Shame on you Jow Forums for letting this slide in less than 24 hours. The Obama Administration tried to institute one party rule using the intelligence agencies and only failed by a margin of 100,000 votes. This is the biggest threat to our Republic. Ever.
>The New York Times has essentially outed the CIA and FBI informant as Stefan Halper tonight in yet another lengthy justification article citing the reasoning from the perspective of the corrupt intelligence officers who conducted the surveillance and spying operation against the Trump campaign.
>Two things to remember: First, they denied all of this for eighteen months. Second, these are their leaks, their story, their version; delivered via their spin, from the people who were conducting the scheme against the Trump campaign:
>NYT: The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia... >they took steps, those officials said, to ensure that details of the inquiry were more closely held than even in a typical national security investigation, including the use of the informant to suss out information from the unsuspecting targets... >The informant offered [to George Papadopoulos] a $3,000 honorarium for the paper and a paid trip to London, where the two could meet and discuss the research project. >Mr. Papadopoulos replied that he had no insight into the Russian campaign — despite being told months earlier that the Russians had dirt on Mrs. Clinton in the form of thousands of her emails.
>[Papadopoulos'] RESPONSE CLEARLY ANNOYED THE INFORMANT, WHO TRIED TO PRESS MR. PAPADOPOULOS ABOUT WHAT HE MIGHT KNOW
Don't worry. You're a voice calling out in the woods. Eventually enough people will feel innawoods, and begin to decipher those voices calling out, yeah?
You know they use difficult words so that normies don't understand shit and ignore it completely. The precise case in this article.
Easton Robinson
This story is too big to be hidden. Yesterday it was in WSJ, NYT, WaPo, AP, CNN, MSNBC, Fox, CNBC, and dozens of smaller outlets. They are trying to spin it. The DoJ is really digging their own grave. They have been leaking non-stop since Wednesday in a desperate effort to control the narrative before Congress forces the truth out.
Yeah. Its all a media circus trying to steer the masses blind day by day through a shitstorm of legal and satanic ritual abuse of corrupted power in institutional establishments. Justice takes time. Time needs a capital city dome as much as parliament needs a clocktower for their barely 9-5 inside desk jobs at the house of cards swirling in an opal ocean.
>trying to identify and obstruct foreign influence operations >by using a source that wouldn't know the first thing about whats important to record or what questions are important to ask.
Author is retarded, they wouldn't use an informant for a CI op, they would use a field agent or a security officer. Also the FBI doesn't do shit overseas unless they're partnered with an overseas law enforcement agency. Meaning they wouldn't be conducting any form of CI op overseas because they would risk bring foreign intel ops in on it.
The tide is turning. The Wall Street Journal, which my Democrat father suddenly says is written by fascists, was the first to break the story of a spy in their opinion section, they did their first regular coverage, and today they published pic related. The DoJ has already leaked enough information that it's incontrovertible that the State Department was also involved. The whole thing reeks to high heaven and there's a President shaped hole missing in the story.
Oh wait, President Obama "want[ed] to know everything we're doing" on September 2, 2016. "We" is Peter Strzok, FBI agent assigned that same day to meet with Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat, in London later that month. The author isn't retarded, the anonymous DoJ leakers may well be.
If the FBI was secretly watching the campaign to protect it from FI operations but didn't want to do direct interviews, as the author states, because it would risk tampering with the election why were john brennan and samantha powers unmasking individuals involved in this whole thing? Why was nothing done to revoke their access.
Interesting that after the unmasking effort starts suddenly POTUS wants to know everything were doing.....
Christian Brooks
They do that shit to american citizens all the time.
Yeah, it's called getting a warrant to conduct surveillance on suspected criminals. It's logical, legal, and good.
Brayden Ortiz
There is speculation that the CIA was involved, due to strange statements John Brennan has made over the last year, as well as Senator Harry Reid's letter in August 2016. This is BEFORE the informant met with the FBI, but after he met with Carter Page.
>Unfounded >Trump claims they're tapping him >Authorities admit they tapped Trump tower >Oh shit wait... it wasn't for Trump SPECIFICALLY it was for... uhh... this guy!
Jesus the media is bullshit. You know the funny thing is if they just did their jobs honestly I might not like Trump. He's done some shit I don't agree with. But god damn the more you try to tell me what I'm supposed to think despite what's apparent and objectively true the more I want to see him become the actual fascist you fucks are crying about.
Brayden Hernandez
I want to make sure the traitors are executed before the primary in June.
I would prefer that the traitors be executed in May. That means organizing a mass execution in only a few days.
Turning a mass execution into a spectacle will send a message to the whole world: California is SICK of the POISON and decided to get rid of it
Landon White
If the FBI is surveilling you, they have a warrant. Otherwise no one finds out about it. You're a retard.
Jason Perry
the Democrats in California are INSANE and PSYCHO
they are rabid animals
they are dogs
a dog is not a man
a dog is not a political animal
Ian Scott
The FISA warrant was not issued until October 2016, three months after the FBI confidential informant first met with Carter Page and two months after he first met with George Papadopoulos.
When this all comes together there will be atleast one RICO case involved. Playing the RICO card means any, and every, person associated with the organization, which has been slapped with RICO, gets a federal felony organized crime charge stacked on top of any other crimes. That means even if there is no other crime committed the mere act of being in the employ of a group which operates in an organized criminal fashion is enough to wind up in FEDERAL POUND ME IN THE ASS PRISON. That's right, shillboi, what you are doing is a crime, and you will be held to account. Read these words and read them well. If that is something you can live with, by all means, continue incriminating yourself. If not, I would urge you to consider immediately submitting your resignation along with a notarized letter stating that you are resigning because you realized that the company is operating as part of a criminal enterprise. Probably wouldnt hurt to send it certified mail also.
Brody King
Kill Kennedy Fuck with Nixon Spy on Carter Shoot Reagan Poppy Bush the grandmaster Control Bubba with Clinton dirt Dubya son of Poppy Obama CIA Muslim Manchurian candidate And now Trump
Andrew Peterson
>implying anyone cares about American politics It was fun w years ago now its just a grind with nothing happening make a thread when someone gets arrested
You're going too far. The Courts WILL take care of this. The ends are the means. You lynch criminals and you are no better than communist revolutionaries. You prosecute, convict, and execute them by court order, and you preserve our republic for another generation.
Fuck that shit they should have just shot him like they did with JFK It was her turn
Isaac Clark
but an informant meeting with Page and papadopoulos isn't the same as monitoring their communications. You don't need a warrant to talk to someone and see if they act suspicious.
Nathaniel Adams
bumpo
gotta spread this shit before the next inevitable false flag attack
warrant is irrelevant, the question isnt whtether the trump campaign was illegally spied on the question is whether or not federal law enforcement and intel agencies were used to produce political weapons for the democratic party, or as strozk puts it, an insurance policy in the event of a trump win.
Zachary Price
Obama gonna be making a 1 way trip to GITMO
Ryan Miller
You don't need a warrant to try to entrap someone either. Ask yourself a question, if the FBI merely wanted to stop Russian interference with the Trump campaign, why did they not warn anyone in the Trump campaign? Why was the only warning given a single, underreported joint statement by Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence addressed to the general public and state election boards?
>The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.
> the question isnt whtether the trump campaign was illegally spied well that seems to be the narrative the Trump team is pushing in the media look at Trump's insane campaign rhetoric, he was totally unpredictable, its not about Trump vs. Democrats, its trump vs the entire political system that doesn't want him around.
What did he think was going to happen when he challenged the entire gov and intel agencies?
Aaron Russell
>What did he think was going to happen when he challenged the entire gov and intel agencies?
he probably though he would win. As he appears to be winning now.
Besides how is
>well he said mean things to people in power so of course they would use tax payer money to try and fuck him over as hard as possible int he middle of the election
a justification of any kind.
Joseph Reed
lol if Trumps against neocons why did he hire fucking John Bolton, fire his moderate generals and advisers, and nominate Gina Haspel, a literal torture advocate, as CIA director?
Trump has no idea what hes doing, you're delusional
Obama did everything he could to cross the Rubicon. By God's merciful grace alone was the "HER TURN" stopped.
John Miller
>What did he think was going to happen when he challenged the entire gov and intel agencies? Nothing because fucking with their own lawfully elected president is 100% illegal and beyond their scope?
Blake Sanders
the FBI spying on him seems legal but ethically questionable with the info we have now. But really my point isn't that its legal, its that anyone could predict them doing this from a mile away.
Do you really think the most powerful government/deepstate in the world is just going to go "oh, looks like we're electing someone who's going to reverse the last fucking 50 years of foreign policy, lets just do everything he says"? its so obvious they would do this, cmon
How many people are going to jail? This is dominating Twitter. The left is getting completely BTFO on their own homefield. Kek.
Christopher Rodriguez
>oh, looks like we're electing someone who's going to reverse the last fucking 50 years of foreign policy, lets just do everything he says That's exactly what I expected, yes. But also >the FBI spying on him seems legal It's clearly not
Nicholas Cox
We warned you Shareblues months ago that RICO was coming for you. Feel the breath on the back of your neck yet?
Colton Gray
>That's exactly what I expected, yes. Yeah, and that's why you're an idiot with no practical understanding of US politics aka a Trump voter... what evidence do you have that the FBI spying was illegal (other than the godawful op name)
Grayson Morales
something tells me you have no idea how RICO works...
Christopher Garcia
Bump. It's all really starting to unravel.
Tyler Gutierrez
>How many people are going to jail?
Pic related is one guess, the cast of operation Crossfire Hurricane.
>President Trump Questions FBI and DOJ Campaign Surveillance and Spy Operations – Carter Page and George Papadopoulos… >In essence what the Deep State apparatchik was/is doing is admitting they conducted a large-scale surveillance operation against their political opposition by weaponizing the most intrusive intelligence gathering capabilities of the federal government. An admission they denied for the previous 18 months…. theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/18/president-trump-questions-fbi-and-doj-campaign-surveillance-and-spy-operations-carter-page-and-george-papadopoulos/ archive.is/8D4Hj >If Carter Page was an FBI asset and witness, responsible for the bust of a high level Russian agent in 2013, and remained so throughout the court case UP TO May of 2016, how the f**k it is possible that on October 21st, 2016, Carter Page is put under a FISA Title-1 surveillance warrant as an alleged Russian agent?
>Conclusion: He wasn’t.
>The DOJ National Security Division and the FBI Counterintelligence Division, knew he wasn’t a Russian agent. The DOJ-NSD and FBI flat-out LIED to the FISA court.
I just want to do a quick rundown on four of the five people that the FBI investigated via their informant and the publicly known reasons they supposedly did so
>General Michael Flynn Flynn attended a dinner in Moscow (Jill Stein also attended) in December 2015 and was paid to speak there.
>George Papadopoulos He told an Australian diplomat in a bar that he had heard Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton's e-mails (the ones on her private server) before Wikileaks released the DNC e-mails. There were rumors at the time saying the same, as well as rumors that Wikileaks had them.
>Paul Manafort As has been reported since 2006, Paul Manafort worked as a lobbyist for a Ukrainian politician with ties to the Kremlin. He was investigated by the FBI for this in 2014-2015, but no charges were pressed and the investigation was closed.
>Carter Page Carter Page was the target of a Russian spyring's attempt to recruit unwitting Americans for use as intelligence assets. Page cooperated with the FBI and gave testimony that ultimately led to the arrest and prosecution of one of the Russian spies, the rest were allowed to leave the country without charges by the Obama administration.
>Yeah, and that's why you're an idiot Nevermind. I gave you a shot but now I know you're trying to troll. Go do something more honest user, you seem like a reasonably intelligent-ish person.
Gavin Jones
It is not legal to spy on a political campaign--remember Watergate and associated legislation? So no, what the FBI did was completely illegal based on all we know, as the OIG report has also pointed out, which is why this is ramping up so fast and why the media is trying to spin it so hard their mascara is flying off.
Camden Rivera
Good shills are highly creative people, as such they are easily bored. The best thing to do is ignore them or reply with an anime smuggie and no text.
Aiden Lee
dude, Im trying to be gentle but you are really testing my patience. give me ONE intelligent reason why you think the 3-letter agencies and political establishment would just roll over for someone who insulted them and wanted to radically alter the course of US policy?
literally one plausible reason? they do illegal/unethical stuff all the time because they make the rules.
Jaxon Rivera
UK is involved in this?
Why are there sanctions on Russia and not the UK?
> UK meddling in US election > CIA/FBI/Deep State cabal with Obama officials and UK to manufacture a scandal to oust Trump if he won.
How is Halper not under arrest?
Jayden Fisher
this thread makes the shills uncomfortable
Daniel Moore
why would trump even hire those people in the first place? Im open to debate, you just ignore me because you call anyone who disagrees with you a shill
Yes, everyone is reporting that the FBI had a confidential informant, potentially a paid one, who they asked to invite Carter Page and George Papadopoulos to meet with him in London for the purpose of trying to get them to admit to colluding with the Russian government.
>The FBI Informant Who Monitored the Trump Campaign, Stefan Halper, Oversaw a CIA Spying Operation in the 1980 Presidential Election glenn greenwald the intercept archive.is/ix9M9 seems Halper has some experience at this game
Landon Ramirez
Except the wiretapping was actually proven true. Is that what they’re saying then?
you should read the Intercept article if you haven't archive.is/ix9M9
The fbi/government haven't confirmed it, but if we believe the sources the NYT and WaPo quoted, they gave so much info that it basically guarantees that its Halper
Mason Russell
then don't
Kayden Flores
> I'm an underpaid shill but here's this anti-Trump meme to try to distract somehow.
>Im a butthurt Trump supporter who can't admit he got conned you're welcome to dispute anything I've said if you have credible evidence. If im an underpaid shill that should be easy...
Cameron Baker
hey since you're going to be here shilling for awhile can you update us on what's going on at the Bureau?
Juan Brooks
What ever helps you sleep at night. Don't worry, you wont have to sleep alone too much longer.
Charles Butler
CNN is worse than North Korean news at this point, pic related is NOT a shop.
