Fighting Youtube Censorship

Bitchute is a torrent style video platform that allows p2p video hosting.
bitchute.com/

The creator of Bitcute recently did a video with the Frenchman
youtube.com/watch?v=HJWR3eCZ43k
Seems like an awesome fellow

They are working on a torrent based commenting system for Bitchute that can be used for other websites
Here is their indiegogo for more information.
indiegogo.com/projects/an-alternative-technology-comments-platform-community#/

Projects like this a crucial to fight internet censorship, especially on YouTube.
The added bonus is they offer increased privacy and are working on a method which allows users to donate to video makers.

We know who owns Google, we know where they are heading. We know how much the media lies. Which is why we need alternative platforms that value liberty now rather than later.

Attached: Sweden media censorship.jpg (720x396, 45K)

BUMP people are always bitching about censorship and the typical Reddit response is "Make your own"
Well here it is cunts.
I could've been shitposting, but instead I chose to help out a top bloke of a project.

Attached: doom pepe.jpg (600x546, 53K)

did u say birdshute?

Attached: IMG_20180326_214038738.jpg (1377x2448, 1.62M)

Witty

Attached: 'witty responce' AIDS.png (652x944, 623K)

Attached: macroon.jpg (685x385, 49K)

bump

Bumping

Bump

Relevant quote.

Attached: plato politics.jpg (700x700, 62K)

the thing Bitchute needs more than anything is a mechanism to find related content. even if it was just a user curated 'related channels' thing that each person uploading things managed by themselves and/or showing what channels an uploader was themselves subscribed to. If the site had this then I might switch to them full time.

ah fucking swedes
i used to admire their country
at least its still in the ~80% in terms of whiteness, still far superior to the 56% of some other nation

In human research, you have an ethical obligation to inform participants about risks. There is also the ethical prerogative of beneficence, meaning you must show that there is more benefit to doing the study than there is potential harm to participants or resources. Etc

There are many ethical research concerns done to prevent Nazi style experiments from ever occurring again. More theory is required so that less harm is done and then only on willing volunteer informed participants that can quit at any time.

...unless the topic is sex, then fuck informed consent. You're a Nazi if you think someone should be obligated to tell partners about known risk factors that could take 60 years off your life. what the left is doing with HIV blows all the philosophy about consent out of the water. It's been logically determined that one cannot consent if they are not fully informed of risk, period. This was decided in research and many committees and debates have taken place about it. It's rather conclusive I'm afraid. There's not even a strong argument against it. It's now mandated as a requirement to properly inform all participants in all studies.

That makes any gay man hiding having HIV from partners a form of violating consent. There's really no argument against that at the moment, it is merely ignored. For a man with HIV to knowingly expose partners to it that are unaware means they are not informed of the risk. Uninformed people cannot consent to an activity. This is the precedent in everything else and the LGBT community and democrats have made no attempt to argue any other way, yet they have changed law.

This is a very dangerous precedent that can lead to everything from dangerous contracts not informing employees to rape. Where the line is drawn between consenting to have sex and consenting to any activity or consenting to research is very poorly defined and was previously considered the same.

Attached: AIDS for everyone.gif (480x270, 805K)

>That makes any gay man hiding having HIV from partners a form of violating consent. There's really no argument against that at the moment, it is merely ignored.


I have bad news for you

Attached: california degen.png (1200x600, 521K)

Also relevant.

Attached: consent transgenders.jpg (851x500, 124K)

I have a feeling old libertarian Jow Forums would have been all over this.

Attached: libertarianism 1998 to 2016.jpg (960x640, 100K)

Attached: 15018E39-5D48-4DB0-BC2F-5905C50A0C84.jpg (640x572, 151K)

That's a spicy meme-a!

That's not news, what do you think I am talking about?? Those things are the problem. The gay community pushed violating consent into law and culture without an argument as to why violating established requirements for consent is ethical. It's a dangerous precedent. If it's not undone then this will spread to other topics with wild enthusiasm.

Like the trans one you shared, I didn't even think about that. This violation of consent is already being spread. I remember reading trans plebit posts about how they would spring being trans on a guy after numerous make out sessions and the guy would leave and the whole lot of them are insulting the guy that left and encouraging the trans to exclusively target strait guys. That's all violation of consent too, then using social pressured to prevent a volunteer from quitting, which is also a gross ethical violation.

The LGBT community is a fucking joke. No internal consistency or self awareness at all.

It's almost as if the gay community is ok with rape. HHHMM

The EU is about to pass a law that forces every website to use AI that filters for copyright and hate speech. The internet as we know it would cease to exist and be censored.
Please everybody stand up and spread awareness, that Art13 would be fatal for our democracy and every public media we consume or use.