Let's say you take a few panty shots. The woman is not aware. You don't spread the images. Should this still be a crime? Or should it be a crime when/if you decide to share your images with the rest of the world?
Should upskirt photoraphy be illegal even if you don't spread the images?
PROTIP: there are countless sluts out there that want to get Instagram famous and will let you take pics of their ass all you want. Just buy a canon rebel shit dslr and make a squarespace site
Only in Japan, right?
it should be illegal to take a picture of that flat ass
Man I sure am glad Jow Forums redpilled me about the great white race and right wing. Such admirable concerns and moral policies.
SAGE
The shutter sound that many cellphones have nowadays when snapping a picture are precisely because of Japs taking upskirt shots, the more you know.
Did you take that photo OP? Post moar
It should be illegal and the penalty should be death.
A turd cutter like that could only belong to a dude. You could pick up a penny with that crab claw.
it should be illegal but i support and encourage doing it
If women are bold enough to show it off, then taking a picture of it isn't a crime, fucktard.
this post reminded of the literal gigabytes of creepshots my friends and I took in high school just sitting around in cloud storage. I haven't touched them in years. Should i get rid of them or am i good
No, if you dress like a whore you deserve to be harassed by creeps and shamed on the internet. It's a fair punishment for degenerate clothing.
Chicks post daily booty shots on their instagrams but taking a photo of one of them without their consent is wrong?
Fuck these cunts.
cant you just mute it though?
Private property yes
Public property no
I'm pretty sure this has been declared legal in like 95% of counties because fuck your expectations of privacy
that is not even remotely true
I love pussy. Easily fucked over 100 women. Lost count actually.
So i love pussy. And i have to ask. Why the fuck would you do that?
Taking pictures of girls in tights ect i can sorta understand. But you seriously have to be fucked in the head to want to take upskirt photos
Um are there even any other people where you live? An island of what, 20 people wtf?
I should be able to record anything that I can see in public.
I could bend down to tie my shoe and be able to see up a woman's skirt. So what?
Women wear that clothing for attention anyway. They want men looking at them. I've seen married women rocking tops that show off their cleavage. They like the attention they get from wearing stuff like that.
They should dress modestly if they don't want people to be able to see their body.
Of course there would be some gay ass laws against recording up women skirts, because our laws are heavily decided by lame ass Christian fundys.
Fuck the fundys. We should get rid of all religion-based laws.
Cayman Islands currently has 6,692 recorded posts on Jow Forums; semi-rare at best
>those poll results
I didn't know Jow Forums was this gay
Do not reply to shills.
Degrading / humiliating for the women to unknowingly have their most intimate areas on display for the world to fap to, and excitement factor of the risk, upskirters get busted sometimes. There's quite a lot of fake commercial stuff out there but real candid videos can be amazing (extreme closeups, following them walking for ages etc.)
Uh, not that I would know about any of that of course since porn is degenerate.
Depends on the phone.
I've been lied to then.
Also if ass isn't your preference then there's the related sport of taking candid "downblouse" pics / videos of tits.
of course its a crime , its a violation of privacy without consent.
I agree.
Yeah but the fact it's non-consensual and publicly humiliates thots is a big part of the attraction, for that reason the best upskirters try to film the face too.
I like your pragmatism.
Makes sense
Are you retarded nigger? Of course it should be a crime (and it is in Finland)
We need more religious-based laws, not less.
I came.
Yes it should be illegal. No one should have their photo taken without consent. It’s on the same level of “Big Brother watching you” paranoia. It’s creepy
Pussy lol
>basedboy alert
Literally nothing worse than a male feminist. Off yourself
yes, you stupid faggot. or should it be legal for me to take pics over the divider in the men's room?
It's pretty disrespectful. I mean should we let pictures like this be taken without any punishment?
This woman clearly intended only a few people, namely everyone that was at this festival, to see her body.
Dress like a slut in public, don't be surprised when they're treated like an object.
Fuck off Chad you don't belong here
gb2 Instagram and shit
You can all take pic of my butthole
I think it should follow the same rules on expectation of privacy as any other photography. If the photographer takes steps to film somebody in a space where they reasonably expect that nobody will see them - i.e. a private residence with no view from public roads, a bathroom stall or changing room, etc. - it's illegal, but just walking around at the mall or on the street is fair game, as is a nude beach or a pool that can be seen from nearby buildings or whatever.
But then it's fake and that makes it way less hot.
I love upskirts and it's not for any of those reasons. I like the "window" into something you normally don't see and I like what it implies about a girl's personality and actions. To me there's nothing hotter than a girl who goes commando under a skirt for her own benefit and nobody else's.
kill all fucking niggers
That's pretty ignorant desu.
OP ISNT INTERESTED IN DISCUSSION HES MENTALLY ILL AND OBSESSED WITH WHAT OTHER PEOPLE THINK OF THIS GENERIC ASS. HE POSTS THIS THREAD EVERY SINGLE DAY
Supreme court has already ruled on this, as long as the shot was taken in a public place it is protected under the 1st ammendment.
This is why you should only bang women in public settings like a shared yard or the beach, so you can clandestinely record the encounter for indemnity against raep accusations without falling afoul of the new 'revenge porn' statutes which rely on the presumption of privacy.
So basically if I steal your money and plan to give it back to you... then its not actually stealling.... you may lose your camera and the pics released, your mate may peak and send them to himself or whatever. Victimless crimes are pretty much just circumstantial
Don't professional upskirters have shoes with a camera in the toe an shit?
60k people.
It's pretty sad that people take pictures like this of these poor girls and share them around the internet without the girl being privy to all of this. How do you think she feels to be looked at and ogled at by every guy with an internet connection?
Powerful
Step 1: don't dress like a whore
Problem solved.
such a nigger question to ask... should theft be legal if nobody finds out and you don't sell the stolen shit? NO no crime should be legalized for the reason that victim is unaware of it.
Stick this in your shoe while it's legal
It's literally because their sex appeal is their only valuable asset. They want to be able to distribute that asset themselves as they see fit. When you take a picture of them without knowing, you take a part of their asset, their only valuable thing, which to them is literally theft.
its illegal?
kek
that is different. She's not "hiding" anything
but a girl in a skirt isnt' wearing the skirt to show her fucking pussy or ass, moron.
she's covering it.
Nice try to stretch your reality into why it's okay