How do these fags get a 32 million pounds worth of wedding?

Arranged marriage using the Kardashian method of using negros as accessories to tap into the ratings audience of reality television and ghetto phone apps

Also after browsing the staged wedding coverage Markle was not shot using the whitening filters she uses to make her appear less black while minimizing her ginormous nose.

Attached: royal-wedding-2018-meghan-markle-jewlery-makeup[1].jpg (1644x2405, 1.91M)

They are not even British but a horrible inbred German family called Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. At least put a fucking Plantagenet back on the throne.

Pretty much. I'm not too fond of royalty per se, just look at our Habsburger family. Prince is a full blown asshole and retard. But I respect the tradition and who doesn't like to visit a castle now and then? Couple kilometers south from my home lives the count of Spee. Last count was pretty alright, his kids are faggots who waste the family's money on the stock market, but damn, they have a really nice garden which is open to the public and quite a (local) tourist attraction.

The real Prince Harry - James Francis Alexander, was murdered the other day in a professional execution.

I'd already seen everything else several times and I still had an hour left before my return train. Your monarchy is literally nothing more than something to pass the time during a moment of extreme boredom.

Only a cucked normie would defend the monarchy resorting to muh money kind of arguments.

For you perhaps. Your entire country is literally nothing more than something to pass the time during a moment of extreme boredom while I'm visiting the Netherlands and I wont know who your leader is without a google search.

Why would anyone ever date, let alone marry, this 4/10 mutt who's been riding the cock carrousel for the past 20 years? Especially if you're fucking royalty. Harry could've have had a harem of perfect 10/10 qts based solely on his wealth.

This is Harry's former giirl "Chelsy Davy". There are scores of Page 3 girls available and hundreds of thousands American Instagram models if the Royal Family wanted more attention

Nope gotta go after woke twitter.

Attached: chelsy-davy-pic-david-harley-946515277[1].jpg (1200x630, 98K)

45 million pounds is very little when you compare them to Communist "kangz" who generally apropriate the entire economies for the "people" or "party" or whatever.

Communism is the truly expensive system.

They're both ugly, wtf...
Kate beats them all...

Do you know Putin? It's their future leader.

She's so ugly. Like a used baseball glove.

>thinks the queen is his 'leader'.

Someone forgot the whole Bill of Rights thing I guess.

Also Hoegaarden is the leader of Belgium.

Who pays for this bullshit?

The Windsors only pretend to make money from the gov. In reality, they pay to be royal. They are the largest landowners in the country, and almost every single gov building is leased by them. They own the vast majority of the contents of the museum as well. Then consider how much money they have invested, having owned the country itself for generations. They are not dependent on the gov. The situation is just convenient.

>Isn't their wedding being payed off the taxpayer's wallet?
no

But he probably would have gone regardless of if there was an actual royal family or not.

>At least put a fucking Plantagenet back on the throne.
they died out + the plantagenet were french

businessinsider.com/british-royal-family-richest-people-2017-11

You're quite wrong there, friend. We're firmly in control of Jupiler and AB Inbev, largest beer producer in the world.

the queen paid for the wedding, only thing the tax payer paid for was security, which aside from the tourism is arguably good for the economy.

Her nudes leak when??

it was all private money, dumb commie

>The Brand Finance research documented that the monarchy contributes nearly £1.8 billion to the UK economy each year.

theyre already leaked

This was beautiful

Attached: B3CB4949-B7F0-4A77-8F89-7B570B71338D.jpg (1024x490, 124K)

The government also takes most of the revenue from the crown estates in exchange for the £45m stipend. These revenues were £328m last year, so the royal family are extremely cost effective.

the royal family payed for it

Keratin straightened hair and whitening photo filters in action

Attached: imrs[1].jpg&w=1484&t=20170517a.jpg (1484x649, 91K)

Attached: meghan_markle_nude_proof.jpg (1000x1550, 330K)

england has a bill of rights? hm. imagine that.

Well, Brits have already proven they shit on it on a daily basis. But it does exist.

Hear me out but what if they take the revenue from the crown estates and not pay them any money and instead kill them? France is the most visited country in the world, getting rid of your monarchy wouldn't get rid of the buildings people come to see and their jewels, clothes, etc, plus the areas which are closed off to the public can be opened because no one will be living there enticing people who have already visited to re-visit making even more money

And those crown estates were received from the state. How would it work if without that 45m stipend, the state would own the estate and manage it?

Our Queen is the head of state as much as you republicans like to say otherwise.

they own literally half of oxford street property.. where the rent is 100K+ per month

Attached: download (1).jpg (300x168, 13K)

So the government should appropriate the lands of rich people and kill them? We are not full blown socialism yet.

Only in name, idiot. The government rules in their stead.

>And those crown estates were received from the state.
no the crown estates are not owned by the state

>France is the most visited country in the world
those are 'refugees' not 'visitors'. there's a marked difference.

London has more than one thing. Imagine my shock.
Americans buy more monarchy merchandise that us Brits do. They also have a much higher viewer count in monarchy related TV programs like the Royal Wedding.

As was the royal court for centuries

Most of the land was accumulated over nearly 1000 years of the monarchy. It would be difficult to justify appropriating it.

>Let's kill the rich and take their land then manage it directly.
The Crown Estates are private land. The Government shouldn't be taking anything from them. The only reason they can do so legally is because the Queen is charitable.

She has definitely had a nose job and whatever else, right?
I did often wonder If she was bleaching her skin.

The crown still owns that land. The deal made in the 18th century means if the government stops paying the stipend then the crown estate revenue reverts back to the crown.

Just the stolen lands and wealth from """royalty""", they took this land, they didn't pay for it, they didn't earn it they just seized it because they said they had a divine right

Is that why every major bill they pass needs to be viewed and signed by the Queen who regularly sends them back for further amendment?
She's like a boss who has delegated too much work to her subordinates. She doesn't run the whole show any more but important decisions are still hers to make.

Attached: WorldTourismRankings.png (1644x499, 38K)

>they took this land, they didn't pay for
from whom?
>didn't earn it they just seized it
so are you going to give up all your property to the aboriginals?

>they apparently bring in money indirectly through tourism,

Ah thats what they tell you guys over there?
In the Netherlands they say that the king brings in alot of big business deals for the country.
And then i look at other European countries without a monarchy and they are doing just fine, most of the time even better.

These people still controll their country. Even if they say its all just a tradition. Behind the scenes they still rule.

Like your ancestors seized Australia, a whole fucking continent?

Perhaps you would have a point if we look at the lands belonging to Eliz2 as part of her title as monarch. Like the entirety of your country. However if we look at the crown lands alone they have been bought or conquered and inherited properly from historical times through legal processes as private belongings of the Royal family.

Not that I'm particularly in favour of them and i lmao@ cUcKs, but the UK government basically confiscates their property and in return gives the queen a portion of the income in pocket money

>from whom?
From the landowners at the time, which were the villagers, farmers, etc
>so are you going to give up all your property to the aboriginals?
Whites took this land by right of conquest, the """royals""" took it by faux laws

See above

Also give back stolen jewelery and diamonds.

Attached: noor123.jpg (640x480, 47K)

>Isn't their wedding being payed off the taxpayer's wallet?
Taxes in monarchies, even democratic ones, mean something a little different than in republics. There the monarch has dominium eminens over the whole land, and people basically pay the rent for being allowed to settle. Democracy in constitutional monarchies just means that the monarch was pressured to renounce some of his powers. In the republic (res publica), the people have the sovereignty. They decide, as a collective, to pay taxes on their own.

>not being a republic
Kek

>Write the legal processes
>Somehow end up as the largest landholders in the world
Nice Jew trickery you got there

you fucking idiot

>From the landowners at the time, which were the villagers, farmers, etc
no they inherit it if from their ancestors , going back to William the conqueror who took the land by right of conquest

Attached: 1526848880612.jpg (1536x856, 935K)

Look up the Duke of Edinburgh award and charities they work with they help with the soft skills of the youth better than any govt run and funded bullshit for minorities would be.

Duke of Edinburgh works well desu and it was all his idea without the bureaucracy

She didn’t even have the power to stop her grandson from marrying a nigger and further disgracing New Pakistan. Lol.

Attached: 7A368FC0-B417-4C8E-888D-151DE14F7FAE.jpg (1024x613, 71K)

Is an Islamic republic better than an Islamic monarchy?

I see
Seems like even the state was just one of their properties, instead of it being a mandate from the state/title.
So accumulating property with the power of the state, but it being their private instead.

So... are you arguing for or against this "right of conquest"? Seems you're moving goalposts there. And keep in mind, those English peasants weren't relocated to reservations like what happened to the natives in America and AUS.

I didn't watch the Royal cucking. Why did he chose it?

Attached: 1492788314886.jpg (604x453, 59K)

Taxes don't pay for this, they're independently rich.
I hate that nut, too, but I'm more than certain that most of the royal family and what's left of the aristocracy don't like the whole thing, but need to grin and bare it in front of the cameras.

I don't recognise a Protestant ruler of England

Right of conquest only applies to lesser """peoples""" like Abos

She did. She signed the consent form allowing Harry to maintain succession rights.
It's always interesting to see you Americans forget about your own recent history.

Attached: Monkey in a suit meets the King.jpg (3500x2333, 1.03M)

After what they went through with Charles, Harry is just a tiny blip on the radar.

So you're saying that you're a Catholic? Don't you have some niggers to welcome into your asshole while you kiss their feet?

>Isn't their wedding being payed off the taxpayer's wallet?

Nope.

>The royalty gets payed 45 million pounds per year not including the money they make off crown duty.

No they don't.
youtube.com/watch?v=bhyYgnhhKFw

Attached: 1525933932372.jpg (962x918, 328K)

The half nig is going to be nothing but a tolerated stain on the royal family because grandma loves Harry too much to tell him no. Its sad but its going to affect nothing. Charles, William and Williams kids have to all die before he has a chance to take the throne.

Look at Poland now look at Britain, you allow poofter marriage in Churches and women Ministers, you're a fucking joke of a religion and heretics

Constitutional monarchies have an average GDP per capita of $29,106.71 and an average life expectancy of 75.6. Republics have an average GDP per capita of $12,518.76 and an average life expectancy of 68.3. Point: constitutional monarchies.

Besides, Britain is still on its first monarchy. You're on your 27th republic. Doesn't say anything good about republics, Ahmed.

Attached: 1524274130966.jpg (1024x439, 131K)

Poland is a country of crypto-jews. Naturally the morality is going to be kept as tight as Israel.
Catholicism is cancer. The pope spoke about letting refugees into Europe without regards to national laws or security.

>having a nigger president for 8 years is the same as having a nigger monarchy forever.

Attached: A4342C72-176C-40E5-A522-3F1F0DFA7DDD.jpg (601x508, 38K)

Current Pope isn't even the real Pope, Benedict is still the Pope, Francis is a fucking Jesuit which is another word for Jew

Many people would be relieved if that were the case.

As long as William's kids survive and have kids of themselves Harry's lineage will have no chance of being king/queen. They'll be dukes/duchesses but thats it

>An actual nigger leader.
vs
>A man who will never be king.

They can't have children anyway. The bitch is too old. If they want children they will have to harvest eggs from the generic blonde hair, blue eyes chick that everyone favours.

>by mako
How embarrassing.

The Plantagenets were incredible rulers; very underrated. Smart, cunning, ruthless, but fair.

Well more Americans exist. Imagine my shock. People would still purchase trinkets from the castle.
But the type of monarchy you have makes no sense. I’d be all for it if it was the kind where the king fucked up it was off with his head or when life expectancy was lower so there was more turnover of who was on the throne. Even when they weren’t so filthy rich. Now they live forever and have infinite amounts of money there is no reason for them to care about the commoner. Just look at Harry’s behavior. He has no care to marry someone from his own country or even politically expedient. There is no point to these people. They just continue to get wealthier while changing all the rules to accommodate themselves.

Jesus Christ how many levels of stupidity are you on?
>Catholic sedewhatever communist republican.

Harry’s other exes are hotter