So, what exactly is wrong with being gay?

So, what exactly is wrong with being gay?
Why should it be forbidden for a man to love another man?

Attached: handholding.jpg (1024x685, 126K)

Other urls found in this thread:

discord
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Degenerate and stagnates evolution.

Because it's degenerate. It makes society worse, just like murder, stealing and lying

Your asshole wasn’t designed to be a pleasure center. If you stick your dick in a shithole male or female you are degenerate and should be shot. Also fags are pedos. How about that wicked serial killer mcarthur cleaning up the streets of faggots in toronto? Absolute madman

nothing, just stop shoving it in the media and down the childrens throats

>stagnates evolution

Well clearly not, otherwise there wouldn't be any around..

It makes your eyes water

Because it is cheating on life. Heterosexuality is here as a punishment for men.

THERE IS A CONTAINMENT BOARD FOR ALL YOU NEGLECTED/ABUSED/RAPED/TORTURED PEOPLE
FUCK OFF AND STAY THERE

Attached: 1525181755895.jpg (3100x1855, 1.39M)

Enjoy your aids and ass cancer

Nothing wrong with zoophilia, either.

I am not trying to meme or bait and I'm not being sarcastic. You hate me for the same reason normalfags hate you (and wish you were dead)

Basically "stop liking what I don't like"

Mind your own business, nosy housewives

They band together and aid multi-kulty nation destroers.
Thats the problem not who they fuck with.

If you love another man thats called Friendship or Brotherhood.
Being effeminate and loving anal sex has nothing to do with love.

I don't think there are any convincing arguments against homosexuality that don't rely on the natural fallacy (something is unnatural, therefore it is undesirable). However I do think you are disgusting and you should keep it to yourself.

It's... gay.

Yet again for the thousandth time, what is your point? Acknowledging these are true, do you have a solution, or are you just hating for the sake of hating? Why do you try and seem intellectual by justifying your bigotry with statistics while ignoring the fundamental scientific law of "correlation vs causation?" Do you think gay people are magically going to turn straight because you posted an infographic about drug use? Do you also agree it's okay to discriminate against white people because they commit the most white collar crimes, or it's okay to discriminate against everyone in a specific state because that state has the highest level of drug use, or do you only cherry pick the statistics that shame the demographics that you don't like?

Attached: 1524427217682.png (1506x3976, 443K)

Because it's illogical. There's a reason why MALE and FEMALE exist

>gays breed other gays

lol ok retard

Based leaf. R a r e

WTF, I'm straight now!

Rainbows aren't faggots FTR

The guy on the right looks like he’s trying to get away

If gays were evolutionary disadvantageous, why are they still here, tosser?

Faggotry is bad for the individual and society.

Attached: HT (9).jpg (1149x714, 63K)

Don't have sex with a gay. Mind your own business

Every thread you see the same faggots moving the goal posts. They claim that it's just love, and that we are bigoted and intolerant for rejecting them. Then the infographics come out, and the undeniable, disgusting nature of their lifestyle is made plain to everyone.

Then you have people like this responding, who not only lack the capacity to understand why people might not want their deviancy in their community, but also demonstrate the mental derangement that is so typical of the homosexual. He rambles on incoherently, driven by some vague sense of injustice, never really comprehending that his behavior is part of the reason people grow to hate people like him.

>still here

Because there is bad genetics that keep getting passed on due to social systems that prop up and take care of people that should honestly curl up and die.

Homosexuality is a product of a terrible environment and bad genetics.

>Homosexuality is a product of a terrible environment and bad genetics.

like NEETs, yet we are here..

There is no "minding my own business" in this hyper-connected society. I have to pay for people's healthcare based upon their decisions. Stop ruining it for everyone, fag.

>if being fat were evolutionary disadvantageous, why are they still here, tosser?
>if being stupid were evolutionary disadvantageous, why are they still here, tosser?
>if being handicapped were evolutionary disadvantageous, why are they still here, tosser?

You do not have to be genetically successful to exist in modern society.

>his behavior is part of the reason people grow to hate people like him

But I don't do drugs or have aids or am a pedo. Plenty of gays are similar. You can't rationally discriminate against a whole demographic with statistics because that's correlation vs causation. You know you can't win this argument because your entire reply is ad hominem. I'm not denying the infographics, but like I said, every person can probably be shoe horned into a demographic with shameful statistics.

>You do not have to be genetically successful to exist in modern society.

As this armenian body hair appreciation image board proves on a daily basis.

>So, what exactly is wrong with being gay?
Nothing, really.
Being a faggot, though, makes you sub-human.

Because of muh duhgenruhsee, user. Basically, being gay is what the anti-white, anti-man, anti-straight Jews want you to do and what they've turned our culture into. Everything is anti-white. Everything is anti-man. Everything is anti-straight, and you have to point. It. All. Out.

Attached: ohlookit'sjustthesamethingbutwiththegroupsflipped.png (1000x573, 576K)

But user, Jow Forums is the site's biggest containment board

Like 50% of gay men have an interest in teenage boys or possibly even younger

That's what's wrong

>what is down syndrome

My criticism of the way you fags always conveniently ignore statistics is hardly ad hominem.

>You can't rationally discriminate against a whole demographic with statistics
Actually that's the only thing you can really do with statistics. you have to make generalizations when you talk about groups of people. Gays are not the exception.
>correlation vs causation
gays in the 80's were disproportionately responsible for AIDS, but I'm meant to believe it's coincidental rather than causative? That is but a single example.

Your attempts to discredit inconvenient information are admirable, but these arguments are not built on logical fallacies as you claim.

>"responsible for AIDS"
Gee I wonder if sex in an part of the body with fragile tissue and little protection from this new disease know one knows about yet could be a problem

Faggots spread massive amounts of disease.

Faggots push society further left.

Faggots demand that the rest of society pays to support their faggot lifestyles.

Faggots are destructive and their faggot does not provide a benefit to civilization.

Yet you act like people are just being nosy, even though fags go out of their way to promote their faggot lifestyle.

>gays in the 80's were disproportionately responsible for AIDS, but I'm meant to believe it's coincidental rather than causative? That is but a single example.

MSM is still the largest fraction of new HIV infections in most western countries, despite the low(er) occurrence of MSM acts.

>Why should it be forbidden for a man to love another man?
It shouldn't.
But, it must be recognized that homosexuality serve to purpose in the survival of the species as gay sex server no purpose others than pleasure, without being called a homophobe or whatever derogatory term one can use to diminish someone's statement.


It's true, accept it.
Beside that, do as you see fit.

Simple male homosexuality is a destructive behavior that correlates massively with STI rates and infections and other dangerous lifestyle choices, and makes people less healthy and increases healthcare costs while at the same time does not provide the basic biological reason for sex which is reproduction. It provides no benefit to society and only adds destruction.

Gee, I wonder if the increased promiscuity associated with the gay culture might have contributed to the disproportionate spread of the disease among gays compared to heterosexuals

Ok so by your own admission then homosexuality is bad if your not encouraging that the poster partake in it.

Glad we can agree homosexuality is destructive, immoral, and a cancer on modern society.

It induces a natural disgust in all humans. Keep that faggot shit to your faggot house so i dont have to yell faggots out my car window.

>Mind your own business

the absolute fucking STATE of a shit-eating leftist demon. How the fuck does any leftist "progressive" have the balls to tell someone else to mind their own business?

Attached: 1515910394704.gif (200x150, 2.11M)

This would be easy to say if homos had HIV rates slightly higher then the rest of America. But literally about 1 in 5 fags according to the CDC has it. No other demographic comes close. It is the fags that spread the deadly disease that costs billions per years. If the fags would have stopped their degenerate lifestyle HIV would not be an epidemic.

Ok so you admit that being a gag spreads disease and is bad since the primary act of faggots is buttfucking each other.

We let you guys be gay, now you're molesting and trying to indoctrinate our children.

Attached: 1505537502676.jpg (593x484, 162K)

Attached: 10-17-17-satanic-tranny.jpg (800x420, 114K)

>what's wrong with a sexuality literally fabricated by jews to make white men weak?
I don't know, user.

Attached: A_Letter_from_Freud_to_a_mother_of_a_homosexual_-_1935_-_1.jpg (640x812, 140K)

The virus eventually entered male gay communities in large United States cities, where a combination of casual, multi-partner sexual activity (with individuals reportedly averaging over 11 unprotected sexual partners per year[61]) and relatively high transmission rates associated with anal intercourse[62] allowed it to spread explosively enough to finally be noticed.[58]

Gilbert MT, Rambaut A, Wlasiuk G, Spira TJ, Pitchenik AE, Worobey M (2007). "The emergence of HIV/AIDS in the Americas and beyond". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104 (47): 18566–70. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10418566G. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705329104. PMC 2141817Freely accessible. PMID 17978186.

Gee, I wonder if heterosexuals have less likelihood for AIDS given that they have different options for sex

>fag
ftfy but anyway if that's really what you took from my comment then I guess women don't have anal sex

Forgot to switch your flag from the ancap LARP buddy

There is no secular reason to oppose sodomy because secularism is the ideology of the weak, eunuch men.

there's nothing wrong with subjectively loving other men so long as it doesnt become an obsession. so you can be in a relationship with a man and stuff, raising kids is not wise, especially adoption. but the act of buttsecks is degenerate inherently, even between straight people. same as masturbation. it all comes under the same idea. however ragging your wife silly in her minge is holy and furthers the species.

>Bake the cake, bigot!
literally the only reason for me, and the only one I need too.

I already responded to you here, brainlet.
> where a combination of casual, multi-partner sexual activity (with individuals reportedly averaging over 11 unprotected sexual partners per year[61]) and relatively high transmission rates associated with anal intercourse[62] allowed it to spread explosively enough to finally be noticed

>combination
>over 11 unprotected sexual partners per year
>relatively high transmission rates associated with anal intercourse

Undeniably the fag disease.
Honestly the fact that you cannot humbly accept any criticism of your culture and cannot take responsibility is one of the most off putting things about you as a group.

discord gg/khbcN7

add a .

Attached: Pic.jpg (957x1024, 210K)

bump

bump

bump

>Armin Meiwes case
>mind your own business
>b-but they consented
>love is love

Attached: Arminbernd.png (568x326, 243K)