You can't even make up the defensiveness

You really can't even make this stuff up. Damage control is in full force LOL. This is a disorganized article that tries everything they can to dissuade people, including bringing up incels and saying sexbots shouldn't be used for medical research (what does this even mean??)

washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/06/04/theres-no-evidence-that-having-sex-with-robots-is-healthy-new-report-finds/?utm_term=.4a3044f84a42

Attached: Screenshot_20180604_211458.png (1309x620, 356K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/QnR3bNBna3Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Can a robot give you an STD?

is there a lot of robot sex going on I don't know about?

Attached: pepe investigation unit.jpg (882x731, 124K)

The absolute state of roasties lmao.

>New report doesn't not find that not not having sex with robots isn't not good for you! Stay away goys!

But they didn't say it was unhealthy. /thread. That's a wrap.

If theres contaminated jizz on it where the virus/bacteria is still Alive, then yes.

When will they call it robot rape?

feminists are in panic mode

>ban vibrators

I don't get it. is there evidence of it being unhealthy?

Lefties and liberals have been saying for decades that what makes you feel good and isn't harmful to anybody is healthy.

>oy vey hedonism and faggotry are actually normal and healthy
>NO GOYEM NOT THE SEX BOTS
The absolute state of liberal women and kikes

Attached: 1507661124652.png (1366x768, 666K)

>is there a lot of robot sex going on I don't know about?
theres about to be

>Lefties and liberals have been saying for decades that what makes you feel good and isn't harmful to anybody is healthy.
its hilarious how everything they've done in the last 50 years is coming back to bite them in the ass bigly

Attached: 1527898237502.png (613x768, 667K)

Fucking robots is nothing... The future will be living biological flesh holes that you can fuck made in labs using that fake meat technology or the 3D printing body parts stuff combined. What if I submit my own DNA to be used then what law does it break?

I would assume that would be one of the first issues they figured out when building these things

According to the article there are already brothels with them.

But... but... I thought the new pansexual Lando from Star Wars: Solo made robots acceptable, now?

>THERES NO EVIDENCE FUCKING ROBOTS WON’T KILL YOU!

Attached: 4164AD9C-E8A1-4402-9B12-ECBAE95F9547.jpg (728x546, 99K)

I'm happy they didn't find it to be UN-healthy. Shopping for a doll this week.

Attached: 1528010045534.jpg (663x663, 38K)

Just wait until those robots are convincing enough to pass as human.

W E W

Attached: 1521517115582.png (1046x2183, 1.24M)

Are they running field tests to validate their claims?
If so where do I sign up?

>imblying having sex with women is healthy

Argument of ignorance. Commonly used by theists to prove the existance of God.

They are so desperate and stupid they don’t even realize how transparent they are

If futuristic technology in entertainment is a hint to classified technology already in existence then westworld is real and yes.

They DID say more research needed to be done

roasty getting toasty!

>No evidence that exercise is healthy

Attached: wrong.gif (480x287, 1.21M)

I rather they find a way to supress sexual urges without secondary effects like erectyle disfunctions.
Non-reproductive sex and masturbation is just a massive waste of time.

Attached: 1514527990804.gif (800x508, 231K)

the Institute is real

>Carpenter disagreed. “I’m not an advocate for releasing a doll into the general public” and claiming it is therapeutic, she said. But she recommends that the door be kept open to explore sex robots “as a critical tool” used with the guidance of a human therapist.

From the article. People never read the article before losing their shit and getting conspiratorial lol

It's mainly because whatever a woman has to say on the subject is largely irrelevant.

Well the article just comes up with the idea that these dolls are only for therapy, and the layman should not use this medical device until more testing is done
>better just put this on the back burner, no need to explore this option

All sex and hedonism is good and should encouraged, except monogamy and shit that enables men to drop out of the system when it's not monogamy. Women hate undesirable men, but they sure as fuck want them around. Who else is going to build their comfortable hypergamous utopia, drive their sex market value through the roof, and take care of them once their vagina pass expires?

What the fuck is a dildo?

But the OP is claiming:

>Damage control is in full force LOL. This is a disorganized article that tries everything they can to dissuade people

Which is just not what's happening in the article. This woman may have no place talking about this, but she's not in "damage control" mode, and she's not trying "everything she can" to dissuade the use of them. On the contrary, she's encouraging the exploration of sex bots as therapeutic tools; though she's also saying that because of the lack of evidence, sex bots shouldn't be advertised as having medical benefits.

She's not the only one who's being written about in the article, they bring up other views.

OP also dramatizes the way they "bring up incels", but they just bring it up to say that it's been claimed that these sex dolls may be sought out for help with their involuntary celibacy:

>A recent New York Times column equated robots with human sex workers and suggested that self-described incels — meaning “involuntarily celibate” — will attempt to find fulfillment in having sex with machines.

Read, Jow Forums, it's good for you.

The roasties, they are afraid.

Except the article no where says that they shouldn't be used for personal use (as sex toys and so on).

The entire article was talking about the use of sex dolls for medical/therapeutic purposes, because the article was reporting on the "new report" that says that there is currently a data void with respect to medical uses of sex dolls.

Just cool down before getting too emotional. Though this is Jow Forums, and I suppose I'm saying this on the wrong board.

The day will come when we as a species no longer need them

Attached: 895FBDCF-974A-4E2A-92EC-C2204552A8C9-1894-000004AFA89B8FA6.jpg (682x1034, 150K)

*breaths in*
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1528025995164.jpg (800x1199, 338K)

how long are your beef flaps?

Roasties are getting extra toasty

Attached: 1472780078422.jpg (788x999, 272K)

The ABSOLUTE STATE of roastoids, imagine being such a terrible wife that your husband would pick a chunk of silicon over his own child because of you.

Attached: New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy The Washington Post.png (764x109, 22K)

Yes, it is a report that reports that two other reports didn't have enough data to report that there are any benefits to sexbots, therefore they should not be used. This brings into question the true motive of the article in the first place. Why write an article about nothing that tells people not to do something. Are we stopping "self medication"? Are there therapists out there attempting to use this right now? It states none of those. It is a suspicious article, especially considering it is the Washington Post.

she arrives next week.

>not being a monogamous robosexual

These anti-robot "articles" are propped up to make otherwise sensible people lose their minds and WANT killer robots everywhere. You think it's a cute harmless robot waifu that YOU control.. think again.

a robot could malfunction and cause industrial grade injuries. stick to safe, latex balloons.

Attached: 29564-02.jpg (940x940, 36K)

I'd want a 10/10 robot wife. I'd then use a program to mix our phenotypes into what a kid would look like and get a custom kid robot made which would start as a baby robot and progressively upgrade into an adult. I'd then have a genetically superior human kid made for it to grow up with.
Overall a 10/10 robot wife, a robot kid and a human kid.

Attached: robotwaifu.jpg (796x534, 175K)

Literally what I was about to type, every faggot (((science))) article I've seen praises casual sex and degeneracy

If you read the article, you would know: these dolls are being claimed to have medical benefits, and are being advertised and sold on that basis. The report is saying that these kinds of claims cannot be made, because there is no evidence to back it up.

Give me a week alone with one of those sexbots and I'll give them a whole doctoral dissertation on the subject.

Someday, user. Someday.

Attached: 1519418523986.jpg (601x850, 115K)

Every time a new one of these "sex robot" articles pops up I get excited, go look and it turns out they're talking about the same cold silent motionless silicon corpses that have existed for 20+ years now, just incredibly unwieldy and expensive fleshlights.

What the fuck?

Attached: 492425876.jpg (725x400, 180K)

Hopefully soon.
Heil the future AI overlord.

Attached: robot4.jpg (1443x873, 415K)

I'm willing to accept that we just have different opinions of the article. I brought it here, because I felt it did not need to be written, and wanted to share it simply because I wonder why it was written. I have actually never looked into buying one of these, and cannot attest to whether they are being marketed in this way.

youtu.be/QnR3bNBna3Q

Read Washington post article
Change my mind on sex robots
-said no one ever...

Attached: 22554842_10155834781194324_7392841006373662854_n.jpg (411x401, 15K)

RIP Women's rights : 1922 - 2022

it would be weird trying to bang one of those rubber things, and probably depressing

Unfortunately we'll likely have decent ones around 2040...

But what about your vibra-
>THAT'S DIFFERENT THAT'S EMPOWERING

lol

Is this how anime becomes real? This sounds like an anime plot.

>posting the humorless version
Shut up retard and keep shilling how great they are. We need tons of losers to buy these so there is market incentive to improve the tech.

Attached: E0C7F15B-EA69-4475-B20D-32E973C0BFBC.jpg (2000x600, 270K)

Attached: Save and RePost.jpg (1334x694, 530K)

Okay, agree to disagree.

Yeah, I don't feel like I'm asking for the frigging T-1000 here if I'm expecting one that can climb into your bed, ride you off into the sunset, then go take a shower and clean itself out and maybe do vacuuming/dishes/dusting during the rest of the day

Attached: haydeeoutfits-1.png (1920x1080, 626K)

There's no evidence of it being unhealthy, either.

Still gives me a giggle.

It’s just a shitty leftist version of the original where the joke is overexplained and stripped of comedy.

A2 WAIFUUU

Attached: 21s_by_wlop-dbl42zz.jpg (1600x960, 146K)

Who get's to decide what's "healthy"?
Also, this is bullshit, there's no robots(real sex-robot, not a science project or Teddy Ruxpin with tits & ass) around to have sex with yet...

Attached: haley2.png (772x885, 220K)

>mod your waifubot to have cat hears, tail, angel wings and a sweet seiyuu voice as she serves you in maid clothes
>even buy waifubots enough to have an harem and give them from tsundere to kuudere personalities
Hmmmm....

They'll find a way, I'm sure. There will not be a clean dick left in existence when the eternal roastie has finally completed her work. But she will not harm me.

>an army of customized maid waifubots in your home
Sounds fun.

Attached: 1525224683772.jpg (1000x803, 722K)

Can a robot write a symphony? Can a robot turn a… canvas into a beautiful masterpiece?

Attached: CE4984E9-A3ED-4C90-A90F-1CCCC4B39F9D.jpg (800x450, 23K)

So technically, if you had a vagina grown from your cells, and kept it alive on a box and fucked it, would that be fucking yourself?

>Who get's to decide what's "healthy"?
After the beastiality/public sodomy/attempted pedo normalization, Ancel Keyes single handedly ruining Western Civilization and all of this obesity normalization, health is a pretty relative concept. So who cares if it turns half the male population into unrepentant psychopaths? It's their body, their choice.

can a nigger?

Ok young anons, here is a homework assignment.
While the roastie and millenicunt are all up in "Handmaid's Tale", YOUR film to watch is the prophetic "Cherry 2000".
Trust me.

Is there evidence that it is unhealthy??

Daily reminder that vibrators are sex robots. And no one tries to fucking ban them.

Half the population shoves a decapitated phallus in their orifices and is ok with murdering their unborn child. Their body, their choice.

Attached: A48499F7-53FA-4851-BC56-125DC3ACAA8A.jpg (1112x462, 177K)

>what does this even mean?
it means old women know their value in the world is about to be zeroed out. it also means that the demand for single bed room apartments is probably going to be greater than ever and state representatives who do not repeal regulations to prevent entire residential zones from being nothing but stacked single bedroom apartments will loose their fucking jobs and or be found having died from auto erotic asphyxiation with a isis pamphlet in 1 hand a dick sandwich in the other in a room with CP scattered all over the floor in front of a computer with ghey pron on it with their dick in a toaster thats plugged in and set to burned toast

That's what I was getting at brah.

Isolation.....
Like when I was married 11 years ago and never felt more alone, neglected, and used than at any other time in my life.

Dude, if you want to fuck the toaster, just fuck it. Don't drag us into your weirdo fantasies.

We should fuck with the degenerate left, take their "medical"approach, and demand that insurance cover the cost of the sexbot.

Going to check this out desu.

Nor do they try to ban sperm banks

Henry Bowman is that you?

>oy vey, shut it down

You don't have to buy a robot waifu you liberal communist faggot.

>Hurr Durr humans shouldn't be humans

hahahahaha! This. God bless you, user.

Hope you're not one of those who spams blacked porn here, that would be so funny.

>I'm always pissed off all the time.
>See doc.
>You need to fuck, user.
>Medical issued sexbot!

Attached: LaughingMao.png (851x851, 1.24M)

Heiled.

it's like they were all posed to look like they need to take a shit.