I'm torn, which is better: atompunk or futurist renaissance?
We need a refined aesthetic in order to defeat leftists in the arts. These two are good choices, but they're incongruent with each other. One looks to the past, the other looks to the future.
An example of "futurist renaissance"
What is "atompunk"? I'm familiar with dieselpunk and steampunk and cyberpunk, obviously
This one, whatever is it. Nothing with "punk".
I like the futuristic stuff.
It also feels better to loose yourself in dreams of the future rather than memories of the past
Better for what?
Just as a general asthetic. You know how postmodernists have their crazy buildings and what not, whereas conservatives have Greco-Roman symmetry.
I was thinking that too, plus it's less degenerate.
You know It's kinda hard to start a revolution when everyone's too busy jerking off to 2d, right?
>...when everyone's too busy jerking off to 2d, right?
It's not the jerking, it's the creation, the act of expression that IS the revolution.
Gibs examples of Greco roman symmetry.
So?
Yeah,I get your point. It's inspirational. But there's still that side effect.
Not politics
Castizo futurism
benis :D
Uh yeah it is.
fashgoth aesthetic is my favourite short-lived Jow Forums meme
Post examples
WTF are you babbling about?! Propaganda isn't politics?
atompunk is the jetsons, clean with lots of strong shapes and angles
renaissance is retro and dirty "white people on mars," sort of the like a western or the concept work for star wars
honestly the atompunk is more jarring, and thus more impactful, you're not creating a line of pillows
Yeah, let's scare people away from what's good for them.