>abortion
>muh body muh choice
>sodomy
>muh two consenting adults
>dueling
>still illegal
>abortion
>muh body muh choice
>sodomy
>muh two consenting adults
>dueling
>still illegal
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
kek imagine dueling with modern hand guns
You don’t have to imagine it, just take a trip to Detroit
Duelling is 1v1
(dune) coons don't know what it means
But those aren't duels per se, they're impromptu gunfights. Dueling has rules and ritual and oversight, as a way to neutralize external factors so that only the skill of the better duelist prevails.
I wouldn't mind it under the following conditions;
1: both sides must consent with waivers
2: there must be no shame in turning down a duel, any attempt at shaming or psychological manipulation will be met with execution of the party even if a child or female
3:no invalids, wards of the state, or mentally ill, or extremely physically handicapped
4: challenger has no rights to weapon selection or location, challenged picks.
5:no betting, again met with execution of all parties involved
>letting an adult taxpayer die
never, goy
actually back then it wasn't like the famous scene in barry lyndon, shooting at the same time
people always shot after one another
the guy who initiates the duel actually gets to shoot first which is very weird
Oh and challenging party has no notice of location or weapon.
We have to make it risky to challenge someone, and we had to make it hard to use for assassinations.
>tfw you will never kill a rival in a swordfight for your waifu's pussy which will be gushing over your manliness
why even live bros?
Also council duels occured in many places throughout history, adjudged conflicts not necessarily to the death, but many times to such.
Also imagine an RPG or grenade launcher duel. Televised.
You should be fighting yesterday.
But you won't.
You are being sweden
>no betting
Come on, dont be a faggot.
>at the base
>this guy challenges you to a duel
what do?
Actually you can have legal contract to get in rings and fight. Sure you wont be killing anyone, you wont be using guns, but you can still have some sort of duel if you want.
>bet against yourself
>lose on purpose
>get millions of shekels
But that is how it was
Except they flipped for who went first
Use a weapon he probably isn't used to.
Then proceed to fight dirty.
>there must be no shame in turning down a duel
Then there is no point in having duels, as leftards will keep refusing them when provoked by right wingers.
Burr v Hamilton. skip to 42:00
youtube.com
>Let's coerce people into the dueling arena!
Yeah no
Remember the same can happen to you.
What if he decides to pick someone you don't know how to use but he does?
>Something
just make the distance bigger
>dueling
>still illegal
Seattle has a mutual combat law on the books.
>smoothbore pistols with round shot at 100 paces
>skill