How is Europeans conquering iron age African societies in the 19th century any different to Romans conquering iron age...

this city made rome look mehh, niggers never even came close

Attached: 99d90f9f7add57e6cbb8f83e682dd80d.jpg (2560x1920, 1.04M)

you think snowniggers were better?

Who do you think would win a battle between Aztecs and Celts?

1000 aztec warrios vs 1000 celt warriors clashing in plain land

>chainmail armor and metal helmets craftsmen made
>axes and swords also made by skilled smiths
>sailing in expertly designed boats allowing them to traverse ocean and shallow rivers quickly
>advanced navigation skills allowing them to travel the world and return home perfectly

Yeah no.

Impossible to say, all of Europe was connected in trade since the neolithic. The Mediterranean developed quicker since it was closer to the near east. Snowniggers had complex socities but contact with Rome made them even more complex. Even northern Scandinavia began transforming around the 1st century AD.

natural spread of science and genes
its not that hard to see

>no society, no cities, no nothing to be conquered
theguardian.com/cities/2016/mar/18/story-of-cities-5-benin-city-edo-nigeria-mighty-medieval-capital-lost-without-trace

celts easy

>the guardian

I don't think niggers have developed the intellect to be capable of that. With northern Europeans, everything just managed to align properly, and thus we got things like the industrial revolution.

also

>lost without trace

kek, i swear guys, it was just like wakanda

Attached: 2YAoTl.gif (320x180, 1.29M)

Before you keep talking bullshit about “snowniggers” like the bunch of ignorant idiots you are let me remind you some things

You can thank the Vikings for:

>the creation of many medieval kingdoms and duchies all across Europe like Normandy and the kingdom of Sicily,

>The creation of modern day England and Russia

>etc, etc.

Attached: 1C1B0C8E-394C-443A-BCF1-B6422DCE6018.png (1200x786, 317K)

Literally sticking-fingers-in-ears tier

>I'll have an abortion so I get that promotion at work
Child sacrifice is still a problem

>the creation of anything
They just stole the thrones, tho. They didn't create or help create anything. They even got outbread and didn't leave much linguistic traces.
This is just like that we wuz kangz bullshit

>1000 aztec warrios vs 1000 celt warriors clashing in plain land

At what temperature?

>didnt leave much lingusitic traces

Orkney and Shetland spoke Norse until the 19th century. Also English has plenty of Norse words, this them there their husband, all Norse words. Even more in Scots and North England dialects. They founded the cities of Dublin, Cork, Galloway, Waterford in Ireand. You know nothing meme flag.

>the creation of many medieval kingdoms and duchies all across Europe like Normandy and the kingdom of Sicily,
So, in other words, cancer.

You would be exterminated by turks if we hadn't created Russia to save you

One drop of Germanic blood is holier than all of the Mediterranean people combined, wogshit

Attached: 1528050158332.jpg (913x624, 201K)

This, but unironically.

>builds roads
>can't invent wheel
why live?

probably the circle was too sacred to be used as a wheel, but they had stone circles, massive ones used to kill people in

and here the natives did perfectly round stone spheres, some of that impossible ancient shit

try making niggers do that, I bet OP is kike shill, this is a psyop, the purpose of the thread is to have people think it is an obvious fact that "africa was conquered", it was not, the thread is camouflaged as a "pro right wing" thread

no matter how much shill articles fagOP keeps posting, you cant pysop me kikes!!

Huh, have you seen ancient Rome reconstructed in 3D? Nothing will ever come close again sadly

Why did we ever bring you civilization? We should have let you to run wild in the forests, that's where you belong

It wasn't a joke, the norman fags was one of the main reasons that the East fell to Islam.

>You would be exterminated by turks if we hadn't created Russia to save you
kek. The state of Kiev was created by slavs and rus, fag, united in the end by Rome. And ruskies would be exterminated by khazars if it weren't for Rome. Ruskies weren't much of help anyway, until they got their ass handed to them and bowed to Graeco-Roman superiority.

Do you really think you have something in common with the glorious Greco-Roman, white, civilization of the past?
Apart from squatting on their land?
These fucking Turk rape babies are delusional.

I actually know my ancestry, so yes. And if you were educated in the slightest you would know that even turks in Turkey are not turkic. They are anatolian( a mix of the peoples that lived in anatolian region)

Because the Europeans had tried and failed for centuries before the invention of quinine.

>
idk, thats a drawing of one of the small cities, the main city, was something else, you have to imagine that all the stone was clean and painted in bright colors

the size of the city and of the pyramids makes rome look small

Attached: wi-fi-gratis-en-teotihuacan-1024x767.jpg (1024x767, 160K)

Greco-Romans were swarthy as fuck, this idea that they looked like pale, fair-eyed northern euros is pure revisionism

not saying rome isnt impressive, i am mostly refering about both the physical size and the size of the population and trade, mexico was bigger, by far

Attached: teotihuacan-ciudad-del-sol.jpg (800x542, 129K)

You're fucking retarded. Draft animals were not indigenous to mexico. Carts with wheels weren't needed.

thats just the central square, the city itself was like any modern city in size, of today, kilometers across

and still that central square is MASSIVE, the picture doesnt show it

This is no contest. Iron sworded 5'8 Celts in chainmail versus 5'4 Mexicans with stone spears?

Wrong.
They were white Europeans.
Or are you trying to tell me that centuries of Moorish and Turkish raping changed nothing?
You're the revisionist.

Attached: 102799954-RTX1IGUB.530x298.jpg (530x298, 37K)

It was larger than London, the most populous city at the time of contact. Cortés even wrote that tenochtitlan was more magnificent than seville back in spain

>bla bla blather

no, the difference is niggers are significantly biologically inferior. blonde whites may have destroyed the civilizations of brown and curly haired superior whites via mindless barbarism, but at least they were able to steal the blueprints of said civilizations and emulate it elsewhere. blacks have never emulated and instead were GIVEN civilization by Muslims. no barbarians destroyed them, rather they destroyed themselves and never once properly re-propagated with the blueprints given to them

Why is it so difficult for you to accept that a group of people of a darker complexion but the same racial group were so successful at an earlier point in history? Romans colonized and conquered huge swaths of the med, france, GB, parts of Balkans, north Africa, all of modern day Italy. Incredible infrastructure, engineering, innovation, and a willingness to accept good and decent ideas and technologies from other nations (especially those of the greeks.)

The ancient greeks and romans already had a fuckload of assyrian, phonecian, berber, etc. blood in them. That's literally how societies operate - they change genetically overtime due to trade, immigration, conquest, diplomacy, etc.
2. Modern turks are only about 10% turkish genetically. The rest of their DNA is armenian, levantine and - yep, you guessed it - greek. Having turks interbreed with greeks would do very little to dilute the "greekness" of greek people. Not to mention how overblown the "rape baby" thing is in the first place.

So yeah, you're still the revisionist.

Attached: 1528216581032.jpg (1920x2240, 1.39M)

its also notorious that the city itself has passed through 3 civilizations, lasting thousands of years, and to the date of contact, it was still maintained in good shape

another hit against the wakanda nigger lovers, if ancient africa had big cities, why didnt they endured? why couldnt the new civilizations keep the city in good condition?

note when i say size of the population and trade, i mean just the city of rome, not all of rome, just city vs city

and the mexican cities lasted all the way since roman times and possible before, till the new world discovery

The Norman's basically whiten Europe toi leaf trash. The fought all the super power and won convincingly. Unfortunately most decedents are potatoe niggers, frogs, Anglo trash and spaghetti niggers. It's been noted that most pure blood died fighting for France in WW1.

The Celtics aren't still bitching about it centuries later

Original Indo-Europeans were blonde and blue eyed. Ancient Romans and Greeks were the same, since they didn't mix with Turks and Moors yet.
Now, I am sorry. I truly am. But they're no longer white. And since they're no longer white, they've become nearly bankrupt states who only masturbate about their past glory.
Glory, which I might add, they'll never manage to capture again, since... you guessed it, they aren't white anymore.

africans were not iron age. they were stone age still. no copper no bronze no iron

Well Western Turkey and Asian minors are antolian apparently. The rest is mutts.

Italy continuously contributes more than it takes from the EU stupid meme flag.

>Near bankruptcy
>Takes hand outs
>Contributes
Fuck off mutt.

Dude the description of the Meds we're redish hair and Olive skin. Yes some had blue eyes but the characteristics are not very common due to interbreeding. But they were not northern euro standard of look.

> kikery

Cute racial theories. We have one choice. We stand together or get wiped out.

Attached: 7e837d4beca3e7d5f6d87fab3bfcb40ca505770d2b7b8660d026764a5f7180b9.jpg (1800x1800, 756K)

White Europeans should stand together. Instead of letting in non-white LARPers join the club.
If you allow that Italians and Greeks are white, swarthy as they are, then that means you wouldn't mind them dating your daughter.
And frankly, seeing a white woman with an Italian or a Greek is almost like seeing her with a nigger.
Vague platitudes, rationalizations and justifications. Blonde and blue eyed Italians and Greeks were the emperors, generals, philosophers and leaders of their respective civilizations.
Alexander the Great was blonde and blue eyed. Look it up.

>Original Indo-Europeans were blonde and blue eyed
Original Indo-Europeans were light brown who sometimes had light hair / light eyes. The blue eyed shit came from interbreeding with Old Europeans, which is hilarious because it means the Aryans actually made Euros LESS white, not more

Holy shit you're a dolt.
4th highest contributing memberstate.
138% debt to gdp
but so does Japan and they're not going anywhere anytime soon.

Attached: Screenshot (5).png (1920x1080, 282K)

true shit my dude.

Italians can be blonde and blue eyed and still have swarthy olive skin. So can greeks, albos, berbers, spainards, and portuegese.

>das rite we wuz da real romanz n greeks n sheeeeeit

as far as eyes go**

also
>wanting to mix ethnicities
If it happens so be it, but I want an italian olive skinned beauty just like me.

it's so fucking annoying when unironic supremacists re-write history
we can hate niggers but don't pretend to be god you fucking mongrel 56%ers

Only in the north.
The vast majority of Italians look like literal Arabs.

Romans didn't have to put up with abbos

You forgot to add in Spanish, French, Portuguese, Czechs, Yugos, Brits, Slavs and literally 80% of all Europeans who are not blue eyed with blonde hair.

Germany would have lost to Poland in 2 days if they were to follow your genius racial theories....

9 out of 11 from pic related are impure niggers. Youre either a kike or a fucking moron.

Attached: FSJ873245-23878f7fg-9f6d097g6u32i5.jpg (800x573, 193K)

It isn't, which is why the first world will be conquered by the third world

*sigh*
I'm tired of beating a ded horse with faggots like you. Historic revisionism the same as africans with egyptians. but you're too much of a faggot to see your hypocrisy.

I'm not saying we can't use our brown haired or brown eyed, non-white European "brothers".
But they have to kneel before Germanic/Anglo/Scandinavian superiority before we can accept them.
They have to admit that blonde hair and blue eyes is the master race.
P.S. I'm sorry you have dark hair and brown eyes mutt.

>Blonde and blue eyed Italians and Greeks were the emperors, generals

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septimius_Severus#Early_life
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrinus#Background_and_career
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximinus_Thrax#Rise_to_power
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_the_Arab#Early_life
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aemilianus#Biography

Attached: pepe.png (660x603, 288K)

Im sorry youre a kike in Tel Aviv. Im 100% certain youre a Jew and not white. Clock is ticking for you faggots.

Attached: 1523391078966.jpg (184x184, 9K)

Yes, yes.
I'm speaking the actual truth.
Dropping the real red pills.
Therefor I must be a kike.
I'm sorry, but there's white, and there's non-white and a clear line in between the two.

Sounds familiar. Muslims and christians giving away their pearls to degenerates. A grave sin.

Satan won boys. This world is refuge.

>Germanic/Anglo/Scandinavian superiority
You mean the ethnicities that are currently wiping themselves out of existance with mass immigration and low birthrates? Oh yes they are very superior.

That doesn't refute anything retard

You mean the ethnicities that the Jews are trying to destroy?
Yes.
They certainly don't seem to give a shit about you brown Europeans.

False. Italy is also heavily targeted. Norway/Denmark do not have a much higher % of non-Europeans. Meaning there are far more non-Europeans in Italy.

>the only reason we are wiping ourselves out of existance is because that's how much jews care about us and not about you brown euros hahahaha!!!!

That's not really something to brag about.

Italy was 91.6% Italian in 2016 while Norway was only 86% Norwegian in 2013 and in Denmark 88% of the population was Danish also in 2016.

>e only reason we are wiping ourselves out of existance is because that's how much jews care about us and not about you brown euros hahahaha!!!!
>That's not really something to brag about.
You're not white, why should they care about you?

As long as there are shekels to be made jews will care. Anyway if you're so superior I really don't understand why you continue to destroy yourselves.

Yes, and majority of immigrants in Norway are other Europeans. Same in Denmark. Both countries are only getting strickter and strickter immigrant policies - strickter than Italy. Both countries have higher native birth-rates than Italy too I believe.

My point is that Italy is also heavily targeted and it makes me sad. I hope you are not one of those "Sweden is so bad it justifies not doing jack shit about my own country's situation"

>Yes, and majority of immigrants in Norway are other Europeans
That doesn't make it a whole lot better. Anyway Italy voted in an anti immigration right wing government that just started officially yesterday. Give it some time.

It makes it a lot better that they are Europeans though lol. In my mind, European immigration counters the immigration from outside. Ideally no immigration (I'm fine with guest workers, intellectuals etc.), but as long as the non-Europeans keep pouring in...

We will have to see how effective their government is going to be. Hopefully Sweden Democrats will become the biggest party in Sweden too.

the celts put up one hell of a fight. they couldn't even conquer the germans. caesar fled from england in the middle of the night on his first trip there he got rustled up so hard. entire legions were slaughtered in gaul. then these fuckers turned right around and conquered rome. nothing like african domination.

africa was more sophisticated than anything north of central america in many parts. the benin area in particular. remember, the bantu forged iron.

there were a lot of middle eastern slaves moved in to southern italy and sicily late in the roman empire's days, but have you actually been to italy? even in those areas there are still plenty of whites and even a sizeable portion of blonde haired blue eyed people.

European immigrants are better than non European immigrants I agree but ideally as you said there should be none. We'll have to see about SD though. The polls say they're the third biggest party but that won't be enough.

Unlike the "superior" Greaco-Romans, the Russians actually resisted and defeated the Ottomans

SD is probably going to end up the biggest party, as things are looking now. I think they can hope for up to 30%. AfS is the real bad goys though.

>The guardian
>Australia flag
Did the abos break in and take over shitposting for you?

I hope so but they will definitely need to be the biggest. In The Netherlands the nationalist party became second largest and they still got blocked from the government by the other parties.

Completely retarded.

Celts were feared Warriors and Greco Romans adopted their military tactics and Equipment. Furthermore Celts had big cities themselves.