Why is he so beloved, even today, despite accomplishing literally zero achievements during his presidency?

why is he so beloved, even today, despite accomplishing literally zero achievements during his presidency?

Attached: 1200px-Jfk2.jpg (1200x1385, 233K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_John_F._Kennedy
npg.org/library/forum-series/a-vast-social-experiment-the-immigration-act-of-1965.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nation_of_Immigrants
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy#Immigration
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson#Immigration
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965#Long-term_impact
m.youtube.com/watch?v=K7y2xPucnAo
twitter.com/AnonBabble

He was a war hero
He was handsome
He faced down the Russians
He grew due to his death

Many people receive acclaim and senpai for dying young. It multiplies their virtues, abilities, and accomplishments.

Catholics control the media and prop up their own.

Lol yeah that's it

Executive Order 11110

It was thought that he was trying to take monetary power back into the government's hands, and away from privately owned banks aka the "Federal" Reserve.

He got lots of pussy

Because I'm a boston potato nigger

He tried to fight zog

he was irish

Established NASA
Solved Cuban Missile Crisis without blowing up world
Authorized the green beret as uniform headgear for Army Special Forces despite Pentagon generals hating it.
Directed founding of SEAL Teams 1 and 2, and funding for what is now the Air Force Special Operations Command.

He was the first catholic to be elected president. Catholics (and especially the Irish) like to prop up their own. The fact that he was attacked for being catholic helped him too as people like underdogs.

Because he was a young Democrat he appealed to liberals the same way Obama did. Just watch Obama will be looked back on fondly by democrats forever they will say he was a good guy that the republicans held down.

He's part of the leftist deity system, like Nelson Mandela, JImmy Carter, etc. Ignore all the BS, spin into Camelot.

most jewish cabinet in history.. appointed more than 40% jews to federal courts

He's the Irishman's Obama.

Both were spoiled little faggots that pimped themselves as part of an oppressed minority.

He said we'd go to the moon by 1969 and we did but he didn't live to see it because he died in one hell of a spectacle. Recipe for a legend.

>why is he so beloved, even today, despite accomplishing literally zero achievements during his presidency?
Because he was killed before everyone found out just how corrupt him and his family were.

Sold out the country and LBJ finished the job.

and when he tried to take israel's nukes away they fucking killed him.

He knew how bad it really was, RIP

Attached: BVkR5An.jpg (640x491, 23K)

fpbp

He doesn't have 0. Most people like him because, believe it or not, he was good looking(see the R. Nixon v. JFK debates) or because of his handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis. I like how he attempted, or at least was in the early stages, to get rid of the Federal Reserve Systems. Those who don't know much about the system should know that the system is detrimental to the market economy that the US was founded on and can be seen nationalizing parts of the US(and international economies) . An alternative reason could be that he was a modern president killed in office and subsequent years were significantly worse in the United States.

>Sold out the country
Yeah it wasn't Woodrow Wilson and FDR was it. Get the fuck outta here anglokike.

Attached: London.png (800x450, 892K)

Because he is a Kennedy

Attached: F67D387F-8BE1-4731-97CF-887EF120FB43.jpg (890x590, 105K)

he was one of the greatest in history and achieved more in 1000 days than most presidents in 2 terms

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_John_F._Kennedy

Attached: jfkchad13 cigar.jpg (1200x630, 251K)

He was an alcohol

LMAO at the butt-blasted proddies ITT

Attached: d621592a894d729a38793ce4df1b8bf4a10dd97ba774b88accff005ffff769ab.jpg (1845x2331, 1.28M)

(OP)
Kennedy fought the British Anglo-Kikes and showed the world how Jewish they are. Anglo-Kikes have been crying ever since.

Attached: The New Phariseeism - Anglo Phariseeism.jpg (583x936, 203K)

Keep crying Jew

Attached: plit1000.png (1031x932, 347K)

Attached: quote-israel-was-not-created-in-order-to-disappear-israel-will-endure-and-flourish-it-is-the-child-o (850x400, 76K)

him and robert are responsible for the state america is in right now.

Attached: quote-everywhere-immigrants-have-enriched-and-strengthened-the-fabric-of-american-life-john-f-kenned (850x400, 56K)

Bc he got shot in the fucking head on the job

Anglos like to prop up their own people. This is why Richard Spencer was shoved into everyone's face when nobody liked him and thought he was a homosexual. Imagine Richard Spencer getting shot in the head by an Irishman.

Attached: British Phenotype.jpg (2600x2528, 1.7M)

this

Attached: 1331139315_the_assassination_of_jfk__graphic.gif (330x271, 3.8M)

He stabbed Diem and South Vietnam in the back. Also started with loose monetary policies, leading to the collapse of Bretton Woods and by extension the ruin of the American middle class.

Fuck him; he got what he deserved.

Attached: kennedy-corpse.jpg (800x826, 51K)

Oh look.... it's the typical "Anglo-American" scapegoat. Commonly heard repeated among white trailer trash swamp niggers. Of course, Anglo-Saxon Woodrow Wilson, and Anglo-Saxon Franklin D. Roosevelt didn't kill the country back in 1913 and again in WW2.

Anglo's are the dumbest fucking people. I enjoy watching them suffer.

Attached: faaagck off.jpg (539x418, 92K)

i cant watch

Attached: jfk pic.jpg (432x647, 69K)

no 7 up for me? fug

Attached: jfkchad.gif (370x330, 807K)

Handled the Cuban Missile Crisis.

In 15 years I have never once heard anyone defend Bretton Woods. Good god man... these kikes are fucking PISSED.

HAHAHA, I am laughing so god damn hard right now.

Attached: 1459674555248.jpg (499x583, 49K)

:)

Attached: dcfe40f450fa308391635cc27c9406ebe5b5daac605cd8e02393f90145cf403d.jpg (500x339, 44K)

All you need to do is see what happened when Nixon closed the gold window. We've gone nuts with financialization and leverage ever since.

Attached: 1973 dollar.png (1216x1102, 177K)

You're one of those idiots that tries to sound smart. Go back to NPR.

Attached: 0f37c7c456302497915719b37fdd8026c6018a1fe8b20247ac3e039eaa4fb88b.jpg (1000x900, 131K)

Who is behind gun control?

Attached: Anglo_War_On_Guns-Johnson.jpg (933x1346, 230K)

America has been going downhill ever since anglos voted for their guy FDR.

Attached: Communist__FDR_Churchill.jpg (400x465, 109K)

I often think he gets too much praise, but his steady head to not bomb Russian ships in the Caribbean really helped prevent World War III when half of his military staff wanted immediate action. People often forget that he signed off on the Bay of Pigs disaster, so he was a mixed bag.

The absolute worst thing about him was appointing LBJ as his VP. JFK's assassination led to LBJ selling the soul of America to the kikes and we're where we are today because of him

Dems were the conservatives back then.

is this bait? have you never read anything about that man?

he was a fond believer in hitler.
he called out the cia and threatened them.
he wanted to unify the US.
he wanted to destroy the federal reserve

god i fucking hat the stupid flag.

On my planet, he stands for hope.

Attached: JFK_VBM_NASA.jpg (320x316, 17K)

Boomers exalt JFK and Reagan because they're dumb. They don't like JFK because he was wise to the jews, they like him because he was killed.

and look what happened when he tried to do something against some of the people behind the presidency.

Attached: dead kennedy 1494732579830.png (676x488, 369K)

He wasn't a leftists by todays standards. He was actually center right by today's standards. He was a civic nationalist and was actually closer to Trump in terms of policy and values than any other president. Lefty fags just screech so loud that they can't think.

Why is there no True Christian series of icons?

Attached: jesus-christ-icon.jpg (300x407, 72K)

Because LBJ had the CIA blow his head off.

Attached: JFK CIA.png (530x398, 114K)

He fought the deep state and lost

>Irish
>oppressed minority

They're literally the most successful and popular group in America (except for Jews)

Attached: IMG_2453.jpg (1239x2153, 485K)

Kennedy introduced the immigration bill that turned America into a multicultural cesspool, and he was only successful because he was backed by Brookline jews.

>Who would lead, and formulate what alternatives? Massachusetts Senator John F. Kennedy cautiously stepped out on the issue in the 1950s, sensing that a liberalization stance would gather vital ethnic voting blocs for his long-planned run for the presidency. His work on a refugee bill caught the attention of officials of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, who convinced Kennedy to become an author of a pamphlet on immigration, with the help of an ADL supplied historian, Arthur Mann, and Kennedy’s staff. The result was A Nation of Immigrants, a 1958 bouquet of praise for the contributions of immigrants and a call for an end to the racist, morally embarrassing national origins system. The little book was initially ignored, but its arguments would dominate the emerging debate. The ADL, part of a Jewish coalition whose agenda included opening wider the American gates so that increasing U.S. ethnic heterogeneity would reduce the chances of a populist mass movement embracing anti-semitism, had made a golden alliance. John F. Kennedy was no crusader on immigration (or anything else), but he was an activist young President by 1961, comfortable with immigration reform as part of his agenda, elected on a party platform that pledged elimination of the national origins system.

npg.org/library/forum-series/a-vast-social-experiment-the-immigration-act-of-1965.html

Because he was young by president standards and attractive. If he looked like Truman or LBJ people would have given much less of a fuck.

>was going to end the fed's control on the money supply
>was going to end foreign aid to israel
>praised Hitler
he was the baddest goy around, that's why the kikes had the CIA ice him

Attached: 1526918567460.png (544x733, 349K)

Because dying too short always gives a special zeal: JFK, Lincoln, etc.

>Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 3, 1965
fucking retard

oh and a fun fact, the 1965 immigration act was drafted by a kike
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler

Attached: kike.png (600x701, 386K)

President Johnson, a fuck ugly Anglo Protestant, proudly signed the immigration bill (not Kennedy, who resisted it for years) and the majority of Protestant Senators voted for it.

George W. Bush pushed for amnesty for illegals, while Catholic Pat Buchanan was the only national figure to fight against it.

Attached: IMG_4877.jpg (1188x232, 94K)

This. Marylin Monroe

>The only Catholic president
>tries to free the people from (((The Federal Reserve)))
>Fights against filthy fucking (((Bolsheviks)))
>Tried to stop Israel from getting nukes
>Gets shoah'd by Ben Gurion

His death is a tragedy.

family
go read up on him and his family
educate yourself

Half the US Presidents have Irish ancestry.

Irish Catholics are wealthier and more powerful than Anglos in America.

Attached: IMG_4755.jpg (1119x1359, 385K)

>Richard Spencer

Toppest kek. Nobody takes that homo seriously. He actually took on the most successful/ wealthy/ powerful white group in America (and England btw) on the premise that they were the exact opposite. It's like he's never heard of fucking google. I've never seen anyone embarrass themselves more.

I knew then that he was either a paid shill or an absolute drooling fucking retard.

Attached: IMG_4878.jpg (1242x883, 219K)

I'm no fan of LBJ, but I'm sure I read that he wanted to keep the existing immigration laws. Kennedy, despite being tough on Israeli nukes, was apparently more enthusiastic about muh "let's not be racist now" diversity immigration.

Although, LBJ doesn't seem to have resisted it in any major way. Probably due to personal political considerations. If it passed congress he probably thought he had to sign it or risk doing himself in. There was also some sense that the new legislation wouldn't significantly alter the demographics. Of course, there were Jewish interests pushing for exactly that kind of change.

But Kennedy didn't sign it. He was in office for 3 years and resisted the pressure to sign it the ENTIRE time.

Johnson did sign it. Enthusiastically. Nobody held a gun to his head. And Bush desperately wanted to legalize the 10-20 million illegal immigrants.

Jesus Christ.

Attached: IMG_2500.jpg (1242x997, 187K)

A Nation of Immigrants
>The book was originally written by Kennedy in 1958
>The book contains a short history of immigration to the in Colonial America onwards, an analysis of the importance of immigration in the country's history, and proposals to liberalize immigration law.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nation_of_Immigrants

>During the 1960 campaign Kennedy proposed an overhaul of American immigration and naturalization laws to ban discrimination based on national origin.
>The late-president's brother, Senator Edward Kennedy helped steer the legislation through the Senate.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy#Immigration

>Scholars give Johnson little credit for the law, which was not one of his priorities; he had supported the McCarren-Walters Act of 1952 that was unpopular with reformers.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson#Immigration

1965 Hart-(((Celler))) Act
>The proponents of the Hart–Celler Act argued that it would not significantly influence United States culture. President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions."[16] Secretary of State Dean Rusk and other politicians, including Senator Ted Kennedy, asserted that the bill would not affect US demographic mix.[2] However, the ethnic composition of immigrants changed following the passage of the law.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965#Long-term_impact

I'm not a Protestant by the way. LBJ did screw a lot of things up, but even if he had his doubts over this he wouldn't sign off while openly acting like he was against it. He had some political sense, even if he used it to fuck things up. Not saying Bush was any good, either.

Ted Kennedy was a piece of shit. But LBJ signed the Immigration Act and the majority of Protestants happily signed it.

JFK's father was seen as pro-Hitler, so in order to shake that label and still be a viable candidate, Kennedy went out of his way to cultivate certain liberal groups. He didn't write that pamphlet, somebody on his staff did.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=K7y2xPucnAo

he cute!

also this

I know JFK's father was pretty redpilled on the JQ (like Ford and Lindbergh). His eldest son (who died at war) was originally going to be his successor of sorts.

I still have my suspicions that JFK was bluepilled or basically naive when it came to immigration, even if he did well in other ways. As for Protestantism, a lot of it has headed in a pretty bad direction over the years. However, it was the religion of the old elites and they seem to have been strict on immigration for some time at least. Let's not forget, there are quite a few open border Democrats today who are Catholics. I don't dispute that many types of Protestants having gaping flaws today, whether it's Evangelical Zionism or liberal stuff like Episcopalianism.

wonkey-eyed no brain havin' midget president

>Protestantism was the religion of the old elites

Protestantism is literally hundreds of different churches with completely distinct takes on Christianity.

Also it was only the religion of the old elites because most of the country (save for the Irish, French, and Jewish) was Protestant.

Now it's not the religion of the elites as both Catholics and Jews have overtaken them academically and economically.

And Open Borders is the work of one group only...and it's not Catholics.

only the good die young, and he is still the youngest US president

> There was also some sense that the new legislation wouldn't significantly alter the demographics
That makes sense considering the demographic of the world back then

... however it was short sighted

He made the federal reserve lose power temporarily.

He tried to break the (((bank))) as Jackson did.

BUMP

All of that, especially the movie-star good looks, combined with his self-confidence, great sense of humor, and appearance of being honest and candid. I'm not saying he wasn't honest and candid, but it's hard to be a politician if you are, even if your dad is filthy rich and buys your way into your early success.

Take his first failure, the bay of pigs. He could have blamed that on Eisenhower and the CIA, but he stood up in front of the press and said it was his fault and he takes responsibility, now are there any questions. If Nixon and Clinton and all the rest had that sort of bravery Watergate and Lewinskygate would have been nothing.

He was the one that caused the cuban missle crisis. His brother bobby was the one that fixed that mess. He worsen the conflict in veitnam. He spent more time drinking and whoring than anything. It was jis brother that did most of the behind the scened work. Jfk didn't give a shit for civil rights. The man was a oppurtunist and took credit for everyones work and everyone ate it up. The only reason he is do beloved is cause he was assassinated. He would of done more harm than good for the country.

What he did was reversed after they shot him.

He was pretty based for what he was trying to end the fed and was fond of hitlers systems. The only arguments against him i this thread are neo con boomers who hate all democrats and literal kikes defending Bretton woods.