James Comey: Trump’s "Spygate" Claims Are Made Up

youtube.com/watch?v=nUDe99ZUft8&t=13s

Attached: Comey-Smirk-Alex-BrandonAP-640x480.jpg (640x480, 34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OMX6qIr--Q0
thefederalist.com/2018/05/25/code-name-crossfire-hurricane-evidence-fbis-russia-cover-story/
youtu.be/CgY2N7E0eEs
steynonline.com/8667/tinker-tailor-clapper-carter-downer-halper-spy
foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/27/judge-napolitano-what-happened-to-fbi-its-been-corrupted-by-obama-and-his-team.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

OK, we can just move on to something else because a book salesman said so.

Comey sucked so bad that both candidates hated him. Now they are propping him up like he didn't royally fuck up the Hilary investigation.

The guy is a disgrace to LEO's everywhere. Zero compunction about blatantly lying to cover his own ass. A true sicko. Different kind of psychopath than Brennan, Clapper, et al but still a psychopath
youtube.com/watch?v=OMX6qIr--Q0
>Clip from Lou Dobbs last night, based ex FBI director shits all over current politicized leadership in bureau and DOJ

This will definitely convince the 5 people that watch Conan.

Is this guy secretly our guy or is the noose waiting for him?

Attached: 1515657514186.jpg (320x482, 25K)

Attached: lul.jpg (226x223, 8K)

Comey didn't fuck it up, Carlos Danger did, if he hadn't had those emails on the laptop, it would have worked.

>James Comey:

The man is shitting bricks... he knows if they instigate him that he seriously abused his power to under investigate Hillary and over investigate Trump (he was ASSURED that Hillary would win)

why is the exFBI director having an appearance with Conan? Are they telling us the whole Comey thing is just a big show or what?

Aren't they cutting his show to a half fucking hour soon? That will take the 5 down to 3 or fewer

2 book salesmen and as an added bonus, one is an admitted perjurer.

www.hasjamesclapperbeenindictedyet.com

Attached: least_untruthful_book_he_could_write.jpg (1695x2560, 572K)

>Aren't they cutting his show to a half fucking hour soon?

Literally ALL he does is rail on Trump and Republicans.
It is boring as hell.

Haha is that true? Oh man, that is bad.

>Facts: I arranged the payment of taxpayer money to spies for the purpose of fabricating blackmail against a major party's presidential candidate and his campaign associates
>Fears: I may spend the rest of my life in Guantanamo Bay

5.9

Did you notice he is starting to look real stressed out and tired? He aged 10 years in the last few months.

If I get digits, he'll die the same day as McCain.

Idk honestly how any of them could sleep. I guess on big 5 figure beds they could afford on their bigshit taxpayer funded salaries. Like McCabe and his 70k fucking conference table

Reminder that this spergoid fuck thinks Trump sitting behind a desk is "a throne"

Attached: trumpthrone.png (861x801, 111K)

The new liberal angle... no wonder liberals like recycling, they recycle their talking points

JFC other lanklets wont even be able to defend this

reroll

Sounds like what most late night shows do. Where did Conan go wrong?

I assume Comey is a Catholi-cuck. He is/was obsessed with Reinhold Niebhur. Strzok is Catholi-cuck from Georgetown. Anyone know if McCabe and Clapper are also?

Man accused of crimes denies crimes. This and more at 11.

How TRUMP dares to actually sit at the Presidential Desk, James is totally intimidated by the desk.. the desk is the entire focus of James Neurosis

Attached: Comey.jpg (960x664, 58K)

Clapper went to St. Mary's Uni in Texas...Catholic school.

What's up user? detecting a pattern here?

>chances of getting the full truth plummet

So is Comey admitting he lied or withheld information from his boss?

when he tried to pretend Haiti wasn't a giant slurry puddle of sewage, plastic bottles and crumbled concrete

Wouldn't liberals just eat that shit up the way they do all the other inane things spouted by other late night shows?

He might be tall but he's got a manlet mentality.

They’re all Catholics or Jews. No shit, even the 1965 immigration act was drawn up by Catholics and Jews. podesta and several of his friends are Catholics. A lot of them have Georgetown ties.

>Sounds like what most late night shows do. Where did Conan go wrong?

They are ALL going wrong.. political humor can be VERY funny BUT only when it is used on ALL parties. Modern comedians are scared shitless of the liberal progressive PC Democrats so they ONLY talk about Republicans and only to make them out as Neanderthalic NAZI morons. It get boring after a time. VERY boring.

the cuban's would say...
> trying to block the son with a finger.

It's obvious this guy is guilty but think he's untouchable.

The guilty parties in spygate are doing a lot of deflecting, denial, and equivocating.

Big problem is that Sessions appears to be doing shit. No special counsel, no arrests. They'll panic when one of them gets put in handcuffs.

Yeah a lot of our deep state alphabet fags especially in the FBI but probably all over are Catholic cucks . There's much more to Spygate than just "Obama was worried about Trump winning." For some reason, you may recall, the first truly major public figure against Trump even when he was just a GOP candidate was......this commie fucking pope Bergoglio.

>sun

in terms of the lack of interest in him, there's a market saturation of late night snark and he's a dull, unremarkable Melvin on an unpopular channel.

We might be looking at the foundation of the Deep State. Knights of Columbus? Jeb Bush is KofC.
I wonder how many of these Catholic Deep State actors are also KofC?

>Sessions appears to be doing shit

I agree, what the fuck IS Sessions doing??!
We have a potential case of the FBI spying on a Presidential election candidate with nothing but evidence presented by the opposing presidential candidate AND all the upper management knew this and seems to be OK with it.

Sessions get off your old skinny southern ASS and do your JOB!

Attached: 1523210908816.gif (197x245, 1.86M)

Remembers all those details. Cant remember when he had the meeting that lauched investigation.

KofC connections are worth looking into. And Georgetown definitely has some centrality to it. That's basically been Jesuits operational HQ in the new world for hundreds of years now. Most anons don't even realize that long before there were ADL type anti semitism defense groups in America the Catholic defense industry was immense and thriving. Now they work cooperatively

>
Over 5mill subs on youtube is unpopular?

Attached: efr.jpg (928x532, 27K)

Nope. Comey already exposed himself, because Comey is a whore.

thefederalist.com/2018/05/25/code-name-crossfire-hurricane-evidence-fbis-russia-cover-story/

Sessions is a disgrace.

Death penalty.

It’s a problem.

Attached: 32CD73D6-FAD1-44C7-B73D-4EBCF0CC1776.jpg (2343x2189, 1.02M)

Bump

This.....I smell a misinfo campaign.

Notice Comey is only telling his version of the facts on entertainment shows or through a book. In a book, you are free to use creative license in order to alter facts or even outright lie in order to tell your bigger story. Because ultimately, that's what a book is about, a personal story...it doesn't have to deal with facts, it just has to support a unifying narrative that people can read along and follow.

People can buy subs. Why wouldn't a TV channel do the same for its shows?

Because that is against the TOS agreement and doing so would make the channel be deleted?

Youtube is trying to act as a TV service where they'd sell people access to these channels, they would never delete their channels.

Finally some one has the guts to say it

Top kek you think google would delete a night time show hosts channel for bots? While parroting their approved opinion? YouTube is a terrible site, but they got that monopoly down.

You and Comey are liars.

FBI is caught in a lie: The FBI’s Desperate Origin Story EXPOSED.

thefederalist.com/2018/05/25/code-name-crossfire-hurricane-evidence-fbis-russia-cover-story/

>The New York Times’ 4,000-word report last week on the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe of Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign’s possible ties to Russia revealed for the first time that the investigation was called “Crossfire Hurricane.”

>The name, explains the paper, refers to the Rolling Stones lyric “I was born in a crossfire hurricane,” from the 1968 hit “Jumpin’ Jack Flash.” Mick Jagger, one of the songwriters, said the song was a “metaphor” for psychedelic-drug induced states. The other, Keith Richards, said it “refers to his being born amid the bombing and air raid sirens of Dartford, England, in 1943 during World War II.”

>Investigation names, say senior U..S law enforcement officials, are designed to refer to facts, ideas, or people related to the investigation. Sometimes they’re explicit, and other times playful or even allusive. So what did the Russia investigation have to do with World War II, psychedelic drugs, or Keith’s childhood?

>The answer may be found in the 1986 Penny Marshall film named after the song, “Jumpin’ Jack Flash.” In the Cold War-era comedy, a quirky bank officer played by Whoopi Goldberg comes to the aid of Jonathan Pryce, who plays a British spy being chased by the KGB.

>The code name “Crossfire Hurricane” is therefore most likely a reference to the former British spy whose allegedly Russian-sourced reports on the Trump team’s alleged ties to Russia were used as evidence to secure a Foreign Intelligence Service Act secret warrant on Trump adviser Carter Page in October 2016: ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele.

Attached: E07B5F42-164E-4C19-BA43-A995C5D874EE.jpg (2124x1344, 612K)

So no channels have ever been deleted?

continued from >Helping Spin a New Origin Story: It is hardly surprising that the Times refrained from exploring the meaning of the code name. The paper of record has apparently joined a campaign, spearheaded by the Department of Justice, FBI, and political operatives pushing the Trump-Russia collusion story, to minimize Steele’s role in the Russia investigation.

>Taken together with the other significant revelation from last Times story, the purpose and structure of Crossfire Hurricane may be coming into clearer focus. According to the Times story: “At least one government informant met several times with [Trump campaign advisers Carter] Page and [George] Papadopoulos, current and former officials said.”

>As we now know, the informant is Stefan Halper, a former classmate of Bill Clinton’s at Oxford University who worked in the Nixon, Ford, and Reagan administrations. Halper is known for his good connections in intelligence circles. His father-in-law was Ray Cline, former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Halper is also reported to have led the 1980 Ronald Reagan campaign team that collected intelligence on sitting U.S. President Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy.

>So what was Halper doing in this instance? He wasn’t really a spy (a person who is generally tasked with stealing secrets) or an informant (a person who provides information about criminal activities from the inside). Rather, it seems he was more like an agent provocateur, whose job was to ask leading questions to get Trump campaign advisers to say things that would corroborate—or seem to corroborate—evidence that the bureau believed it already had in hand.

>It appears Halper’s job was to induce inexperienced Trump campaign figures to say things. Halper met with at least three Trump campaign advisers: Sam Clovis, Page, and George Papadopoulos. The latter two he met with in London, where Halper had reason to feel comfortable.

Attached: FF957849-4FC6-4F51-ADB1-ED69BE6E7906.jpg (2124x1344, 710K)

It'd probably be a major news story if a channel for a TV channel was deleted, so most likely no.

At one point Jow Forums made a list of deep state actors that were Catholics. It seems especially bad in the fbi. Don’t know why interest waned. According to Bella Dodd in the 50’s or 60’s at least 1500 communist were enrolled in schools to be priests.

To begin with -- we're not what you'd call -- human. Over the past two hundred years -- A kind of consciousness formed layer by layer in the crucible of the White House. It's not unlike the way life started in the oceans four billion years ago. The White House was our primordial soup, a base of evolution -- We are formless. We are the very discipline and morality that Americans invoke so often. How can anyone hope to eliminate us? As long as this nation exists, so will we.

Human memories, ideas. Culture. History. Genes don't contain any record of human history. Is it something that should not be passed on? Should that information be left at the mercy of nature? We've always kept records of our lives. Through words, pictures, symbols... from tablets to books... But not all the information was inherited by later generations. A small percentage of the whole was selected and processed, then passed on. Not unlike genes, really. That's what history is, Jack. But in the current, digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second, preserved in all its triteness. Never fading, always accessible. Rumors about petty issues, misinterpretations, slander... All this junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate. It will only slow down social progress, reduce the rate of evolution.
youtu.be/CgY2N7E0eEs

Welcome to the world you chose Bobby

Attached: 1527210262512.gif (650x650, 373K)

continued from and >Halper’s close contacts in the intelligence world weren’t limited to the CIA. They also include foreign intelligence officials like Richard Dearlove, the former head of the United Kingdom’s foreign intelligence service, MI6. According to a Washington Times report, Halper and Dearlove are partners in a UK consulting firm, Cambridge Security Initiative.

>Dearlove is also close to Steele. According to the Washington Post, Dearlove met with Steele in the early fall of 2016, when his former charge shared his “worries” about what he’d found on the Trump campaign and “asked for his guidance.”

>London was therefore the perfect place for Halper to spring a trap — outside the direct purview of the FBI, but on territory where he knew he could operate safely. It appears Halper’s job was to induce inexperienced Trump campaign figures to say things that corroborated the 35-page series of memos written by Steele—the centerpiece of the Russiagate investigation—in order to license a broader campaign of government spying against Trump and his associates in the middle of a presidential election.

Attached: 4830E787-B517-4A11-8225-1011DDB1A651.png (614x435, 279K)

case closed I guess. Cant believe trumps would make it all up.

Attached: Sad Dad has something to say to you.jpg (580x386, 81K)

Imo, I think they are afraid of actual prosecution and are trying to poison the jury pool. Same with Clapper and Brennan going on TV/book tours etc. to tell "their side of the story" without being under oath. Think about who watches the shows they are going on, only normie, guillable and easily moldable people (many are women" watch these shows. They are trying to gain sympathy from the public, hence the whole "it was to protect Trump!" narrative lately.

For once, just ONCE, can a host have someone like Comey on and be prepared with some actual information? All this bullshit ever is is questions like

"Is this true?"
"No."
"Haha okay Trump is crazy then!"

Why not ask Comey what lead him to reopen the Clinton case after Weiner's laptop was taken, and then immediately close it again? It's never that, it's always "Ask a yes or no." "No." "Haha Trump's Crazy!!!! LOL"

Fuck this gay shit. We're sick of it and that's why their ratings are tanking.

Attached: 1501800202680.gif (320x320, 240K)

continued from >Halper Reached Out to Trump Campaign Members

>Chuck Ross’s reporting in The Daily Caller provides invaluable details and insight. As Ross explained in The Daily Caller back in March, Halper emailed Papadopoulos on September 2, 2016 with an invitation to write a research paper, for which he’d be paid $3,000, and a paid trip to London. According to Ross, “Papadopoulos and Halper met several times during the London trip,” with one meeting scheduled for September 13 and another two days later.

>Ross writes: “According to a source with knowledge of the meeting, Halper asked Papadopoulos: ‘George, you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?’ Papadopoulos told Halper he didn’t know anything about emails or Russian hacking.” It seems Halper was looking to elaborate on the claims made in Steele’s September 14 dossier memo: “Russians do have further ‘kompromat’ on CLINTON (e-mails) and considering disseminating it.”

>Had Papadopoulos confirmed that a shadowy Maltese academic had told him in April about Russians holding Clinton-related emails, presumably that would have entered the dossier as something like, “Trump campaign adviser PAPADOPOULOS confirms knowledge of Russian ‘kompromat.’”

>Another Trump campaign adviser Halper contacted was Page. They first met in Cambridge, England at a July 11, 2016 symposium. Halper’s partner Dearlove spoke at the conference, which was held just days after Page had delivered a widely reported speech at the New Economic School in Moscow. According to another Ross article reporting on Page and Halper’s interactions, the Trump adviser “recalls nothing of substance being discussed other than Halper’s passing mention that he knew then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort.”

Attached: EA83B965-CE73-4475-A25C-E13D8B5C9889.jpg (951x1200, 242K)

continued from>Page and Manafort both figure prominently in the Steele dossier’s July 19 memos. According to the document, Manafort “was using foreign policy advisor, Carter PAGE, and others as intermediaries.” Page had also, according to the dossier, met with senior Kremlin officials—a charge he later denied in his November 2, 2017 testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Evidently, he also gave Halper nothing to use in verifying the charges made against him.

>Halper’s fishing expedition therefore came up with nothing to suggest the Steele dossier was true. The real story is therefore the continuing attempt to assert that the dossier, or key parts of it, are true, after large-scale investigations by the FBI, and now by special counsel Robert Mueller, have failed to turn up any evidence of a plot hatched between Trump and Vladimir Putin to take over the White House.

>Using Spy Powers on Political Opponents Is a Big Problem: That portions of the American national security apparatus would put their considerable powers—surveillance, spying, legal pressure—at the service of a partisan political campaign is a sign that something very big is broken in Washington. Our Founding Fathers would not be surprised to learn that the post-9/11 surveillance and spying apparatus built to protect Americans from al-Qaeda has now become a political tool that targets Americans for partisan purposes. That the rest of us are surprised is a sign that we have stopped taking the U.S. Constitution as seriously as we should.

Attached: 97F22CD0-0A23-4FB6-BBA8-6C2D373E1CB4.jpg (1024x783, 483K)

Attached: 027c3dd3214fde44a38cb7fc49dd2f2a[1].jpg (1191x1200, 161K)

continued from etc.

>The damage done to the American press is equally large. Since the November 2016 presidential election, a financially imperiled media industry gambled its remaining prestige on Russiagate. Yet after nearly a year and a half filled with thousands of stories feeding the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy, last week still represented a landmark moment in American journalism. The New York Times, which proudly published the Pentagon Papers, provided cover for an espionage operation against a presidential campaign.

>The New York Times provided cover for an espionage operation against a presidential campaign.

>There are significant errors and misrepresentations in the article that the Times could’ve easily checked, if it weren’t in such a hurry to hide the FBI and DOJ’s crimes and abuses. Perhaps most significantly, the Times avoided asking the key questions that the article raised with its revelation that “at least one government informant” met with Trump campaign figures.

>So, how many “informants” targeted the Trump campaign? Were they being paid by the U.S. government? What are their names? What were they doing?

>Under whose authority were they spying on a political campaign? Did FBI and DOJ leadership sign off? Did FBI director James Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch know about it? What about other senior Obama administration officials? CIA Director John Brennan? Did President Obama know the FBI was spying on a presidential campaign? Did Hillary Clinton know? What about Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta?

>These questions are sure to be asked. What we know already is that the Times reporters did not ask them, because they do not bother to indicate that the officials interviewed for the story had declined to answer. That they did not ask these questions is evidence the Times is no longer a newspaper that sees its job as reporting the truth or holding high government officials responsible for their crimes.

Attached: F8D59A47-212E-4CD5-AD85-7688B8F56942.jpg (1200x578, 132K)

No they aren't. This asshole has been lying with impunity for so long he wouldn't know the truth if it kicked him in the balls.

Trump/Tesla

Attached: 7E09D54D-5A62-4C19-857D-1559564A0B89.jpg (1200x630, 128K)

>drumpf supporters BTFO

Neck yourselves you conspiracy peddling faggots.

How could he possibly say anything else? How are people taking his word for anything?

>taking someone who lied under oath seriously
how long till the day of the rope again? maybe we can get the big fish and the people who believe them

I’m disappointed that neither the press nor the conservative blogs have picked up in the image of Comey doing the whoopi jump. In fact, it would have sealed the deal had Lee from the Federalist seen the damning image. Anyone have a Twitter account to get it to him? Because he is ABSOLUTELY doing his jump in reference to the movie poster. Surprised no one has picked up on the connection.

thefederalist.com/2018/05/25/code-name-crossfire-hurricane-evidence-fbis-russia-cover-story/

Attached: ADA82A42-D202-49DE-B330-419EC565AFAF.jpg (2124x1344, 687K)

It's only going to work on the idiots who lap this garbage up. At least it has the added effect of deescalating this category 5 shitticane. A shitticane THEY created to cover their asses. Even if they poison the jury pool, if this trial is public, there are going to be a lot of pissed off former democrats. Their smugness and arrogance, and sometimes violence, about this whole thing and they're being made to look the fool as all the truth comes spilling out of the court room. They're going to be enraged with embarrassment. This is why the revolutionaries always got the bullet after the revolution. They're the true believers who become disillusioned and then become their own staunchest critics.

>the absolute state of "entertainment" shows of america

what an abomination.

Reroll

spread it boys

Attached: oc.jpg (2278x1118, 528K)

Steyn’s rundown on the Halper Affair is top notch despite it’s atrocious title.
steynonline.com/8667/tinker-tailor-clapper-carter-downer-halper-spy

He definitely fucked up with that press conference. I get he was doing it for the purpose of a public exoneration, but why list her felonies? Wouldn't a simple, "we found some improprieties, but nothing that would warrant prosecution" have sufficed? Why go in depth?
He gave Trump all the ammo he would ever need with his antics.

V2

Since he isn't wearing a tie..

Attached: oc.jpg (2278x1118, 529K)

Bump

Attached: 95BA728A-EC0C-4C79-9056-2E5D1A0C535A.jpg (2343x2189, 1.33M)

V3

Forgot the VS in the middle

Attached: oc.jpg (2278x1118, 536K)

Comey knows he used the steele dossier to verify the steele dossier after the fbi shitcanned steele as an informant for his obvious integrity issues. Then took the dossier paid for by clinton, from a discredited m-i5 agent to the fisa court to get a warrant, then he leaked classified information, through a friend to get it published by the NY Times, in order to get a special counsel appointed to try to entrap and then impeach Trump, simultaneously with a tried and true media character assassination. All with the seeming knowledge and complicity with senior Obama administration officials (Lynch, Comey, Brennan, Clapper et al.) I was once left enough that I voted for Nader, but seriously, after watching this shit show I am fucking appalled at what the DNC and Clinton tried to pull, and that doesn't even scratch the surface of what that cunt did. You want to know the REAL reason why? Because her and her coked up rapist of a husband along with the highly compromised Obamas used positions of power to enrich themselves by peddling American influence something they hate. That's right it's all about that trillion dollars US credit account and controlling it and stealing some of it. I don't think the billionaire sees it that way though.

This old Judge Nap article gives the best insider account
foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/27/judge-napolitano-what-happened-to-fbi-its-been-corrupted-by-obama-and-his-team.html

>i am with her

He did it to allow Obongo the ability to campaign with Hillary and the Strzok faggot singular focus to take down Trump.

>And everybody knows the fix is in. The Strzok-Page texts show that the pressure to schedule the Clinton interview is based on the imperative to shut down the case, not to weigh what she had to say for investigative purposes. Clinton is permitted to have her co-conspirators represent her as lawyers at her interview — in violation of federal law, professional-ethics canons, and rudimentary investigative practice.

>Lisa Page spitefully texts Peter Strzok. “And yeah, it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.”

>That was July 1. The very next day, the FBI does its just-for-show interview of Mrs. Clinton. Three mornings later, July 5 (at the start of the work week after Independence Day), Comey holds his press conference to announce that, of course, no charges will be brought.

>To accomplish this, he effectively rewrites the classified-information statute Clinton violated; barely mentions the tens of thousands of official government business emails that she destroyed; claims without any elaboration that the FBI can see no evidence of obstruction; and omits mention of her just-concluded interview in which — among other things — she pretended not to know what the markings on classified documents meant.

>On the very same day, the FBI’s legal attaché in Rome travels to London to interview Christopher Steele, who has already started to pass his sensational dossier allegations to the bureau. And with the help of CIA director John Brennan and British intelligence, the FBI is ready to run a spy — a longtime CIA source — at Carter Page in London on July 11, just as he arrives there from Moscow.

Attached: AA0EB6FC-D732-48F3-B8C0-446EF8DBCC02.jpg (1200x1018, 141K)

>With the pressure to finish MYE in the rearview mirror, Hillary Clinton looked like a shoo-in to beat Donald Trump. By mid September, Lisa Page was saying as much at a meeting in Deputy Director McCabe’s office. But Strzok was hedging his bets: Maybe “there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

>Soon, as the campaign wound down, the FBI and the Obama Justice Department were on the doormat of the FISA court, obtaining a surveillance warrant on Carter Page, substantially based on allegations in the Steele dossier — an uncorroborated Clinton-campaign opposition-research screed. Meanwhile, the FBI/CIA spy was being run at George Papadopoulos, and even seeking a role in the Trump campaign from its co-chairman, Sam Clovis.

>Or maybe you think these things are unrelated . . .

Attached: D865BA40-C98D-451E-B137-DF2D55253BEE.jpg (1125x1750, 404K)

bamp

Attached: Newspeak.jpg (2044x4088, 2.6M)

Exactly.

I mean...it looks complicated but the fact that diagram is even on Jow Forums speaks to the amateurish antics of Obama, a lying liar lies...but he started believing his own press and the voices in his head, figured he was so smart compared to DRUMPFFF that he didn't even have to cover his tracks because he had his hand picked minions on it. I guess we should thank him for that winning combination of arrogance and incompetence.

>gets caught lying multiple times, which is a documented fact that is preserved in historical FBI documents until the end of time.
>meanwhile Trump has literally been proven right every, single time he's called a liar

They put all their eggs into one basket, Hillary winning, that they didn't even have time to cover their tracks properly. The internet has a lot to do with this.

"pretend we are friends"
"draw them out"

Jesus what a manipulative garbage piece of shit.

Attached: comeyclinton.jpg (701x526, 92K)

Well, I guess if the director of the FBI says, so then it must all be ...
Wait a minute.
He doesn't know more than anyone.

We thank the Almighty. “Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.” - Proverbs 26:27

Attached: 03E646A2-319D-42A3-8333-DC8B32F3AB9F.jpg (720x540, 57K)

>noted liar fired from FBI goes on a late night talk show to discuss political "lies" in front of an audience that protested the government and FBI but still thinks the government and the FBI tell the truth and are good

Attached: EB5EACA4-9C00-4353-A6C0-EDB2A1B2563C.jpg (1004x484, 65K)

p-p-p-p-please don't investigate me

Attached: maga.jpg (600x402, 26K)

The book gives insight into Comey's biased thinking and rational that resulted in his cockups and the predicament that he's in. All self created problems because he's whacky Comey.

that's what I instantly thought. And he admitted to to that fact when he said he didn't think it was necessary to inform President Trump that the dossier was funded by Hillary.