Why do so many people think female promiscuity negatively affects society?

its bad for civilization because it creates low birth rates, single mothers, and many other problems.

Back to r9k

Attached: 2018-05-26 08.51.52.jpg (852x724, 433K)

It's insecurity, and an arguably justified one. There's this belief, right or wrong, that women are hard to please sexually. In the event of a long term relationship, a guy would be competing with the previous men the woman was with. If a woman had sex with many men before settling, it makes it harder for the relationship to survive infidelity or breakup.

>because they're jealous they're not getting any
Why is being jealous a bad thing?

Naturally casual sex cant happen.

>and there is no longer any incentive for the betas
bing bing 1up wahooo!

Don't mistake polygamy for promiscuity. If chad can't have an harem but all those women he would have had are used up ragsluts anyway because they have no consequences for riding the cock caroussel, they won't be an incentive for betas to work and mantain such civilisation.
On the other hand, if not only chad but anyone who works hard enough have the option to have one wife or as many as he can support, betas have a very nice incentive to work and improve the civilisation: work hard enough and you can have as many women as you want.

Polygamy such as this even helps ugly women: men won't be as restrained in marrying an ugly woman if he can just keep working harder to get a prettier one later on, while still supporting the ugly one.

It matters if you want more than just something to fuck out of your relationships.

>living under the same roof with more then one woman
one is already more then enough drama thanks

you cannot turn a whore into a housewife

and now they're all whores, even that girl in the back of the classroom who doesn't speak to anyone

they will never be able to bond with a husband
they'll never be able to have kids
they're going to end up full of stds and meds and a total drain on society

ROASTIES OUT
youtube.com/watch?v=m-ZmJuQqT9Q

I been on political message boards longer then you have been alive since puberty... the "red pills" yall speak about on here like its breaking news have been discussed for over a decade.

All i ever see here is old topics, rehashed and exaggerated, but mostly.... very incomplete. And not only that, there is no linear discussion here... fuck ups like yourself always digress the convo for a short term chuckle...

Are you having fun? Did your picrelated make you feel better about yourself? Or that you got one up on someone.

The reason that no one here will ever have power and its going to be a eternal circle jerk of larping that yalls rhetoric and ideology is going to win is hilarious.. not only that, your ideology is fucked and would not even hold up in a proper debates.

what ideology? being on pol isnt an ideology, we argue about everything. this isnt the leftist hivemind mainstream consensus club. all the dude said was back to r9k, which i agree is a useless post, but he didnt express any ideologies. you dont know him

Attached: CasualSex.png (1843x4794, 2.64M)

Then why are you still here ?

to lump all our ideas and beliefs into a single ideology that he can then demonize, throwing the baby out with the bath water.

subversion, basically. he glows in the dark

They can’t get any so they get mad instead. This board is full of incels.

Attached: 19F4C58E-F2D1-46B9-872B-51F56E7900A9.jpg (700x391, 47K)

Attached: 54061698.jpg (400x400, 126K)

Implying that's a bad thing as long as it only spreads among the degenerates and fornicators.

good question.... probaly cuz I am completely alone and this is placebo for socializing.

stds fagit

except you fucking monkeys can't seem to string together a coherent argument one way or another anymore. we don't demand consensus but God cannot the amount of fence sitting faggot around here is becoming sickening. pick a god damn ideal and explore it. explore is deeply and express it here and defend it as best you can and learn from the experience. this is the entire point. this is what made pol great.

fight damn you.

>we dont demand consensus
>your ideology
you already implied we have consenus in the form of a shared ideology. youve already proven you dont even understand this board.

This is why prostitution was legal for a long time.
It allowed whores to specialize into being whores and the rest of women to specialize into being mothers.

should always be illegal
otherwise it makes it an acceptable career path for young girls and then they'll all want to do it

Science, Religion, Common Sense, Tradition

Choose one. They all agree on it being destructive.

Oldfag here 2005 whenthere was no Jow Forums just /b/. And you're right user. The thing about this place is that you can't hide from the truth. These children on here are just starting to touch truth for the first time. The problem is that there aren't too many oldfags left to redpill the normies. Ever since the massive influx in 2015 and again during the election this place has gone to shit. Most oldfags have left to better places.

Because while it's nice in theory, moderation, and fantasy, it's not sustainable on a mass scale, in practice. There needs to be a societal force, like it or not, to rail in people to family life, the stability, and expectations around it. Monogamy, marriage, whatnot. Large-scale promiscuity, to excess, does not help in that regard.

Women pursuing a kind of 'Sex in the City' ideal is a contributing factor. Most people can't juggle a dozen partners and settle down successfully for a life happier and more fruitful for the average Joe and Jane. Especially if they do it over the course of their twenties, and wind down in their '30s.

Some people can, but such individuals weed themselves out to Bohemian circles, Homosexuality, or swinger clubs. Society, however, makes an excess of casual sex a more acceptable thing than it should be. The Sexual Revolution pictured a liberated climate with it in full, and we do have it, good and bad, intended and unintended consequences tagged along.

Going back to repressed kind of Victorian, or '50s attitude towards sex would be the wrong way to approach things. But continuing the present course is a path to large-scale inceldom and spinster-dom, and the collapse of families needed to sustain a functional civilization. So moderation is required one way or another.

Oznigger bringing the bantz

I think it can negatively affect society when the women choose to reward inferior men and poor behavior with their affections instead of rewarding that which is more beneficial to society. Why do they do this? Serious girl gang malicious social engineering project.

Attached: CUBES___356rudffiut97tygjhgiugoihhg4h9.png (762x1061, 2.07M)

1 post by OP
Sage Sage Sage.
We know why!

>better place than Jow Forums

Found the faggot

Fellow old fag. Been hiding out on biz. Don’t know where else to go. Please help. Summer is coming...

promiscuity affects the society negatively, there is no female promiscuity without men beeing involved

Attached: 365.gif (248x203, 96K)

Even if they don't up with a half brown baby, they demonstrate themselves to be the type of person that no self respecting man would want to raise their children. I mean, wtf is some stupid tramp that cares about money, men and looks going to teach my daughter.

The children of single mothers score worse in every single metric regarding quality of life. They do worse in school, have lower IQs, are shorter, are more prone to disease, make less money, and have a much higher chance to end up in jail.

Promiscuous women destroy their ability to pair bond and have an increased chance of divorce for every Chad that pumps and dumps them. The sluttier a woman is, the higher chance she's a single mother.

A slut destroys the future of her children by gagging on cocks in the present. It isn't "liberation." It's myopic hedonism and a destructive force that rots your society from within.

Pay attention to whoever tells your women to be promiscuous. They hate your society, hate your race, and want to do everything in their power to destroy your people in order to make you an ignorant slave with no heritage to draw from. And when you are lost, you will make the perfect slave.

Roasties are the gateway to a future hell.

Attached: 1450172372767.jpg (638x991, 360K)

Lower your standards. You will get laid more.

Used women are no good, dont understand what love is

Personally i think promiscuity from men and women harms society. I don't expect everyone to wait until they are married to have sex but i think people should at least get to know someone before banging

99% of women would rather date rapists, date rapists, drug dealers, etc. than a guy of good moral character.

Of course that means 1% of the female population prefers men of good moral character to violent, abusive psychos. However, these women are very quickly picked up by men smarter than you, more attractive than you, who earn more than you, or who happen to be more lucky than you.

Honestly I don't even expect to find a decent woman at this point. Because I stayed pure due to my moral beliefs instead of whoremongering, and now it would disgust me to settle with a woman who wasn't a virgin. So I simply work dutifully to save, and improve my life steadily. I hope a miracle happens one day and a decent woman who is a virgin stumbles into my life but I totally am ready to start a family through surrogacy in the very likely even the universe decides I'm not worthy enough of a respectable, chaste woman to wife.

the man who fucks a married women behind the back of her husband is as accountable as the slut.

>rather date rapists, date rapists, drug dealers, .
it seems we have no shortage on characters like these

Attached: 1246.jpg (657x527, 27K)

How old are you? Sounds like you've settled down as a virgin for the rest of your life. Give a non-virgin woman a try user, at least she's better than not having anything at all (assuming that she isn't a whore). The population of crazy whores greatly diminishes by age, but that doesn't mean that they should be forgiven for their past actions. However, I do hope that one day you find it in your heart to forgive them, because if you don't, then you'll just be miserable for the rest of it. There are women out there to stay away from, such as feminists, but whether or not she's virgin shouldn't matter to you.

If he knows then yes. If he doesn't know she's married then he is still accountable unless she somehow managed to really get to know him in a relationship while keeping her marriage a secret

>are shorter

Yeah that’s basically proof whatever data you’re referring to is made up and or does not exist as this would be an impossible to measure and correlate variable considering how many factors there are. Although in general you’re correct.

>How old are you?
mid 20s
>Give a non-virgin woman a try user,
no. the future mother of my children is a virgin when i meet her and so will i be. we both will be able to tell our children that we both saved ourselves for each other. i will not look over promiscuity. it's disgusting and unbefitting of the woman i make the mother of my children.

if i had slept with whores, then i could not say this. but i have not. i stayed pure and my future wife will be pure. and there is no convincing me otherwise so dont even bother. i'm not a degenerate of weak moral fiber. i stand by my morals no matter what.

As a man, you can't be sure a child is yours, especially if you have a woman who is used to a promiscuous lifestyle. It's only natural to aim for more modest women when it comes to actual partners.
Also, women are more prone to get infested with all sorts of STD, including life-threatening (or at least - changing) shit like HIV, especially when they let niggers and LGBT scum near their pussy.

t. someone who hasn't lurked here for even a month

I fucked up. I meant shorter lives.

It leads many woman to think of a partner as disposable resulting in single mothers becoming more and more common. Basically, it fucks up future generations.

The way they keep staffing hospitals with barely literate third worlders who give zero fucks about sanitation or hygiene, those "degenerates and fornicators" could really be just about anyone. They are blood borne diseases, you know.

You should consider whether you staying "pure" was actually your choice rather than women simply avoiding you. Also, you will never be able to know whether your "virgin girl" is actually a virgin and not some girl with regrets lying through her teeth.

That's why I said "As long as it affects the degenerates/fornicators" I understand that they also don't test for hiv etc. in some places when blood is donated either from what I heard I think california is one.

lol really? this tired, old argument? you think the only people having sex are super models and adonises? you think only attractive people are having sex?

you think ugly, fat, disgusting slobs aren't constantly fucking each other? because they are.

> Also, you will never be able to know whether your "virgin girl" is actually a virgin and not some girl with regrets lying through her teeth.
if she bleeds after the first time we have sex, i'll know

na.... a few might try it for a bit but being a true whore, is a degrading thing and most women havent got the balls for it. I know several sex workers as friends, fucked them repeatedly and brutally. The type of shit I do to them and get away with would make the hair curl on most women.

you wouldn't know for certain, plenty of chicks do not, any girl who had used a vibrator to stave off the chad cock and wait would not... you are fucking stupid, and you will end up childless as you wait for a virgin that doesn't exist.

It ruins women.

Attached: 1439335928343.jpg (1223x1570, 312K)

They lose the ability to bond with their partner, thus leading to eventual and inevitable divorce.

It also furthers the spread of STDs.

>you are fucking stupid, and you will end up childless as you wait for a virgin that doesn't exist.
As stated previously, I am prepared to have children through surrogacy

Reee all you want at me. I'm not putting a ring on the finger of a slut.

yeah its like watching an addict dissolve over the years, whatever they do it hurts them badly.
but they don't see it that way ,not yet at least.

Attached: 534665.png (670x565, 59K)

Because a women wants a man for sex? Because women, lol, want men for sex, lol. Haha, no. Women dont even care about sex, not even a little bit. It means nothing to them, any girl can fuck any guy whenever she wants. Its a big deal for men, and if men were going around fucking everything and making a ton of babies than yes, that would fuck things up. But a women can have like 1-2 babies every 18 months. Its not that much, compared to a guy, who can make a million babies if he has the money to do it.(whores)

Attached: 1517102337678.jpg (753x706, 155K)

>prepared to have children through surrogacy
Almost spit as I laughed at you... HERE SLUT POP THIS BABY OUT OF YOUR WRETCHED WOMB... where is that egg coming from bucko? Well known source? I thought single parents were shit? You think single dad is better than a single mom... classic... Have fun navigating the world as a moral absolutist

Attached: 1502564400011.png (401x372, 56K)

>The more partners one has, the less likely they will be able to maintain a long term relationship (one necessary to raise kids)
source?
>The oxytocin your brain releases when you have sex with someone is a powerful bonding chemical that shouldn't be played with
source?

I can tell you're a leftist and a marxist but how vitriolically you attack someone who has a different perspective than the one you've been taught to believe is the 'correct one'. have a fun life, kool-aid drinking leftist.

user, you know nothing.

Also, anyone noticing the Proxy Kikes are done with Sweden, Leafland and the UK and are now moving on to Australia?

I have been monitoring it for a while, I noticed Svenposting went down to almost nil as soon as Leafposting began, Leafposting went down to almost nil when Bongposting began, and now they have sewn division successfully, they are moving onto Australia. Notice how Bongposters are suddenly not all kikes again?

Proxy fags. The same one that pushed the Amerimutt 56% meme originally. Its a psychological warfare tactic, don't let the kikes win.

>mid 20’s virgin
>thinks any women are virgins in their 20’s
you’re going to be alone forever user.

Him telling you to fuck off to your containment board was more on topic than your sad little incel diary entry.

Old fag from 2005 doesn't meant old fag. Old fags wouldn't even be on this website, or much on a computer. They're the silent generation. Old values have been since eroded. Namely, the legacy of being wary of certain things, mostly black people and, the jews. Deep shit among inter generational "hate" that will be forgotten that was whispered down.

Tinder is women peeling from the top.
It is 10% of the men hooking up with 90% of the women.
Most women will meet someone on tinder and get pumped and dumped, leading to women thinking they cannot have a stable relationship.
Most men will not find a women on tinder, leading to men thinking they cannot have a stable relationship.

Shits cancer.

Attached: 35316246735735.jpg (300x400, 34K)

Because they are smarter than you.
What do you think they call you a dumbfuck, dumbfuck?

> Why do so many people think female promiscuity negatively affects society?
Facts.

Attached: teachman.jpg (385x400, 36K)

Don't mind that fuck. Stick to your beliefs as you're not alone.

>casual sex has no downsides

Attached: teachman.jpg (666x692, 74K)

Women store DNA from every man they have had sex with inside their brains. I'm not making this up. What does it do in there? We don't know yet.
Source: woked.co/women-dna-man-made-love/

bulletproof

Attached: 21241.jpg (125x103, 3K)

It is literally breaking down their ability to properly utilize oxytocin. This causes all kinds of problems down the road.

Attached: 1522752341044.png (1692x1791, 1.56M)

Can't care less how many men my girls have been with before. If anything, it makes them more experienced and better in bed.

Also, the "you can't bond after X partners" is bull, and you know it. If I hae had 100 friends before, I won't be less of af riend to friend #101. In fact, he may turn out to become my closest friend.

There’s never been a greater time to be chadlite with a big dick. I literally have opened up with “yo I wanna give you babies” and these whores will give it up easy.

Attached: BD3D34C4-C313-4D72-B770-E7742128B24C.jpg (1242x2208, 269K)

Because it objectively does? Deny reality all you want. It will never change anything.

How do you manage that? I'm a solid 6 or 7, and when I try out sexual opening lines I get called a creep. I cba with Tinder tbhfam, I succeed well enough at the club, but I've tried Tinder from time to time and it's just awful.

LOLz

Not him but here:
>Sexual Regulations and Human Behaviour. London: Williams & Norgate ltd., 1933.
>Sex and Culture. London: Oxford University Press, 1934.
>Sexual Regulations and Cultural Behaviour. London: Oxford University Press, 1935.
>Hopousia: Or, The Sexual and Economic Foundations of a New Society, with and introduction by Aldous Huxley. New York: Oskar Piest, 1940.

>Feldman SS, Cauffman E. Your cheatin’ heart: Attitudes, behaviors, and correlates of sexual betrayal in late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1999;9:227–252

>Treas J, Giesen D. Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage & the Family. 2000;62:48–60.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407304/#!po=11.1386
>"Having more prior sex partners predicted a higher likelihood of future ESI"

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
>Teachman study correlating number of sexual/cohabitational partners with divorce, using 1995 National Survey of Family Growth

psycnet.apa.org/journals/senpai/24/6/766/
>"Both structural equation and group comparison analyses demonstrated that sexual restraint was associated with better relationship outcomes, even when controlling for education, the number of sexual partners, religiosity, and relationship length."

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00996.x/abstract
>Sexual restraint in relationship correlated with better relationship quality

tl;dr: If your wife has been with even ONE other person, she's not marriage-material. Sexual promiscuity has historically collapsed civilizations. Decline is inevitable.

Attached: 1481366851197.jpg (4920x4161, 2.69M)

Degeneracy.
Within my lifetime, people like you will be lashed to crosses and propped up alongside roadways as reminders of what ultimately happens to degenerates.

Because its an observable fact you asian whore.

Attached: the effects of sexual promiscuity on marriage quality.png (433x750, 68K)

Well I’m a white looking spic in a spic city so my SMV (sexual market value) is high. Plus I’m ripped. In Europe I’d be a 6 or 7 here I’m a weak 8 I’d say.

If you really wanna get laid get tinder gold. Just don’t be autistic and swipe all over the world that’ll make people close to you not see you as much.

It isn't insecurity if you factor in statistics. You are literally gambling with a shitty risk reward ratio.

the answer is impurity creates impure mutts and broken families

Women are only dramatic because you are not allowed to slap the drama out of them

Saw a friend of mines long term gf on there describing herself as in a polyamouros relationship.
My friend is apparently on board with it.
I'm never talking to that faggot again.

>using Tinder
When it first came out it was cool now it's insufferable kind of like Cuckbook

Fuck around until 30s then by then their pair bonding mechanism is rough like a callous, and their womb is almost dead. On the scale of millions of people = fertility crisis

I get a decent number of matches on tinder selectively swiping but the amount of girls that actually meet up is pretty low. Probably only like 1 in 10 if lucky