Was it the CIA or just really fucking stupid city planners that turned American cities into such shit? I know of the GM conspiracy to get rid of streetcars, but the significance of streetcar rails flush to the road 100 years ago seems to be lost on people in this country.
Look at how far we've fallen. I'll start with Detroit. Who the fuck is responsible for Detroit? Yes, niggers, but how did they even get there? Why weren't they allowed to build a nigger city? hmm
Can't argue with those digits. Although I have to say these spread cities just look barren and dead to me, all that empty spaced paved with cement could have trees
This is this time again we had to remember the Goyim that most of those designs were made by Jews.
>why the change master the same reasoning behind lightweight cars, its cheaper. streetcars cant handle today pop density. its one of those not so beutiful aspects of capitalism.
Liam Cooper
yeah but Detroit went from to pic related
Many other cities here are nothing like they once were and heavily depopulated, like Rochester, Syracuse, Buffalo, etc.
No it was dumbass utopian modernism that thought we living in a “space age” apartment tower in a park created a cohesive and healthy space when it actually created social alienation and destroyed communities.
One of the reasons many American cities had their cores gutted was to destroy “old outdated buildings” and make way for modern towers that never came because of people moving to suburbs.
We are just now in current times seeing those empty lots created in the 1960’s fill in.
Those urban planners caused so much damage it’s taken 50 fucking years to come back.
We’d have been better off getting bombed desu
Pic realated what they almost did to central Paris
exactly. this blight on Manhattan for instance, is one of many. The boroughs are covered in them, and NYC wasn't alone in erecting these monstrosities. Some cities have knocked them down, since.
Paris already got rebuilt once in the 19th century, someone fucking sane had to have stepped in, because I'm sure those wrecking balls were being polished.
It was called "Urban Renewal," and yes, it was going to make everything clean and new because so much of the country was slummy and falling apart by the mid 1960s. But after they tore everything down, they just ran out of money thanks in large part to the war in Vietnam and all the social programs called "The War on Poverty." Lyndon Johnson did most of the damage, but the states and cities jumped on the bandwagons and joined in the carnage.
No it isn’t, housing projects like that breed crime, isolation and destroy community and culture
Austin Gonzalez
It's jewish copy and pasting, it's a teardown at this point. New York has a lot of that type of development, usually they're dangerous projects, though. These are where rappers come from.
Planning departments in general thrive on most people having no idea what they do or not knowing their power level or accountability structure. It’s a black box to 99.9% of people. I worked in civil engineering for 25 years and had to deal with almost every city, town, and county for a few hours drive in all directions. Generally speaking planning departments are a total cluster fuck. The only nefarious stuff that happens is for friends of staff. They are too disorganized to do anything on purpose.
The real Illuminati of planning is the “company” who writes the planning codes. Don’t be fooled, the locals did not write the code. They just place little bows here and there amending it.
No shit, if you want to go down the rabbit hole, research the “company” who writes everyone’s planning code.
Brody Johnson
America is not worth saving.
Ethan Morris
I looked up a contemporary one of that, too. The trees and other aesthetic touches make it cozier, the cluttered architecture is absolutely post modern
i know what youre saying, but that only means theyre shit because of the low iq people that inhabit them. a private project like this, if they were designed towards the middle class, and had communal areas like a common market, would be pretty cool. why? because you see theyre not designed for cars, theyre surrounded by parks and walkability. youre niggers if you dont understand this
I do understand this. That's a picture of Peter Stuyvesant Village which isn't even bad, but without commerce and the way they're designed in particular, when you're deep in a complex like that, you're removed from New York City. 21st century city planning would do it more organically. Not zoning blocks the size of towns.
Some of those Victorian-era homes still exist in Echo Park in Los Angeles. The neighborhood is mostly Mexican now though. Some white hipsters moved in and gentrified the neighborhood a bit.
If I'm not mistaken, they pretty much flattened that entire hill to build downtown. That was one of LA's most historic neighborhoods. It was full of beautiful Victorian houses and in the 50s they bulldozed the whole thing to make room for modern skyscrapers