Manafort sent to jail

Happy Friday.
bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-06-15/manafort-sent-to-jail-after-judge-cancels-house-arrest?__twitter_impression=true

Paul Manafort,
Former campaign manager of Donald Trump,
Former secret lobbier in Ukraine for Russian interests, including Yanukovych during Maidan Protests,
Known associate and underling to Russian oligarchs close to Putin,
Attendant at the Trump Tower meeting with russian lawyer and TrumpTeam to get dirt on Clinton,
Charged by Special Counsel Mueller with several felonies and facing life in prison,
Under house arrest in his luxurious D.C. home, wearing two ankle bracelets,

Had his bail revoked for witness tampering today. He was led immediately to jail. He’s sleeping his first night on a jailhouse mattress tonight.

This is splendid news! Won’t be long before he’s ripe to roll on the President. Trump Jr. and Kushner have maintained that they received no dirt and that Pres. Trump didn't know about it. Manafort can corroborate or contradict those claims, which is why Mueller's giving him the squeeze.

Cohen's next to fall.

Attached: Which.Hunt.jpg (807x652, 188K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/donald-trumps-jrs-email-exchange/533244/
mobile.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/trump-mueller-ukraine-victor-pinchuk.html
mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/paul-manafort-ukraine-donald-trump.html
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-28/manafort-discloses-17-million-in-payments-for-ukrainian-work
dailycaller.com/2018/04/10/mueller-pinchuk-donations-clinton-foundation/
washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/05/02/trump-repaying-the-stormy-daniels-money-doesnt-mean-there-were-no-campaign-finance-violations/
theintercept.com/2017/07/11/russian-oligarch-plotted-aid-trump-named-private-intelligence-dossier/
nytimes.com/2016/01/30/us/politics/22-clinton-emails-deemed-too-classified-to-be-made-public.html
washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-private-server-wrote-104-emails-the-government-says-are-classified/2016/03/05/11e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html
washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/04/how-did-top-secret-emails-end-up-on-hillary-clintons-server/
foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/inspector-general-clinton-emails-had-intel-from-most-secretive-classified-programs.html
politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-email-state-department-release-214246
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
redstate.com/patterico/2018/02/02/significant-inaccuracy-thememo-calls-credibility-question/
nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-metro-michael-cohen-fbi-shredded-documents-encrypted-20180615-story.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Manafort? That was the political advisor of Reagan right? Has his team given any response yet?

Here's hoping he doesn't fall on a shiv in the shower before he can talk.

Manafort again? Still fucking that dead horse? meuller’s got nothing.

I thought Manafort was already in jail? how long has this investigation been going on? years?

hahahahahah

give my regards to Putin, comrade

this trump charity scam is enough to put any ordinary schmo in jail no questions asked, not to mention the trump treason which shoiuld have him up against the wall at dawn in front of kim's antiaircraft gun

FYI: The Watergate investigation took just over two years and then Nixon resigned in disgrace.

Attached: 1520309223136.jpg (602x423, 249K)

So silly.
Consider that Mueller was authorized to raid Manafort's property. To convince a judge to allow that, Mueller must already have compelling evidence of serious crimes.
Consider that while on bail, Manafort was caught using encryption apps to reach out to witnesses and tailor stories with them.
We don't know what Mueller has, but we have enough info already to know it's serious and compelling.

If you libtarded cuck faggots actually succeed with your plan to illegitimately disrupt the presidency using all of this impressively unsubstantiated "muh russia" faggotry -- that'll lead to something that i'm sure a cocksucking canadian like you won't enjoy. let's just say it doesn't involve other men asking for consent.

it'll be your buns behaving like the bread in my big fat cockmeat sandwich

Attached: socialism.jpg (812x531, 103K)

when you send him to jail and go forward with charges that means that they tried to squeeze him and found no juice. If Manafort was an asset he would be on the street, gathering evidence and entrapping people close to Trump.

Mueller sent him to jail out of frustration and to send a message that the feds are willing to destroy anyone in politics that is willing to work with Trump. It is Mafia-style aggression, not standard investigative work.

Oh shit kek agrees. Get fucked ruskies

Attached: B4FEA6FE-2F99-4A9D-9A1D-CB41778C4684.jpg (640x718, 66K)

What you wrote makes no sense. You're pretty stupid to have even typed it out.
Putting Manafort in jail pretrial is BEST squeeze there is. It was easy for him to hold out while living in the lap of luxury. Now non-cooperation is costing him every day, every minute!

Manafort gathering evidence? You mean wearing a wire and getting people to trust him and say incriminating things to him, AFTER he's so been publically charged?? Get the fuck out with that shit.

Is a nigger with a big black cock expanding Manaforts asshole right now? What's Manaforts facial expression?

>sent to jail on the premise of "conspiring to launder money"
>no trial, no evidence, no nothing
These are the small victories progressive shout about when they say Mueller's jailed several people in his onsalught of bullshit.
Trump should have the guy brought up on military charges and play the same fucking game. Prepare a public execution and see him shit his pants before telling him to fuck off.

t vacationing leaf

Uh, you two do realize that his bail was revoked for tampering with witnesses, right?

Granted, the end game could be to apply pressure to him to have him cooperate, but revoking bail due to witness tampering is pretty standard. It doesn't imply that there's something else going on.

Corruption is a good thing to die.
Let manafort rot.
But don't fool yourself into thinking hes in jail for any reason other than being part of this witch hunt.

> If Trump gets impeached, I'm gonna rape men with my penis!!

Attached: 1452034438877.jpg (360x309, 25K)

>To convince a judge to allow that, Mueller must already have compelling evidence of serious crimes.
Like a dossier of fiction drafted by a British spy collecting a Clinton paycheck?

>because this is the same as Watergate
You faggots must love eating crows and sour grapes.

It's only gay if you catch. Better plug that anus, fag.

Damn, even satan agrees.

Attached: satan pepe.gif (425x481, 1.51M)

Possible Trump impeachment and/or two terms of Trump presidency notwithstanding, the specifics of *THIS* case, involving Manafort, are hilarious.

He already had not one but two ankle monitors, one for a pending trial where he stands accused of campaign finance violations and money laundering, and one for evidence tampering.

So. Paul Manafort looks at his trial plus other pending trials (remember, 19 have been indicted so far) and began reaching out to witnesses to "get their story straight". Witnesses both for his trial and others like Stone, Gates, etc.

So he's hauled back in for witness tampering.

So .... get this ... his defense team argues, that he hasn't violated the terms of his probation / house arrest. These are new and different criminal accusations. So they argued he shouldn't be taken off of probation.

HE ARGUED HE SHOULDN'T GO TO JAIL BECAUSE THESE FELONIES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OTHER FELONIES HE'S COMMITTED!!

HAHAHA

The judge literally said, literally, verbatim, said to him just prior to sentencing him to jail, "this isn't middle school, I can't simply take your phone away from you"

What a fuckin moron

What makes it a witch hunt? Jow Forums love Hillary conspiracy theories, so maybe imagine this is Hillary and her camp for a sec...

In June 2016, Trump Jr. received an email offering a meeting with "The Crown prosecutor of Russia...to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump"
Trump Jr. replies saying "if it’s what you say I love it."
theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/donald-trumps-jrs-email-exchange/533244/

TeamTrump (Trump Jr., Kusher and Manafort) knowingly met with Russians representing the Russian government and its interests to get the promised Clinton dirt. The parties considered it a highly sensitive matter. Trump Jr. failed to disclose this meeting, and later lied about it. When that lie was exposed, Trump Sr. dictated a false statement about the nature of meeting, but later denied dictating it.

If it's a which hunt, what innocuous explanation do you have for the meeting, and all the lies about it?

I tell you no Clinton conspiracy theory ever posted here had such compelling evidence.

> Becoming visually stimulated by a man's hairy asshole and making a conscious decision to shove a cock into a man's hairy asshole isn't gay

You sure you wanna trust the Prince of Lies on this one?

I'd say that the airport tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch is on the same level, but then I remembered that Donald Jr posted screenshots of all the emails discussing the conspiracy to hack Hillary's emails with Russian operatives on his Twitter.

So maybe if Chelsea had uploaded a YouTube of Bill and Loretta talking on a tarmac, we'd have something comparable to the Trump Tower meeting

>campaign finance violations
The payment to Stormy was out of pocket.
Whats sounds gayer?
>Man fucks an asshole.
>Man gets fucked in the asshole.
Leading astray and endorsing are two different things. Better go find that buttplug asap, user.

1. The campaign finance has nothing to do with Stormy Daniels. That was a different campaign finance violation. It's all right, it can get a little confusing. This campaign finance actually has to do with Russia funding political puppets in Ukraine, and those Ukraine puppets making donations to the Trump campaign, and Manafort hiding/laundering the fact that they came from overseas.

You can Google the details if you're curious.

2. I don't put things in my asshole, even if I'm near homosexuals. You do you, though..

It's literally a democratic mafiaistic fiasco is what's going on here.

Where's the proof of this muh Russia shit, the FBI draws straws and doesn't give squat. Honestly I do and don't give a fuck if trump is muh Russian puppet, he's made this country the best it's been in like 30 fucking years.

The Steele dossier is a red-herring on Jow Forums, you guys shouldn't talk about it. Especially, if you read the infamously partisan Nunes Memo, then you wrongly think the dossier's been debunked. It hasn't. In fact many of its claims have proven to be true, and the jury is out on the most damning allegations.

Personally, I think Steele had good connections, and reported honestly what his sources told him about Trump and Trump-Russia collusion. As a career intelligence officer I think he found what he learned horrifying. When his principals sat on the dossier without making it public, Steele took it himself to his is U.S. intelligence brothers in the FBI. When the FBI sat on the dossier too, Steele leaked it to the media.

The facts make the most sense if you see him acting out of duty, less so if you think he was a partisan.

>You can Google the details if you're curious.
which is another way of saying
>I have zero proof of anything but the burden of proof is on you
fucking meme flags are cancer

>In fact many of its claims have proven to be true, and the jury is out on the most damning allegations.
lol you just say it's true so that makes it true... that is a pretty good tactic

why provide sources for your claims when you can just make up bullshit

>Personally, I think Steele had good connections
lol the guy getting information from actual Russian officials? yeah his sources were great

it is slightly absurd that the Hillary campaign colluded with the Russians (via Steele) to create the story that Trump colluded with the Russians

And yet nothing is brought up about the various saudi and other Middle eastern donations that clinton recieved? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

> Where's the proof?

One article:
mobile.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/trump-mueller-ukraine-victor-pinchuk.html

Two article:
mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/paul-manafort-ukraine-donald-trump.html

Three article:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-28/manafort-discloses-17-million-in-payments-for-ukrainian-work

***
I never said Trump knowingly accepted foreign donations for his campaign and then covered it up. I'm only saying that it looks like Manafort did.

Maybe he lied to Trump about it?

Maybe Trump's not evil, maybe he's just stupid, who knows?? He's so new to all of this.

I'm just getting a kick out of Manafort's legal argument today .. "the felonies I committed while under house arrest for alleged felonies have nothing to do with the alleged felonies I'm under house arrest for, these are completely different, new felonies, so, I like, shouldn't go to jail"

What a fuckin moron

This year is getting better already

Attached: trump-prison-feature.jpg (600x336, 117K)

Those were brought up in the separate IG report.

Turns out they weren't as blatant a violation.

Clinton is just way better at laundering money
>"That makes me smart"

>Victor Pinchuk
dailycaller.com/2018/04/10/mueller-pinchuk-donations-clinton-foundation/

oh yeah you mean the guy that made $150k donation to Trump but donated literally tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation

you people are fucking stupid lol, the fact you cannot see the utter hypocrisy of the justice system and the fact that they are simply trying to cover up for crimes committed by the Obama administration is incredible

>Special counsel Robert Mueller has reportedly turned his latest prosecutorial sights on a $150,000 donation Ukrainian Victor Pinchuk made to a Trump charity.

>Mueller can investigate the donation, but it pales in comparison to the tens of millions of dollars Pinchuk bestowed upon the Clintons, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

>The Clintons have repeatedly jetted to his Black Sea resort to attend his galas. They’ve also accepted between $10 million and $25 million from his foundation for the Clinton Foundation, according to the group’s web site. Hillary Clinton rewarded him frequent access to the Department of State while she was secretary. Pinchuk also was tied to allegedly illegal sales to Iran while Hillary headed the State Department.

washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/05/02/trump-repaying-the-stormy-daniels-money-doesnt-mean-there-were-no-campaign-finance-violations/
It actually is. The only campaign finance violation that even exists in this witch hunt is between Trump and Stormy. Manafort is in trouble because of money laundering unrelated to the Trump campaign but the establishment is trying to combine the two with (surprise surprise) no evidence.

>2. I don't put things in my asshole, even if I'm near homosexuals.
That's not what your deity thinks.

>accomplishes world peace
>but... the DOSSIER!

"campaign finance violation"*

>I'm just getting a kick out of Manafort's legal argument today .. "the felonies I committed while under house arrest for alleged felonies have nothing to do with the alleged felonies I'm under house arrest for, these are completely different, new felonies, so, I like, shouldn't go to jail"
>What a fuckin moron
and yet you don't even bother attempting to explain what any of this has to do with Mueller attempting to prove Russian collusion, or why Mueller doesn't have a single indictment that alleges any sort of cooperation between the Trump campaign and the Russian government

What the fuck are you talking about. It's not on the same level because we don't even know what Bill and Loretta talked about, let alone if it was an arrangement, let alone if it was a criminal arrangement! Jow Forums just leaps to criminal conspiracy because, well, it's Jow Forums, and there's no one to tell them no.

Get your facts straight. Trump Jr. only uploaded the incriminating messages to twitter AFTER he was given a heads up by the New York Times--you know, the hideously dishonest and unfair mainstream? The incredibly biased reporters felt bound to give Trump Jr. a chance to comment on their story about the leaked emails. Trump Jr. took the opportunity to upstage the reporters by posting the emails himself to downplay them before the story. Not exactly forthcoming.

>one fucking meeting that led nowhere
>trump wasnt even there
>because of this there's a grand conspiracy involving the highest levels of Russian government and they got trump by the balls

The mental gymnastics needed to pull this shit off is Olympic level

>>one fucking meeting that led nowhere
>>trump wasnt even there
>>because of this there's a grand conspiracy involving the highest levels of Russian government and they got trump by the balls
>The mental gymnastics needed to pull this shit off is Olympic level
don't forget that the "Russian lawyer" that set up the meeting was only allowed in the US because of direct action by the Obama Justice Department (her visa expired, they made a special exemption)

>get sent to jail based on charges
>still no proof or conviction
I thought this was the United States?

Next time just ask for a source.

The Steele Dossier includes allegations that (1) Carter Page meeting with high level Russians, (2) Russians planned 2016 election interference in swing states to hurt Hillary, (3) and Donald Trump's shady ties to Araz Agalarov, the man who organized the Trump Tower promising Hillary dirt.
theintercept.com/2017/07/11/russian-oligarch-plotted-aid-trump-named-private-intelligence-dossier/

There's no denying that at minimum, those allegations from the Steele Dossier have proven true. And that's only what reporters could figure out--Mueller could know more.

The Nunes Memo misleads you, exactly as the Dems and FBI said it would. The Steele Dossier is not "proven false" or totally discredited or the like.

Any theory defending Pres. Trump that does not allow for the fact that the Steele Dossier contains both verified and unverified allegations should be laughed the fuck out of here.

For someone who isn't gay, you sure do talk a lot about gay sex.

Is the pic serious or Ironic? I can't tell. >To convince a judge to allow that, Mueller must already have compelling evidence of serious crimes
No, this not how it works. You're an idiot. A warrant can be issued based off hearsay. The only standard is an investigator must convince a judge it's probable a crime may have been committed. You don't need compelling evidence for that. A working theory based on very weak evidence can be enough in some cases.

>It's not on the same level because we don't even know what Bill and Loretta talked about, let alone if it was an arrangement, let alone if it was a criminal arrangement! Jow Forums just leaps to criminal conspiracy because, well, it's Jow Forums, and there's no one to tell them no.
jesus christ, it's like your defense on this issue is that you're an absolute fucking moron

Hillary Clinton is facing decades in prison and the ruining of her political career, but it's a total coincidence that the Attorney General meets with her (EX-PRESIDENT!) husband on an airplane for 40 minutes, and the FBI orders zero press coverage

and you effectively call it a conspiracy theory, while the US' media is carrying the biggest conspiracy theory of all time on daily coverage (that Trump colluded with the Russians to get elected)

>"Russian Lawyer" meeting
>expired visa
>Obama DOJ makes exception
>Trump Jr part of Russian conspiracy
It's all so convenient., isn't it?

Unfortunately, making a donation to a non profit is not the same as making a donation to a political campaign.

You don't have to like it? But it's not criminal.

In fact, it's perfectly legal for The Clinton Foundation to then donate millions of dollars received from Ukraine, to the Clinton Foundation, to the Clinton campaign!

They're just not allowed to talk about it while doing it, because that shows intent.

Sorry you're confused or mad about the laws, but these are lawful actions. That's why no one's arrested Hillary.

Don't blame me, I wanted Bernie.

Uh no there are dozens of claims of campaign finance violations in the Mueller case. It's part of the reason why Gates and Stone have been indicted and it's precisely what Flynn pled guilty to (illegal campaign donations from Turkey and lying about it)

> your diet
Sorry kid I don't believe in fairy tales

election night still hurt little bitch?

>le meme Jew socialist

not even Paul Krugman (super liberal, also Jewish) took Sanders seriously. 15 minimum wage would be an inflationary disaster

>There's no denying that at minimum, those allegations from the Steele Dossier have proven true. And that's only what reporters could figure out--Mueller could know more.
again, you claiming that things are true does not make them true.
>Any theory defending Pres. Trump that does not allow for the fact that the Steele Dossier contains both verified and unverified allegations should be laughed the fuck out of here.
sorry cowboy, the FBI Director himself said it was "salacious and unverified"

i.e. garbage

but don't worry, they got counter intelligence warrants to spy on an opposition party during a Presidential campaign based on fake information

it's okay, Trump is the criminal

>dozens of claims
Then cite them.

Commit too many felonies while under house arrest and eventually they just throw your ass in jail. Doesn't matter how powerful or poor you are.

If you drive drunk, get a ticket, post bail, and drive drunk again while waiting for your first trial, your ass stays in jail.

Been like that for years, pal

Nothing to do with the Trump Campaign NO COLLUSION. NO CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED

Attached: 256969BC-7A0B-486D-ACAA-DCC3321879A7.jpg (640x360, 38K)

>Sorry you're confused or mad about the laws, but these are lawful actions. That's why no one's arrested Hillary.
nobody has arrested Hillary because she's protected. it's that simple.
nytimes.com/2016/01/30/us/politics/22-clinton-emails-deemed-too-classified-to-be-made-public.html
washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-private-server-wrote-104-emails-the-government-says-are-classified/2016/03/05/11e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html
washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/04/how-did-top-secret-emails-end-up-on-hillary-clintons-server/
foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/inspector-general-clinton-emails-had-intel-from-most-secretive-classified-programs.html
politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-email-state-department-release-214246

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Where is the evidence?

I literally just came here to laugh at the absurdity of Manafort claiming that he's allowed to commit crimes while he's on bail, and somehow not go to jail.

That's the only reason I started this conversation.

You feel free to believe this is secretly awesome for Trump's reputation if you want.

Are you one of those people who thinks Mueller is /ourguy/ or has everyone admitted that's not true now?

> Where is the evidence
It was presented at trial today?

That's why he went to jail

So you have no sources? Good to know.

>It's part of the reason why Gates and Stone have been indicted and it's precisely what Flynn pled guilty to (illegal campaign donations from Turkey and lying about it)
lol you're actually outright lying now. Michael Flynn plead guilty to 18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally

because he said that he did not discuss sanctions with the Russian ambassador, and the FBI transcripts said otherwise (Although FBI admitted they didn't think he lied that's another story)

Rick Gates is part of the Manafort business

Roger Stone has not been indicted. dumbass.

but seriously, claiming Flynn plead guilty to that when it is public record that what you state is patently untrue

fucking memeflags are the worst

Dude, you need to stop huffing.

You're changing the subject. You were talking about Hillary's alleged campaign finance violations.

The indirect donations from Ukraine were super transparent and unfortunately very legal. That was my point. You don't have to like it. I don't. But it's still the law. That's why she hasn't been arrested for campaign finance violations.

So you change the subject to emails instead?

Did you read the IG report yesterday? They found no reason to arrest her for her shitty email server. She's been investigated and the DOJ couldn't think of a reason to arrest her.

Sorry bud

Hey look on the bright side. No one's arrested Donald Trump either! They've just arrested his campaign staff

What was Watergate about again? Spying on a rival political campaign wasn't it? Hmmm...

>You're changing the subject. You were talking about Hillary's alleged campaign finance violations.

>Sorry you're confused or mad about the laws, but these are lawful actions. That's why no one's arrested Hillary.

I was disproving your concept that Hillary hasn't been arrested because she broke the law. she very clearly broke the law, and at the very least faces 10 years in prison. you cannot possibly explain how what I posted doesn't satisfy the definition of 18 USC § 793(f), so I look forward to you not attempting.

There MUST be something else going on, because if there isn't, it means their favorite politician might actually be guilty of something. The only other explanation is a massive conspiracy by the deep state that involves every aspect and level of the American government and legal system. The whole thing geared up to destroy a single innocent man who just wants to make America great lol

The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice both disagree with you, so I'll take their word for now, anonymous poster

Wrong again. You're reading from the Nunes Memo. I warned you that it's false and misleading. Nunes misleads you with that Comey snippet!
redstate.com/patterico/2018/02/02/significant-inaccuracy-thememo-calls-credibility-question/
Comey was testifying about bracing the president and framing his presentation of the salacious and unverified allegations (and that means the piss tape!).
In that same testimony, Comey refuses to answer whether "the FBI confirm[ed] any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document" Comey answered: "Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation."
Source: redstate.com/patterico/2018/02/02/significant-inaccuracy-thememo-calls-credibility-question/

The reporter notes that while we don't know what Comey said in closed session, we can deduce that if he testified the FBI had not verified any of the dossier's criminal parts, that testimony would be out by now.

>In that same testimony, Comey refuses to answer whether "the FBI confirm[ed] any criminal allegations contained in the Steele document" Comey answered: "Mr. Chairman, I don’t think that’s a question I can answer in an open setting because it goes into the details of the investigation."
well golly gee probably because admitting the FBI got FISA warrants based on unverified information is a crime

fuck you cuck

>I have no argument so I won't even attempt to make one
thanks for playing

I know it sucks when you deal in innuendo and news articles and I throw actual statutes at you

you haven't even addressed your lie about Flynn and Roger Stone, lol

Stone hasn't been indicted, and Flynn did NOT plead guilty to the bullshit you said he did

>again, you claiming that things are true does not make them true.

No, them being true is what makes them true. Those things happened, and before we knew they happened they were alleged to have happened in the dossier.

So as a simple matter of fact, some of the items within the dossier have turned out to be accurate and true.

>Unverified.

No, that's not how a FISA warrant works.

we just have FBI agents texting about how they're going to stop Trump

don't worry goyim, Hillary will win and Trump is a Russkie agent

oops... better go with the "insurance policy"

>No, that's not how a FISA warrant works.
which is why he can't admit that any element of the Steele dossier was unverified, because then the individuals that swore to the FISA warrant would have commited a serious crime

sorry nope, keep fabricating

I'll post sources, you can post garbage

Why is the FBI suddenly so competent when it comes to taking down Trump allies?

Could there be, are I say it, political bias behind their competence?

Attached: 1528666167012.png (1080x1020, 396K)

sources would be nice, about three posts ago.

I .. I don't want to make an argument?

You have an opinion that she should go to prison for ten years, based on your own loose interpretation of one law which you believe supports your opinion.

I'm over here aware of the fact that legal professionals investigated her and have decided not to file any charges. I'm operating under an assumption that these legal professionals are aware of the law you cited.

So I have an opinion that maybe, just maybe, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about?

So that's my opinion. That's where I'm coming from.

OH NOOOOOOOOO

IT'S ALL FUCKING TUMBLING DOWN

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

Or maybe Trump allies are just shitty criminals.

Remember, Paul Manafort literally argued that he shouldn't go to jail because the witnesses he tampered (a felony) have nothing to do with the money he laundered (also a felony)

"Your honor I shouldn't go to jail for probation violation because the family I ran over while drunk driving aren't related to the other family I ran over while drunk driving two weeks ago"

I mean ya, maybe Trump just hires shitty criminals. Maybe there's no conspiracy maybe his crooks just suck at being crooks

>we just have FBI agents texting about how they're going to stop Trump

Yeah and then they were taken off the case and investigated, and nobody could actually demonstrate what underhanded actions, if any, they did to actually try to stop Trump.

You're confused here. The Steele dossier could be 99% demonstrably false, but as long as the FBI used that 1% that was true, the warrant is legal.

Go for it lol

the deep state/globalists/kikes must really want a civil war. if there's no equal justice under the law and this fake investigation based on clinton/russian lies continues, or if they do anything to president trump, washington will be a bloodbath

STFU Kremlin JIDF

The only resemblance to watergate here is obama spying on Trump.

This witchhunt is guaranteeing Trump two terms and it’s going to cause the Democrats to lose seats in November

Don't care if trump is a russian puppet? If you're not a shill that's pretty shameful. It's ok I'll just feel ashamed for you while I drive people to the polling stations.

Nice shareblue thread
stop replying to it you idiots

chk'd

turnip's lawyers admitted nearly two weeks ago that he dictated a statement that dotard junior released about the meeting.
Friday morning, turnip said, “It’s irrelevant. It’s a statement to The New York Times. The phony, failing New York Times.”
“That’s not a statement to a high tribunal of judges. That’s a statement to the phony New York Times. In fact, frankly, you shouldn’t even speak to The New York Times because they only write phony stories, anyway.”

btw
turnip told Fox News' Steve Doocy on the White House lawn Friday. "Don't let anyone think anything different. He speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same."

Attached: another one bites the bus.png (822x354, 130K)

The best part of all of this is Trump won't even have money to keep himself or his family out of jail.

>Cohen's next to fall.
.....umm g-guys?? d-did Q predict this?

nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-metro-michael-cohen-fbi-shredded-documents-encrypted-20180615-story.html

>Liberal constantly apologizing ironically

Ted was right about you diseased faggots

Attached: ted kaczynski on liberals.png (1200x1620, 152K)