Why did the intelligence agencies have to ruin art? This sold for 140,000,000

Why did the intelligence agencies have to ruin art? This sold for 140,000,000

This is not art. In fact, just googling this picture I found out some movers damaged the paint in the center, and Pollock just repainted the whole fucking thing and everyone was like "yep, it's better, cool!"

Fucking phony

Attached: Jackson Pollock - No. 5, 1948.jpg (1100x647, 385K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sN9iJCZ5Il8
youtu.be/ANA8SI_KvqI
youtube.com/watch?v=CyFNsNZhSeg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

looks like a picture of lint

Attached: Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino - Disputation of the Holy Sacrament (1509-11, fresco representing Theolog (3258x2349, 3.07M)

Attached: Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino - The School of Athens (1511, fresco representing Philosophy as one of fo (3820x2964, 2.35M)

Attached: Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino - Cardinal and Theological Virtues (1511, fresco representing Law as one (2832x2404, 2.74M)

Attached: Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino - The Parnassus (1509-11, fresco representing Poetry as one of four main (2350x1548, 1.93M)

Attached: Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino - The School of Athens and The Parnassus representing Philosophy and Poet (1800x1439, 1003K)

Attached: Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino - Allegory of Justice above The Cardinal Virtues (1511, tondo, fresco on (3450x2285, 2.84M)

Attached: Unknown-6.jpg (194x259, 8K)

Mustard and Ketchup on Canvas

Attached: images-1.jpg (201x250, 8K)

Attached: images-2.jpg (262x192, 9K)

Whats the easiest way to move/launder 140 000 000 in physical wealth?
Cash, gold, property, shares or a painting?

Abstract art was the result of modern and postmodern philosophical thought permeating art culture. You're entitled to your opinions but to simply dismiss such a seminal piece of postmodern art is disingenuous to the history and study of art.

you are like a little intellectual babby

or pretend that you donated a painting worth multi-millions for a tax cut. When you really just cut a deal with an artist to buy his shit for a few thousand. Hype it up to be worth millions and then donate it, getting a nice juicy tax cut that you split with the artist for some more of his 'art'

You didn't read Frances Stonor Saunders? The CIA admits they manufactured it. MOMA and Guggenheim were funded by Rockefeller and the latter's namesake, jewish elite had their hands in many of the modern art museums. How bluepilled are you?

Insult me like a fool but you only prove you have no taste, which is expected of an American. You think you're an intellectual because you understand Pollack? Are you circumcised? moron.

Attached: (1939) Wassily Kandinsky - Composition X.jpg (1135x744, 165K)

posted Kandinsky because he was about the only good modern artist, and consequently an early one

Atheists ruined art

Attached: Gnon.jpg (1280x814, 310K)

if you think you're an intellectual because you understand why this sells for 82 million dollars and it's because of postmodern theory, you're fucking stupid. it's called money laundering. a credit default swap. this is garbage

Attached: Mark Rothko - White Center (Yellow, Pink, and Lavender on Rose), 1950.jpg (1200x1747, 189K)

No, abstract is the bastard child of postmodern who was the shit child of impressionism which was just a group of faggots who were too shitty to get into art masters school or get recognized so they rebelled and drum up controversy.

Now every art piece has to be earmarked with some bullshit story about the half nigger crazy trans artist. I could respect it if true art that takes talent and skill to make was still respected instead of seen a mediocre.

>pic
Here is the champion of your Abstract Art

Attached: Unknown-7.jpg (225x225, 10K)

Attached: Jules Adolphe Aimé Louis Breton - Fin du Travail, or The End of the Working Day (ca. 1886-87).jpg (1536x1087, 371K)

Attached: Ivan Shishkin - Study for the painting Lumbering (c. 1867, oil on canvas).jpg (2000x1195, 2.06M)

Attached: Ivan Shishkin - Forest Distance (1884, oil on canvas).jpg (2000x1407, 1.02M)

lmao, as if abstract art was 'invented' good one, and yeah pollock is popular, limited supply of his stuff, rich people wanna look cool/potentially make money, its fairly simple..

Yep. A scam. Thats ((modern)) art.

Jackson Pollock was a chad with tons of charisma and a huge white cock who liked fucking influential Jewish women. They don't mention it much in art history classes, but most men who have been extremely influential in the arts have huge dicks and get famous because they happen to fuck rich heiresses while they're in college and that jump-starts their careers.

Guys like Pollock and Picasso were just Art Chads, and everybody else pretends to love their paintings because a couple rich roasties they fucked convinced other people to buy their shit.

Attached: Young_Jackson_Pollock.jpg (1000x1225, 102K)

Attached: jackson-pollock-paint.jpg (800x498, 64K)

Art is literally designed to launder drug money nowadays

^This
Or like everyones huge boner for the Mona Lisa. Its only because of its famous heist, before then it was just another medium famous painting.

Now everyone pretends that it is the greatest painting on the planet and will fight you if you say its just 'okay'

Attached: domenicacorriere-maxi.jpg (353x500, 29K)

Same thing with guys like Andy Warhol. Warhol was a shitty artist, but he was great at throwing sex parties and a lot of rich art-world Jews liked Warhol because they got to fuck underage boys and girls at those parties, so they promoted him in the media so he could attract more young starlets and have sell his paintings for more money to fuel his sex parties.

Attached: P13101_10.jpg (1536x599, 83K)

>Be Me
>Live in rich Texas neighborhood
>Have filthy rich neighbor
>Neighbor has amazing art collection
>Collection rivals many small countries (and all of Africa)
>Talk to him about his many pieces (Loves William Bouguereau, has several in his collection)
>Talk to him many times over the years about his collection and how he came to acquire them
>HOLY (((THEM))) .JPEG
>He was a representative of a Eastern Europe country
>Did this just to smuggle out works of art that he bought for pennies on the dollar (Made a killing when Russian economy collapsed) to sell or (((Donate))) for tax breaks.
>Had many art pieces like this that all had shady pasts and history
>Had one piece that was very interesting tho.....
>The very short story was that it was Prussian (painted in the 1800-1810s), stolen by the germans (Invasion of Poland 1939), Was in Goring's private collection, Hitler found out and needed money, Was sold to jews (for gold 1941), Jews then smuggled it into the US, and was finally bought by my neighbor.

Lol and normie fags think that people create and collect art for arts sake!

Attached: images copy 3.jpg (254x199, 13K)

Changes the definition of what's "art".
Anything can be art.

The best argument for why modern art is able to get those kind of prices that Iv heard is money laundering by the Jews.

You create something that is easy to make, spin some bs story about its hidden value and cough up 1 million dollars at an auction for it, for some reason this isn't questioned.

If I give my friend 1 million dollars for a q-tip the government might suspect fraud going on, but put a blob of paint on a canvas and suddenly the transaction is legitimate.

Attached: perplexed dogo.jpg (600x600, 48K)

It makes sense; why else would they donate them to museums later on if they're so awesome and valuable?

>Abstract art was the result of modern and postmodern philosophical thought permeating art culture.

Also literally JEWS.

Hitler literally outlawed "degenerate art" in Germany, since the urbanite kikes in Berlin had been purposefully making ugly stupid shit in order to subvert Romanticism.

Just consider all modern abstract art for what it is. A means to launder money, as are most things in society nowadays. Only wholesome things left are local farms and mom and pop stores but nobody is interested in their local communities anymore.

Because the Soviet communist Realism needed to be BTFO’ed.

It was quite literally funded and pushed by the CIA.

What is money laundering?

These are absolutely beautiful. I read they're in the Vatican. Can people actually go and see them or is it one of the private rooms?

Art has become nothing more but a tool for money laundering. Criminals and spooks use art to launder money.

Art is money laundering

Female brainlet art student who strolled in from tumblr/Twitter detected.
Take your basic bitch dog whistle response somewhere your yaaaaswomyn will inflate your ego.

Art is nothing more than money laundering. How do you not know this.

Cant have people liking this kind of stuff, now can we?

Attached: Unknown-8.jpg (189x267, 5K)

Attached: Unknown-9.jpg (257x196, 6K)

I went to the Vatican this year and it was pretty lit and there's literally masterpieces by the dozen in every square inch. Unfortunately it is PACKED at all times and you are moved along like rats.

Attached: images-3.jpg (300x168, 8K)

i did shit like this in 5th grade, shoulda sold it.

>dude art that doesn't represent something I can immediately recognise is SHIT!!!

grow up you fucking children

Attached: 1526358863867.png (491x528, 363K)

hey dumb dumb, art is nothing more than a tool to launder money.

Motherfucker thats not art

I would still call this art.

Attached: 'Unique_Forms_of_Continuity_in_Space',_1913_bronze_by_Umberto_Boccioni.jpg (1416x1764, 346K)

That shit doesn't represent anything. I bet you think the smear of shit on the toilet paper after you wipe also represents something, don't you?

Yeah, Rome is on my bucket list of places to visit. Seems like everything would be awesome, the actual definition of awesome.

it

This dude nails it

youtube.com/watch?v=sN9iJCZ5Il8

Definitely go burger bro. I'm going in a few weeks, and I've been a few times already. My favourite city in the world. Problem with America is weekend trips to Europe cost a fortune.

^-This
and
This: youtu.be/ANA8SI_KvqI

I will someday, once I amass the fortune I'd need to stay a couple weeks and tour Italy. Any recommendations for things to see that you might not find in a travel manual?

For Rome, not so much as I've only been on weekends so didn't get too much time to venture out. But just walking around the centre you're steeped in history and sights worth seeing, you don't even need to try.

If you do a tour of Italy, try to go Sicily if you can. The Turkish steps is a definitely worth seeing if you get the chance. Same with the valley of the temples. Some of the best preserved Greek temples outside of Greece, if the Greeks also interest you. I know Sicily gets a bad wrap on pol but it's definitely worth seeing. One of the most beautiful islands you can go too.

Attached: Screenshot_20180609-102611_Google.jpg (1080x583, 300K)

I wasn't planning on it but I might have to now. I get a hard on for ancient stuff and those rocks are breathtaking. Why does it get a bad name here?

Just keep in mind it's got a LOT of touristy stuff in Rome and a lot of people.

Go see more than just the big sites.

I thought that was a photograph.

Attached: 187hmo.jpg (271x200, 13K)

It's more of the Sicilians themselves that get a bad wrap desu, not so much the island. If you've ever seen true romance you'll understand. There's a scene where the policeman who's getting slapped around starts going off on one about how all Sicilians are darker because they bred with Africans. Pol loves going on about it.

Pollock technique, while lazy in execution actually made for an interesting painting because while dangling his arm like a pendulum he painted fractals in all of his paintings, staring at them is actually a wild ride in real life. If you want to blame someone for the fall of art blame fucking Marcel Duchamp who's the actual father of contemporary art.
>Here's your art bro.

Attached: d27cafdc3ef9f41b40ae2305f9ee59b5.jpg (564x603, 19K)

That's why I'm trying to compile things to see off the beaten path. Do you have any recommendations?

Miles Mathis laid it all out.
(((art dealers))) and (((modern art))) "artists" are part of a colossal tax avoison (it's a word etc.), organised crime and unauditable payment system.

With all the hoops you have to go through to make regular BIG money transfers, it's appealing in every way to "buy" really expensive "art". The "art" needs to be cranked out because each of these fuckawful works of "art" is actually a bank cheque.

Russian art dealer buys art -> huge sum of money changes hands (allegedly) -> tax dodge, financial status change, payoff for some high crime somewhere.

A moment's examination of where the dealers and buyers are and where the money is allegedly going to and from explains everyhing.

Also why art dealers like the one torched at Trump Tower lead lives like coke dealers. They ARE coke dealers.

the patriarchy did this

Right? Why haven't I heard of this artist before? Everything he does is photorealistic.

It wasn't the intelligence agencies, it was the invention of the camera. Previously art strived for photorealism, over the centuries techniques were evolved and we got some great looking paintings. But by the time WWII was over, most people could photograph whatever they wanted. Like an instant painting. So naturally painters had to get 'creative' to stay relevant. Nobody was impressed by photorealism anymore.

Stop being an triggered vagina, they didn't ruin art.

money laundering you goy

The art is in the money it launders...

Attached: 183259846.jpg (612x407, 86K)

get deprogramed youtube.com/watch?v=CyFNsNZhSeg explains JFK assassination

Real art is rare. Money laundering is not. People have died trying to stop certain art dealers in my country alone.

Its a huge network and we will need a revolution just to shake up the trade.

Attached: 1519666279113.jpg (960x640, 99K)

Modern "art" = money laundering scheme.

wow 140.000.000
i have protection rags for when i have paintjobs looking much better than that..
would it be a great idea to turn those 2.49e/m2 rags into 140.000.000 pieces of art?
atleast i can try.. immagine how many germanic families, besides my own people, i can help out by giving them 10.000 euros for each baby they make.
that would be sweet

Yeah. That doesn't make it good, or interesting, or important. Just a sad reflection of our degenerate culture

Attached: nb8dt755nur01.jpg (2000x1189, 608K)

I know you idiots I said that in the beginning

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - The Vegetable Farmer (ca. 1587-90).jpg (900x1217, 192K)

Miles Mathis is amazing

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - The Waiter (1574).jpg (1007x1300, 288K)

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - Vertumnus (1591).jpg (826x1024, 200K)

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - The Librarian (1562).jpg (1141x1576, 750K)

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - The Jurist (1566).jpg (1411x1779, 1.02M)

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - Air (1566).jpg (960x1293, 336K)

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - Earth (1566).jpg (1224x1812, 462K)

Imagine being a kid raised in a house with paintings like that everywhere, your brain would get messed up.

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - Fire (1566).jpg (880x1158, 340K)

Attached: Giuseppe Arcimboldo - Water (1566).jpg (1361x1815, 609K)

>This is not art.

Says person on a fringe "politics" image board online

Why would you think that's art? Beauty is what defines art, and that's not beautiful. Are you blind or just stupid?

Attached: Albrecht Altdorfer - The Battle of Alexander at Issus (1529).jpg (1445x1886, 1.41M)

If it has to be explained, it's not art. Art is a universally relatable experience.

doesn't even deserve a (you)

Attached: Jean Béraud - Symphony in Red and Gold (1895), scene in the Palais du Luxembourg, Paris.jpg (1000x771, 273K)

Attached: Antoine_Watteau_-_L'imbarco_per_Citera.jpg (2953x1933, 2.17M)

Roger scruton is all about this. He's a fantastic orator on the historical importance of beauty and aesthetics

Attached: (1718) Jean-Antoine Watteau - Fêtes Vénitiennes.jpg (3238x4001, 2.86M)

That's the table in my schools art room

Bruh this shit gay as fuck. I'll take the shitty Pollock paintings over this as long as it means I don't have to stare at naked men.

Attached: Jospeh Noel Paton - The Reconciliation of Oberon and Titania (1847).jpg (1920x1209, 950K)

that's because you have no brains like a circumcised american

Attached: Barberini Faun, Glyptothek Munich (3rd century Roman copy after lost Greek original, recovered from (1760x2850, 433K)

Attached: Eros stringing his bow - a Roman marble copy of a lost bronze by Lysippos (ca. 2nd century AD, after (511x594, 420K)