How is Monarchy not the best possible system?

How is Monarchy not the best possible system?
In Democracy you don't even know who your king is and who is to blame for all that corruption.

Attached: 20180615_211753.jpg (2896x2059, 3.48M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ixX25rVqET0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Kurwa weź sobie raz porządną kolację zrób

The mob always is. Anarchy is best.

being born shouldnt make you king or fit to rule. democracy is a fucking joke, but monarchy is a rollercoaster ride of incompetence.

Yes, it does. Multiple generations facing the same thing adapt to best face that thing. Raising people from birth to do the job they'll have for their entire life is sure to have better results than electing some crowd pleasing fool in who'll run away after several years, having robbed the land for his mob.

The Canadian brother said it best
Monarchy is a guarantee of corruption and total degeneracy.
Democracy provides at least if done correctly an ability to confront and potentially disable a tyrannical order.

Attached: bucko cup.jpg (340x270, 5K)

>How is Monarchy not the best possible system?
inbreeding and nepotism

>Poolack is eating buckwheat again

dobry ten jogurt?

ja wpierdalam kasze ze zsiadłym mlekiem

is that sand

How do you expect any leader to bear accountability for his people when the people can't even hold themselves accountable?

Best yoghurt in Poland, brother.

Attached: 20180615_212154.jpg (3088x3088, 2.98M)

no it's kasha

it is good for you and based food that jews don't want you to eat because it's make white men stronk

Attached: pobrane (4).jpg (184x274, 13K)

Jow Forums is not your food blog, you stupid polack

Democracy gives a voice to the population.
Too bad the population is fucking retarded and easy to manipulate with enough flashy lights and sweet words.

>is that sand
I'm pretty sure even Poland isn't on par with Haiti when it comes to sand cuisine

Attached: mud_cakes.jpg (282x179, 10K)

as you can see jewish mutt fears kasha

Attached: pobrane (5).jpg (275x183, 11K)

Keep eating your cheeseburgers and microwave dinners and you will never be ready for the race war.
Kasza is nutricious and healthy. It might not look nice but it is better than the artificial and chemical shit westfags eat

>How is Monarchy not the best possible system?
It's degenerate and leads to liberalism.

Attached: charles_ii_inbreeding.jpg (815x623, 165K)

You have two choices, OP
(1) you must accept that as a constitutional monarch, the Queen of Britain has zero power, as evidenced by the fact she's witnessed the destruction of the UK and done nothing about it
(2) the queen has been instrumental in the destruction of the UK

so which is your choice?

Neither should money.
But I'd take a person who was born into nobility and trained for years in order to lead a country over that any day.

Liberal Democratic society is nothing but the rule of moneyed international oligarchs who spend all of their time lobbying for their interests.
an open, codified hierarchy is much more appealing .

Democracy is cooperate fascism with self-loading consumers

>How is Monarchy not the best possible system?
Because its shit.

It's the complete opposite. Democracy is a guarantee of corruption and degeneracy. Have you spent a moment in monitoring real life democracy? How do you think politicians get so rich? Why are business lobbies so fucking strong? Democracy always lets you shift the blame on others and if you make long-term mistakes you won't be held accountable. It's the problem of the others. Also credit for good work goes unpaid, as we can see in the Obama-Trump transition. Everything that's going good in Trump's era is credited to Obama's work. No matter how false that would be, the mere fact that you can even make such an explanation indicates that we really do not know who to praise when praise should be given.

In Monarchy, even the average pleb knows where True power resides. You always know who it is to blame when things go good. The monarch doesn't have excuses to give. He has true long-term skin in the game, as his descendants will inherit his kingdom. In the end, we will always have kings. The choice is between the shadow-kings and visible kings. Democracy is run by shadow-kings, and all we have is their puppets that we change every 4 years.

Attached: cafe girl nordicism.jpg (1688x1125, 374K)

are you going to eat all of that, fat fuck?

A dictatorship or Monarchy led by a righteous genius would be a fantastic form of government. But unfortunately if they are evil or an idiot the country will reflect it.

There used to be some accountability at least, unpopular Kings got overthrown all the time. You're right that there was instability with rulers tending to be either bad or good, but can you honestly say that's worse than the "democracy" meme, where you're almost guaranteed to get shitty unaccountable ZOG boring gay managers ALL THE TIME? At least back then if a ruler was crappy you had a realistic hope of genuine, radical change in your lifetime.

They didn't know about the problems of inbreeding back then though, (in fact some of the resultant sperg diseases were considered to be divine blessings,) whereas now we do and could easily prevent it with genealogy / genetic testing.

Attached: The-Execution-of-Charles-I-unknown-painter.jpg (2000x1090, 692K)

Attached: illuminati.jpg (300x277, 17K)

You kind of avoided the problems of monarchy by being really cynical. "The choice is between the shadow-king and visible king"
Welcome to the land of the black pill.
Abandon hope all ye who enter.

Attached: Bucko sitting.jpg (650x366, 18K)

>that polish guy that always posts images of gruesome polish cuisine
this is avatarfagging and I have reported you

cool cool

Trust a German to get pissed off by "gruesome polish cuisine"

Attached: jbp wave 2.jpg (1200x1200, 356K)

narc

>nepotism
We have nepotism in any political system that is run by humans. It isn't inherent in monarchy but in human nature.

>In monarchy, all the badstuff gets higher and higher with each generation as the monarchs isolate themselves
>In Democracy it reset every election*
*Exceptions exists
>Honestly, only problem in Democracy is the lack of political literacy in the population.
We should focuse more on telling people about how the dangers of not looking into what their politicians have done, so much bullshit could be removed.
Also the Alternate Vote, it's just better.

>In Democracy you don't even know who your king is and who is to blame for all that corruption.
and in a monarchy there's nothing you can do about it.

>someone unironically belive in this

Attached: 195.jpg (475x356, 21K)

Democracy only works until people figure out they can just vote for people who hand out gibs

Attached: 32169522_374305376391823_7358434908366176256_n.jpg (954x960, 70K)

It's buckwheat you Mongol rape baby.

Bs. If the monarch family is strong and just they will weed it out. Only in a pathetic family this would happen since they are not in a position to weaken themselves.

Monarchies have some good features beyond their star qualities. They can reduce the size and parasitic nature of the management bureaucracy. They can make speedy decisions when necessary. They fit an ancient human demand for a parental (tribal/feudal) hierarchy where every person knows his place. It is valuable to know your place, even if that place is temporary. It is galling to be held in place against your will. This is why I teach about tyranny in the best possible way—by example.

No it is not, but I'd like to at least read arguments against it once you're at it.

A superintelligent AI would make a far better monarch than a human king.

Attached: racist_AIs.jpg (1520x1121, 318K)

Why do you say such thing despite all the evidence presented to you here daily against it?

t. The UK hasn't been a monarchy for awhile lad.

Ew...

by the way: youtube.com/watch?v=ixX25rVqET0

Definetely, Slavic master race.

>How is Monarchy not the best possible system?
It is. No need to make a thread about it

More than "population", current democratic norms of universal suffrage give "voice" to the individual in a designed sellfish unproductive manner.

True democracy cannot fall for the universal suffrage meme.
The basic block of society is the family (a man, a woman and their legitimate children) and not the individual.

Monarchy knew this.

Power structures should be centered around transparency, accountability and skin in the game. How am I "cynic", when all democracies in the world have proven themselves to be corrupted? It's realism. If a power structure relies on people being good and decent, it's a bad system.

Smart people have written books about democracy and the problems it has. You should ready any of them. Nowadays I just think anyone pro-democracy is an idiot and exactly the type of person that should not vote.

The First, easily.

A Monarchy is a system in which power is vested into one and only sovereign. Who then may (needs?) delegate power for others to act in his name.

A (((constitutional))) monarchy based on parliamentarism is the exact opposite of a monarchy, it is an oligarchy of sorts or a representative democracy.

Parliament should put limits on the sovereign, not boss the whole thing around.

I couldn't have said it better myself. Congrats. Nice pic also.

>Even non-partisan AI learn to hate niggers

Attached: 41123810-3102-43BE-9A66-93C51C04CFE2.jpg (345x336, 214K)

How about a monarchy, where the monarch is trained and schooled about important aspects of rule, until he can replace the old king/kaiser. When the old monarch dies or is not able to rule anymore, out of a group of trained aristocrats the best suited is selected and becomes ruler. He shall go through many tests, such as scientific ones like IQ-Tests and tests for genetic purity. Also personality tests, so we can determine if it will be a charismatic leader or something different. I would suggest, that he is bound to an unchangeable constitution, for example like the american one. The plebeians should have nearly no impact on national politics, but should be able to decide on a regional level.