Attached: 1500048696436.png (827x740, 566K)
RENT CONTROL DOESN'T WOR-
Julian Gray
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Cameron Richardson
You don't need rent control you just need to tax the ground-rent appropriately and annul all other forms of taxation. Generally speaking whatever you tax you create less of, whatever you subsidise you create more of.
Taxing ground-rent however? That's finite. Not producing anymore of it, not producing any less of it - so it doesn't matter.
You tax property too much, people stop wanting to own property and prices go down. Tax it too little and the opposite. It's a self-correcting sort of tax which ensures property is used for its utility instead of its speculative potential as an opportunity to rent-seek off of other's work. By living off of other's work you work less, and there is less production in the economy. We created a situation in our tax policy where speculation and rent-seeking was encouraged so the ground-rent and the prospect of living off of other's work was privatised instead of public.
Bear in mind the biggest recipient of this is the fucking banks. We replaced the feudal lords of old who lived off of the work of serfs with banks. Same shit different era - and we are steadily being reduced to a neofeudal serfdom again. Everyone pays their tithe to the symbio-parasite for its adulterated, debt-based currency supply. The strain is now too much - and instead of seeing the problem, everyone's blaming boomers, millennials, fucking white males, SJWs, feminists, foreigners, muslims and jews.
Chase Walker
Getting their money before a bunch of spics and niggers destroy whatever value it may have had left seems like fairly sound protection of their assets.
Jacob Peterson
Matthew Flores
Might pump this thread up with some turbo-autism again I'm not sure.
Jaxson Richardson
1.1. Gold was used as money in the cycle between production and consumption in an economy.
1.2. It becomes expedient to vault it to keep it secure from theft.
1.3. Receipts issued for ownership start to circulate, considered "as good as gold".
Logan Brown
2.1. Vaulters who counterfeit are quickly discovered as fake receipts exist in excess to vaulted metal.
2.2. Only vaulters who learn to avoid this malpractice survive onwards.
Benjamin Harris
We have had rent control in Germany implemented in 2015 and it has been an absolute disaster. Rent prices have actually risen as a result of it.
Aaron Scott
3.1. Vaulters realise they can make money available as venture capital to bring forward productive potential to enterprises with ability but lacking means.
3.2. This is agreed with clients to share profit from interest.
John Baker
4.1. This is used to invest in productive capital.
4.2. Manufacturing, building, logistics, agriculture, R&D, mining, etc.
Aiden Sullivan
5.1. This productive capital increases standards of living.
5.2. The currency is finite and thus deflationary.
5.3. E.g. A quarter ounce of silver buys you one loaf of bread today, 5 in 5 years.
Colton Rogers
6.1. This opportunity to loan to generate surplus provides an opportunity for counterfeiting.
6.2. This is because there is not adequate information feedback on surplus.
6.3. E.g. How would you know if a quarter ounce of silver only buys you 2 loaves of bread in 5 years instead of 5?
6.4. Counterfeiting begins in the form of loans to siphon surplus.
6.5. Counterfeiting in this fashion incentivises issuance of loans for its own sake instead of for viability of the investment.
6.6 Which eventually creates misallocation.
Lincoln Brooks
Considering their return of investment will be down the toilet, it is a good idea to sell your house this to people who don't know of that Law yet
Landon Parker
7.1. Adequate allocation in a complex system requires full information feedback for it to maintain an optimum homeostasis.
7.2. If you imagine cars on a road (be it a 30mph or 70mph zone) it's desirable to leave adequate room between cars to compensate for micro-misallocations to maintain optimum transit.
7.3. Similarly if you imagine:
7.3.1. The speed of the cars as the money supply circulating.
7.3.2. The distance between the cars as inverse to the money not circulating and thus set aside for productive venture capital formation and investment.
Gabriel King
8.1. Counterfeiting to finance productive capital is akin to placing "more cars on the road".
8.2. Unfortunately because it is counterfeit it is cut off from the information feedback mechanisms of the market which pricing is supposed to provide.
Evan Perez
Ending all immigration would solve this problem
Caleb Bennett
9.1. This situation turns micro-level misallocations into macro-level misallocations.
9.2. This in turn creates business cycles wherein businesses fail.
Carter Gutierrez
Predictable as a chimp-out.
Joshua Wright
10.1. These failures can result in the failure of the banking institution financing them.
10.2. Where they do not they can set-up a situation for such failures to affect banking institutions that survive this stage.
Julian Gutierrez
11.1. Upon failure of a business its outstanding debts are settled via the sale of capital and stock.
11.2. Enterprising institutions will realise in the process of derangement and reorganisation which the market is forced into via their counterfeiting they can sell such capital and stock for a higher price if they time it properly.
11.3. I.e. they create a cycle of derangement and re-organisation which can be gamed both by the derangement produced on the down-swing and misallocation creating enhanced demand on the upswing using excessive lending.
11.4. Speculation becomes profitable - i.e. buy low sell high.
Robert Williams
12.1. Buying low and selling high is profitable however it isn't clear where the actual value for this process is coming from.
12.2. After all there is no actual production of value, no new creation of goods or services in this process, merely speculation.
12.3. The question is thus: Is it extractive or productive in terms of its profits?
Ryan Ross
13.1. The truth is its value ultimately comes from pressure on the value of labor in the cycles of derangement and reorganisation of the economy.
13.2. I.e. it comes out of you.
13.3. This creates a vicious cycle of problem, reaction, solution where the bank profits. They loan too much, creating misallocation from, which they speculate on at the expense of labour.
13.4. It's as though over time they are a casino. Whatever speculation takes place it always ends up with them winning at the expense of the people less able to weather this disorganisation.
Jaxson Morgan
If they are dumping properties then it is time to squat and reclass the property.
Cooper Morris
14.1. This sort of rigged-casino style gambling / speculation is seriously profitable at the expense of those without capital or information. It's a game they always win.
14.2. As a result all such banks develop "investment" branches which start to speculate.
Hunter Smith
15.1. Because it's a game they always win over time, there is little disincentive to borrowing money from each other to increase leverage on bets made (given they always win).
15.2. Fees are paid for the use of borrowed capital to increase speculative bets.
15.3. This leverage is exactly akin to counterfeiting in its potential for creating misallocation.
Jaxon Lee
16.1. Leverage turns good bets into great bets.
Daniel Long
17.1. Because some leverage is good, more leverage is better.
17.2. Banks are prone to take leverage from anyone who will offer.
17.3. Because wins and safety of capital are guaranteed it's money for jam so everyone does.
Bentley Stewart
Hedge Funds will buy them and then get them rented when the Democrats win the White House Again. Look for the Chase/Housing EBT Card.
Cameron Taylor
18.1. But counterfeit of value via leverage is the same as any other counterfeit, it creates misallocation.
18.2. It's akin to taking building materials from the base of a tower to build more storeys on top (hence the Jenga analogy in the Big Short).
18.3. Eventually it fucks up.
Jackson Howard
19.1. For creditors there are multiple options to this collapse.
19.2. One is to insiste the institution backing up the investment arm pays for the amount staked.
19.3. They carve up what can and can't be paid.
19.4. Unfortunately whilst this leads to squabbles it also leads to secondary feedback.
19.5. The public at large loses faith in banking institutions and may start withdrawing their capital - which is no longer fully backed up.
Aaron Clark
20.1. One means of resolving this is for all parties to bail out the offender so the gambling game (siphoning from pressure on labor) may continue.
20.2. e.g. This happened in the case of Long Term Capital Management.
Jose Wilson
21.1. Or in the case of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, everyone is so inter-leveraged with everyone else there is no possible way for them to bail each other out.
21.2. So ultimately via TARP and QE (which has myriad effects on you) labour pays. Plebs pay. You pay. In order to bail this shitty system out.
Jacob Gonzalez
22.1. Inenvitably some institutions will fail.
22.2. This has disastrous derangement effects on the economy and cycle between consumers and producers banking with these various private institutions.
22.3. The average citizen (you) doesn't know any better and is pissed off.
22.4. At best they blame the government for this damage to the economy.
22.5. The politican knows fuck all, they consult experts.
22.6. Guess where the experts come from...?
Tyler Johnson
Good. They hardly build houses anymore. Everythings turning into apartments. They want to squeeze as many people onto one chunk of land so they can maximize their profits. Greedy Landlords are whats ruining this fucking world.
Nathan Miller
23.1. The expert portrays a picture of banking as though it operated on a productive, industrial Hamiltonian model of finance.
23.2. Whether they are doing this and lying intentionally or they've been lied to and absorbed it as part of their "education" is up for grabs - most education on this subject is horseshit.
Charles Myers
Its California, just dump a 55 gal drum of used oil on the property so that they have to superfund the site. Drive the costs up as much as possible.
Austin Walker
What the fuck are you posting
Evan Hall
24.1. The expert portrays a model of balancing the risk of investments for productive enterprise by using interest as a means of risk compensation.
24.2. So they propose a "central bank" which will operate on the same basis - charging interest to manage risk from failing financial institutions.
24.3. In return for this they have control over issuance of the money supply (outlawing all other issuance by banks) and thus total control over those institutions.
24.4. They also offer the prospect of lending on favorable terms to the government.
Christian Perez
The reason why populism is happening.
Leo Reyes
25.1. This is a great position for a financial institution, being cosy with a government with the ability to tax.
25.2. Remember, financial institutions operate on a model of siphoning of surplus via lending to promote growth which must come from human energy, ingenuity, productive endeavor and ultimately the materials they use from the planet to do so.
25.3. In this position they may lend to the government.
25.4. This is favorable to the government because they can borrow from the future to get elected on platforms of goodies now, paying for it via future taxes.
25.5. This occurs by pledging bonds to the central bank - a promise of future interest taken from tax revenue.
25.6. This is why today governments borrow their money from central banks in exchange for bonds backed by siphoning various sorts of tax from you.
Nathan Price
26.1. The relationship this creates between the central bank and the government is akin to that between a symbio-parasite and a host organism.
26.2. The symbio-parasite embeds itself into the host organism's functions in a fashion such that it cannot be replaced or pulled out without the immediate damage being worse (or even fatal) by comparison with servicing its wishes.
26.3. As a result it demands an enhanced amount of growth - of income from the material environment.
26.4. In return for as long as there is the prospect of growth there is still the speeding up of the deployment of human energy and ingenuity in the form of capital brought forwards.
26.5. As with all good symbio-parasites, it's better to not be entirely negative in your effects.
Robert Myers
27.1. Unfortunately as with every other attempt at illegitimately gaming the system, the M.O. of a parasite has issues.
27.2. If you exist via sponsoring unhealthy growth via the formation of industry, eventually you'll hit limiting factors on growth.
27.3. E.g. In the formation of industry there is a finite amount of land to your need for infinite growth.
27.4. This applies pressures for example on agriculture, which pushes up the price of food for an increasing workforce.
27.5. You can't have a workforce if they can't eat to survive, so you must pay more.
27.6. This creates the push for imperialism and exploration to acquire more land to feed the workforce at lower prices to increase productivity and thus infinite growth.
27.7. The parasite seeks to use the defensive military of its host political entity to increase its scope for growth to sustain itself.
Oliver Myers
28.1. Unfortunately imperialism for new resources merely postpones the compression of limiting factors on growth, it does not anul them.
28.2. The world is most assuredly (save for one or two places) entirely under the control of a global financial empire - it's just culture and politics is still not quite administrated to reflect that.
28.3. As a result the same limits on growth as with before are eventually encountered.
Nathan Phillips
Fucking link to it instead of spamming up the thread you autistic bong. Do you really think anyone is reading this?
Jack Johnson
29.1. Where there are such limits on growth alternatives can be found. After all, what is being capitalised on is not material itself but human energy.
29.2. Human beings can easily be riled up to hate each other over specious horseshit.
29.3. Their desires accordingly can be financed by creating growth which is in itself immediately offset by human destruction.
29.4. Provided this game is balanced and you fund both sides you siphon surplus and extract not from pressure on wages but via death. Military-Industrial-Complex style.
Jordan Hill
If you enact rent control people are gonna start going to start living in places that are bigger than they need and nobody will be able to find a place to stay. This happened in new york.
Aaron Wright
I read it all. Fascinating
Carter Clark
>Do you really think anyone is reading this?
The ones with an attention span only long enough to read a neck tattoo or the keywords required for the next wank?? Nope.
But nobody gives a fuck about those people, you're just a cancer that got attracted here by autists like me.
Jaxon Fisher
Those Jews that everyone pities actually have the majority control of Central Banking all over the world. That essential fact is left out of all discussions about the banking systems of the world.
Jews pretend to be pitiful because they actually are Masters. Good Goy Whites pretend to be Masters because they are the favorite slaves of the Jew.
Nolan Stewart
...
Ryder Smith
30.1. Unfortunately as with everything finite limitations emerge.
30.2. You cannot profit from wars which destroy yourself and the planet and people you siphon off of.
Jonathan Bailey
31.1. With growth via imperialism or war neutered, the only option left is using strategic control of what resources exist to maintain a monopoly by force to keep your system of extraction operative.
31.2. This is then used to extract more and more via taxes to fund money issuance via loans.
31.3. It starts on the outside then it draws in.
Jace Collins
Just put my units up for sale, bought it 20 years ago and the same family of salvadoran obese hobbits wont leave, I can only raise the rent three percent a year meanwhile my costs are spiraling out of control and these shitskin spicks wont move out and now seems like their obese unemployed grandson will stay there indefinitely, I hope to dump the place on an unsuspecting chink and relocate my $ to a red State
Julian Edwards
-k.
Jaxon Perez
32.1. Money issuance via loans made by a central bank in the form of the exchange of fiat for bonds is something everyone knows about.
32.2. It's exchange human energy and ingenuity in the form of bonds for fiat, which is what, at this point unhinged as it is from gold?
32.3. Fuck all - which is why it's theft and extraction via an elaborate historical con.
Caleb Myers
33.1. The mode of extraction wherein there is no prospect of growth is a net loss to the borrower.
33.2. It brings forward your life's earning potential minus interest.
33.3. Like a drug - feels good now, eat shit later.
Josiah Turner
What costs? Literally taxes?
Oliver Hughes
34.1. In other words you're at a net loss over your whole life - the symbio-parasite begins to switch from promotion of growth to siphon to extraction to cannibalise from you because your appreciation and bargaining position based on time is not operating on the same scale.
Caleb Bailey
35.1. Bringing forward earnings using debt can be useful if it is being used for productive endeavor with effort and ingenuity, this can increase your personal value production over time in excess of the costs of the loan.
Easton Richardson
>and instead of seeing the problem, everyone's blaming boomers, millennials, fucking white males, SJWs, feminists, foreigners, muslims and jews.
>jews
>not a massive chunk of the exact problem you are describing
stop defending kikes.
Gavin Reed
HOME OWNERSHIP A THING OF THE PAST
Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn't afford it. People who already owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a house. Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant. People just couldn't buy them. But the cost of housing would not come down. You'd right away think, well the vacant house, the price would come down, the people would buy it. But there was some statement to the effect that the price would be held high even though there were many available so that free market places would not operate. People would not be able to buy these and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children. Then as the number of real home-owners diminished they would become a minority. There would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home ownership and would be acceptable to the majority. Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind in 1990 when they ask, "How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room?." This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you'll be asked those questions and decide how you want to respond to them.
William Perry
36.1. For example you can see the distinction in student loans.
36.2. The notion was as we hit the limits on growth that that's what we'd do. We'd unlock people's ingenuity, "mana from heaven", and they'd become more educated and produce more value.
36.3. Unfortunately borrowing and then using it to study useful things is hard work and requires intelligence, most people are lazy idiots who never do anything productive or intelligent in their lives unless someone else has set it up for them to do.
36.4. So most people just borrow on the basis of consumption - the "fashion statement" of having a degree and being ever-so-intelligent. When really all they're doing is wasting time for a few years and borrowing for the pleasure of doing so, whilst studying incoherent nonsense which they can use to blame others for their stupidity, whilst inflating the qualifications necessary to get a job at Starbucks so now everyone has to get into debt just to get a job as a fucking sandwich artist.
Matthew Russell
what the fuck did this thread turn into
Eli Brown
oh boy, would this be hilarious. banks ALWAYS require a phase i esa to be conducted on commercial property loans, and they dont shy from phase ii assessments. thatd be fuckin rich
Gabriel White
And how the fuck are they going to do that? Not allow me to sell my house. I may not want to at a loss but I could.
Jose Thompson
My utility bill went from 450 to 1200. Trash went from 110 to 250. City inspection fees. Insutance is up from 2800 to 3600. And construction repair costs are way up because theres a shortage of men who will do manual labor.
Julian Barnes
Plus it now takes almost 6 months to evict a bad tenant plus legal fees. And interest on my loan is rising. Fuck this I am selling
Andrew Reyes
I think perhaps certainly Judaism ended up being a vessel for some of this kikery, but I'd prefer to actually identify the functional problem instead of just killing everyone with a kippah. I know it's satisfying to see it in those terms but you never actually quite sterilise the problem when you're only using a simpler proxy for the actual source of the problem.
Some jews are decent people who do good things, just like some "niggers" are also okay people.
Brandon Sullivan
They love playing victim as they roll around in million dollar homes.
David Wilson
37.1. Surprisingly and equivalently governments are equally short-term thinkers and just as likely to use money they borrow from your future children or grandchildren (given the debt service is so high your children might not even be able to afford children - UH OH, I think we have to help those poor refugees right guys? The ones right next door to the country we're also bombing) and waste it on unproductive bullshit. Unfortunately however the scale and timelines governments borrow on are intergenerational.
James Diaz
38.1. Unsurprisingly as this extraction kicks off in full swing the generation that benefits from the borrowing is loving it, meanwhile their kids get a little pissed off - make sure you teach them to hate each other so when they start getting mad they're not studying you, your system or how to fix it.
And this is crucial.
Is is for this reason there is so much anger and anti status quo sentiment starting to emerge, and it has been intentionally scattered, distracted from the actual cause and hijacked in order to make sure the livestock turn it on each other instead of using it to solve the problems with this system.
Anthony Mitchell
I don't understand. You're paying their utilities? Insurance I can understand. And the occasional permit.
Julian Moore
If you wanted to get rid of the "bad ones", how would you?
Jonathan Davis
From 'Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars'?
Jeremiah Wood
Ehhhhhhh... the white world would be infinitely better without them.
Aaron Jenkins
shit man, fuckin brit for the win!
David Ramirez
I'd start by dealing with the financial system as it currently stands. If people genuinely believe that Judaism is a culture which always undermines its host nations then that's something I hope we can actually ward off generally speaking by just being armed with the means / knowledge as to how it generally does so, if it's truly a recidivist culture which will always do that.
Hopefully it's a culture that can actually reform itself (as one would hope Islam can be). It's only if not - only then, and only then, that it should be destroyed.
But even destroying a culture doesn't necessarily require genocide. I mean if the culture refuses to reform or be destroyed - maybe if it can't ever be fixed, but it'd be nice if we didn't have to sully our hands with that sort of blood when so much of it would surely be innocent.
Not sure / don't care either way - just putting some ideas out...
Xavier Bell
Jow Forumstards are also angry people seeking answers and being distracted by illusive things, don't think you aren't.
You hate feminists but you don't see that the increasing debt services on bonds is what has lead to all of these increases in taxes to service them. You don't get that the reason women were encouraged into the workforce in the first place was because half of the population wasn't working to service the increasing extractive need for debt service siphoned directly from income.
You don't get that the destruction of the family, marriage, and the derangement of relationships between the sexes was instrumental to this.
Michael Green
I am.
Adam Hughes
You hate the fact you can't afford a house but you don't see that as taxes can only go so far you have to create a "wealth effect" by inflating the value of houses using credit to encourage people to borrow and spend money they don't have or shouldn't spend. It bids up the house prices and people speculate and follow, but it does the owners no good in the end because unless they plan on sleeping in a tent, all the other house prices have gone up too. The only people who benefits are the banks who take a longer and deeper siphon from your life's work. Soon you just have a landed class who own everything and everyone else just pays in rent or mortgages a tithe of their life's work. You know what the point is called where it hits subsistence? Serfdom, and you're already passed it because you're in your mother's basement. You can't afford kids, you can't afford to even create a place to attract a woman to have kids.
Ryan Lee
Fuck off retard.
Luke Flores
You hate the destruction of your "white countries" but you don't get that in the first place the reason all of the work was outsourced to cheaper places was for the same reason agriculture was outsourced in slide 27 or for the same desire to put pressure on and extract from labour in slide 13.
The boomers had a great time because government short-term thinking (enabled by (((experts))) as in slide 22, anaesthatised them to this by borrowing from your future output. Don't blame Boomers for being stupid though, you're just as stupid and your children (if you can afford any) will hate you for your stupidity and selfishness even more than you hate the Boomers for their stupidity and selfishness.
Of course, you might not have any, half of you can't afford it, that's why birthrates are chilling - you still think you can have the same standards of living your parents had. But the financial system is extractive now, you can't do that - the banks are cannibalising now instead of encouraging the host to consume more. They want to consume your children's future and you can do nothing other than spot and complain over the symptoms instead.
Chase Gonzalez
You can live cheaply and be married. Don't feed the system, just find a good girl to breed with.
Lucas Edwards
Don't worry about the banks' debt service though, they'll be just fine. Now they've put pressure on wages by outsourcing the labour externally and anaesthatised it by borrowing? They're going to put pressure on wages domestically by importing the same labour.
You don't need to have kids, you can go extinct for all they care, it'd be beneficial in some ways because they're stupid enough to just be slaves whereas some of you (barely any of you though) aren't. They'll work as serfs to support this system for the next few years as parasites do tend to think short-term.
They'll do the work and replace you and you'll just die out. You probably will just let it happen too. Oh sure you'll bitch a bit about the symptoms, but as long as you don't spot the cause it's fine.
Lincoln Allen
>muh georgism
Taxation is theft brainlet
Ryan Wilson
>as long as you don't spot the cause it's fine.
And how could you? They've been busily teaching any form of divisiveness they can find and inventing concepts to make you all fight each other, it's hilarious, you spend all of your time and energy swatting at these enhanced symptoms, clueless as to what the real cause is.
You didn't vote for Ross Perot, you didn't vote for Ron Paul, you did vote for Trump and I applaud that as a FUCK YOU to the establishment, you've at least started to spot that - but let's be honest - it's not enough.
You could still stop it now if you pushed for people to stop using fiat, stop using banks, pushed cryptos, PMs, debit-vaulting services, unionising on the basis of civics and consumption through rent strikes, mortgage strikes, debt strikes, tax strikes, consumer activism, etc.
However it's quite possible you won't. Thinking is hard, changing things is difficult - I don't know however, it's your choice, the solutions are there waiting and they're not hard once you spot it.
Samuel Martin
>once you spot it.
Which is what they fear most.
Forget the politicians, they're an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They've got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.
>But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interests. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.
You know what they want? Obedient workers people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, they're coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it.
Jaxon Johnson
>California
Anything they do is holistically irrelevant
Carson Gutierrez
Place a market cap on rentals and you’re going to have a massive case of short supply on your hands as landlords start getting really picky about who they admit.
>needs 850 credit
>first and last months rent and $2500 security deposit
Andrew Davis
I'm not exclusively advocating georgism but as I said, what I'm saying won't fit on a neck tattoo. Sure, some ideas can, however not all.
Henry Young
>$2500 security deposit
we jews now
Elijah Evans
2500 depsit isnt even enough considering it takes 6 months to evict bad tenants
Juan Nguyen
Pure bread in this post.
Bump for a rare occurrence
Justin Nelson
Perhaps, but "white" is such a vague idea people often argue over. I'm not saying ethnostates don't perhaps make sense given how easily we've seen people are marshalled along ethnic lines - but it doesn't have to be the default.
Up to you though isn't it!
Jacob Ramirez
This guy fucking gets it. Good job. Too bad nobody will ever listen and continue to blame other stupid shit for the problems we face.
Jeremiah Baker
God save you, thanks for the uber tier red pill
Xavier Richardson
Could you but that into an infographic for me? It's a bit hard to spread those ideas if you have to copy-paste it all the time.
Jayden Murphy
I don't think so I think the establishment (most of whom don't know what's going on bear in mind) is terrified of the rage that has been building and everyone has been brought to an impasse because the original plan of the (((Real Owners))) has been kind of screwed. The incoherent, SJW left has been stared down.
>pic related - don't necessarily know if it's all on point but I feel some of it fits the situation.
And at this rare moment of fury and rabid anti-status quo semto,emt, with the (((Real Owners))) on the backfoot, it's got to be capitalised on to re-direct the fury where it should have gone. We've had a fantastic opportunity to truly see how it's operated, where the sickness is, but it's only know with the population searching for answers that it can actually be done.
Without the symbio-parasite you have unparalleled prosperity, Star Trek TNG shit - if it's allowed to win however by balkanising us, serfdom and neofuedalism for no other purpose than that pathological psychopaths love power over the stupid.
Jack Cruz
I'm definitely going to I'm just trying to piss it into the collective zeitgeist of Jow Forums at the moment to see if anyone who has a better idea criticises it so I can integrate that.
Jordan Ortiz
user
im ashamed to say this, but here in commiefornia,
studio apartment ("kitchen" bathroom and one bedroom)
no yard
deposit: $1000
Rent: started at $650 two years ago, is now $790/mo
repeat, no yard. I have to walk my dog half a mile (not really complaining) everytime he has to shit. really only a pain late at night or when its raining (never gets cold here)
i want to leave so badly but my son wont leave his mom, who wont leave the county.
>CUT MY LIFE INTO PIECES