Thread for discussion of Italian Fascism, and other forms of fascism, Mosley, Codreanu, Falange, etc. Also for sharing fascist literature and information.
A Fascist general for Fascists and those interested
Be respectful and please try to keep conversations relatively "intellectual"
Good fascists/similar or influential people to get an introduction
Oswald Mosely Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera Benito Mussolini Adolf Hitler Stepan Bandera Corneliu Zelea Codreanu Salazar Ramiro Ledesma Ramos Ettore Ovazza Gaetano Mosca Friedrich Nietzsche Charles Maurras Enrico Corradini Filippo Tommaso Marinetti Johann Plenge Alceste De Ambris Gabriele d'Annunzio George Lincoln Rockwell Juan Perón Giovanni Gentile Ezra Pound HP Lovecraft Julius Evola Konstantin Rodzaevsky Francisco Rolao Preto Dimitrije Ljotic Ante Pavelić
Types of Fascism
Italian Falangism National-Syndicalism British Union National-Socialism Strasserism Meme futurism Clerical Fascism Brazilian Integralism Peronism
Albania - Albanian Fascist Party America - Silver Legion of America Austria - Fatherland Front Belgium - Rexist Party, Vlaams Nationaal Verbond Croatia - Ustaśe Czech republic - National Fascist Community Denmark - National Socialist Workers' Party of Denmark Finland - Patriotic People's Movement France - Vichy France Germany - National Socialist German Workers' Party Greece - Golden Dawn Hungary - Arrow Cross Party Ireland - Blueshirts, Ailtirí na Aiséirghe Italy - National Fascist Party Japan - Shõwa Restoration Latvia - Perkonkrusts Netherlands - National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands, Verdinaso, National Socialist Dutch Workers Party Norway - Nasjonal Samling Poland - ONR Portugal - National Union Romania - Iron Guard Russia - Russian Fascist Party Slovakia - Hlinka's Slovak People's Party Spain - Falange Española de las JONS Sweden - Nationalsocialistiska Arbetarpartiet Ukraine - OUN UK - British Union of Fascists
Daniel Cox
Can I have a perfect definition of fascism and how it differs from socialism (redistributive means applied to businesses and individuals) or republicanism (where the governance is the concern of the people)?
Blake Ross
Fascism differs to Socialism in the fact that Fascism still allows for private enterprise, it's just that the private enterprise is at the mercy of the state. And if they (the business) go against national interests, the state has the right and the duty to shut them down. It's also not a top down centrally planned economy. There are some elements of central planing sure, but in Fascism businesses are generally free to do what ever they want (as long as they don't go against national interest) And Fascism differs from Republicanism in that Fascism is usually a one party state, with the ruler having direct and near absolute control of the state. It's not a government by talk. It's a government by action. What this mean is that when the Fascist regime is faced with an issue, they figure out a way to solve it and then instead of debating every details of the issue and also whether or not it is an issue, they strike down on it. This is called the principle of the direct action.
No, you can't have a perfect definition of fascism, because each nation has it's own brand, fascism is created around the nation, his people and his traditions. Look at the OP, there are countless types of fascisms.
Ian Nguyen
Another thing to keep in mind is that, Fascism is more of a template ideology. It doesn't really have any set policies it wants pushed. It has some core tenets, those being: - Nationalism - the pride in ones kind and culture and the willingness to preserve it. - Totalitarianism - which means that nothing is beyond the reach of the state, the state is all encompassing in fascism. - Direct Action - this I have already explained but the gist is, walk the walk instead of just talking the talk. - Tradition - Stressing the importance of the nuclear family and the need for hierarchy and the need for all to play their part. Men as fathers, workers and servicemen, women as mothers, and bringers of the nation's future. - Palingenesis and modernism - Fascism promotes the regeneration of the nation and purging it of decadence. Fascism accepts forms of modernism that it deems promotes national regeneration while rejecting forms of modernism that are regarded as antithetical to national regeneration.
From these principles and the characteristics and culture of the nation form the basis for all fascist policies, and thus why Fascist Italy and NatSoc Germany can both be considered Fascist while still enacting somewhat different policies.
What form of Leadership does fascism use, and what stops it from becoming despotism?
Secondly, why is Fascism better than White National Republicanism? >Only White property owning (top 33% by wealth) males over the age of 25 who are married with children can vote i.e. what the Founding Fathers intended
Obviously our "democracy" is absolute shit with one party actively encouraging the ethnic replacement of whites, but you can still find remnants of what the FF believed in the GOP. If the nation went back to its White National Republican roots, we would have a country that is very right-wing. I think the Republican Party would be the only party till it splits into different conservative parties (neocons would become the political left, and traditionalists the political right).
>top 33% by wealth This will push people to make money and demoralize low pay jobs like scientists or the caregivers (like being a nurse or a teacher) or the military. Fascism want a well balanced society, were people who are not inclined to make money at all cost can contribute in other ways.
Push for wealth and you end up like modern murrica, where all your teachers are sub-humans communists and the next generation kids get shit education.
Sebastian Thompson
reminder that half of those people and parties were puppets and the rest were moderates to jews
Michael Cooper
Fascism and Catholicism fit hand in hand. Fascism is God's government.
Wealthier people are generally smarter and if you let poor people vote, they will inevitably vote for wealth redistribution because they're lazy. I don't think that many people will feel the need to work super hard in order to vote. Everyone over 18 is allowed to vote in the US and we barely get 30%.
It probably wouldn't be awful for it to be the top 70% voting either. I just think having a stake in society is important, and so did the FF
Cooper Harris
>which means that nothing is beyond the reach of the state, the state is all encompassing in fascism. I would argue that this is not a defining characteristic of fascism's governing style and more a question of mindset. All the power centers that exist under liberalism continue to exist under fascism but fascism seeks to bring them under the control of the state, which is itself conceived as a hyperdemocratic manifestation of national will.
Like Google is an arm of the globohomo Leviathan but it's """"private"""" so it has certain privileges that the state nominally does not. Fascism doesn't put up with that.
Adrian Long
Same guy here
Good. I have some questions.
>And if they (the business) go against national interests Can you define national interests? Do you mean the ruling party (which sounds like corrupted) or do you mean the people themselves, perhaps a majority or a certain concerned minority?
>And Fascism differs from Republicanism in that Fascism is usually a one party state, with the ruler having direct and near absolute control of the state. It's not a government by talk. It's a government by action Sure. Authoritarianism.
I've been trying to come up with a true, perfect definition of fascism and what I've got so far is as follows: >the authoritarian protectionism of a certain and specified demographic group
That being said I've noticed this is incomplete as >Tradition - Stressing the importance of the nuclear family and the need for hierarchy and the need for all to play their part. Men as fathers, workers and servicemen, women as mothers, and bringers of the nation's future. Is both a very common feature of fascism and has little to do with my definition, I can justify this as the demographic in question is family and thus the ethnic demographic of an individual in question, but that's questionable.
Please bear in mind, I'm a little invested in my definition as cultural Marxism or neo Marxism qualifies as a form of fascism, the demographic in question is simply not a majority.
>What form of Leadership does fascism use, and what stops it from becoming despotism? It's an authoritarian system, obedience to the party would result in greater power and privileges.
Of course, a fascist state would enact protectionist means (penalise google or whatever) to protect the demographic they're interested in, it's exactly like how the media organises boycotts and shames companies not aligned with the Marxist agenda of protecting minorities
Bentley Gomez
>they will inevitably vote for wealth redistribution If the main value of your society is money, yes, they will want wealth redistribution. Just give a decent living to the workers and stop to push for materials goods in commercials and media, push for moral values instead, and let the poor know they are valued for their own work, each one will find a good hobby and stop crawing for other people money. Just kill the jews, and society will normalise by itself.
Just because I think generating wealth is good doesn't mean I think decadence and moral decay is good. A wealthier society can afford better medical technology, infrastructure, and military capabilities.
A sin tax and taxes on luxury goods would help to curb decadence. Its mostly Kikes who use their wealth for evil anyways. We need /ourguys/ to be rich counters to people like Soros and he Rothschilds. Right-wing philanthropy can be a worldwide force for good. The FF were very rich for their time and used their wealth to start some of the first universities and fund projects that helped the citizens of the United States. Their wealth gave them he opportunity to study the arts and sciences and apply that knowledge to statecraft. We may look at them as a privileged class, but really that were heroes who used the lot they were given to help the White American people.
Gabriel Torres
Fascism is corporatist/syndicalist, meaning that society is organized in guilds or corporations, which act in a variety of ways to coordinate the functioning of society (or the functioning of the state, the two are identical to the fascist). Think union (for both capital and labor) plus political constituency plus consumer advocacy for a very rough idea of what a corporation is. >Of course, a fascist state would enact protectionist means (penalise google or whatever) to protect the demographic they're interested in I didn't bring up Google as an example of something I'd attack so much as an example of a non-state power center that would be brought to heel under fascism. I'm okay with people saying anti-white shit on the Internet, but globogayplex farms out censorship and shit to Google because the American state doesn't have the official power to censor. >I'm a little invested in my definition as cultural Marxism or neo Marxism qualifies as a form of fascism I'd disagree with that. A-racial fascism can exist, for example in Brazil or Italy, and attacking minorities is certainly not a requirement (Codreanu had a quote about this, I'll have to find it) but fascism is totalistic. You can't have a total society that serves only the minority, it's a logical contradiction.
Jace Bailey
If wealth is what define your elite, and as you imply, rich people have to be viewed as privileged and smarter and better than everyone else, then you can expect the poor to want to be part of this elite and thus push for wealth redistribution, turning your society in a comunst shithole. Let's everyone vote, or maybe only those who served as military, and don't use money as the measure of one person worth if you don't want a degenerate society. Generating wealth is good, but there are other talents people may have that are equally or even more valuable than generating wealth.
Brandon Torres
I just don't see why a janitor should have as much of a say as someone who's studied art, philosophy, and literature. Most men a few centuries back understood they were not qualified to meddle in the affairs of the state. This would lead to populism, which can be good at times, but is often ill-thought out. We are in massive debt because people voted for unsustainable policies, like Social Security, which is nothing more than a ponzy scheme.
Military service should honestly be required of everyone. It would provide national unity and is a social equalizer for a period of every man's life they ought to experience. Rich, poor, dumb, and smart will have a chance to work together on equal terms.
Either way, it is a post-modern mindset that equality is a virtue. True inequality is when unequal things are equal. People born and educated into a leading position in society are the best equipped to handle it. Obviously there should be meritocratic means to success (as was the case for the FF Alexander Hamilton), but the wise beget wise more often then the commons do. Genetics were playing a role in our politics before we even knew a great deal about them.
When facing this problem one faces the issue that were we to define fascism as for example militarism, nationalism and such, we would find that many democracies would also fall under this categopry, infact most countries in world history would. Therefore we must find a fundamental difference between fascism, socialism and liberalism. As we know socialism is defined as worker ownership of the means of production, and liberalism then as private one. Of course focussing on economic terms has its flaws, but defining ideologies through non material conditions suffers from the fickle nature of culture. Therefore I propose a rather Sorelian definition: "A system where the means of production are owned by the state for the benefit of the nation."
Under this definition we'd actually find that most fascist nations don't fit under this definition, but I would assert that that has more to do with the fact that most nations known today as fascist weren't infact fascist. However the model example after which fascism is named after, fascist italy nicely fits under this category, as by the second world war the state owned the whole economy. Of course this definition also has the strange implication that most marxist leninist or better called stalinist systems fall under this definition, but it is undeniable that most marxist leninist systems were incredibly fascist in their nature. One only has to look at propaganda produced in these states to get a fascist vibe. I suppose the fundamental difference between fascism and marxism leninism then is that the former supports religion while the latter opposes it, whether this is important is left to the reader.
Benjamin Long
It's called a sumptuary tax.
>A system where the means of production are owned by the state for the benefit of the nation." That's socialism.
Just because you interchange "the workers" for "the nation" doesn't mean you haven't mistaken socialism for fascism, where I'd argue they're similar here only in that both provide some sort of protectionism.
>I suppose the fundamental difference between fascism and marxism leninism then is that the former supports religion while the latter opposes it, Cultural protectionism. Religion is simply a means of propagating culture.
Isaiah Peterson
I've seen this, I'm still coming up with a decent response.
Nathan Robinson
Which group of fascists were the most socialistic in policy? I would also appreciate a link to any fascist thinkers, or any sort of content creators. (other than cultured thug)
Caleb Bailey
Take your time. Also I can't find the Codreanu quote but the gist of it was that he was responding to the "Jews as scapegoats" allegation and pointed out that he doesn't have any beef with the Csangos, a Hungarian ethnic group in Romania. If he wanted to stir up Romanianist feeling against a foreign people, who better than against Hungarians, especially at that time? The Csangos don't do anything, they're normal peasants- unlike the Jew.
Luis Phillips
Socialism is defined as the worker ownership of the means of production. Therefore if we define fascism as state ownership of the means of production there is still a clear distinction between the two, although you're correct that then most communist nations historically fall under our definition of fascism. However this doesn't invalidate the definition, and it is undeniable that many communist nations were extremely fascist in their nature, for example just look at thomas sankara or kim il sung.
The issue I see with your defition is that its way too broad, and infact even feodalism would fall under it.
Kevin Bennett
I've been reading Codex Fascismo. It's an anthology of various fascist texts from around the world, intended as a primer for what the various fascisms wanted. Good stuff, though the translation can be a bit choppy.
The more radical communists typically call Marxism-Leninism "fascism with a coat of red paint," and I see where they're coming from when they say it since ML is totalistic. However, the terminology I've most often seen used is socialism as state control of the means of production, and -communism- as worker control of the means of production. Also fascists and communists hold radically different positions on what society is and should look like, wrt. culture, race, religion, etc. Communists are as materialist as capitalists, whereas fascists are "spooked" and care about higher ideals.
Hudson Jones
Fascism/ultra-nationalism has destroyed the west many times. We should be united in our christian values. A house divided will not stand. The two world wars destroyed the west, making it possible for communism and social liberalism to poison our societies.
Mason Adams
Counterpoint: Fascism is the only modern political system in tune with divine law. The spiritual aspect is important however. It would be useless to create an expensive new garment for a man without a strong body or a strong soul, and likewise we can't devote ourselves fully to statecraft. Religion-culture and race are equally important.
Xavier Thomas
What are the higher ideals? Which people do the best job of rationalizing these ideals? What is the underlying philosophy of the fascist worldview? I've read nsbw, a squires trail, etc and still have no fucking clue. I need someone to just lay them before me instead of trying to convey them in some over complicated and incredibly vague way.
Fascism always fails. The reasons why are that power consolidated into hands of corrupt people stirs the masses to revolution and civil wars that last for decades. Corporatism is not an answer. Taking away worker rights of any stripe is a huge step in the wrong direction. Workers are what make the world go round, not the rich. We make the things that make the rich man rich. Without us, you are nothing. You fear because we have discovered that capitalists are nothing but mere middlemen who profiteer off of laziness and no labor. You grow bitter at the covetousness of those who work for scraps compared to what you make, you claim the wages are fair but don't disclose to your workers the end value of their product. You dupe workers into wages and demand them work harder while pocketing the surplus value they generate. This type of system cannot last because undemocratic systems collapse, many times from losing money in adventuristic wars of aggression that cause their countries to stretch themselves thin on resources, they destroy themselves with their warmongering ideology
Elijah Wright
Fascism is hyperdemocracy, in a nationalistic frame, typically focused on national rebirth or rejuvenation. It comes out of pre-Marxist and anti-Marxist socialism and it rejects both liberal capitalism and Bolshevism as overly materialistic. What specific ideals a given fascist state would pursue are going to vary because you're looking at autocthonous nationalist philosophies (like I wouldn't try to implement Legionarism or National Socialism wholesale in America, much as I admire Hitler and St. Codreanu) but a national religion and traditionalism (in the sense of discovering the underlying good of pre-liberal/Bolshevik practices rather than going full Varg), coupled with a fascination with modern projects and national achievement, tend to be pretty common.
Seems like you've noticed, but neofascist literature tends toward obscurantism because they want to get at primordial, non-national fascism and they find that it's an impossible task. It's for that reason that I'm friendly to Americanists, who want to cultivate an American White ethnicity and a fascism surrounding American symbols, the way the German-American Bund and the America First group did.
I'd urge you to read Codex Fascismo, as well as the Doctrine of Fascism and maybe For My Legionaries. They're great reads and I can get you links.
Nathaniel Roberts
An example for you fascists: Stewart Parnell owned Peanut Corporation of America. He got caught letting tainted salmonella infected peanut products go out knowing they were tainted. Okay, which is a more JUST punishment for this man? 20 years in prison, or the workers rising up in righteous indignation and beating the man to death and seizing the means of production and increasing safety standards on their own?
Carter White
I'm a worker though. Go blow up a church, you stupid kike.
Kayden Flores
The righteous punishment for someone like that is death by hanging, at the hands of the corporate state. Class conflict is like punching yourself in the face.
There should be no government. But if there were a government, it should serve all, not few, under equity of rights, regardless of race, creed or nationality. One should have no privilege over another, there should be no fanciful rich class who do no labor who make billions on the backs of those who are barely able to pay their rent and eat.
Brandon Cook
Based on the fact that he knew they were tainted he should be executed.
No debate. No trial. No wasted money, time or resources. Just some pocket change for 1 bullet. Problem solved.
NEXT PROBLEM.
Colton Cook
>it should serve all, not few, under equity of rights, regardless of race, creed or nationality "I'm a foot soldier of Jewish capital and I think I'm edgy"
Gavin Brown
and there should be no corporate power without some form of democracy of the worker within, that should not be crushed. Workers have to live too.
Jace Russell
>and there should be no corporate power without some form of democracy of the worker within i.e. fascist syndicalism?
Charles Ramirez
I'm against capitalism, so I oppose money and banking, as well as Zionism.
It got destroyed by Atomwaffen, it was a bunch of faggots stealing content from us.
Ayden Lopez
Drama is gay. They looked like IM though
Colton Carter
taking away the billions doesnt make the poor workers any richer. why do you retards keep saying that. they're poor because they are stupid and cant do anything about it, no matter how you configure the game to their advantage
Justin Morales
anarchism is not astroturf. Decentralization is necessary, not centralization. Fighting against entropy is retarded. Let things become more chaotic, let the world be as it is and stop trying to fight against it for racial means. There are bigger fish to fry like saving the planet from gamma ray bursts from Wolf Rayet 104, the triple star system that is only 7500 light years away and pointing right at us, its a dying triple star system. We need to focus on the survival of all of everyone, not just on "a few." You're suggesting replacing one boogeyman with another. You fascists are always on about Jews, but then what, you'll become the next "Jew" as the white man replaces usury with usury, only to enrich himself!
Jaxon Bennett
Good luck saving the planet through decentralization and chaos. lol.
Benjamin Nguyen
He's not actually wrong. At a certain point wealth ceases to be a reward for skill and effort and just becomes Capitalism Points, while on the other end a very modest expenditure could keep the lower classes well-taken care of and much more productive for it. Marginal utility, you know.
>There are bigger fish to fry like saving the planet from gamma ray bursts from Wolf Rayet 104, the triple star system that is only 7500 light years away and pointing right at us, its a dying triple star system You mean the thing that ONLY a total society could deal with?
Nathaniel Bell
Especially E-drama.
Liam Rodriguez
multiple ideas worked on by multiple people to reach consensus and standards of practice work better than a monopoly
Jeremiah Watson
Good luck getting a million different queer feminist biracial workers' collectives to cooperate on a space colonization project.
Lincoln Morales
lol >tfw I actually work in aerospace and there are transexuals who work there too and you're a bigot lol
Ryan Hernandez
I'm sure there are. You know what there also is? Fucking organization, beyond a bunch of blue-haired freaks sitting in a circle and trying to decide if a rocket is too phallic.
You know I'm right, kike. You fuckers would spend so much time being intersectionally non-oppressive that Wolf Rayet 104 would pop off and your descendants would still be working on the name of the rocket.
Or a fascist/Marxist-Leninist/liberal state would roll over you lol. Maybe two or more at the same time like in Catalonia!
As I said the only seeming difference between fascims and marxist leninism now seems to be that one is materialistic, while the other is spiritualist, but does this actually matter? Both materialist and anti materialist states ultimately operate on the same principles and infact I think materialist fascism is possible.
Jacob Roberts
Fascism is compatible with most types of Christianity due to the 'render unto Caesar' passage. I would argue that Eastern Orthodoxy is better for Fascism as it emphases more central control and obedience to the state. This can be seen in Legionary Romania.
Landon Green
He should have been sentenced to eating peanut butter sandwiches
Joshua Cook
You imply that every Fascist government and every authoritarian leader would be susceptible to this extreme corruption. Fascism, as we know in the ww2 era was never given the time it needed to find its feet and lead its people.
If Fascist governments cared only for wealth, they wouldnt call themselves fascist. They would call themselves Capitalists.
Isaac Bell
Vi samler sammen norske Fascister til en celle i Ostlandet nå, er du interessert?
William Jenkins
hahahahaha you reap what you sow right? But think of all those workers, many of which who brought the shit to the guy's attention who lost their jerbs because of an idiot in charge
Matthew Allen
I was raised christian. I can't ever see myself becoming a christian at this point in my life. I agree with Bowden and I consider myself a philosophical Pagan. Bowden really hits the nail on the head for me here, check it out:
I really dislike movements which just ape national socialism. That ideology failed in the 20th century and now we must create new better ones.
Jack James
Socialism is based upon class warfare whilst fascism is based on national unity and the classes cooperating together for the will of the nation.
Hunter Ward
Nah fashcast is shit, if you want an actual site that posts great fascist articles check out rapecast.wordpress.com/
Caleb Green
I agree Simo. We can dream in abstract idea's all fucking day. But a true fascist movement must be organic and a popular one. Cloning the 3rd Reich is stupid. We need a new synthesis.
Parker Richardson
National Socialism is basically Facism right ?
Samuel Baker
Dette.
Asher Edwards
Yes, Germanic Fascism.
Ethan Thomas
It's one of many forms of fascism.
Nathan Murphy
Did you mean to respond to my post? Well, the observation you're making is why the tankie-nazbol-fascist nexus exists. I can admit some positive aspects to the USSR under Stalin or Romania under Ceausescu, even if I despise Bolshevism and the anti-Christian Jews that spawned it. I think ideals and visions are important- for example the communist, even the Marxist-Leninist, doesn't really care about who makes up his society, as long as "the workers" are in charge and GDP is rising. Polyamory, a mix of cultures and creeds and races, starvation of entire nations- who cares? Germanic fascism.
Cooper Richardson
Bullshit. Fascism is based on unity of egoists who are greedy who want for themselves and exclusion of outer classes. It isn't all inclusive. It isn't for worker's rights. It isn't for safer work conditions. It isn't for anything but bottom line: The boss stays rich, the worker stays poor. All in the name of "Patriotism! (tm)"
Brody Johnson
Fascism has many forms. That is one of them.
Caleb Richardson
No sorry,
was meant for :
Ethan Walker
It's for national strength and workers' rights. You've never read a single fascist text, you stupid pseudo-Trot faggot.
Colton Cruz
Fascism in a nutshell: "Work harder for less benefits!" "If you don't like your job, be an entrepreneur (you fucking worthless prole!)" "Unity for better living conditions is wrong when you have to sacrifice for your supreme race (while oppressing other races)"
Ryder Ramirez
>"Work harder for less benefits!" Fuck no. Fascism seeks to increase wages and better the lot of the worker. Meanwhile all you give a fuck about is raping nuns.
Nolan Peterson
Careful, I can almost see the (((Star Spangled Banner))) peeking out from your ancom meme flag
It is quite apparent you dont have a fucking clue what Fascism really is and you are just here to bait.
Luis Diaz
This discussion really is about how to define fascism, and therefore with that regards opposing degeneracy is not exclusive to fascism, making it a poor identifyer for whether a system is fascist or not. On the contrary any non post modern society whether it's socialist, fascist or capitalist will oppose degeneracy, meaning that we could even state that degeneracy is the defining feature of the ideology of post modernsim.
As a side note this is why I dislike thinkers like Evola, as they reject objective reality and modernist thinking like the scientific method, meaning that there is only a short jump from Evola to degeneracy.
Eli Rodriguez
It seems to be the strictest form of Fascism yes ? For example Mosley's Fascism seemed more about encouraging people to be healthy whilst NatSoc was about law-enforced healthiness (for example)
Alexander Long
Why not both methods, to battle obesity for example
Benjamin Brooks
howcome pinochet isn't in the influential people list?
Sebastian Fisher
Mosley's BUF were more hard lined against capitalism and 'the power of money' He hated exploitation of the workers in foreign countries with sweatshops and the like, only to enrich London and Wall Street. He hated that humankind was drifting itself to being subjugated by money.
Based as fuck. Man, I haven't thought about Fascism much since I've been so busy with school, trying to suck up or at least blend in with commie liberals.
Fascism is beautiful. Eastern Orthodox Fascist rule would set everything straight, but the feminist poison has dug too deep into the west I'm afraid, which is part of the reason I have at least temporarily drifted away from fascism. I used to post Fascism general threads as well.
At this point Id say I'm slowly slipping into nihilism, as I think the west is completely hopeless at this point, and even if a strong nationalist fascist government did take hold, all of these crazy fucking commie feminist faggots would kill themselves, or rub their shit and period blood all over everything in never ending degeneracy protests.
The Jew has won, we live in the rubble and the ashes of our greatest ancestors failed conquest.
Strength and Honour Comrades.... if the day of the rope ever comes, you know I'll fuckin be there.
>"Work harder for less benefits!" Wrong. The worker and merchant class are merely put in their proper place. Both have to work together and are forced to cooperate by a higher class, either the aristocracy or the state. Therefore the merchants and workers share the profits in a fairer sense, both worker and merchant voices are heard out in cooperative guilds.
Jack Fisher
Here, I just came up with this plan:
> ban corn syrup > increase tax rate for fat fucks > prohibit fat fucks from reproducing > create incentive's for people to grow food in their yard > discourage obesity via state ran fat-shaming propaganda > create emphasis on fitness and nutrition in school > purge "healthy at all sizes" bullshit > fat fucks pay more for bus fair or flight
