Reminder that if you don't forbid the women in your life from wearing pants...

No decent man would ever let a foul mouthed roast beef like you raise his children in the first place. Your not mine to control, if you were, you would be controlled.

A woman is not a princess, you domineering spoiled twat. A woman is a toiler just like you, and when she needs to wear pants as a part of her work she'll fucking wear them.

No decent woman would let a prissy shithead like you anywhere near her twat in the first place. Try to "control" me and put your own eyes down your throat.

Attached: 6d7f3e8c965a8ba95d486e4d2205347c.jpg (2000x2770, 479K)

Attached: 2016-Korean-fashion-2-piece-summer-sets-women-two-piece-pants-outfits.jpg_640x640.jpg (640x640, 134K)

Pointless and retarded rethoric
No different then when Romans wrote about pants being "barbaric and uncivilized"
Clothes don't make one "masculine" or "feminine", clothes serve a function

And heres a brain jogger for you: why did pants become associated with men and skirts with women when the position of the genitals indicates it should be the other way around?

Attached: romecloth[1].jpg (500x215, 26K)

Attached: Crop-Top-and-pencil-pants-Sets-2018-Women-Fashion-Sexy-Camis-Casual-high-waist-trousers-Office.jpg_6 (640x640, 71K)

Attached: 3513f529bd99403fed9442cddd278648.jpg (1125x1087, 888K)

Attached: f0ef1976d5f338abe622ccaff8018fa2--daily-fashion-spring-fashion.jpg (736x909, 93K)

Attached: 35db7126a40e29826cb2ebaecd0792aa--style-instagram-instagram-fashion.jpg (640x640, 86K)

Attached: c689fd3ee15bd6dfc4d8f8c620806fb4.jpg (356x635, 45K)

>clothes serve a function

Yes, clothes serve a function, like helping society identify faggots and whores.

Attached: 51a68a0d1c1ae7357b26e0c3e5b78a9f--instagram-ideas-fashion-killa.jpg (736x736, 98K)

I 100% agree with you, OP. Keep up the good work.

Attached: ABE99801-0A20-496E-A49C-A453C19A6CFB.jpg (736x1104, 94K)

t. incel

Really, how much do you weight? I'm betting at least 230lbs. Unless you're a manlet, then I guess at least 190lbs

Unless you're a manlet AND weight 230lbs, that would be amazing

>No different then when Romans wrote about pants being "barbaric and uncivilized"
Except it is different you fucking retard. Seriously, how fucking hard is it to do a proper analogy?

also, /thread

lol all these fags and roasties raging because they got BTFO by the truth.

Attached: 88DDD1E6-EF8F-4866-8D1B-654B29753AE4.jpg (375x563, 61K)

lmfao you fucking loser

Back in the late 90s when I was at school, my school allowed girls to either wear skirts or trousers as part of the uniform. Lately I had the opportunity to walk around my home town at a time when schoolkids were leaving for school and I noticed I didn't see one schoolgirl wearing trousers, they were all wearing skirts.

It's worth noting my old school got closed down, knocked down, and a new school with a new name was built in its place, the building being an ugly, featureless giant cube. But regardless, it seems as a rule this new school enforces skirts. Either that, or the girls have the option and they've all opted for skirts.

I am mostly conservative with this type of stuff, but having worn a kilt I have to say we've gotten this one ass backwards. It is so much more comfortable to not have a seam just underneath your balls.

>Except it is different
No it isn't. Next you are going to tell me how colors can be masculine or feminine.

Clothing doesn't make one masculine or feminine, but they are a part of our gender roles, and gender roles are important, unless you're a sniveling little white knight "male feminist" in which case you're basically a genderless eunuch anyway.

I smell a toasty roasty

Attached: FFE144C0-DFC3-4AB3-AA09-7C56551AC4AC.gif (360x414, 2M)

>fags and roasties.

Oh you mean non-virgins? Lol you fucking incel faggot.

Attached: Gnarnarrng.jpg (455x362, 21K)

Cry about it all you want but deep down you know I'm right. You put up with masculine behavior from women because you're too weak to put a stop to it in your own life. I have no respect for that. Especially since I know how easy it is to fix this problem on a personal level.

>gender roles
When you assign random ass shit to natural gender roles created by nature don't be surprised when people start to assume that the whole thing is just a "social construct".

>You're a virgin if you give your woman direction in her life choices
No. You're just a scared weakling who thinks being firm with women will make them run off. Absolutely false.

Maybe it's you who is the virgin.

Scots got this shit right. Balls need room to breathe. And keeping them cramped down in hot environment cannot be good for fertility.

It is a social construct, Euroserf. That doesn't make it wrong or without useful function. We live in a civilization. Women should be expected to look and behave a certain way.

how's it feel to come hands free desu?

>social construct
No it fucking isn't. Women give birth, women nurture children. It's not a "social construct". It's a fact of nature. You add shit like fashion to it and you just end up mudding it down and make it easier to reject. But then again americans are masters of mudding stuff down.

Pay attention to the conversation you impoverished little basedboy. I didn't say all gender roles were social constructs, but as you yourself pointed out fashion is. But that does not mean that gendered fashion has no place in our society. It obviously does. Unless you think women should be permitted to take it to the extreme and dress identically to men? Do you think that? No? Then shut your backwater ass up.

Because no real men want to a.) see dick and balls all the time and b.) real men need easy access to procreate with their lovely wife to make many beautiful children.

Attached: 665F73F5-421B-46D4-BF61-687E64691DCE.jpg (271x400, 34K)

Sorry some if us have sex instead of buying doritos.

Real woman dressed whatever. Wtf.

>implying the disgusting hagbeast picture you posted of yourself gets laid regularly by any man worth a damn

Fashion changes. So unless you are willing to put on a codpiece shut your mutt trap up.

I don't believe you.

I'd sooner put a codpiece on than allow my woman to put pants on again. So let me ask you this, feminist. Since fashion changes, who would best be charged with overseeing that it changes in an acceptable way, men or women?

>see balls and dick all the time
are you afraid of balls and dicks?
>easy acess
just go to the gym, I guarantee it isn't that hard to pull some pants down

Yeah, you clearly don't.

>Since fashion changes, who would best be charged with overseeing that it changes in an acceptable way, men or women?
I dunno the people wearing the damn clothes + people judging them for it? Like it always worked you fucking faggot?

It hasn't always worked that way. You think if a woman in the 15th century paraded around in yoga pants that she'd get away with it? Why should women make those decisions when men can make those decisions for them? Why?

It's not like historically men were that great with clothing choices either.

Attached: Louis_XIV_of_France.jpg (1390x1975, 811K)

And if women could get away with their nipples hanging out...

Attached: Naughty late 18th Century Fashion Plate 27.jpg (448x640, 152K)

That looks better than the sloppy cross-dressing I see most modern women doing. At least the king is putting some effort into it, unlike shameless roasties like this:

True.

Attached: F4C1EC57-548B-4210-9FAA-4982305C0A0F.jpg (599x800, 140K)

So you wouldn't mind walking around in what is essentialy a pair of yoga pants and high heel shoes? And a wig?

I'm not a king, and if I was I'd have a duty to my people and the court to dress up to expectations. If the question you're asking is would I conform to the gendered fashion standards of my time and place were I transported to a different time and place, yes. And I'd expect women to do the same. If the woman was mine, I'd demand it, just as I do now.

>I conform to the gendered fashion standards of my time and place
When why can't you do it now?

I do. I don't wear dresses then run around saying "teehee, I need to wear this dress because my balls are sweaty, silly girls." And yet that's basically what women do to you, and you put up with it. Because what, you want other men to leer at your girl's ass?

Cuck.

>Because what, you want other men to leer at your girl's ass?
Well it's not me who want them to have an eassy acces to her box, mr redditspacing. :^)

It's not about easy access for me. It's about dignity and respect, and I don't respect cross-dressers because they have no dignity. And you'll find that telling women that to their face and informing them that you have expectations of them isn't as scary to them as virgins like you think it is.

they can wear pants, you just have to take them down, now and then.

Attached: 2200a579f02580599eef130fcdfae8d664da462c.jpg (500x542, 36K)

I don't find women scary but i don't particularly feel like enforcing expectations of some mutt faggot.

>women just wear tights in public now
It’s a good time to be an ass man.

No, you'd rather enable cross-dressing because you've been conditioned into thinking it's normal and healthy for women to run around in skin tight men's clothing so they can better present their ass to strange men.

In other words, you're a cuckold.

>cross-dressing
What's with your cross dressing fetish? Do you wear skirts when nobody's watching? It's just fashion. What gender wears what clothes is decided by society, not by a mutt on the internet. Would you go to the scotland and try to pull kilts from highlanders?

You're the one with the cross-dressing fetish, which is why you're defending female cross-dressing as a means to sexually entice men who aren't you. And no, what women wear is ultimately up to the men they're with. It's actually very easy to guide women who are emotionally attached to you to dress like women and not men. If every man did this, instead of tolerating cross-dressing thottery, then that's how women would dress.

So cross dressing is bad only when women do it? Do you feel jelous that they are allowed it but you are not? Do you feel angry that thos dumb thots can wear pants while you aren't allowed to wear your pretty skirts in public? I mean that must feel like a horrible injustice. I bet you look like the prettiest little princess as well!

>Got all his basedboy points blown out one by one
>Resorts to b8 posting because he has no more arguments
Enjoy poverty, cuck.

Attached: 1522880034344.png (600x696, 125K)

You seem to be rather bothered by it. Did someone found your pretty princess stash?

Why don't you learn to speak our language instead of mangling it in your malnourished developing country mouth?

Sorry, i'm too poor to afford spanish lessons. :(

>Reminder that if you don't forbid the women in your life from wearing pants
durka durka

It's funny because it's true.

Attached: 1524746319699.jpg (334x334, 88K)

Attached: serveimage.gif (500x374, 2.87M)

What can i say? Life just isn't fair. But some men need to suffer hardships so other men can afford their pretty dresses.

What are you suggesting? Dresses are feminine? That can't be. I've been told by Polish intellectuals that men and women are equal.

>I've been told by Polish intellectuals that men and women are equal.
II first heard about such a thing. But a certain Mexican Intellectual told me that cross-dressing is only bad when women do it. And wearing pretty-princess dresses is a height of masculinity.

Nobody ever told you that, that's just your poor English skills burning you again. Maybe if you slave away some more on the potato farm or in the textile factory you work in for pennies a day you can finally afford those lessons.

You need not "demand" anything or be as autistic as OP.

>be me
>have younger impressionable gf
>often asks my advice on what to wear out because I know my stuff when it comes to clothing
>make a point to always recommend skirts, dresses and other feminine things over pants
>give her compliments on how lovely and pretty she looks whenever she wears feminine clothing but conspicuously avoid it when she doesn't
>starts to wear trousers less and less until she barely ever wears them at all.

It's all about subtle influence.

Well, you didn't outright state that but you didn't denny it neither. So how about we cut to the chase, esse? Are you showing that boipussy in the skirt or not?

>Give kids their breakfast. Feed the dog. Hang out a load of washing. Wash the dishes. Dress the kids for school. Make their school lunches. Remind self to take one kid to dentist after school while the other has to go to sports practice
>Finish work. Go to collect kids before ferrying them around. In meantime go to supermarket for food for family dinner. Fill car with gas.
>Get home, bathe kids, feed them, feed dog, bring in washing from line, do dishes, help with kids' homework, vacuum floors, do another load of washing, pay bills
Women actually doing this in 2018
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I didn't denny it because I'm not in the mood for pancakes.

Attached: dennys.png (1200x600, 114K)

>when you larp about having a trad woman but you are able to instantly pick up names of wafflehouses

1) I don't believe in "trad women." 2) Every red blooded American knows what Denny's is.

Pretty sure that your american diet had turned your blood yellow.

That doesn't make any sense.

wtf does anything in your rant have to do with wearing a skirt?

> high heels
degenerate
> stockings
wtf?

> Upskirt?
skirts should be worn to your ankles you ma'am

stop complain about having to work. women did it to themselves. they begged for a hundred years now and lower males wages by demanding to be part of the workforce and continue to do so.

Also be a degenerate if you want to it sounds like you already are

I'll give you an explanation, my trap friend: eating junk food gave you such high cholesterol that your blood no longer red but yellow from fat.

> You try to tell me what I have to wear when I'm working to raise your squealing piggies
Literal state of all women. Why do retard beta-males want them to be "part of" the alt-right?

You learn that at Polish medical school? Must be state of the art. Yeah, no, my blood is still very much red. And you are still a cuck.

roasty getting toasty!

haha 100% correct. women wanted to wear pants for 1 reason. to push androgyny which only serves to hurt our species

So good so far, OP. You sound like a real man and I like you.
Reminds me I saw a disgruntled man in a store give me a sarcastic expression while waiting for the busy-body uppity female clerks wearing pants. Their penis envy certainly rubs me the wrong way and has for some time. Anyway, he had a teen daughter in a odd looking skirt outfit which in hindsight I did miss the chance of complimenting.

Furthermore, I need to break the conditioning and start sticking my fingers into yoga pants thots and punching jeans wearers in the face.

>Real women wear dresses/skirts not pants

Wrong. Women have to show legs, Ahmed.

Attached: moha.jpg (900x900, 450K)

>Legs can't be exposed in a skirt
Do you even have eyes?

>>Legs can't be exposed in a skirt

No they can't really. Trousers expose legs far better.

Attached: opsgf.jpg (450x338, 48K)