If Scandanavians have such high IQ's, how come they lived in literal wooden huts before Christianity?

>our ancestors were shit eating savages before jew religion came along and enlightened them
This is some insane next level self hate.

If you got wood you build with it. Meds also built with wood until they ran out of it

This is simply not true, every Scandinavian had their own castle. The wooden houses is a sami conspiracy theory.

can confirm

>how come this geographic area where they had one harvest a year and hardly even 1% of the geography constituted agriculturally cultivated land didnt create a grand civilization like the mediterreneans did, where they had several harvests a year and huge areas of fertile, ready-to-cultivate land where crop security was significantly higher than northern climates

really activates my almonds

Attached: barbaric.jpg (600x709, 160K)

Harsh winters. Our focus was always on staying alive in an environment few others would thrive. When Christianity arrived with new architecture they converted existing Norsemen who knew how to survive and live there.

Even though your bait is weak, I'll bite - who ever claimed that Scandinavians have high IQ? I'd say on average we have ~103-105 IQ, which is about the median across all races.

>I'd say on average we have ~103-105 IQ, which is about the median across all races.

We dont have an average IQ of 103-105, but if we did, that would be quite high. Our average IQ is about 99-100. The median across all races is certainly lower, though. Not sure where you get that from.

Also, how did christianity "arrive with new architecture"? Stave churches were built by norwegians. It was funded by christians who in turn were likely funded by english and southern missionaries, sure, but the architecture itself didnt "arrive" from anywhere else.

Please - don't be that guy. It's blatantly obvious that the Norsemen got inspiration from other cultures when going on Viking raids. Even from the battle at Lindisfarne cloister in 793 revealed vastly different methods of building compared to what the Norsemen were accustomed to.

If you're unsure if this is true or not, I recommend that you read up on www.arild.hauge.com and visit khm.uio.no/besok-oss/vikingskipshuset/.

Jews.

You want to know something funny? They built roundhouses and the like because they're good at preserving heat, unlike Greco-Roman style architecture. I know your mutt mind can't comprehend life without AC and heating, but these things were quite important back in the day. Each environment asked selected for different behaviors, they didn't all live in cut and paste cardboard McMansions. Even if they could, why would it be needed? They didn't have an empty life like most modern people do, they didn't need to try to fill that hole with useless piling of consumer goods

yes of course if they didn't start to worship the crucified judean carpenter they would've never acquired architectural techniques of largely Greco-Roman pagan inspiration

>how come they lived in literal wooden huts before Christianity?

They didn't you bloody moron.

Attached: standard_langhus_borg_580.jpg (580x352, 193K)

>they lack experimental energy \ drive.

?
We literally conquered your entire island except Wessex due to our ship and war technology.

Attached: 1200px-Viking_Expansion.svg.png (1200x786, 317K)

Late Iron Age / Viking Age innovation, clinker technique, led to the Hanseatic cog.

Attached: clinkertechnology.png (300x151, 13K)

Attached: gokstad.jpg (1440x720, 93K)

They often built something called a longhouse. Part of the logs that where put into the ground was often burned so they would not rotten

wooden long-hut

Indeed

Attached: langhus.jpg (900x505, 118K)

Do you know what a hut is? Is pic related a hut?

Attached: JamestownThatchedRoofHouse.jpg (800x532, 104K)

just fuckin with you faggot
>id reflects the butthurt

There's literally nothing wrong with wooden buildings.

Jorvasker!

They still do. Your country also builds your houses out of wood. How primitive.

Looks like a hut to me.

Or maybe they just turn their boats upside down when they fuck up on building them.

No, you build our houses out of wood

Yeah too bad we don't use superior tin technology.

Attached: mexico.jpg (400x300, 61K)

Christians are fundamentally race blind globalists. They don't care about their ancestors because we're all equal under God.

People still live in wooden huts and houses

They had wood. What else would they built their homes out of? In Canada we still build our homes from wood.

Attached: 42bc.jpg (800x531, 164K)

Not sure about the IQ, look at this ->

The Viking ship technology was by far the most advanced in the world. Long time before Christianity. Housing, farming etc did get better when Christian and contact with Christian Europe. Kind of a mix.

Why are there hardly any Danes on Jow Forums?

No mouldboard plough = no agriculture in Northern Europe = no civilization despite good genetics. The better question is why despite good genetics *and* access to agriculture, both Southern and Northern Europe made next to no scientific, economic, or military progress for a thousand years after (((Christianity))) took over Rome.

Attached: Macclesfield-Psalter-77v-Detail-of-the-Plough-1024x562.jpg (1024x562, 227K)

Why is living in a wooden hut a bad thing?

KÆK!

Burrito btfo

If you honestly think from 0-1000ad there was no progress you are retarded.

Besides which, after civilizations fall, there is generally a loss of cultural/societal level technologies (IE aqueducts with running water were a thing in rome, not so much after it fell)

Fuck man... its like you never even read Kasinki's manifesto

Attached: 1519073433321.gif (512x384, 3.99M)

Too enlightened to care for materialistic crap.

Mortage free wooden huts.

Because Danes are a bunch of normalfags. They can't even have their own general on Jow Forums.

This.

But we managed to scrap together about 20 - 30 danes from here on our Scandinavian discord.

Forresten, er du på Nordtinget?

Says the mutt who lives in some suburban termite infested timber piece of shit with a 30-year life expectancy, if a tornado does not blow it away before that.

>lived in literal wooden huts before Christianity?

You mean like everybody else in Europe until a few centuries ago?

We had a 104 IQ in the 80s. Its probably 80 now with all the negroes and muslims.

Is clinker better?

I used to row in boats that were build like that sometimes.
Looks very beautiful but heavy as fuck.
Smooth hull rowing boats are lighter and more streamlined.

First you say 105 IQ is common amongst all races, then that statement.
Politiskt korrekta dritt!

The hibernation shit is obvious bullshit.

They aren't quite autistic - but they are what's called schizothymic, which is pretty close. Basically it means introverted. The opposite is cyclothymic, which means being a noisy Italian

Yes

>I'd say on average we have ~103-105 IQ, which is about the median across all races.
Do you consider niggers non-human?

Scandanavia is a lie created by whip crackers to hold the black man down. It was known as Wakanda but the jews drove us out into Africa where the toxic food lowered our iq.

user the answer is that most trade was centred around the Mediterranean and Near East, and also that sub-par farming conditions meant very large populations couldn't be supported easily. The main point is trade though - muh Vikings did trade, but it is nothing like you'd get if you were ANY city on the Mediterranean

Raided uk for british brainlets.

Cities don't pop out of nowhere... they virtually all start out as trading outposts (or military outposts, but a military needs to be funded!)

So did brits and everyone else in europe at that time lol it was the dark ages mate
Want to shit on germanics? Then mention how they were living in even shittier huts and using maille while rome had huge buildings of concrete and had the lorica segmentata

I am fascinated by the autism of Finnish F1 driver Kimi Raikkonen.
Do Finns think he's pretty normal or what?

youtu.be/qMvZSeJy26Q?t=1m21s

Found the Jews.

Dark ages is a myth. By the time of the fall of Rome the majority of Germanics were Christians.

Varg is ethnically Jewish, not Norwegian.

>The better question is why despite good genetics *and* access to agriculture, both Southern and Northern Europe made next to no scientific, economic, or military progress for a thousand years after (((Christianity))) took over Rome.
American education.

I want this to be true so badly. Pls show proof

Don't spread lies to counter lies.

Can someone tell me where these stones are located?
I know, that they are somewhere in sweden and have been used to build ships, but i forgot the town. Help please. :(

Common folks built their house with materials they have around, that are cheap and can survive the climate.
Europe had shitload of wood, which is perfect material.
Most of the houses were built out of wood.

Only time you see brick/stone houses/buildings is when rulers/states built them to symbolize their power/timelessness and shit like that.

Building a wooden hut isn't ez though. You need to have a lot of tools, which requires a lot of different type of labor, which requires advanced society.

Africa also has shitload of wood, but they still built their houses out of shit.

>rome fall ca year 500
>635 – Wessex (Catholic Church
>675 – Sussex (Catholic Church
>734 – Frisians
>785 – Saxons
>911 – Normans
>960 – Denmark
995 – Norway
999 – Faroe Islands
ca. 1000- Christianisation of Iceland
1008 – Sweden
Honorary mentions
1387 – Christianization of Lithuania
ca. 1159 – Finland
966 – Christianization of Poland

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_official_adoptions_of_Christianity

The forest provides all you could ever want.

There's no need to raze the ground when everything you need is just laying around

One of my teachers once told me, that witches weren't burned in the dark ages, but in the period of Enlightenment.

That is complete opposite of scandinavia you dipshit. We have winters. Winters urge you to think ahead which is opposite of what you describe.

The ((enlightenment))

Visigoths, Vandals, Ostgoths, Suebi, Franks those are the majority. The population of England was Christian before Saxon invasions.

Mostly between the XV and XVII century. Witch burnings and the Inquisitions are the biggest memes in history ever.

You can't just state those are the majority, can I see some stats on populations at the time or something? Would be cool

Have you seen the danish version of Alone in the Wild?

His descriptions reminds me of the difference between that australian guy in cargo shorts, who builds a ton of shit in the woods and the danes in Altevatn who can hardly find wood to hold their tents.

Yes I can because that's the truth. I'm sure the immigration bureau of the Roman Senate has the stats though. Look up their website.

more appreciation for nature, consider that the religious place of worship wasn't a stone temple but rather closer to a garden (cultivated grove)

It also has a lot to do with a lack of the romantic drive for flashy arrogant artistic bravado

overall I'm not sure but probably something like that

>American talking shit about building quality
Holy fuck.

>before cuckstianity

kek Because cuckstianity invented concrete

Cool theory bro. Want to hear my theory too?

Easily cuttable stone isn't as plentisome as it is in Mediterranean area. Meanwhile there was practically endless amount of lumber in Scandinavia. Lumber was by far superior to stone in pretty much every way, except that lumber buildings would only last a few human lives unlike stone structures that would last >2000 years.

The biggest reason for the lack of stone structures was the unavailability of workers. Scandinavia was not very populated and the climate was not as good to produce surplus food. You need fucktons of surplus food and workers (slaves for Meds) to start massive building projects. Scandis were free tribal men and not slaves of kings, so they had little incentive to build grandiose palaces for kangs.

Attached: 92dda006.jpg (1242x1542, 408K)

We still live in wooden "huts". It's cold here, Burgerman. Wood is excellent for our climate, and we have plenty of trees here.

This. Due to harsh climate northern europe needed houses that could keep the heat inside well, and while it looked primitive, it was perfect for the job. Because of how well it worked, those techniques are being used nowadays for "green" houses.

the avergae iq across races is 100. it is fucking SD curve. by defealt 100 is the base across sets. that is how the test is set up. half the people have an iq below 100 and half above. always always. that is how the scale is set up

Because environment plays a factor.

They would have been pretty dumb to build marble buildings in freezing temperatures... wood is used for warmth, while meds in warm countries sued marble for cooling.

Stop just comparing buildings. Compare metal work, jewellery and so on. People like the Romans also had cities which come with problems that forced them to work out things like sewage while other groups of people didn't have cities and thus no need for that.

Africans despite differing climates and groups all performed generally the same and poorly.

This, the actuall witch trials were rare and far between. Nowadays muslims kill more gays a year than witches killed by christianity thorough its whole existence.

>ca. 1159 – Finland
If Finland was christianized in 1159, I wonder how Elias Lönnrot was able to find so many knowers of pagan poem-singers in 1830s? Despite of nearly a millenia of christian suppression? Makes you think!

Attached: kaleval.jpg (625x550, 125K)

they lived in literal wood huts after Christianity, just like most people in the other countries did, you fucking moron

they were so smart they knew it was enough

Attached: Median.png (652x522, 25K)

the garden of eden is beneath your feet you cattle of the Cult of Saturn

fucking idiot species, humanity

He looks super horny. Probably all the asian grills.

who wouldnt be uncomfortable with a bunch of weird insect people gookfuing at you

This.
And the abundance of this wonderful material.

This.