Jow Forums wrong on Tommy Robinson

Attached: idiot-robinson.png (540x382, 109K)

I need me tommeh because I have no life of my own

Attached: rommy tominson.jpg (259x194, 8K)

Attached: royal pedos.png (664x389, 254K)

Suiting for british culture that it looks like there's desert runes scribbled all over the back of that book

Jow Forums is never wrong you newfaggot

>Jow Forums
>Wrong
Pick one, you fucking Paki bastard.

that conclusion relies on accepting the validity of tommy's initial arrest,
and tbph, i don't see how you can accept the reason for his arrest as valid.
unless you are some sort of bootlicker, in which case, i have no more words for you.

it is possible that there needed to be a gag order on the rape gang trial, but please tell me what could possibly be the valid reason for setting a gag order on tommy's ultra quick trial and imprisonment

Reminder this is a literal shill thread to divert from
Stupid fucker literally created and announced the thread in the middle of this earlier one to try and prove a point

Gib back me knoife loicense

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 27K)

Bud bud ding, bro

he was arrested because about 50 muslims where threatening to behead the infidels if their friends where sent to prison.

I am pretty conflicted on this whole scenario on the one hand the story is:
>Tommy is filming at the court drawing attention to the case which could collapse the trial by filming those involved. Has been arrested for breaching the peace and then had his suspended sentence lifted and sent to jail.
On the other hand:
>Where was his right to a fair trial? Where was his right to defend himself and say that he was merely live streaming a story from outside court reporting on proceedings unaware there was a gag order on the trial. Instead he has been arrested on trumped up charges and then without the right to a defence has been imprisoned because he is seen as a threat.
I am inclined at the moment to side with the latter although I understand the reasoning behind the first but he should absolutely be allowed the chance to defend himself. The judge has absolutely abused the powers granted to him to essentially jail somebody without a trial and then banned people from reporting on the actions.
I already know how this is going to be spun when our media can report on it. They are going to say it was to ensure a fair trial and tommy broke that. My understanding however is that this was a sentencing hearing? No jury to influence? Can anybody provide further information on this?

Attached: 1521621968836.jpg (662x713, 70K)

>Where was his right to defend himself and say that he was merely live streaming a story from outside court reporting on proceedings unaware there was a gag order on the trial.
Ignorance is not an excuse.

dirty tricks MI6

Attached: 1522620290888.png (762x810, 62K)

>>Tommy is filming at the court drawing attention to the case which could collapse the trial by filming those involved.
First of all, no it couldn't.

The gag order was (allegedly) to protect this from a mistrial by having a media ban so the Jurors can't be biased by outside sources. But that doesn't mean that any such breach would necessarily mean a mistrial.

There has to be a case made that sufficient information about the trial was leaked and then influenced the Jurors. Firstly that's impossible because it was the last day of the trial and none of the Jurors could have possibly seen the broadcast until after.

The details that Tommy streamed are already public knowledge, the media has already released that info to the public, and it's all on public ledgers that anyone who wants to look at the court logs can do so. He didn't say anything in the stream that the jury don't already know (names of suspects, what they're accused of, etc)

Lastly a case has to be made for a mistrial based on evidence presented, it's not just an automatic "you're let out of prison free" card. A judge has to look at what information was leaked and if that could reasonably influence a judge or jury, and it's obvious in this case, no, no reasonable case could be made.

>Firstly that's impossible because it was the last day of the trial and none of the Jurors could have possibly seen the broadcast until after.
Simply incorrect

>The details that Tommy streamed are already public knowledge
Again, incorrect.

Took you 4 days to spin this you dumb fuck. We see you.

it is when there is a SECRET order you are literally not supposed to know exists in the fist place.

>He's dumb so he deserves to be in prison xD

fucking lefties jesus christ.

It's not a secret order and you are supposed to know about it.

THAT'S THE FUCKING POINT

That picture is from Guido Fawkes. He's not a leftie

How can I possibly counter this stellar argument? Better just accept the complete annihilation of the free press by the government.

>and thus we see Jow Forums at the crossroads: does he choose the zionist to spite the muhammedian or does he except that said zionist is more useful to him in the prison of the foremost nanny state
cmon niggers

Attached: these people.jpg (5508x6561, 2.62M)

Attached: played.jpg (576x575, 67K)

His original conviction, though politically motivated, had a legal basis. His second conviction is spurious at best. It's one of the few charges and convictions that can result in summary conviction and jailing, allowing for appeal. Even then, it was handled in a very suspicious, most likely illegal manner.

>though politically motivated,
No it wasn't.

>His second conviction is spurious at best
No it isn't.

The first CONVICTION was legally valid.

This second one is highly questionable. His conviction, separate from the arrest is ridiculous - however, to play devils advocate, thanks to the reporting ban we don't know what Robinson did in the room.

If his claims are true, he was also denied legal representation (not that it helps all that much in this particular instance)

Yes it was.

Yes it was.

Ignorant faggot btfo.

>there are people unironically shilling for political prisoners in western countries

I'm gonna need some actual data

>He gets arrested for making the gov look bad and sent to prison because he had a prior that he was out on, you are defending your 1984 state it appears...
Wew lad.

>it is possible that there needed to be a gag order on the rape gang trial
No.

How was he making the government look bad?

The courts are separate from the government.

He choose to violate court imposed postponement orders on the reporting of trials, not once, but twice.

To do it once is one thing, but to then do it again when you have a suspended sentence is just fucking stupid.

>The quality of that rebuttal

you are actively defending your corrupt goverment, media, child rape gangs and the islamisation and erradication of your culture.
The fact that naive vapid useful idiots like you are not hanging from lamposts is an insult against the UK itself.

Fucking Shills, neck yourself you Paki cunt.

f-free tommy robinson, he's fucking based he btfo's mudslimes!!!!

Attached: 65654654.jpg (500x375, 43K)

Attached: fellowmodhere.jpg (740x864, 255K)

Fucking state of your life.

Attached: d3.jpg (1280x720, 86K)

There's a gag order on Tommy's trial as well, which you are violating, you hypocrite prick. Do you not see what is wrong here?

>Le jews are evil meme

>Ignorance is not an excuse
It literally is an excuse for contempt of court

Tommy is IRRELEVANT.

Getting the KIKES OUT is all that matters

GET IN HERE

Attached: 1527480567641.png (1264x932, 556K)

Lol, deflection, you cunts stick out like a sore thumb. Back to Snitchcord with you, you fucking Cunt.

No, it literally is not. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse and as this is now TR's SECOND conviction for contempt of court you're trying to defend the indefensible

> "Haha, those guys sent in prison by the government are really ridiculous"

Remember when satirists were at least pretending to be a thorn in the system's side ?

Arrested for BREACH OF THE PEACE, NOT CONTEMPT... you fucking idiot

the disease of progressivism. it's fucking mind-blowing, the justification they're making for it. at the end of the day, there's only one solution for this shit.

Attached: 1525404645768m.jpg (1024x1019, 99K)

This isn’t even about Tommy anymore. He’s the face of this matter, but the matter itself is much bigger than Tommy. There are true failings in our system when the public are forbidden to cover the court case of child rape gangs, whereas something as little as a “racist pug” attracts media attention blood in the waters would a shark.

If Tommy is murdered in jail, then he will be a martyr for the cause. It’d be sad, but perhaps is the jolt up the ass the country needs to realise there are some serious fucking failings. MI5 are probably doing more to track hate speech here than they are hunting down rape gangs. Our priorities are straight up fucked. If shit doesn’t change and fast, then we’re set for a civil war.

People that will never breed don't care about child rape gangs that have been a common thing in the UK for YEARS now.
If they can put someone whose political views are not like theirs, in prison, then all the raped children are worth it.

After we crash the world banks and the Muslims begin to starve... we're going to let them know how it was the Jews who made the U.S. destroy the middle East... and how they are responsible for their starving in the U.K.
They will kill every kike within a week. I can't wait.

Attached: 1525665090340.png (454x685, 115K)

Ignorance of the law is the BEST excuse. If one is ignorant of the law than one has obviously not consented to the law.

It's not ignorance of the law, it's ignorance of this specific order. Which actually IS an excuse. Law has to be published in a very specific way, which this order has not gone through.

No self-respecting Brit would watch that video of Tommy getting lifted and find criminal fault with what he did. You betray your Paki Shill credentials by espousing this view here. So fuck off.

It's going to be so fun to watch the Muslims slaughter you

Actual data? His entire trial, all the way to the end of sentencing, took four hours. Four hours. It's a farce. Furthermore, the judge transparently lied about why he had handed out his judgement as he did, and then put out a press injunction to prevent anyone reporting on it. What Tommy was arrested for and what he was charged with were completely different things, and he had explicitly and on record confirmed with the police in the area that what he was doing was not, in fact, a breach of his court order.

Filthy bootlicker, get off our board

Attached: image.jpg (225x225, 24K)

Fuck off nigger. Those kikes are mine.

Attached: image.png (659x1026, 78K)

The judge violated separation of powers.

did you know that the uk has jew-only police force? did you know that all hate speech laws were lobbied in by jews?

ITT Leftist cucks attempting to wedge us with happy merchant spam.

The only way to end this BS is to start killing the people who enact these BS laws and the judges who uphold them.

stop trying to blackpill me, faggot. I still believe there are brits around that want to do what's necessary to fix their country. they just need weapons.

Attached: 1522209869030.png (1124x1165, 171K)

Should we traffick weapons to the Brit rebels?

Token legal case is meaningless. There's still hundreds of rapes going on everyday and it will get much worse. A large percentage of police/journalists/politicians in these areas should be in jail for conspiracy to rape and obstruction of justice.

Until that happens there will be increasing resentment against the state.

looks like we're on the same page.

Attached: 1517887445533.png (500x500, 39K)

There aren't.
Stop being a retard that believes in miracles. I'm sure a lot of people in Rome believed the same bullshit when everything around them was crumbling and burning.

>which could collapse the trial by filming those involved

An equal injustice which must be faced, especially given its use as justification for further injsutices.

The notion that reporting on a trial already in progress is some divining factor relevant to the facts of said case is ridiculous.

Tommy may be a fuckwit but we need fuckwits.

I believe in the power of this board of peace, let's leave it at that. chequed.

Attached: Resized952018032395171939.jpg (800x480, 81K)

absolute SEETHING paki

Attached: index.jpg (275x183, 7K)

No. It's not an excuse. And he is ignorant of the law because he thinks he's not doing any wrong.

Likewise all the niggers and spics that will you.

Tommy did nothing wrong

OP is a huge faggot. been running anti-Tommy threads for like 3 days now, why dont you kill yourself Paki

nah

Where is your sense of adventure chap? I say we sail pic related full of arms to some Brit harbor under the cover of night and if we get caught we let loose the grapeshot and cannons!

100% you're not British. No Brit posting on Jow Forums would support Tommy's arrest. So you're either a Shill or a Paki on some sort of triumphal march. You're demonstrating Shill tactics though, so i might be wrong. Post your hand.

Whats this a uk faggot that is pro-tyrant? Your system is a joke at this point. Your rape gang island is a fun place.... If your a brown male. kek the uk is going down fast.

Tell your jewish whore of a queen hi for me dirtbag.

Attached: Tick_Tick_Tick.png (1134x678, 135K)

Fuck. I forgot pic related

Attached: pirate_ship_by_bbruschi.jpg (900x675, 150K)

He happens to be doing the queens work m8.

Got to support your Kike shill. Good lad.

thank god your country is going to absolute shit

>still trying
>still using the same BS excuses BTFOed 100X
>still proving himself unworthy

Got to support your child raping Paki cousins, right, Mohammed?

They might as well carry a sign at this point, they stick out so badly.

Funny af seeing all these shitstains on here defending Tommy when he's in the pocket of his Jew masters

Post your hand.

Post your nipples.

Court orders you to stop breathing, you take a breath.
You get arrested, leftist cartoonists make a point that it is your own fault you end up in jail for breathing.

Attached: 123456789.gif (387x309, 2.01M)

You shouldn't be conflicted.
In what way does being filmed getting out of a van interfere with 'A fair trial' we've always done that and it's 100% legal. If they want nobody to do that then they should make special arrangements like they often do.
Mistrial letting them go free is a myth - it could never have happened from Tommy filming them but wouldn't cause anyone to go free anyway. The COS these days can put you on trial for the same thing an infinate amount of times even if you are found not guilty.
Corruption has destroyed the highest form of law, common law (ancient tradition) and starting with Blair they replaced it all with EU law that always sinks to Europes lowest most draconian denominator.
Tyrants don't make rules to be fair they make rules to keep power.

Attached: IMG_4555.png (720x450, 520K)

>COS
*CPS. Crown prosecution service

That is correct you cock sucking nonce

Post your hand.

Attached: IMG_20180529_130006[1].jpg (2560x1920, 1.51M)

Shill thread .. fuck off

They are scared. That's why they are shilling so hard.
INTERNMENT WITHOUT TRIAL was what made the troubles in Ireland spread in the 70's.
Nobody I spoke to over the weekend had heard of what's happening. If they can shut us up they think they'll start getting away with it and have total power. I didn't even believe this story was true when I first read about it here,I thought Lauren was exaggerating for attention.

Attached: IMG_4447.png (300x271, 127K)

Tommy was originally arrested for livestream challenging the defendants pre-trial.
Now, while it is reasonable to protect defendants identities from public disclosure before they are convicted in order to prevent the jury being prejudiced, it seems to me that in this case every member of the public and the press are being put on a severe restriction that strains their rights to the limit, in order to allow the defendants to stroll up the court steps as if they were visiting the local library.
These men are accused of commiting gang rape on numerous children. This is a very serious matter, and they should be in a cell on remand until it has been established whether they represent a further danger to the public, not walking free for months while the trial debates the minutae of the case. Given the fact that, if convicted, they face an extended period behind bars, there is a real danger they will jump bail and simply disappear overseas.
Also, at what point is Tommy no longer video'ing these men arriving at court? Is it outside the Court? As they are coming up the road? As they got off the bus? As they left their house that morning?
Men like these used to be hustled into court under a blanket, protected from a lynching by lines of police. When was all that defined to be too inconvenient by the authorities?

in time you will learn that Jow Forums is never wrong

>moderate thinks extremist rightists haven't tried moderate approaches yet
lmao
we'll be selling this nerd his first swastika armband before the year's out