Can we build a compilation of things cuckservative neocons say?

>China produces food from slavery
>Undercuts American and Australian farmers who cant employ slaves. They stop growing food and all food imports rely on imports now

OH WELL CANT INTRODUCE TARIFFS LOL THEYRE JUST BAD FOR EVERYONE I READ IT IN MY BOOMER ENCYCLOPEDIA AND HEARD IT ON THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA

Who is this MILFalicious goddess?

importing still costs money, you have to ship it across the ocean on giant boats in refrigerated containers, after all. are you honestly telling me you can't grow your own food cheaper than the chinks can grow it, package it, and ship it across an entire fucking ocean? you're using tariffs as a lame excuse for not being competitive, which was my original claim. work smarter or harder, or both, if you want to beat the chinks. tariffs are just admitting defeat and running to hide your face in mommy governments skirt.

>importing still costs money, you have to ship it across the ocean on giant boats in refrigerated containers, after all. are you honestly telling me you can't grow your own food cheaper than the chinks can grow it, package it, and ship it across an entire fucking ocean?

Yes that is precisely what markets tell us. Turns out that the savings made on paying living wages to thousands of farmers are most expensive than the cost of petrol on a cargo ship.

Your boomer neocon bullshit is so fucking weak. Free markets my ass.

>Yes that is precisely what markets tell us
do you mean those markets that are regulated halfway to hell already? and how's that working for us?
>paying living wages to thousands of farmers
this is the problem exactly. thousands of farmers? make it hundreds of farmers using better equipment, techniques, fertilizers, GMO, pesticides, etc. and the rest can find other productive employment in another sector of the economy. this is what brought about the industrial revolution. if the west had done things your way we would still be 90% agrarian societies with shit for technology. in other words, we would literally be africa-tier. once again, you're using tariffs as a lame excuse for being uncompetitive.
>Your boomer neocon bullshit is so fucking weak
this is fast becoming like the left wing shrieking "racist" when they don't have an actual argument.

The argument is obvious.

You would rather your countrymen compete with slaves than use their borders to protect themselves.

You want a slave to have the ability to sell their goods in your country, and put your men out of work.

The globalist cuckold logic you spit doesnt stand up anymore. The West is dying because of you cucks. You are the cause and solution to the problem. People look at your traitorous globalist ideals and recognise they have no option but to become protectionist populists.

You have made zero arguments for your opinion...

Are you fucking stupid?

1. Countries in the East like India and China pay their workers fuckall
2. This reduces the cost of production to sweet fuck all
3. The West cannot produce these products at the cost of fuck all because that would mean the workers are getting paid less than enough to live

user, what are you saying? If it becomes profitable to make goods in the us again I'm opening a factory. I have five binders of documents ready to go.

>You would rather your countrymen compete with slaves than use their borders to protect themselves
yes, i would rather my countrymen be able to outperform third world slaves. is that wrong to expect first worlders to actually be capable of beating inbred third worlders in a competition?
>and put your men out of work
i explained what would happen to them. they aren't put out of work, they go to work elsewhere in more productive positions. first world citizens should not be doing the same jobs as third world slaves. if the task can't be automated then it should be outsourced. unless of course you want to see your countrymen doing the work of illiterate, uneducated, unskilled third world slaves and needing government tariffs to level the playing field for them.

The Chinese government subsidize international shipping. It's basically free for a company to export from China.

Attached: 1526668062384.jpg (677x995, 234K)

>yes, i would rather my countrymen be able to outperform third world slaves. is that wrong to expect first worlders to actually be capable of beating inbred third worlders in a competition?

Whats this 'outperform' bullshit? It's about cost. There is no amount of hard work and boot strapping that will make American farmers better than a slave.

You ARE LITERALLY advocating that if Americans refuse to work for the same slave wages as Chinese then theres a problem with the Americans. YOU ARE A TRAITOR. A COMMUNIST.

i really hope it does become profitable again. protectionism has created a nightmare where we trample our own small businesses in order to protect our massive corporations. i would love to see factories opening in america, especially modern factories with highly skilled employees actually outproducing third world sweatshops. best of luck to you, user.

We're sending our first world people to China to help them figure out how to outcompete their countrymen using j. tricks.

Alex Jones

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 128K)

This fucking nonsense from boomers

>Americans just dont work hard enough!
THEY WORK THE SAME. THEY COST MORE. ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO BEAT ANOTHER COUNTRY ON PRICE IF THEY PRODUCE THE SAME GOODS FOR CHEAPER.

>Yeah but tariffs hurt everybody so just get better! be more efficient!
THEY STEAL THE TECHNOLOGY THAT INCREASES EFFICIENCY SO THAT THE PRODUCTIVITY REMAINS THE SAME. YOU CANT JUST KEEP BUILDING ROBOTS TO REPLACE WORKERS FOREVER AND THEN SAY FINALLY WE'VE BEATEN THE CHINESE THEY'LL NEVER BUILD ROBOTS

fucking boomer cuckservative neocon 60s - 90s economic myth logic traitor motherfucking brainlets

and the chinese government gets the money from where? do magic dragon gods bless them with free boats and oil springs or do they tax chinese companies? nothing is free in socialism, this has been addressed millions of times before.

what don't you get about being more productive? if one american can produce the same amount of goods as 10 chinks they don't have to work for slave wages. it's called automation, and again, it's what brought the west into the industrial era. you are advocating returning to the agrarian societies of the middle ages as a means to protect our standard of living. this is absolute madness.

americans are literally lazy fatasses, i work in a factory and i see it every day. for every employee on a machine there are at least two middle managers harassing somebody about some bullshit rule they made up to feel important. the american workforce is pathetic, they spend 90% of their day at work gossiping about the other employees. they call in sick every monday and every other friday with hangovers. they literally cannot wait until friday night to get blackout drunk so they constantly miss work during the week. no amount of magic tariffs are going to protect these worthless people from the chinese. you can't write laws that make unproductive nations wealthy. wealth comes from labor, that's it, once source and one source only. if you refuse to do the work then there will be no wealth for anybody.

Attached: 1503646350804.png (500x350, 244K)

Yay, I love higher taxes!

Yea always these faggots that talk like they know economics but theyre repeating boomer theories. Just like high min wage = increase in prices but can't explain why a pair of reeboks cost 45bucks in Vietnam and 50 bucks in the West despite huge difference min wage, shipping costs etc

Obviously the answer is slavery

Muh Guns
Muh Abortion
Muh civic nationalism
Muh Military
Muh Israel
Muh Bible

ITT: babies whine about how they suck at life and it’s not their fault

Right now food production is one of the only manufacturing sectors we haven’t totally exported simply because the cost of transporting the raw materials and farm subsidies. Even as it is most of these facilities are relics from like 50 years ago. A company might run 10 plants but only 1 was built in the last 10 years kind of thing.

If farm subsidies went away you’d probably see most of that manufacturing exported as these plants age out. We could very legitimately be beholden to chinks and wild Aztecs to feed us in 100 years.

>high min wage = increase in prices
high min wage = high unemployment
>can't explain why a pair of reeboks cost 45bucks in Vietnam and 50 bucks in the West
because they produce them in vietnam but don't distribute to vietnam. they produce shoes for the express purpose of selling them to westerners. meanwhile the vietnamese are all wearing cheap chinese knockoff adidas that fall apart within a month. i don't get what your point is here, are you saying it's bad for the west that entire nation's economies are geared towards serving us? if you don't want the shoes just don't buy them, how hard is that?

RACE DONT MATTER VALUES DO

DA LIBERALS ARE DA REAL RACISTS

BASED BLACK CONSERVATIVES FREEING THE BLACKS FROM THE LIBERAL PLANTATION

WE WOULD NEVER ACCEPT TYRANNY LIKE THE EUROPOORS

EUROPE IS LOST WE ARE THE LAST BASTION OF (((FREEDOM)))

Attached: goodgoyTrump.jpg (670x445, 42K)

Alex Jones
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones_(Welsh_presenter)

A grateful nation thanks Pikachu for beheading 100 Chinese in Nanking -1937

This is because the stock market is going up, as opposed to 1980s when it was going down. People with savings have their income increase when the stock market goes up. Imagine my shock.

>Well it looks like the democrats are the REEEEAAL RACISTS

Getting rid of tariffs, the fed reserve, the income tax, the expansion of the military industrial complex, military adventurism, zionism(part of the reason for promoting the spirit of perpetual massive defense spending was to be able to fund the zionist scheme without raising eyebrows) the deindustrialization of america(NAFTA), free trade/markets fetishism etc, all are part of the same jew program, which started at full speed with the fed reserve.
>Tariffs have historically served a key role in the nation's foreign trade policy. They were the greatest (approaching 95% at times) source of federal revenue until the Federal income tax began after 1913. For well over a century the federal government was largely financed by tariffs averaging about 20% on foreign imports.
Low tariffs were always a DEMOCRAT policy, and were never a right wing policy. Only after WW2, when jews had gained nearly full control of government and economy, did the republican party start this shit.
>Tariffs were the main source of revenue for the federal government from 1789 to 1914. During this period, there was vigorous debate between the various political parties over the setting of tariff rates. In general Democrats favored a tariff that would pay the cost of government, but no higher. Whigs and Republicans favored higher tariffs to protect and encourage American industry and industrial workers.

Attached: Federal_taxes_by_type.pdf.jpg (800x200, 44K)

Attached: 1501105827357.jpg (625x783, 45K)

>high min wage = high unemployment
multiple studies show this to be untrue. Yawn like I said fuckwits repeating boomer THEORIES
>UR other shit point
Walk into any poor chink country mall where there are no tourists and you'll see 1)no white ppl 2) prices are practically on par with the West

>give them shit jobs
>they serving us
What like China? HAHAHAHA

Holy shit I thought that you guys were fucking with us but that actually is Alex Jones.

The boomer logic runs deep. This is the shit all the brainlets who study economics spit out when they're too stupid to think critically and desire good grades so they just regurgitate the bullshit they're told.

Everything in the textbook written by Keynesians thats since been debunked and lead to the US debt hitting what, 22 trillion? Home ownership down? Wage stagnation and loss in real terms against inflation? Yeah that's solid fucking economic planning.

These cunts have been running in the wrong direction for decades and they expect everyone else to just close their eyes and ears and continue going.

I honestly don't know whether they're marxists who want the whole world to be earning the same slave wages, or they're retards who can't critically analyse shit and ignore the world around them.

Every OECD country has stagnant wages, yet the developing countries are all growing; how can this be good for the West? Why are we following policies that weaken ourselves and strengthen others?

Attached: 1514976769799.png (200x194, 21K)

STAGFLATION kills the Keynsian

>65-70% of households in Western countries incomes stagnated or declined between 2005-2014, while only 0-2 per did so between 1993 and 2005.

See: securityconference.de/en/discussion/munich-security-report/

LOL ITS CAUSE WE'RE LAZY NOT BECAUSE WE HAVE EXPORTED ALL OUR MANUFACTURING OVERSEAS AND WE REFUSE TO USE TARIFFS BECAUSE OF THE FALSE SWANSONG OF GLOBALISATION WARNING US IT'S BAD TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM SLAVERY PRICES

Hey fuck you buddy

To begin with -- we're not what you'd call -- human. Over the past two hundred years -- A kind of consciousness formed layer by layer in the crucible of the White House. It's not unlike the way life started in the oceans four billion years ago. The White House was our primordial soup, a base of evolution -- We are formless. We are the very discipline and morality that Americans invoke so often. How can anyone hope to eliminate us? As long as this nation exists, so will we.

Human memories, ideas. Culture. History. Genes don't contain any record of human history. Is it something that should not be passed on? Should that information be left at the mercy of nature? We've always kept records of our lives. Through words, pictures, symbols... from tablets to books... But not all the information was inherited by later generations. A small percentage of the whole was selected and processed, then passed on. Not unlike genes, really. That's what history is, Jack. But in the current, digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second, preserved in all its triteness. Never fading, always accessible. Rumors about petty issues, misinterpretations, slander... All this junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate. It will only slow down social progress, reduce the rate of evolution.
youtu.be/CgY2N7E0eEs

Welcome to the world you chose

The one Alex Jones I'd happily stick my cock into. The other would have to buy me a drink or two first.

fwooooar

Attached: 1501062517439.jpg (600x900, 47K)