>Max is a talking police dog (voiced by Ludacris) who is paired up with a human partner, Frank (Will Arnett) to infiltrate a prestigious dog show and rescue a kidnapped baby panda. >It’s when Max the police dog learns what he has to do to truly go undercover and be accepted as a legitimate show dog that the trouble with this movie starts. WHAT does Max (and apparently all the show dogs) have to submit to? >Having his private parts touched and inspected. Yep. Maldonado continues: >“What could have been solely a fun movie for kids that would get my highest recommendation is damaged by a dark and disturbing message hidden, not so subtly between the fluffy dogs and glamorous parties of the show dog lifestyle. As part of any dog show, contestants are judged on their abilities and physical attributes. One part, in particular, is the inspection of the dog’s private parts.” >Max, of course, is NOT cool with this, and when his partner Frank and a former champion show dog try to get him to accept this process, a certain dark and very dangerous theme for kids emerges. Maldonado explains: >“Since the inspection of the private parts will happen in the finals, Frank touches Max’s private parts to get him use to it. Of course, Max doesn’t like it and snaps at Frank for him to stop. Max is then told by the former champion, who has been through the process before, that he needs to go to his “zen place” while it happens so he can get through it. More attempts are made by Frank to touch Max’s private parts, but Max is still having trouble letting it happen and keeps snapping at him.” >Max needs to get it together, see, and LET PEOPLE TOUCH HIS PRIVATE PARTS, or he might lose the competition and fail at his mission to rescue the kidnapped panda.
I just read this. Hollywood can't get more blatant.
Lincoln Wright
God damned pandas and genital inspection. I know this isn't exactly the right board for this, but I can't think of anywhere more appropriate to get the word out. Sick bastards.
Jose Murphy
is this real?wtf is wrong with jews?
Robert Allen
It's just more kikes grooming kids.
to any incels planning a massacre, go shoot up hollywood please and also take out katy perry while you're at it.
Grayson Cooper
I haven't seen the movie, but the poster seems sincere, and she's referencing someone else complaining about it. Seems legit.
Cameron Carter
Can the dog actually talk or does the audience just hear his thoughts? If he can actually talk I dont see how he could lose a dog show.
Fuck off with your subversion. Every god damned time.
Jace Parker
the real offensive here is that talking pet movies are coming back
Levi Sullivan
Barking at white people.
Nicholas Campbell
How long before they take this off Wikipedia? >According to one review, the movie is an attempt to normalize molestation/grooming to children.[[1]]. A major plot point is that the hero dog must learn to "allow" strangers to fondle his privates and be normalized to it, which is presented as humorous and nonthreatening. eastmesa.macaronikid.com/articles/5b017dc3700a6450421ef1c2 . As the movie is presented as being for children, this arc--allowing your genitals to be fondled by strangers--closely resembles attempts by pedophiles to teach children not to resist sexual assault and not to report child molestation. eastmesa.macaronikid.com/articles/5b017dc3700a6450421ef1c2 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Show_Dogs
Ian Hughes
Pedophile
Connor White
>kidnapped pandas Oh for fucks sake. These people are fucking sick.
