Chris Langan on Identity Politics
Personal idol.
ctmu is retarded, go back to beating up your fat jew wife langan
Uhhhhhhh
Anyone know when he's going to release that book that goes into more detail on CTMU for us brainlets?
I think he said somewhere on Quora that he is still working on finishing the CTMU? I don't remember for sure though.
langan is only capable of using made up jargon words to describe things
t. brainlet / jidf
Reminder that this guy has a group of people he gets to shill for him online, he also edits his own wikipedia page and his theory is pure bullshit
I ain’t listening to a fucking bouncer for advice.
>Muh high IQ meme
Some of the dumbest fuckers in the world. High IQ created the A bomb.
lol what a fag
Ahmed, you said you could speak?
>Humble club bouncer genius hires people to be their PR department.
> or the majority populations of Europe and North America should be encouraged to assert their own ethnic and cultural identities and group interests with full force.
Ain't this a good thing?
retarded bongs don't realize that even if his theory is bullshit, having someone who the media has described as "the smartest man in the world" endorsing the survival of the white race is still of benefit to us.
did you even read the Quora answer, you brainlet bong?
THIS. retarded bongs are too far gone, they can't tell when something is advantageous unless it's spelled out for them.
>described as "the smartest man in the world"
The only time this was said was in some stupid entertainment show, once. He keeps citing this as if its some huge achievement. Even if he truly is the smartest man in the world it means nothing. He has zero experience in anything other than being a bouncer
You guys make me laugh, watch this:
For example, when some overpopulating groups which have overtaxed their own resources by reproductive incontinence and homegrown oligarchy are allowed to migrate into the sovereign territories of worldwide ethnic minorities - e.g., people of European descent - and enjoy special “oppressed” status whereby they reap special benefits such as free food, free housing, free education, free healthcare, affirmative action, reproductive subsidies, and special treatment under the law, and are even credited with moral superiority due to their alleged “oppression”, this can result in the destruction of the national, cultural, and ethnic identity of the hosts, leading ultimately to their extinction. Incoming groups which assert their own collective identities while denying their hosts any reciprocal right of political group cohesion thus amount to noxious, invasive, and ultimately lethal socioeconomic parasites. Obviously, any governmental authority which enforces or encourages such asymmetry - e.g., the European Union - is illegitimate.
Feel dumb now?
Oh boy, word salad with a side of snake oil, my favorite!
cause non spergs are really paying attention to langan
It doesn't matter if he is the smartest man or not. the fact is this: any autistic normie who saw that news report 5 years ago probably believes that he is the smartest man in the world. now the "smartest man in the world" is calling for europeans to defend their ancestry. it's like an endorsement you bonglet
Chris is absolutely based.
what do you think if he said that for what it really is: "sand niggers GTFO REEE"? it would be immediately shut down. the majority of autistic left wingers will likely glide over his answer because they don't see that he is clearly calling out those who want to destroy white culture.
How the fuck is that a word salad? Just how dumb are you?
are bonglets and their cousins genetically predisposed to being autistic? is that why australia is so good at shit posting?
What happens is that our ADHD retards saw this.
>My view on identity politics is that it can be justified only if everyone of any ethnicity is entitled to participate
And stopped reading.
>In a 2014 radio interview, Langan said that he has worked on the P versus NP problem and thinks he can prove that P does not equal NP.[16]
Wheres the proofs Chris
Holy fuck this is incredibly based.
Sadly, apparently there are too many retards on this board to get what he was actually saying, which is sad to see.
Langan was essentially saying that the current setup, wherein minorities and non-whites are allowed to practice identity politics, is hurtful because whites are not allowed to practice it as well. He is saying that if we ALL practice identity politics, that's ok because humans all identify as groups to some degree.
I'm honestly blown away by how based he is. Also, the CTMU isn't horseshit, it's just beyond most of our understanding.
bumping so perhaps someone with even the slightest capacity to think can further contribute to this thread
the only autists here are people like you who lick the asshole of a pretentious douche like langan despite not understanding his ctmu one bit and who think a high IQ genius verifying something common sense will somehow convert loads of normies
how do you know it's not horseshit when you can't even understand it. That's like saying the shit scribbles on the wall of a mental hospital aren't nonsense we just can't figure them out yet. As far as langan uses real english he doesn't explain or solve anything.
t. a bonglet who realizes it's too late for him and his people
yes, not a single normal person in highschool/uni has ever been inspired by someone who is clearly intelligent -- all my friends wanted to grow up and get wives and let ahmed fuck her
Dance my triggered dance.
poor chris doesn't have a mathematical proof (that's beneath him), besides, there is an academic conspiracy against him because he is not part of the establishment. poor widdle chris
last I checked my country wasn't 56% white
How the fuck do you know?
He lives in a rural hellhole and doesn't goes to the aula magna everyday, how can you confirm he can't make the math if if he isn't parading like a proud peacock?
don't worry, im sure bill nye (who is a REAL scientist xddd) teaching our kids about the 63 genders will have no affect on the next generation
This
A guy who does not understand the difference between physics and philosophy should not be given any attention at all
If you think he's helping your cause, you are also wrong. His authoritarian technocracy beliefs are putting off everyone
how do I know? hmmmm lets see...cause where the fuck is it?
he probably needs to invent loads of new words first in order to bamboozle us into thinking he is smart
Stephen Hawkings also considered that information was a universal force, but somehow it's only wrong if he tosses your drunk ass.
Yes,
I assumed he would be spouting pro libtard bullshit. My bad. However once he talks about the JQ I’ll be more interested in listening to him.
He's our proud rednecks with a serious brain.
HE ALREADY HAS. He did a facebook Q and A while back where he describes in detail the way he believes the world will change if the (((powers that be))) remain in power.
Why do all the Brits here act like they have a bone to pick with this guy? Are you all mathematicians that got their feelings hurt when Chris btfo'd you?
It's just an unnecessarily complicated philosophical version of taoism mixed with other existing ideas and made up words.
The knowledge of his intelligence makes him a hack with superiority complex
he has a jew wife, mutts don't seem to have grasped that here
Modern physics IS philosophy, it's the only practical application for that absurd field.
The queen also has jew blood.
t. ahmed's cocksleeeve's husband
we need to discuss how to spread the word that the purportedly "smartest man in the world" believes whites should preserve their culture, not argue over his vision of the universe. jesus christ people in this thread are missing the fucking point.
>Why do all the Brits here act like they have a bone to pick with this guy? Are you all mathematicians that got their feelings hurt when Chris btfo'd you?
no, they are simply sad that the last intelligent pro white mind is an american, and as a result the liberation of the white race in their countries will likely never come.
His vision of the universe it's worthy of discussion and they have him banned from /sci/ cause he refuses the white lab coat and their fancy wall ornaments.
I can understand enough of it to recognize that it's at least a step above scribblings in a mental hospital lol.
He seems to overindulge in verbose a lot, but his points are pretty valid.
This.
It's worth spreading, somehow pol can't get their shit together enough to realize that and are parading their own pseudo-intellectual views.
if you're referring to the quora question i posted, i will again point out that if he used "casual" language, he would be labelled a bigot and would never be able to speak in a public forum, online or otherwise, again.
TL;DR: he langan says he hates niggers, he would be shut down.
>muh optics faggot
It isn't.
Physics relies on 'absurd' math to further predict certain things in our environment and even QM does that.
Philosophy is not exactly the same because it is based on language and this hack is telling us things we already know, like the need to combine language and math, which we have been trying to do for hundreds of years.
Either he solves some of our existing problems, helps to develop physics or should just fuck off; his 'knowledge' is not any kind of revolution, but a huge step back
When you are going places where no man has gone before you HAVE to create a language around the things you are exploring. Quantum mechanics, quantum entanglement could also be perceived as quack terms except in our world they are legitimate.
If we liberate information as a fundamental force we can do a lot.
it isn't a huge step back at all because most brainlets denounce him and retreat to their echochambers of meaningless physics and empirical sciences.
But he talks like that in all his answers, I checked the other ones out too. I'm willing to bet his CTMU could be understood by more people if he just wrote normally.
Did you actually read it?
Tell me anything of his model we haven't thought of before.
Scientifical ideas are not necessarily reality and we know about the flaws of relativity and alike, but they still help us to further define and predict things.
Philosophical ideas on the other side do have a high value, yet are useless in reality and as mentioned, his ideas are far from original.
CTMU has more than 20 years now, he's just outdated in that, but having him moving to social sciences isn't a net loss at all.
How's that original compared to the development of AI perception and/or the quantum sciences?
>belonging to a group exhibiting a relatively low mean IQ and a tendency to violently disrupt the educational environment”
What did he mean by this?
Ai isn't free, development and teaching are restricted, in a free information system we'll be reaching the stars.
but that also runs the risk of it being misunderstood, which could potentially be worse than having less people studying it in the first place. even if it looks like "scribble" to brainlets who are unable to visualize/comprehend what he is describing, his word choice is very methodical. he uses what he believes is optimal language to effectively describe whatever he is trying to say.
hmmmmmm
They say that if you can't explain something to a person, you don't understand it yourself, so me having not looked at this theory would like to know what it's about. I'm asking you to explain it to me.
kek
True, we haven't had the AI perception-theories back then, but a theory of the human perception.
I really wish this guy did something useful with his intelligence and certainly he got knowledge and an amazing comprehensibility, but his ego prevents it.
This person looks like a nigger.
It's not ego to want to be a simple guy user.
Being a teacher can be painful.
who says that? also, isn't it safe to assume that many people don't go into STEM because they don't understand it? does that mean that the people teaching STEM are incapable of teaching it to a retard, and therefor don't understand it themselves?
also, here: quora.com
I think he knows that by simply creating his CTMU, the people who can comprehend it will, and what will result is the scientific equivilent of "trickle down economics", where people passionate about his work will continue to teach it after he is gone. he's like a 50-60 year old man, he's not going to be here forever. so instead of wasting his time climbing the ranks of acadamia and then dying, leaving behind an incomplete theory, he values completing his CTMU and letting other people do the teaching for him.
why are brainlets so threatened by this guy?
they passionately hate him to compensate for their insecurities
this.
mo wonder high Iq ppl are white nationalists
leftism is just fantasy make believe
the juden hate him because he's everything they dream to be but cannot
Incoming groups which assert their own collective identities while denying their hosts any reciprocal right of political group cohesion thus amount to noxious, invasive, and ultimately lethal socioeconomic parasites.
>Obviously, any governmental authority which enforces or encourages such asymmetry - e.g., the European Union - is illegitimate.
Straight from God - time to kill the EU politicians boys.
It's an Albert Einstein quote and it just means that if you can't explain the basics of an idea to a person with a presumably average intelligence, then you don't really understand it and it's just a generalization of course. There's probably some things which literally can't be explained in simple terms.
And I read the brief description, and it doesn't really explain much. He talks about the universe having its own language and talking to itself, and that alone is a foreign concept which requires an explanation on its own, which he didn't provide.
You are probably right, I don't know a lot about his life.
Perhaps it's also not easy to write a whole model and then figure out that it's still too complicated for the majority of people.
I still have plenty of issues with the model itself, but I appreciate the perspectives
this brit gets it
Not a step back. More like either completely wrong or ahead of its time and practically useless. Epicurus presaged quantum randomness when he deduced that free will might require random swerves at the atomic level. Not entirely accurate but the guess was respectable considering what he had to work with. Whether or not it leads to free will btw isn't the point but I merely want to point out that conjecture on things you can't prove isn't always wrong or harmful.
Cognitive functions in accordance with consciousness. It actually makes sense with knowledge of carl jungs theories, neurology and quantum sciences, but it is still up to the readers interpretation and the main reason I'd call it philosophical idea, not science.
I imagine it even a little simpler than that. The CTMU makes thought and matter the same thing. So imagine for you as a thinking being ultimate power as you can concieve it, say being a Rothschild issuing the money supply.
Pretty much anything you can think of you can get people to do, it doesn't really take any effort you just tell people what thing you're imagining being done and they do it. It's as though reality extends from your thoughts and whatever you think becomes reality.
That's what power is, it's the degree to which you can occupy the full range of what's possible with your own thoughts and turn your thoughts into reality. Ultimate power is where reality and thought are the same thing. I.e. where nothing is impossible.
He states at certain levels of reality what is impossible and possible is in flux, there is simply pure thought, but as you diverge from it some basic forms of consensus emerge as the laws of nature, much like some basic forms of self-emergent consensus emerge in political systems or indeed any other complex structure, assert themselves.
How they act conditions the laws governing them and the laws governing them condition how they act. This cycle goes on and on, always changing, all possibilities and impossibilities explored, ever-changing, sui generis.
He got screwed in college because the system is set up to mass produce mediocre graduates. It's about maximizing profit. Success is incredibly difficult to come by if you're smart but have no guidance (which he didn't have). The education system here actually has an incentive to draw your 'education' out to milk you for money. And if you're sufficiently intelligent your talents will be nearly invisible to those around you because unlike muscularity, intelligence isn't something everyone can easily recognize. You kind of need to have it to know it.
You can read this if you want to go more in depth but in summary past a certain point a higher IQ counts against you unless you choose an incredibly rigorous discipline where you can absolutely demonstrate your conclusions.
polymatharchives.blogspot.com
As an aside, this partly inspired my theory on why Jews succeed so much more than the average. It's because of nepotism sure but I think they also get a lot of guidance. A high IQ white kid, let's say IQ of 145, might be the only person around who has an IQ like that and his friends and family might not be capable of helping. But a mediocre Jew stands a high chance of having relatives or family associates who have been through the education system who can tell them what to do and trust me that matters a lot more than talent, especially these days.
>,
fuck nigga thats way better then how i could have explained it. well done.
Oh, I should add that the average Ashkenazi IQ is 106-107, not 115. The study the 115 figure comes from is bogus but it's been parroted so much that it's become accepted. When I found this out I realized you always, ALWAYS have to check into what you're told even if all the 'informed' voices, even alt media ones, are saying it's true. The amount of intellectual laziness out there is astounding.
I've thought about this too and have come to roughly the same conclusion. I think Jews are very good at teaching their youth how to function in society and creating structure in their lives that likely contributes to higher academic success.
>He states at certain levels of reality what is impossible and possible is in flux
This is where you lost me, but I like the gist of the first part, about thought being seen as something tangible almost: shaping reality.
I just don't know what you mean by certain levels of reality.
>I just don't know what you mean by certain levels of reality.
look up the youtube channel 10thdim. watch that shit
bump because i have nothing to do and im waiting for food
Yeah that's kind of hard to explain but I'll try:
1. When we think for example about what's possible and what's impossible they're on a spectrum:
2. On the one end is what's definitely going to happen (and has to happen).
3. On the other what's never going to happen (and definitely cannot happen).*
4. On this spectrum is stuff that is more likely to happen.
5. On this spectrum is stuff that's less likely to happen.
6. So let's imagine a situation involving chance:
7. You flip a coin one time, and the possibility of getting heads is 1 in 2 right?
8. However we might say if you flip it 7 times, the possibility of it getting heads is 1 in 128.
9. However if you flip the coin an infinity of times, you go back to it being once again a 1 in 2 chance of getting heads over that infinity of times.**
10. Now the difference between 1, 0 or infinity is up for a mathematician to highlight for you but you can imagine these as "scales" or "levels" of reality.
11. As a result there are some levels of reality where things are more certain and more uncertain (far more extreme and ultimate than flipping a coin).
12. You can sort of see why: Our scale of reality is quite unpredictable, but on the astronomical level or indeed the molecular they are quite easy to predict.
13. Quantum foam is right around that sweet spot.
14. I.e. The sweetspot being, i.e., the really hard thing to get your head around, that the spectrum is not dipolar but unipolar - it's a circle, not a line.*
15. In the peaks and troughs of those scales is a greater occurrence of "thought" or "objective reality" - though they are not distinct.
16. And there are of course qualitatively different kinds of infinity.**
I'm not sure if that makes sense?
>However if you flip the coin an infinity of times, you go back to it being once again a 1 in 2 chance of getting heads over that infinity of times.**
Poisson distribution related. I only know about it because of imaging, don't ask lol.
Bobby Fischer was jewish
Thanks, bump for the effort, I was away but I'll read it now.
looks like this thread is dead. its been good yall, peace
Let me see if I get this right: Basically, theoretically I could become the dictator of planet earth if the right circumstances align themselves in my favor, but it probably won't happen.
It's more about the way Higgs bosson creates matter, but sure.