Modern science says that there's only one human race

Caucasians should be a subspecies of Africans then?

(((modern))) "science"
like (((modern))) "art"

This again?

Attached: IMG_2829.jpg (967x1024, 180K)

Part negroid societies are all poor third world, including Asian ones. While Negroid free like European and East Asian are developing or developed.
Negroids like Indian, African and Aboriginal have lower iq's.

Attached: south-asian-east-asian-southeast-asian-2925667.png (500x300, 62K)

Modern science claims the exact opposite, but journalists are still quoting marxists from the 1970s (lewontin, gould, etc.)

>>modern science says that there's only one human race

Citation needed.

Also how does BiDil work, and why don't bone marrow transplants work between different races? Is bone marrow a social construct?

Attached: bidil.jpg (180x180, 6K)

If there no such thing as race, then there's no such thing as racism

Two men,produce a child?
>mfw asians "males" are so beta,they don't even count as men

Attached: 1527276815852.png (881x686, 540K)

This is why I don’t understand why Tibetans are getting pissed off at China. If everyone is the same there’s no point having an artificial border between the two countries

this

Attached: 1514963422349.jpg (640x488, 44K)

Attached: sage.jpg (125x82, 2K)

Modern "science" says there is only one human "race", but there are multiple "population groups" with distinct "phenotypical characteristics" and the "population group" they belong to can be predicted by examining their DNA, and the genetic variance that allows this prediction also allows them to map out genetic clusters that show different Caucasoid "population groups" are closer together genetically than they are to different Negroid, Mongoloid, or Australoid "population groups", but let's not call these clearly demarcated "population groups" "races", because "race" has been used in the past to justify "racism" and "genocide".

Does that about cover it?

Most scientists are faggots, intelligent and knowledgeable, but faggots nonetheless otherwise many of them would have been shouting at the top of their lungs about racial egalitarianism being a bunch of bullshit, so as to advance real science, BUT NOPE, gotta be friggin faggots.

We actually share many traits with bananas and lobsters. Would you say that a banana and a human are the same?

Or take the gravity as an example. Gravity Law by Newton was a "social construct" in the sense that it was analyzed and rationalized. Thus, would you claim that gravity doesn't exist?

Also, look at pic related: the ethno-racial map of the Earth, by Masaman14 (look for his YT channel, it's very interesting).

Attached: Ethno-Racial Map of the World 2018 (Masaman14).png (5888x2464, 1.59M)

Actually it's Masaman, without the 14. My fault.

youtube.com/channel/UC1vVNQN-TCy8d3Mb_Owr2Kw/videos

And here's the video in which he explains his map: youtube.com/watch?v=zpjbWjy65pA

>>modern science says that there's only one human species
ftfy
also science admits the differencies between races, how are you so ignorant and uninformed?

Well, James Watson did and had to face a shitstorm. Others do too, like Richard Lynn and there's this article by (((David Reich))) who is forced to beat around the racial difference bush:

nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html

This fucker is so stupid.. Black American isnt a race just like White American isnt a race.. They are Bantus from west Africa mixed with "Germanics".

How are Berbers Eurasian? They dont live in Europe or Asia..

How the fuck are Habesha and Somalis the same as Black Americans which isnt even a racial category its social.. And Bantus.. who we dont even have any genetic markers from..

Attached: Genetic markers.png (1981x2735, 2.48M)