Congress moves to ban child sex robots

fresnobee.com/news/politics-government/article213126084.html
>The U.S. House approved a ban Wednesday on the importation and trafficking of anatomically correct child sex dolls and robots that “normalize sex between adults and minors.”

>The proposal was approved in the House by a voice vote and now moves to the Senate.

>“These dolls can be programmed to simulate rape. The very thought makes me nauseous,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican.

>Child sex dolls are one niche of a nascent robotic sex industry that has generated debate about the ethics of the use of lifelike machines for sexual activity. It is a subject that turns from squeamish to outright revulsion for many when it touches on child sex dolls and robots.

Attached: 134063733.jpg (540x360, 176K)

Other urls found in this thread:

change.org/p/donald-trump-president-trump-grant-uk-political-prisoner-tommy-robinson-asylum-in-the-us
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

wow the government is finally doing something right

I didn't realize they were legal in the first place.

What if a pedophile using these dolls to fulfill his sexual desires meant thy never harmed an actual child.

Do you still think they are bad?

it just normalizes the behavior and encourages it to spill out into the real world, regardless all pedos should kill themselves

>there's no such thing as a victimless crime

So what if this leads to the ban of adult sex dolls right when they are getting human-like?

How does this not violate the first amendment

>this is illegal because we think it's gross
very bad precedent, unconstitutional. for people celebrating it because it aligns with your emotions think about what it means for laws to be passed based on nothing but emotional appeal.

If they're banned for normalising pedophilia then why aren't people who write those pro-pedo articles arrested?

Then he should get psychiatric help instead of self- medicating himself by stimulating sex with children.

there's a difference between pedos and lonely socially isolated men. Unless the adult sex doll is Rachel Rape-Me it won't be a problem

Individual freedom.

use the homosexual argument. "Its none of your business what I do in my bedroom'

How about we castrate these degenerates instead? Easy solution

you're right keep them legal and hang anyone who buys them

>everything is illegal until the government makes it legal

So am I to believe a single politician cares about Carl's sex dolls tits being manufactured with a quarter liter of silicone rather than a half or were these votes paid for by religious zealot lobbyists to virtue signal for bonus tithe before going on to molest the choir boy? Hmmmmmmmm

So a kid being a fag in the street needs no medical help, a wanker does?

These people need therapy not encouragement.

they need a lethal injection

>don't be making those toys too sexual now goy
>wouldn't want to do anything illegal

Attached: 1401925930704.jpg (256x257, 15K)

why doesn't the government just manufacture fakes, impant them with tracking devices/explosives then flood the market to find/kill fredos?

I get it but it's politics. What politician wants to vote against it and still get reelected?(Dems in safe[heavily minority] districts excluded)

By right you mean banning things based on feelings even when no living thing is hurt? Retard.

The data on this is inconclusive.
is 100% right.

Forget this

Make a difference, be part of something bigger than yourselves;

change.org/p/donald-trump-president-trump-grant-uk-political-prisoner-tommy-robinson-asylum-in-the-us

Muh feelings
>You can therapy away a sexual
attraction
Heh, good luck kiddo.

The pedo defense force is out tonight

they shouldn't ban them they should put people who buy them on lists and discretely disappear them

that was my assumption as well when I read the article. I hope the senate is reasonable on the matter.

I don't care what the subject matter is: don't fucking touch the first amendment.

because muh children

Just build each robot to "fail" at some point and castrate the user, but don't ban them

>"HANDS UP"
>"PUT THAT DICK WHERE I CAN SEE IT"
>"HE'S PUTTING IT BACK IN THE DOLL, HE'S-"
>*BANG BANG BANG BANG*

Attached: 1421858472841.png (386x259, 206K)

>sell pedos sex dolls
>company info gets """hacked""", customer info leaked
>RWDS

Weird how quickly they'd pass this. They can't agree on anything else

Oh no no no no NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOl

I defend nothing more than the first amendment. You are unamerican and my enemy.

then instead of getting a dolly he needs to get a hold of his fucking emotions and, you know, grow enough of a soul to not fuck kids. Bob Goodlatte is a hero.

Because they'd unironically rather you fuck actual kids.

inanimate objects are not children. stop defending infringements on the first amendment. you are unamerican.

Good maybe they'll ban pedophilia from Hollywood next. Just kidding, congress will never do anything to stop the child fucking, human trafficking, LGBT promoting kikes.

Attached: faggot jews.jpg (474x296, 19K)

Clearly the makers of such filth are guilty of far greater crimes than the pedos running all our countries.

They must be stopped at all costs.

Most are already made with really dangerous shit tier chinese silicone.
But it's a moot point because banning this goes so far against the constitution it is laughable.

All the cucked basedboys in this thread. You really don't belong on the right if you think controlling the way people play with toys is acceptable.

But I figure either these moralfags are larping, trolling, or brainlets.

Miming depraved sexual acts with an effigy of children is not free speech. If you want to get fundamental, the fucking US was fundamentally founded as a Christian ethnostate, so either defend your point by killing all non white non Christians, or fuck off.

if you ask me he should be sent to a gulag

Attached: 1401902221188.png (489x584, 3K)

Not an argument Mr. Emotional.

Puritanical brainlet.

Quads has decided

>Miming depraved sexual acts with an effigy of children is not free speech.
It literally is.
>the fucking US was fundamentally founded as a Christian ethnostate,
It was founded as a freedom of religion ethnostate, and I prefer we would revert back to that. I am more fundamental about the constitution than you are.

>normalizes the behavior
Not my responsibility. What people do in private isn't society's concern.

>don't fucking touch the first amendment.
Public opinion often trumps the 1st. If people find something reprehensible AND can look/feel good by opposing it, it's almost impossible to change the public's mind.

Can you imagine a hardcore libertarian congressman fighting for legal prostitution, no drug laws whatsoever, legal 2D loli, and child sex dolls on the House floor?

preeeeetty gross, desu

Attached: 1528780657252.jpg (613x531, 36K)

i'm against CP, and im against this child sex robot shit.

but im for marrying underage girls. AMA

commitment and love VS corruption and lust

Attached: 1528614295730.jpg (839x1024, 345K)

Fuck 2, Marry 1, and Kill 3.

>Miming depraved sexual acts with an effigy of children is not free speech.

It literally is

Attached: d27.png (645x729, 75K)

Fucking a piece of plastic = absolute degeneracy

Devoloping and continuing to fund a platform for over a decade responsible for 95% of online real deal child exploitation so that the material can continue to circulate and low IQ individuals in a bout of misjudgement raw dog upload a picture they found on Google to Instagram where make work programs like the ICAC can swoop in and virtue signal for budget increases, DOJ conviction rates, and for-profit prison shekels and labor. = perfectly fine

There truly is no greater sack of retardation than the US government.

Fuck you you retarded piece of shit, maybe ban voilent movies and video games while we're at it, and alcohol, and porn, and ads showing how to get fit, and anything that some snowflake somewhere finds "problematic".

Lol wut?

It's a fucking sex doll bro. Get your shit together.

>be midget
>sex dolls my size are banned now
Great. Now I'll be forced to buy a normal sized one and be reminded of my stature every time I use it.

And what is the difference exactly? In recent news incels have become defacto terrorists. Banning dolls with the pretext.of stopping pesos is the thin end ofnyhe wedge. They don't give a fuck about children. They care about controlling people.

This feels like it's true in Australia.

>It was founded as a freedom of religion ethnostate
Wrong
>It literally is.
Wrong again
You're jacking off, that is not expression, it is self gratitude. You cannot self-ingratiate in other morally reprehensible ways such as rape, drug abuse or homicide, this is not different and if you want the moral arbiters to budge you will have to murder them out of your way. Enjoy the drug, pedo and homosexuality state you wish for.

An originalist terms, it is not. Behavior isn't classified as speech. If it were, indecent exposure wouldn't be considered a crime, but a form of speech. Vulgarity is also not protected under the first amendment.

>normalizes
where have I heard this before?

Doing something to a doll is a victimless crime. There is no real world data to back up their claims. It is policing thought and a clear breach of your constitution.

Besides, if you get rid of pedofiles, who is going to give your children their first orgasm? Lol. For all the parents reading this, I personally hope and pray your little ones go missing. And they will.

Praise Moloch. You have no idea of the power of the devil.

Guess people will just have to go back to molesting real children again, fucking idiots.

You obviously haven't read the constitution.

Fucking this. Protip, if you ever find yourself fighting on the same side as the limp wristed kid diddler down the street - find new fucking sides.

>le normalization
This is a meme. "Normalization" happens when government gets involved and starts passing legislation on it, like gay marriage. Not to mention it's MEDIA that does the vast majority of the "normalizing" aka Hollywood.

I am actually torn on this. On one hand I get it. Because it almost seems to encourage the act.

At the same time I see the other side that this would be a tool to get pedo rocks off and let them have their fantasy and not actually act out on children.

I see that its also victimless thought crime. and all shall be punished for wrong think.

And I also can see grieving mothers using these to help sooth the grief of losing a child.

I find it kind of funny I can own an AK-47 but not a doll.

I feel with the current state of politics and reasoning there really is no winning this one. Seems like a damned if you do/don't kind of thing.

At the same time there are more important things that should be banned instead of dolls like aspartame and fast food.

Stupid. They should have instead put anyone who orders one on a watchlist. They would have then been able to investigate them to see if they have child porn or stuff like this. Would have been extremely useful to find and catch pedos.

good to see that they are going after the really important issues of the country.

Attached: SS.jpg (600x900, 67K)

>getting a bunch of judges together to determine whether the age of a plastic doll is 17 or 18.

>getting a bunch of judges together to determine if the doll is a kid or just short

Oh I am laughing

Find the pedo clause for me and I'll send you 10 thousand dollars and three lolis. Fail and I send your location to the federal butt inspectors.

>X can be Y. The very thought of it makes me nauseous.

If this goes all the way through, then the next stage is being able to ban anything on pure emotion even with victimless circumstances.

We're talking about manufacture and ownership anyway.

"It's for your own good, idiot citizens! Do you think that you're somehow in charge. Now smile while the sodomites parade down your street, or else you're getting sued and our courts will convince you to come round to see it our way!!"

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCKING IDIOTS STOPING FREE MARKET AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: Ah.gif (384x384, 453K)

But what do you expect from a tyranny? Justice?

Checked.
You'll fit in nicely in America where you can legally marry a pre pubescent girl with judicial and parental consent but plastic objects are illegal along with chocolate eggs.

Its just an easy virtue signal.

You can rally limp wristed nupol moralfags with it's to protect the children so easily.
Good goy.

>anatomically correct child sex dolls
phew, the loli sex dolls are safe

Libertardians like you are the reason for this mess, though. Classical conservatism, not psychopath fantasy-land.

Both are infringements on the first amendment, vulgarity laws are particularly unconstitutional.

Child pornography, threats of violence, and inciting panic are also violations, so take it how you will. I personally defend no further violations of the first amendment.

Attached: ancap.jpg (562x435, 15K)

Hope they let us vote on this so I can shoot up every mustache at the booth
>watch me walk on all charges

Such a dumb monkey way to think

Yes, But if they use a doll and not a little kid I could care less.

Found the libertardian, ie. the source of the problem.

you argue like a leftist. ad hominem and emotional appeal. fitting for someone wanting to put further restrictions on the 1A

seriously though, what kind of man buys a toy child to sodomize and fulfill god knows what sick fantasies? this is so beyond the pale of normal sexual interaction it almost demands that we as a society allow prostitution if shit has gotten to this point. stifling your sexual desires and having access to free, easy pornography 24/7 is not healthy for most people that can't control themselves.

Ever heard of the slippery slope? It's real.

Enabling our society to degrade even further is the fucking monkey way of thinking. Congrats. You get to join the niggers, trannies and feminists. Fine company you keep, pedofag.

Their rights are our rights. You can't differentiate

emotional appeal and ad hominem.

protip: if you sound like an SJW when you are arguing, you are probably on the wrong side of the argument.

more emotional appeal, more ad hominem. how about an argument? I'm not attracted to children, I'm a strict defender of the constitution.

Someone should start a business that creates these dolls, but also fills them with explosives. When the non-human sticks its dick in it, the doll explodes.

>already at a loss
>responds immediately with low iq random violence
good goy

>"an american was arrested today. during a routine house inspection the officers found an underaged inflatable doll with what appears to be a hole for a mouth"
>"the man claims he is innocent of raping the doll, but the crime lab is already investigating residue found on the scene- reporters say"
>"as the story develops we will keep you informed to find out if that man did indeed, or did not, put his dick in that doll"

Attached: 1420990062892.gif (262x300, 26K)