Mark Fuhrman

evil man or true american hero?

Attached: 0863FD6F-AE79-459B-B1EF-F1A2E5E22518.png (320x192, 137K)

Other urls found in this thread:

content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/09/ex-prosecutor--oj-simpson-lawyer-tampered-with-glove/1
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

who is he and what did he do

Classic guilty face

Mark Furhman did nothing wrong

An absolute moron of a cop who could've gotten OJ found guilty had he not have tampered with the evidence.

In 1995, Fuhrman was called to testify regarding his discovery of evidence in the Simpson case, including a bloody glove recovered at Simpson's estate. Fuhrman was known to have used a racist epithet toward African-Americans during the early 1980s but claimed on the stand that he had not used that term in the last ten years. Simpson's defense team produced recorded interviews with Fuhrman and witnesses showing that he had repeatedly used racist language during this period. Later (with the jury absent), when asked under oath whether he had planted or manufactured evidence in the case, Fuhrman invoked his Fifth Amendment right and declined to answer. According to the defense, this raised the possibility that Fuhrman had planted key evidence as part of a racially motivated plot against Simpson. The audiotape proving that Fuhrman perjured himself—thereby undermining the credibility of the prosecution—has been cited as one reason why Simpson was acquitted

>did everything he could to put an end to the joose
Is he, dare I say, /ourguy/?

Attached: 1524871787807.jpg (300x300, 11K)

>some dumb burger who was born well after the 80s doesn't even know what happened with the OJ trial or who even Mark Fuhrman is.
Off yourself

he tampered with evidence?

Attached: Screenshot 2018-05-17 at 9.41.43 PM.png (1174x404, 83K)

The jury being mainly black women didn't help. Marcia Clark dragged the trial out FAR longer than it should have. OJ stopped taking his arthritis meds making his hands swell up and thus the glubs did'n fit. Mon Fuhrer Fuhrman gave the jury an excuse to free the man, but he wasn't the main reason.

i don’t see how that’s “tampering”

No he did not tamper with any evidence. He got caught using the word nigger and other shit like that on a recording he did for an interview. Basically calling him a racist to discredit him. Never proved to have tampered with anything

>who
racist cop in original OJ trial
this is shitposting OP you faggot
why not spend more than 2 fucking seconds to make a better post

reported

Fuhrman fucked up as well as Cochran. content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/09/ex-prosecutor--oj-simpson-lawyer-tampered-with-glove/1

Also, Fuhrman was just a lowly LAPD detective. He had no power or weight to throw around in the case whatsoever. They believe that Cochran and the defense team messed with the glove. But Marcia Clark isn't a bad prosecutor. She put a man in prison for life 3 years before the OJ bullshit. Vincent Bugliosi blames the acquittal of O. J. Simpson on Marcia Clark's and Christopher Darden's lack of trial preparation, prosecutorial incompetence, and lack of a trial work ethic.

Got to take that with a lot of weight as well since during his eight years in the Los Angeles County district attorney's office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, which included 21 murder convictions without a single loss. He was best known for prosecuting Charles Manson and other defendants accused of the seven Tate–LaBianca murders of August 9–10, 1969. Although Manson did not physically participate in the murders at Sharon Tate's home, Bugliosi used circumstantial evidence to show that he had orchestrated the killings. Way better prosecutor than Clark

t. Jamal

It's summertime, user. Quality control is at an all-time low right now.

He's right though. They had Fuhrman on tape saying "nigger" a lot, crossexamined him as being "racist" and used it to their advantage.

was his acquittal by a majority nigger jury retaliation for rodney king?

A fuck up, but Marcia Clark is the one responsible for OJ getting acquited

From an original jury pool of 40% white, 28% black, 17% Hispanic, and 15% Asian, the final jury for the trial had ten women and two men, of which there were nine blacks, two whites, and one Hispanic.

They could have easily called for a special prosecutor for the case but no. Had to pick some bitch with a perm.

Probably not. But the jury wasn't certain that he didn't

fuck you it was a legitimate question

I agree with Bugliosi. There was no need for this relatively easy case to last as long as it did. Gut, as for Fuhrman tampering, it's highly unlikely since he was due to retire in less than a year and it would have torched everything he had worked for.

also I’m not the one who asked who he was

Hero? For playing the part of a racist of cartoonish proportions and helping a double murderer get off? The real question is this; How much did Johnny Cochran pay this ass-clown to throw a monkey wrench in the prosecution's case? Riddle me THAT, Op!

Liar. Dirty cop. Ruined the case.

That's what the documentarys say, but black women have no sympathy for white women, especially those who steal wealthy black men. The most relevant post trial comment from the jury was, "We gotta stand by our own"

The lawyers select the jury and regardless of his medicine, they never should have put the glove in his hands. Look at the footage of him pretending to try to force the glove on.

Typical L.A. flatfoot.

And Cochran guilted Clark into allowing all those blacks on the jury. It was the first race card dealt from the deck. And the defense would have had him put on the gloves, but they tricked Darden into to doing it.

But there weren't many blacks though/

9 black, 2 white, 1 hispanic

Attached: Jury.jpg (500x302, 53K)

According to media reports, Clark thought that women, regardless of race, would sympathize with the domestic violence aspect of the case and connect with her personally. On the other hand, the defense's research suggested that women generally were more likely to acquit than men, and that jurors did not respond well to Clark's combative style of litigation. The defense also speculated that black women would not be as sympathetic as white women to the victim, who was white, because of tensions about interracial marriages.

For a 15 year old