regarding female thottery...you got most things right, but why isnt the question of policing the male sexuality brought up?
Roastie/women Q - policing the male gender
Tyler Thompson
Jason Walker
in many ways, the fact that Roosh wasnt beaten up sensesly by men after entering a country where he plans to whore around is telling of the decadence of the male gender and our demasculinization.
Sad thing is that women tried to police him, since men didnt do their job and protecting the capital of powsie, so there you had the episode of those fliers with rooshes ugly face posted as a warning. Really sad story.
now why should men le white knight that way to prevent other man from fornicating with THEIR women. Because women are property, as such they should be protected and respected, not a leddit way but in a genuine trad way.
Dominic Harris
do you not realize that its degenerate and that sexual perversion of one sex doesnt happen in isolation, and it translates to other sex eventually?
sexual "liberation" movements (PUA- yes, pick up artists are a sex lib movement, feminism, homos) of one group/sex translate to sexual "liberation" of all and everything.
if you are not married (=/=(((serious relationship))) ), you shouldnt be having sex.
discuss.
>inb4 brainlet response key and lock therefore it is OK
>inb4 brainlet response sex are dimorphic as is sexual market so its "natural"
partially correct actually, but brainlets dont get that sexual market needs to be channeled not let loose, as previously stated, sexual degeneracy doesnt happen in isolation since you need 2 2 tango.
Thomas Russell
I see your point, but male degeneracy is not destroying the world, women's degeneracy is.
If women are not degenerates, men can not be.
Men will always rise only as far as they need to in order to get women. If women are high, men will follow, if women are low, men also follow.
We need to get women up before we do anything about male degeneracy, it does not matter that much and solves itself out if women improve.
Luis Gutierrez
>If women are high, men will follow, if women are low, men also follow.
its the other way around, women followed men into degeneracy, but since the 80/20 principle, effect is more visible in and women women are "averagly" degenerate, while their is more variability within males.
That being said, whore shaming, thot patroling is entirely legitimate and we need a 2 prong approch - and that means we DO NEED to also police male sexuality.
WOMEN ARE A REFLECTION OF SOCIETIES MEN
Andrew Martin
your country is also very ilustrative in sex degeneracy example, women dont choose to shake their asses on kids shows while kids kille each other outside, its mostly men who clap and reinforce that behaviour.
Anthony Torres
the whole concept of being macho, edgy and masculine totally degenerated
Dominic Harris
>PUAs
>seduce hundreds of women
>time_to_get_married.rb
>"how did women become sluts?"
>what is cause and effect
Andrew King
>in many ways, the fact that Roosh wasnt beaten up sensesly by men after entering a country where he plans to whore around is telling of the decadence of the male gender and our demasculinization.
White knighting much?
If they were not whores he could not fuck them,look at him ffs.
If someone need a beating it's the loose sluts.
David Smith
>We need to stop alpha males from fucking all the women!
Hello melvin.
Wyatt Hill
>If they were not whores
most women are whores.
most children are dumb.
our, genuinly, non memish TRAD anscestory knew that and acted accordingly.
what is virtuous about roosh?
Ian Gutierrez
Women are sluts if they sleep around. Men aren't.
Simple biological differences.
David Smith
>Women are sluts if they sleep around. Men aren't.
yes, and how does that help us?
Owen Morris
>If they were not whores he could not fuck them,look at him ffs.
He has a long jaw, a beard thicker than 99% of Jow Forums, he's tall and he lifts. He's an above-average looking dude, sorry your boipussy in particular doesn't get too wet for him.
Leo Turner
>If someone need a beating it's the loose sluts.
too late for that, they get rejected for society, but under proper circumstances and guidance, those would be good mothers.
Out forefathers wouldnt think twice about beating a Casanove that wanted to seduce their daughters.
what do you think about Bill Clinton? would you let him fuck your wife? Oh Denzel, he is soooooo coool!!!!!
Liam Evans
>most women are whores.
most children are dumb.
Children are under adult autority and get protection,women don't.
Besides why do you care none of this sluts will make stable family.Damaged goods.Let them whore themselvs and suffer the result.That's the only thng they are good for
Are you in love?Soo qute.
Jason Adams
>Damaged goods.Let them whore themselvs and suffer the result.That's the only thng they are good for
there is no turning back for them, but that is not in out interest, we could have prevented this.
Liam Morales
its really funny to me that most on Jow Forums think female degeneracy is responsible for western decadence. its entirely the other way around. the only significant effect that women can have on civilisation is increasing or decreasing the morale of men. they simply don't have the natural power to do much more than that. the reason women are becoming increasing shrill is that men are becoming increasingly inept.
this is true even in a democracy. voting in an indirect democracy is a complete meme and has hardly any effect on the direction a nation takes. most of the culture of modern western states is determined by non-government institutions and unelected members of government institutions. besides that, 90+% of women will vote for whoever they are told to vote for by the strongest voice in their life. when men are weak and unreliable that voice can come from far away.
the condition of civilisation is almost entirely dependant on male virtue or lack there of. take a good look at your own life and contribution. i suspect most people on this board are part of the problem not the solution.
David Bailey
this, fuck those guys
I'm saving my virginity for my waifu
Dylan Walker
>I'm saving my virginity for my waifu
...and even if you dont find a waifu I salute you for not choosing the feelgood path of sexual degeneracy.
>when men are weak and unreliable that voice can come from far away.
word is bond
>i suspect most people on this board are part of the problem not the solution.
really nigga? what place holds a similar discussion you are having right now?
Lucas Lopez
>we could have prevented this.
We can't.Society and laws bind you hands in this.
Keep you energy for the ones that are worth it.In a sence people like Roosh are douing us a favor by exposing the women you don't want to have relationship with.
Carter Thomas
>people like Roosh are douing us a favor by exposing the women
they are exposing women that could have make it with proper guidance, albeit they arent the top tier of character obviously.
Its like asking a child "is socialism good?" and then disowning him for making a bad decision.
Roosh and PUA degenerates are our enemy.
Jose Baker
i didn't say that a greater proportion of men on Jow Forums are part of the problem than elsewhere. i said most men on Jow Forums are part of the problem. this isn't at all the same statement. the reality is that there are few good men anywhere.
in this thread itself you can find:
> If women are high, men will follow, if women are low, men also follow.
>We need to get women up before we do anything about male degeneracy, it does not matter that much and solves itself out if women improve.
this is honestly sickening stuff. men don't follow women! male virtue is not a bargaining chip for sexual access; it is the foundation upon which a civilisation is built upon. it is an intrinsic good.
Daniel Scott
>We need to get women up before we do anything about male degeneracy, it does not matter that much and solves itself out if women improve.
trully sickening stuff indeed, in Brazil they worship women even more than in the West.
There is this Hunter Thompson/GAvin McInsert thing on pol, sort of "cool right wing degenerare" but honestly, there are plenty of good men on pol, unproportinally high number compared to other men groups.
Bentley Cook
>muh degeneracy
>muh ancestors
Wrong! 99.9% of human history allowed the most successful men to take multiple mates. In hunter-gatherer times, only 1 male mated for every 17 women. In the great empires and civilizations, the men of the highest classes had access to multitudes of concubines in their harems. 1 in 200 people can trace their heritage directly back to Genghis Khan."Male degeneracy" is only a problem when it is a excuse for sickness such as homosexuality, bestiality, coprophilia, etc. There is nothing wrong with being sexually successful.
Luke Cooper
>1 in 200 people can trace their heritage directly back to Genghis Khan.
those savages are your idols? amerimutt defending muttism. nothing new under the sun.
Juan Gray
He's lucky he looks good, because he's a super brainlet.
Leo Torres
He's at best a 6.5.
Cooper Torres
Genghis Khan may have been "savage" according to some random irrelevant guy centuries in the future, but he also built the largest land empire of all time. You need to stop living in your ideal world of "what should be" and live in the real world of "what is".
Julian Howard
>but he also built the largest land empire of all time.
what culture was left from it? did he built magnificient buldings, culture like monogamous NOBEL white people did? He was a nog and he is your idol, think about that for a second.
Nolan Parker
he didnt build anything. he destroyed and connected existing empires. american education has taken away your ability to recognise the difference between the civilised and barbarian by making you believe that barbarian is simply an arbitrary term that an ingroup uses to refer to an outgroup. this is nonsense. there are obviously subjective factors and historical examples of misuse of the term but at the same time we know what civilisation and its fruits look like. genghis khan is not a model to follow, he was the ultimate manifestation of what must be continuously purged from the earth. you can't call yourself a conservative if you are more interested in raping and pillaging than conserving.