What would happen if women were no longer permitted to enter the workforce?

Immigration would rise even more than it currently has.

Some unimportant industries would die and kikes would whine about muh GDP. A few productive sectors would have brief hiccups with administrative stuff. It would be a small dip followed by great prosperity.

We would be as backwards as Muslim shitholes?

Attached: 1520373046904.jpg (404x428, 138K)

Single motherhood would explode as women look for a way to get money and continue to ride the cock carousel.

lol implying that the women in 2018 would raise children that would lead to a successful society. they'd come out even more pozzed than they otherwise would

A paranormal boost in productivity (less paperwork and thots pretending to work) and a golden age.

>What would happen if women were no longer permitted to enter the workforce?
Huge increase in production.

Wages would rise and benefits would increase as business would be forced to compete for employees rather than employees competing for jobs. Single-income households would become the norm and it's likely that society would prosper. There would be far less liberal policies in government, less immigrants, and less welfare. Things like fabric and food might see a drop in price as more women start doing proper womanly things like sewing and cooking again.

People would start having families again and we would no longer need immigration because we would have a healthy and fertile population.

Well and not having to double your work load because Sally had to take maternity leave, or needed to do something because of their kid.

women would be property instantly.
those of us with no man to shelter us would face starvation and death. the small fraction of us who are meaingfully high willed might fight and take up arms but it wont make a fucking dent in the legions of slutcows ready to bend the knee to some rich kike. feminism already shows that women are completely willing to be docile fuck puppets if it means they can shit on poor to mid income white men and the political enemies of their masters

Attached: 1528075935213.png (1414x2000, 2.13M)

ALL women deserve to be dirty destitute berry pickers in rags because they are ALL STUPID MONKEYS. Not even worth sodomizing!

Attached: monkey.jpg (720x960, 65K)

sounds like you focused your time on being an independent women instead of focusing on what you were biological made to do - start a family. it's also not hard for women to "find a man to shelter them". you have a vagoo? there's at least 5,000 men ready to fuck you just on that one asset.

also, tits or gtfo

Fuck that shit I had to grow up with a single mother which fucked my psyche up to the core leaving me a useless husk of a man. I'm not going to let feminism reverse right after I'm too old to fix my personality.

jking of course its one of the most evil things and has to die.

Women have always worked throughout history. A traditionalist society shouldn't be concerned about not allowing women to work; rather it should focus on creating sexually segregated jobs. At first it could be economically disadvantageous, but who cares? Economy never was and never will be a main factor in a society's success. In the long run, sexual segregation would be healthier in all aspects.

Attached: 7c98d31d350b858e23dd4ba7ce1b2c9b--th-century-gothic-dress.jpg (736x524, 114K)

but many men would have to take jobs once considered womanly

Maybe you should get married to a good man, start a family and live the good life raising your kids while your husbands brings home the bacon.
Sounds like a dream to me, as a man.
But you'd rather be a
>muh strong womyn
and end up being a single mother to some shit skin kid that doesn't even see you as his mother.
Good luck with all that.

>Tits
>GTFO
choose

You're right they have, but they were still mothers and wives, not cum sucking sluts they fucked every company they got near.

you would fix politics and tech companies, films too, overnight by doing this

Attached: 1514671656479.jpg (584x558, 41K)

>leaf