Question:

Why do white people have the lowest birthrates? The oldest countries still have the high fertility rates. White people, relatively speaking, are new comers and still can't get the basics of being a human down: having kids.

Africa: the place with the oldest human populations, has the highest birthrates.
Asia: the place with the oldest civilizations: has the most people in it.

Can someone explain this? How can white people fuck up such a basic task? What will you do with your gadgets when you don't even have a population?

Attached: LeWypipoRSuperiorMayMay.jpg (1356x704, 156K)

Other urls found in this thread:

populationpyramid.net/iceland/2017/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

When you become civilized you stop having as many kids. Look at chingchongland

Jews have are attempting to cause a white ethnocide through their influence in media, sciences and entertainment.

jews are*

>Africa: the place with the oldest human populations
Africa =/= modern day Africans

>Why do white people have the lowest birthrates?
Because we are full. And we focus on quality over quantity.

Israel's birthrate is 3.09 and Inda's is 2.4. Both are nuclear powers and India has actually reached Mars with an orbiter.

>Civilized countries
You are guaranteed at >90% chances that your children will survive its firsts years of life because they will be vaccinated, have 3 main meals a day, water, infrastructures to protect them, education, no sabage beasts to eat them, no armed conflict that will threaten their lives.

Then you have the choice to have kids or not thanks to contraception, therefore decide if you want to enjoy your life or raise kids.
And to add to what's above, an pro-individualistic mindsetand/or propaganda that promotes "doing whatever you want when you can" as well as reminding you that kids are expensive (you must buy clothes, toys, studies...), are time consuming (bringing them to school, outdoor activities, being with them when they're sick) and a lot of other stuff (like forcing you to stop/reduce smoking or drinking).

When you give a human the choice of being "free" or to have the pain in the side kids are described as, you know the large majority will go for the easiest and less demanding option.

>Shithole countries:
You can't choose when it happens (no contraception), most kids die in their first years of life and only the "strongest" survive, then you have diseases, malnutrition, conflicts...
And since most of those "societies" have the mindset of your kid being the one taking care of you when you're too old to do anything, you need them. And if there's a dowry, then you want as much males as possible more descendants and more stuff coming free from the bribe's familly.

So it's in their best interest to shit kids out 8 per 8 at a time to be sure at least one survives and will be useful to them later.


Problems are appearing because "we" (ie:societies of Whites/european descent/caucasian/etc...) give them the technology, medicine and stuff that prevents their kids from dying, but they keep popping kids like before so the 8 kids survive and then get 8 kids each and so on.
And whites keep wanting to have fun and dying out.

Legacy of the eternal kraut, bismark and his social security. Before that you had to have kids who would take care of you when you were older. That's only true now in third world shitholes

Contraception, abortion and the dismantlement of traditional sexual morality (i.e sex is sinful and only permissible for procreation).

Because half of their childrens die by starvation.

Ha. Hence the mass importation of sub 80IQ Muslims amiright?

>India
>Space program
poo spotted.
Yea India sounds great.
Why don't you, your parents, your cousins, and everyone else Uncle Justin allowed you to come over with go back?

White people and certain asians like the japs are k-selected, nor r-selected like muzzies and niggers. Quality over quantity.

Its a K vs. r
>K- have limited offspring that fully utilize resources and have a higher individual survival rate.
>r- have massive amounts of offspring and rely on sheer numbers that a small portion will survive.

>Plus one "we" crackle up this thing of genetical engineering everybody is going to be white

if a black guys says that he preefers to be black instead of being white is that is lying.

Because of the high costs associated with raising a child. Not that many families can afford to have more than two kids.

East Asia has the lowest birthrates you tard
Its simple r-k culture, the more long term planning a race tends to do, the less children it has (to invest more in them).
The sub-replacement birth rate phenomenon is more modern and is a consequence of sexual liberation/degeneracy.

High quality of life. When you need a dozen kids to work your farm or hope one if tgem makes it out of the shit eating poverty you birthed them into you don't have them.
Populations can not and should not be expected to always increase.

It means you're not white, Argentina.

But we are pretty good at cloning stuff mate :D

>High quality of life

this

Attached: 071_quality_of_life1.png (1350x710, 72K)

If your country's name is switzerland they could do a Iceland thingy of giving benefits to white people in their country that decides to have childrens

populationpyramid.net/iceland/2017/

>can't refute argument
>resort to namecalling
>that'll prove I'm right

>Implying he's wrong

How is he not wrong? Israel and India are both nuclear powers and space powers and have a higher birthrate than white people.

This is pretty simple. If you want high birth rates, you live on a farm where people have no other real opportunities.
When people stop living on farms, they stop having as many kids, in just a couple generations.
Birth rates are directly proportional to the percentage of population that live on farms.
Has nothing to do with race, other than countries where white people, asian people and even Hispanic and Persian are have mechanization and don't require a lot of people to work on farms.

Why you made Mongolia a higher quality of life then russia?

Attached: 2010-qli-map1.png (1350x710, 72K)

I didnĀ“t made a thing and that's from different years.

Oops, i thought both said 2011