mass'
>'Professor'
Fuck off larp
Many People Are Saying Donald Trump Donated to NAMBLA - NYMag
nymag.com
"The theory has been floated by several highly reputable Twitter accounts, and Google Trends registered a spike in searches for “Trump and NAMBLA” in recent days."
En*
I told you earlier I was dyslexic and it is common in MIT.
I was a cynical child who was oppressed ditectly by the state. No details. I experienced an ego death at a young age. No drugs involved. I would say I am driven and with prupose now, a loving and jovial person but with an incredible co tempt for manipulators.
As for spirituality, I am very open to it but have not yet come to a conclusion on what it is I "should" believe and what version is "correct". I know I can raise children who will be beautiful shining lights, and in that process I may find what I am looking for.
en masse
I do know the correct terms, I just don't use them for whatever reason.
>Don't talk to the police
More like don't talk to the ivory tower faggots
>40 posts by this ID
How interesting. I associate spirituality with mathematical perfection.
As well as this, the off world groups are difficult to define.
That's very good you will create intelligent creative beings for the world. People should consider very carefully before having children.
>1 off
Harvard Researcher here, Let's talk grammar and vernacular.
>How do you recognise propaganda online?
It's found on the websites of mainstream news outlets and contains the same blatant politically driven lies their news bulletins/newspapers do. Very easy to identify.
Getting pretty hungry for breakfast
>Do you believe in the immortal soul?
Do you believe in an ever growing number of immortal souls? Where do they come from, where do they all go? Do they look like translucent versions of the bodies they once inhabited?
>everything I know about professors at elite schools I learned from Hollywood.
Faggot, I've done kegstands with Harvard professors. No one talks in effeminate high language besides the faggots in the humanities.
Well I am a writer of fiction novels so I might alter my vernacular if I am so inclined and I do have a preference for the British spelling because it is my place of birth.
My grammar has always been somewhat less than perfect for I originally studied under the tutelage of a chartered physicist in spectroscopy and we really did communicate in pigeon scratchings for a time.
You obviously don't know how the physics and philosophy department overlap in their faggotry. We wore togas for a month.
>Always assume someone has something to tell you.
Are you that Peterson LARPer from reddit?
>We wore togas for a month.
I wear fur suits on a daily basis friend. Not impressed.
I'm not reading this bizarreness. I'm having a pleasant morning.
Enlightenment is likely close to mathematical perfection. I do believe we are not able to perceive something fundamental about our reality. As for offworlders, surely they exist somewhere but as yet I cannot reconcile a plausibke theory as to why they would be here and also be secret, unless they had already conquered earth decades ago and have been sven-gali-ing our leaders this whole time. Even then, to what end? Only something in another dimension or some kind of astral plane would do this, and again, to what end? This line of questioning leads to flat earth, mandela, simulation, and all other manner of defeatist prophecy.
lol ok?
Are any of you going to sit in the sun today?
I'm thinking of it.