The Scientific Council for Government Policy (in Dutch: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, WRR) released a scientific report this week, which shows that ethnic diversity negatively impacts social cohesion.
Translated from the full report (page 87): Our analysis shows that, when a neighbourhood becomes more diverse, it becomes less socially cohesive. This result is significant. Social-economic factors have been taken into account. Although the social-economic status of a neighbourhood impacts cohesion, the impact of diversity on social cohesion IS LARGER THAN THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL ECONOMIC STATUS.
results were quite funny. Migrants who came during the seventies fucking despise the new waves of immigrants.
As they should
Jaxon Turner
>immigrants that come to your country to assimilate into your culture no problem >immigrants that come to your country and REFUSE to assimilate into your culture BIG FUCKING PROBLEM DON'T COME HERE IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE LIKE US
Dylan Watson
See the Email Pluribus Unum study by Robert Putnam. A much larger dataset of polities in the US shows the same thing. Interestingly enough it correlates with racial diversity. Diverse areas vote less, volunteer less, join Civic and social groups less and have less dense social networks even among their own race.
All that diversity increases is television viewership and (((awareness of political issues))) but for the later the means to resolve them are depreciated in diverse hoods.
This stuff needs to be pushed more, it's to the most straightforward and empirical anti-diversity argument there is.
>Added to my stack along with Putnam's study at Harvard
Dominic Fisher
>come here with nothing but your cultural background >work hard to start business, gain trust of locals, become part of the community >"refugees" come and get everything, have no skills, care not for their own culture, let alone the local one and don't even want to work >they start giving you a bad name and destroy everything you and your parents/family worked for Who even is surprised by this? Only the lefties who live in fully white neighborhoods and just ignore everything that doesn't agree with the way they view the world.
John Gutierrez
>no problem I don't think you understand the meaning of 'diversity'
Isaac Young
This. Unfortunately it seems correlated with race.
Nathan Martinez
Have a bump
Joshua Reed
From the summary (page 8): >In our investigation we checked three aspects of social cohesion: neighbourhood cohesion, feeling of home, and social safety. We found the following: >Neighbourhoods with high ethnic variety are considered less cohesive, less homely, less safe. Contrary to earlier research, we found that cohesion has a stronger relation with diversity than with socio-economic factors, like income and education level. >In municipalities with high ethnic diversity, more people have been convicted of criminal acts than low diverse municipalities. There's limit to this amount, meaning that moderately diverse areas (like Helmond or Gorinchem) have similar rates to highly diverse areas (like Den Haag or Rotterdam). >These relations are strongest among so-called 'middle-groups' (areas with similar populations of native and non-native).
>m-muh based first generation This report concerns the negative impact of all non-natives on the quality of life of the Dutch.
We must establish a white homeland because apparently only whites can create a future for all children. Holy shit. This is life or death for the human race. Weeeee what a time to be alive.
From the summary (page 9) On economic growth: In the Randstad (=agglomeration from Rotterdam to Amsterdam) and in areas with lots of highly educated residents, diversity goes hand in hand with slower economic growth, contrary to the rest of the Netherlands. This might be caused by the higher amount of German or Belgian immigrants in the border regions, who have less trouble communicating with Dutch people.
You're correct, however, even affluent white people moving into an area absolutely turns it upside down and causes a whole other host of problems. I'm not sure which is worse, though I can tell you my city has received both recently.
Also, for Jow Forums, here's a recap of the post-war developments in the Netherlands concerning immigration:
>700 guest workers in 1960 >90 000 in 1970 >260 000 in 1980 >400 000 extra benefit slurpers imported thanks to family reunification (so tolerant, thank you communists) >1.8 million today (EU-immigrants not included) >4 largest cities (Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Den Haag & Utrecht) already overrun (Dutch are now getting closer and closer to majority of war/political refugees are here to stay >majority of these refugees are still slurping benefits 10 years after arrival >millions more expected this century thanks to African population boom >b-but they'll pay for our pensions >b-but we need them to raise our birthrates >d-don't have kids though, have a career instead and don't contribute to overpopulation and climate change
Aurorafag here, can confirm that rich white coastcucks are part of the problem. Let me know if you're interested in a honeypot group link. Jow Forumsoradans are more numerous than you'd think.
msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/study-asks-is-a-better-world-possible/ >The more integrated a neighborhood is, the less socially cohesive it becomes, and vice versa. >It’s not that local leaders and policymakers aren’t trying hard enough. Rather, we now think it’s because the goals of integration and cohesion are just not compatible with each other.”
jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html >Ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates.
here's putnam's study for those interested:
macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf >The more ethnically diverse the people we live around, the less we trust them. >This figure charts an entirely unexpected correlation for it shows that in-group trust, too, is lower in more diverse settings. >Diversity seems to trigger not in-group/out-group division, but anomie or social isolation. In colloquial language, people living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ‘hunker down’ – that is, to pull in like a turtle.
We’ve known this for thousands of years and have proven it decades ago.
Levi Sanders
Holy fuck, literally 50/50 works/gibs for Arabs, and 30/70 works/gibs for Africans? A cointoss at best as to whether an immigrant from those nations won't be a parasite? Fuck the lot of them off.
Jayden Gonzalez
is there any political parties opposing to refugees and shiet?
Pvv, FVD and SGP, other partys talk about it to get elected again but do the opposite
Cooper Parker
Very interesting conclusions. Summing them up for you now.
Social:
1. The more diverse a neighborhood, the weaker the perceived social cohesion. 2. The more diverse a neighborhood, the less people "feel at home". This is true even for blacks. 3. As diversity increases from 0-25% of the population of a neighborhood, willingness to commit crimes increases in all groups. 4. After a neighborhood becomes 25% diverse, no matter how much more it increases, willingness to commit crimes plateaus at a high level. 5. The middle class are particularly vulnerable to these feelings.
Economic:
1. There is no one answer to whether immigration helps or hurts destination countries. 2. In the Netherlands, levels of immigration do not correlate significantly with higher or lower economic growth. 3. Diversity as a separate metric does correlate significantly with lower economic growth. 4. In areas with a highly educated population, a high level of diversity has a slowing effect on economic growth.
Parker Cox
Culture is just the behavioral manifestation of a group’s genetic predispositions. Out-group individuals may be able to do a cute imitation of the group’s behaviors but it will never be instinctual to them, and ultimately only serves to disguise the group’s slow replacement and protect out-group individuals while they are still in the minority.
Have other factors been accounted for and controlled for? I want to use these stats in discussions but people are guaranteed to claim that it's actually poverty, lack of education or something like that causing these effects.
Jeremiah Butler
FvD doesn't do the opposite, though.
It explicitly advocates for an end to mass immigration, and its leader has met with Jared Taylor and members of the League of the South. You're underestimating how woke Baudet is.
Jonathan Fisher
This is truth, it is our amygdala and fight or flight response, it isn't even hate, but fear of threats.
Logan King
>science report proves what everyone already knew
Hunter Parker
This is basic common sense? Why the fuck do you have to waste tax money on something like that? Eropa is long gone, brother. Hitler really did try to save...
"Ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates."
And this is where we currently are today. The exploitation of universalistic humanitarian behavior. Think for a moment if the shit skins were white and still acted the same. They would be thrown out in an instance. Everyone would be calling them out on their bullshit. Yet, because of muh racism, we have to let them destroy us and our countries.
Alexander Young
And this is why socialism used to actually work in Europe.
Jace Roberts
There are two things relevant there.
1. They keep making notes that higher-educated people are less affected by the social effects of diversity on average, but my own guess is this is because they have social networks that go all over the country and even all over the world. So basically, instead of being dependent on local social support structures they have national/international social support structures.
2. They do mention that there is an "independent relationship", meaning one which stands on its own apart from socioeconomic factors. So even if you correct for those, you end up with a clearly visible correlation at least between diversity and social trust.
3. On the economic front, the poverty factor is pretty much irrelevant, as it is about macroeconomics, and basically what they're saying is that increased diversity slows economic growth independent of other processes.
Luis White
And keep in mind this is after 10 years, plenty of time to learn the language, get some form of basic education (all subsidised of course) and get to work.
FVD and PVV have centered their party around anti-immigration. Both get boycotted by pro-immigration parties (who hold about 120/150 of the national government's seats). On a municipal and provincial level they are either irrelevant or non-existent.
Then there's VVD (economic liberal) and CDA (christian 'conservatives'), who propagate some moderately anti-immigration sentiments, but ultimately ALWAYS cuck out for their EU-masters.
of course it's common sense, but having hard statistical evidence on a national level is very important to BTFO the "it's poverty, not race which causes conflicts" crowd.
Anthony Carter
>levels of immigration do not correlate significantly with higher or lower economic growth >Diversity as a separate metric does correlate significantly with lower economic growth How can the first point be true if greater immigration necessarily leads to greater ethnic diversity?
Gabriel Butler
>and its leader has met with Jared Taylor and members of the League of the South. And has stated that he also wants to meet and converse with imams. I suppose you think this means he wants to establish islamic rule/shariah law.
The absolute fucking state of lavender ladies.
Leo Edwards
>Diversity is OUR strength >Diversity makes US stronger The people parroting these phrases don't realise that they are not included in the "our" and "us" parts.
William Torres
>4. After a neighborhood becomes 25% diverse, no matter how much more it increases, willingness to commit crimes plateaus at a high level. Okay so now we have the lever of multiculturalism, that triggers SHTF. Good to know. Will keep close eye on that number.
Kevin Martin
How many thousands of years need to pass for people to realize that multiculturalism and multi-racialism doesn't work?? The Evolution shows us that even the same species when evolve, they don't interact with each other.
>throw a clean, white sock into a basket of clean laundry, everything remains good >throw a dirty, brown sock into a basket of clean laundry, it will cause everything it touches to stink >add more dirty socks, you now just have a dirty load of laundry
Hunter James
>>m-muh based first generation >This report concerns the negative impact of all non-natives on the quality of life of the Dutch. don't act like this is a one-variable issue, it's intellectually dishonest
This has been known (and ignored) for a long time.
>IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: our differences make us stronger.
>But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.
>"The extent of the effect is shocking," says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist.
>After releasing the initial results in 2001, Putnam says he spent time "kicking the tires really hard" to be sure the study had it right. Putnam realized, for instance, that more diverse communities tended to be larger, have greater income ranges, higher crime rates, and more mobility among their residents -- all factors that could depress social capital independent of any impact ethnic diversity might have.
>"People would say, 'I bet you forgot about X,'" Putnam says of the string of suggestions from colleagues. "There were 20 or 30 X's."
Caleb Gomez
>But even after statistically taking them all into account, the connection remained strong: Higher diversity meant lower social capital. In his findings, Putnam writes that those in more diverse communities tend to "distrust their neighbors, regardless of the color of their skin, to withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith that they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television."
>In more diverse communities, he says, there were neither great bonds formed across group lines nor heightened ethnic tensions, but a general civic malaise. And in perhaps the most surprising result of all, levels of trust were not only lower between groups in more diverse settings, but even among members of the same group.
>destroy us and our countries. Depends how you think about it. What WWI and WWII had in common, when the white men started shit-flinging? Technology advanced in ways thought possible. What will happen when the negroes will be forced out in a WWIII like situation? There's always something good about everything. From shit can arise a phoenix.
All these studies show that the despised, derided common man on the street is right all along. Mass immigration from outside cultures, and all the related consequences, is wrong and should be reversed.
Grayson Walker
These are the viewpoints that the (((media))) chooses to champion. Mostly because the (((media))) also live in majority (((white))) neighborhoods (within walking distance to a synagogue, perhaps).
I know that neighborhood in my town. It's almost like their politicians and real estate companies collude to make sure nogs are everyone else's problem.
Jordan Edwards
Studies like this just confirm that young Tolerant and Enlightened people buy into the diversity meme at first, but the minute they shit out a kid, they are off to the suburbs and the huwhitest school they can possibly find for their spawn. Every. Single. Time.
>Importing millions of alien ethnic groups destroys society This took a scientific study to figure out! JUST
Jaxon Stewart
My litmus test for liberals who champion diversity is to ask innocently: Oh, you're so in favor of diversity! I can't wait to see which diverse (underperforming) school you choose to put your children into. They stare at me silently, glaring. And I keep asking: If immigration is so great, why won't you put your sweet small child into a school filled with immigrant kids? Don't you want to do your part to help them assimilate? More crickets. And then I say, well surely, someone as passionate as you are about multiculturalism would lead by example, offering up your own children to be the vanguard of assimilation! And then they make lame excuses about test scores and 'wanting the best' for their own kids. Fucking weasels, liars and crooks, every last one of them. The traitors deserve to hang first.
Immigration and diversity being bad, the euro being a mistake, lowering corporate taxes being bad for the standard of living of average people, low wage growth being bad, etc.
Noah Taylor
This too.
We have the truth on our side, and if we can make people see it they'll be on our side too. But we don't control the media, not even social media.
Gabriel Gonzalez
t. Ahmed Neck yourself.
Alexander Morales
Another case of cognitive dissonance. Sad!
Jayden Green
>you're presented with two options >*neck the Boomers* >*neck the Jews* choose wisely
Pastebin is full of additional studies including Putnam's on the same topic, from across the globe. If you need additional sources, I've got about 50 or so in there iirc.
Xavier Hughes
I see them playing golf in their gated neighborhoods as I go to my local supermarket and hear Haitian Creole and Spanish being spoken openly, probably nearly 40% of my local high school is minority now, and the Boomers are watching CNN, nigger ball, drinking piss beer, collecting their pensions and Social Security.
Maybe we shouldn't irritate them too much lest they refinance the house on us again.
Xavier Roberts
You had a good run, user, you guys practically invented financial markets and democracy
