? >Kid enters your house >Steal guns >Go shoot people Aside from being a murderer he's a thief, why should anyone do that leap, you reddit spacing motherfucker?
>Every single midterm apart from 1932 and 2002 ended with the sitting party losing the house, the senate, or both. And HIllary Clinton had 95% chance of getting elected president. Politics changed user, it's a whole lot more polarised meaning people will just suck up and vote down ballot for their respective parties. It is not a matter of policy anymore but of turnout. People won't be convinced to vote for the other party no matter what meaning red areas will get redder, blue areas will get bluer and purple areas will resemble a lot their 2016 presidential results.
hold the texas shooter's dad responsible for not securing the guns, parents have a responsibility to prevent their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
hold the texas shooter's dad responsible for not securing the guns, parents have a responsibility to prevent their kids from perpetrating mass shootings
hold the texas shooter's dad responsible for not securing the guns, parents have a responsibility to prevent their kids from perpetrating mass shootings
So the party run by the guy with an approval rating that is currently at 42% is somehow supposed to hold the house? Because "politics changed, it's a post truth world?"
1900 - 1920??? Almost entirely gone already like .5% of the US. Like .7% of “Non Hispanic White” people. Only 320,000 White WW2 veterans and only 600,000 “Holocaust Survivors” left. Oh BTW apparently 12.5% of American Jews survived the holocaust
Blake Bell
oldest boomers are in their early 70s, and the youngest in their late 50s. Another 40 years, user.
hold the texas shooter's dad responsible for not securing the guns, parents are responsible for preventing their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
hold the texas shooter's dad responsible for not securing the guns, parents are responsible for preventing their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
hold the texas shooter's dad responsible for not securing the guns, parents are responsible for preventing their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
46% and yes. He won 60% of States and only lost the popular vote because some young white people specifically men thought giving 20% of their vote to a 3rd party was a bright idea
the texas shooter's dad is responsible for not properly securing the guns, parents are responsible for preventing their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
the texas shooter's dad is responsible for not properly securing the guns, parents are responsible for preventing their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
the texas shooter's dad is responsible for not properly securing the guns, parents are responsible for preventing their kids from perpetrating mass shootings.
>So the party run by the guy with an approval rating that is currently at 42% You mean the party run by the guy with the highest measured approval rating (as per the RCP average) of his presidency except for the first week, the party who kept the house and the senate even with the candidate posting favorability polls under 40% for his whole candidacy?
It's not as difficult as you would think considering this exact scenario happened in 2016
>Replying to raid cancer bait posts on a fucking Caturday Come on
Lincoln Brooks
So where were they, and why did they fail the job they were PAID to do? The 'good guy with a gun' idea is about civilians, not police and other security.
