Why do you need anything other than a handgun to defend yourself? Serious question.
>Inb4 shill
Why do you need anything other than a handgun to defend yourself? Serious question
Shameful selfbump
knowledge of how to stick and move.
Handguns dont shoot out to 50 meter, from my gate to the house is 55 also handguns are harder to aim than rifles.
Second ammendment is not about self defense.
>false premise thread
I don't need a handgun to defend myself. Nobody I know in this country does or has.
My second amendment doesn’t afford me the right to just defend myself. It allows me to arm myself for offense too. Which is much better to do with a rifle. Your question assumes Americans don’t have the right to do more than just defend themselves.
oh yeah it's about tyrannical governments which isn't in their own interest at all
guns are fucking retarded, but it is also too late to take them anyway. just move on and accept your kids can die at school. like we accept muslim terrorists. move on and dont live in large cities
Feral niggers and hobos
To be able to shoot you from a safe distance.
No, we should give up all of our rights and shackle ourselves to the governments whims. Only the police are smart and careful enough to own weapons. Ordinary citizens should just do whatever the government wants and have no power to resist.
I mean, we should be like europe.
Because a shitty glock isn't going to penetrate level 3 AR500 body armor
Fuck you too
You need bigger guns to defend yourself against elephants
If you had a gun you could make him shut up
Britain is a prime example
Why would you need to defend yourself in the first place? Just wait for the police to come user, they're trained professionals and it's their job.
Because I want to shred any nigger who trespasses into my property into pieces. If the human rights comissions and the like want me to treat them humanely, give me a gun. Otherwise, I'll cut their hands and feet and throw them in the street. Probably will castrate them too
We need whatever our government mercs have. Seriously I doubt they can get the U.S. army and marines and seals and navy to just start killing Americans trying to defend their rights. That is why they use CIA FBI NIGGERS. Our police force seems divided on it as well. Some believe in citizens rights others don't. Don't tread on me. I am getting very heated on this subject. JEWS MAKE UP 30% OF THE SUPREME COURT YET LESS THAN 2% OF THE US POPULATION. IF JEWS MANAGE TO TAKE MORE POWER THAN BELONGS TO THEM YOU MAY HEAR OF A SYSTEMATIC KILLING OFF OF THE US CHRISTIAN POPULATION. THEY PUSH FOR COMMUNISM IN OUR SCHOOLS THEY PUSH DEGENERACY IN OUR SCHOOLS. THEY ARE TRYING TO SHAPE THE YOUTHS OF AMERICA TURNING THEM INTO USEFUL IDIOTS INSTEAD OF USEFUL AMERICAN CITIZENS
Oi mate, you got a loicence for that keyboard?
>Why do you need
Stopped reading there. Why do you need to live?
Why do faggots like yourself think you have the right to tell me what I "need" to defend myself?
Range and accuracy.
That's the way your typical commie works. Their utopian dream is a system where everyone's needs are defined by somebody else. One car for everyone, one piece of bread a day for everyone etc.
Because handguns tend to piss off alligators, and copperheaded water rattlers are easier to hit with number 2 buckshot.
So the only reason you need rifles is to fight against the US military even though you wouldn't stand a chance anyway?
Why aren't you a real country?
You ARE a shill.
This thread is made daily
SAGE IN ALL FIELDS
May I remind you that the entire US military is shit and can't fight? When the day of the rope comes all of those American dogs in Europe will be cut off from any help. It'll be like shooting fish in a barrel.
That's an interesting question coming from a country that's devolving into Anarchy.
Because of the 13th amendment.
handguns are less accurate than carbines.
handguns are more difficult for women and children to shoot than carbines.
That's the entire reason we have our 2nd amendment, congratulations you have the literacy acumen of a 2nd grade student, good on you
If the military is shit what makes you think the civilians are any better?
>Not an argument in sight
Because not all threats are handgun-sized and defender is always at a deficit, so he does need more power than attacker.
I don't give a damn about the civilians in America, I hope all of America burns.
You're a deluded nigger from a fake country
Bill of rights, not bill of needs my wafflenigger friend.
You're a litteral nigger from a Bong colony
Because sometimes there's more than 12 threats and sometimes they have body armor.
I'll give up my shotguns/rifles for a glock 18 and call it a day, but the gubbermint would rather me have the shotguns/rifles... change the NFA laws and I'm down
Handguns do not have enough range, would have to intrude the attacker's personal space of circa 1 km.
A shotgun or a handgun like the Judge (It shoots specialized shotgun shells out of a handgun formula, know as an anti-carjacking and robbery preventer. Easy to grab and handle quickly, you can load a few 'birdshot' then 'slug' rounds as its a revolver if the situation keeps getting worse.) might be more effective for home defense than a normal handgun. Outside that, get a fucking country.