The United States - Dwindling white population (only population which gives net gains from taxes) -Evergrowing expensive loq iq nigger/spic/mutt population -crumbling infastructure -crippling debt -stagnant technology +good strategic locations +natural resources within border -very little overseas resources -eugenics is immoral
China +massive growing population +stealing all the tech that gives the U.S it's edge that the U.S can't do anything about +infrastructure far greater than the U.S and growing exponentially. -possible but not likely civil war +eugenics is not immoral and will most likely create supersoldiers / brainiacs with genetic engineering and or breeding. +population has a slight iq advantage over most europeans +owns nearly all the African resources +building islands to extend influence
Their population advantage will completely evaporate before the century is over, but not before it inflicts irreparable environmental damage. It's projected to shrink about as fast as it grew, basically in the same way they fast-forwarded through the industrial revolution they are also going to race right into first world demography, probably without achieving a first world economy. Think Japan but without the money or robots to care for their elderly. Granted they'll just let them die but it's still going to cause some incredible social problems on a collossal scale
Dominic Hill
>i'm only here cuz abe is
Ayden Robinson
Would definitely mother-daughter three-way.
Xavier Perez
There's no love of China here, you retard. There is the addressing of a clear and present danger that is China.
I don't understand how this is an argument The US has niggers and spics and lardasses across the midwest and we still dominate the world So China has shitty drivers, that doesn't mean they aren't a threat to US interests in Asia
Dylan Gomez
>chinese population is aging so quickly that they're projected to decline to less than 900 million by 2100 >"but they have lots of people" said the retard who doesn't understand that the elderly are not useful for the kind of industrial economy that keeps china afloat
Fear of china is based on ignorance of china
Aaron Cooper
Wyoming. It's big, white, and it has no state income tax.
Parker Nguyen
All of them pretty much suck, and my state is fucking gone t.oregonian
Matthew Allen
G7 LEADERS AGREE TO BOOST COOPERATION TO PREVENT, THWART AND RESPOND TO MALIGN INTERFERENCE BY FOREIGN ACTORS AGAINST DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES - DRAFT SUMMIT COMMITMENT: RTRS
G7 LEADERS AGREE TO SHARE INFORMATION IN A G7 RAPID RESPONSE MECHANISM TO IDENTIFY, RESPOND TO THREATS TO THEIR DEMOCRACIES - DRAFT
Finally, those Putin influenced wins such as Hungary and Italy, will be history.
When you have that many people you probably need something like this; besides it is such an amazing system that Europe or USA will copy it sooner or later.
Camden Nguyen
But Alex said he was woke
Andrew Edwards
Looks a lot like Watchdogs, decent game
Isaiah Green
>Trudeau
Mr. Trump, I'm CIA
Austin Turner
But it was their(kike) fault.
Isaiah Peterson
G7 LEADERS AGREE TO ENSURE HIGH TRANSPARENCY OF FUNDING FOR POLITICAL PARTIES, ALL POLITICAL ADVERTISING, ESPECIALLY DURING ELECTION CAMPAIGNS -DRAFT
sure thing lmao
Zachary Cooper
No really? Wow. The author of this must be smarter than the average Grug.
Gabriel Ortiz
I love that guy.
David Wood
>Trump looking to legalize weed just to spite Sessions ABSOLUTE MADLAD
Jeremiah Gomez
He always said he would let the states decide on this meme issue and this is for the best.
David Powell
hey mutt you going to post your eye? how many chinks do you know personally with blue eyes?
if it ends this Weekend at Bernie's bullshit going on with Sessions in the AG office I'm for legalizing whatever, the deep state cabal is the biggest security threat to this country right now and the late Jeff Sessions is nowhere to be found.
Chase Lewis
>Debate about China turns into debate about eye color. It's almost like CIDF would want to perform this distraction HMM
Oliver Perry
She does have a point. How does one respond to this?
You can't sue people for not saying something (except in some rare legal instances where prosecutors are in charge of discovery). That would be in violation of the first amendment.
Hudson Rodriguez
Shekeltome: How can you support Trump wanting to hear the complaints of the NFL players?!?
>Me: So there's a lot to take in here. What happened in your video is tragic, to be sure. The Philando Castile action reflects poor judgement on the police officer. On a more positive note, bodycam usage by officers has increased since this time, which is leading to less incidents like this, thankfully.
>As for "paying lip service", how so? This is a chance for people who were unjustly incarcerated to be free. He's choosing to hear the players out. If he was the true racist, why would he bother? The thing with racism is that it isn't some switch you can turn off or on, depending on the situation (if ones' racism is that weak, then it's not real, in my opinion). True racism is deeply ingrained in a person to where they would rather die than shake that viewpoint. I find that people conflate bias as racism. If someone in a different skin tone tells me no, I'm not going to automatically go to thinking that person hates everyone my skin tone. Sometimes, a no is just a no, but society has no nuance now, sad to say.
>Second, I don't need him to care about me specifically. As long as many of my fellow citizens benefit as possible or lives are improved, then why should I let my ego get in the way? I'm just one person out of 300 million in this country and 7 billion worldwide.
Dylan Watson
>foreigner whose shitty nation is kept safe only because America keeps whatever enemies they have off their back blames American global peacekeeping for terror attacks against America
There are so many people who would be so fucked without America, yet they keep nipping their master's hands
Wyatt Cooper
It's creepy as hell. Unfortunately most Chinese people are perfectly fine with this sort of thing as long as they get continued economic prosperity. The extent to which they conduct their surveillance also deters those who disagree with the system from doing anything about it.
Austin Diaz
>Third, what I've seen is a person who at least wants to reach out. BLM marched in the streets for weeks for police reform and it all fell on deaf ears with Obama. Meek Mill had a chance to show up and talk about it with Trump, but Jay-Z said no, so he didn't. Kim K talked to him about it and achieved a result. Would a true racist hold a talk on prison reform? The true racist would never have showed up, given how demographics are heavily skewed towards black people when it comes to imprisonment. Incentives matter.
>Finally, my support is contingent on him giving it an honest try. Maybe he's doing it to be remembered fondly or maybe he really wants to do right by working class people. Every moderately great person is flawed in some way and perfection was absent on the ballot, so here we are.
